chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Magnus Carlsen vs Viswanathan Anand
Tata Steel Masters (2019), Leiden NED, rd 10, Jan-23
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Tarrasch Variation (C77)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 122 more Carlsen/Anand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-24-19  raju17: 76...b3 77. Nc3 b2 78. Kd4 b4 79. Nb1 Kb5
Jan-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  rogge: 76...b3 77. Nd4+, and b3 is gone.
Jan-24-19  MrMelad: Impressive
Jan-24-19  Ulhumbrus: If Anand missed the way to draw after 70...bxa4 and one is going to speculate on the reasons why, one may guess more than one possible explanation. Three examples of guesses are (1)fatigue after several hours of play (2) an oversight which 70...b4 was based on, and this could have been caused partly by the first reason and (3) Anand needs more practice at seeing or recognizing quickly the resources employed by Black in arriving at the draw after 70...axb4. Anand's own view can be assumed the reliable one.
Jan-24-19  paavoh: A very enjoyable game with high caliber maneuvering.
Jan-24-19  starry2013: If Caruana was hoping he'd at least temporarily gain rating top spot in this period it looks like he'll be disappointed.
Jan-24-19  The Kings Domain: Shades of 2013-2014. Reminds me of Morozevich's comment on the Norwegian's style of play: "He doesn't play the best move, he plays the right move".
Jan-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: That reminds of me the reporter who asks Capablanca's opponent how many moves he can see ahead: "11. I can see 11 moves ahead". Then he asks Capa the same question: "Just one, but always the right one."
Jan-24-19  John Abraham: Carlsen's domination of Anand is getting to Kasparovian levels.
Jan-24-19  BOSTER: <Eayl>.Another Q. Why did Anand move his knight far from his king playing move 67... Ng6+ not Nc6+?
Jan-24-19  BOSTER: Supposed to be <Eyal>.
Jan-25-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <Why did Anand move his knight far from his king playing move 67... Ng6+ not Nc6+?>

67...Nc6+ takes away freedom of maneuvering from the knight - White should be winning after 68.Ke6, e.g. 68...Nd8+ (moving with the king allows White Kd6) 69.Kd5 and now a5 is coming next move, whatever Black does. Let's say 69...Nb7 70.a5! bxa5 71.Nb2! followed by Na4 (prepared by c4 if necessary) and capture on c5 with a winning position. So 67...Ng6+ was an only move (allowing Black to defend against 68.Kd5 with Nf4+) - another illustration that at least by this stage, the ending is not so easy for Black to defend.

Jan-25-19  BOSTER: Thanks <Eyal>.But computer evaluation after 67...Nc6+ is equal.
Jan-25-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <BOSTER> Not really. I mean, when you say "computer evaluation" it always depends on what computer and which ply-depth of analysis - perhaps you looked at some relatively shallow evaluation, but if you let a decent engine run long (that is, deep) enough it will show you the win.
Jan-25-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <BOSTER>

If you run SF on this website for 15 minutes the eval after 67....Nc6+ is +5.11 (54 ply). I don't pretend to understand all the moves, but it follows the variation <Eyal> gave, and White captures the c-pawn and eventually the a-pawn with a simple win.

Jan-25-19  BOSTER: I agree. You both are right.I follow CG engine, and it creates the wrong feeling.
Jan-27-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Some video footage of the end of this game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9M....
Jan-28-19  fabelhaft: Many were saying stuff like Anand failing to find the draw after 70. a5 will be the blunder of the year etc, but it says something about how tricky it after all was when even Judit Polgar well after the tournament was over thinks Anand was lost after a5 :-)

<@GMJuditPolgar: Congratulations to Magnus Carlsen for winning the 7th time the historical event in Wijk aan Zee! Very nice technique against Anand in game 10. After a5 it is over. If bxa5 Kd5 Nf4, Kc5 Ne2, Na3! And black cannot take Nxc3 to Nb5 and the pawn endgame wins. https://twitter.com/GMJuditPolgar/s...>

Feb-06-19  achieve: <Eyal:

Several people already mentioned that 70...b5? (instead of bxa5!) was the losing move, but it should be noted that 70...bxa5 works for a <very> concrete reason, which requires precise calculation: 71.Kd5 Nf4+! >

I disagree with the notion that it requires precise and <concrete> calculation. During the game I commented on this position and obviously the only way to get the knight back in position to sac itself is from the side and from under the pawns, so the route via f4 to e2 and c1 to the ideal <a2> even, does <NOT> require precise calculation, they are - to me - quite obvious, and as I said the clear way back to the pawns, and harrassing them.

I was fresh at the time, and an endgame freak, admitted, but Anand when fresh ought to have seen and felt that maneuvre, especially since Vishy is a Knight wizard.

Only short calculations (in endgames I excel at those, not in middle games!;)) come into play.

However to close with a compliment, I want to voice my appreciation for the analysis you did in your familiar precise manner! :)

And on a final note; I haven't been around cg much lately, and it was good seeing you again considering the many conversations, including tennis!, we had. ;)

Feb-08-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: I wonder how much of this was home prep by Anand, putting his king in the middle of the board for an early endgame, and at what point MC took him out of prep? Anand must have thought this was a good position, despite the ugly pawn structure.
Feb-15-19  Everett: <achieve> <I was fresh at the time, and an endgame freak, admitted, but Anand when fresh ought to have seen and felt that maneuvre, especially since <Vishy is a Knight wizard.>>

Yes, and so is Carlsen, all the more reason why Carlsen is one of the toughest opponents for Anand. Kramnik I believe once noted just how good Anand is with knights....

Feb-25-19  Shamboozle: It's not a draw people. If Anand plays b3, then Nd4+ immediately nabs the pawn. If black plays a strong move, Kc5, white's plan is easy - Nc1 followed by Nb3 on the next move. Once white's knight gets to b3,- this blockades both of black's pawns and protects white's only pawn. Black cannot stop white's pawn and protect his own pawns simultaneously, so as black fiddles with his king, white will win both black pawns, and then slowly push his pawn to victory. Any attempts for black to capture white's knight end in white queening his pawn faster. Stockfish gives the final position of the game, ie where Anand resigned as +4.5 for white.
Mar-30-19  joddon: goes to show...Carlsen will go out of his mind to calculate....wow, never seen a white knight moves so many places and not make a mistake on placing it on a bad square....as if he s played all the outcomes before in his head....think he starts playing the game before it even starts....LOL!!
Apr-03-19  Jambow: Carlsen seems to me unique in that he loves an endgame with some minor pieces but unlike Fischer and Karpov he is ruthless with his knights. Kasparov used his knights to great effect as well but with devastating effect in the middle game. This is vintage Magnus if it is ok to call a twenty year old vintage anything.

Most players seek clarification in the last section of the game Magnus seeks the opposite.

May-04-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Plaskett: This ending can be tricky, see, e.g. Miles Vs Korchnoi. last round of Hastings 1976.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 6)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 8
by 0ZeR0


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC