chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Alexander Grischuk vs Wesley So
FIDE Grand Prix Moscow (2019), Moscow RUS, rd 2, May-22
Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense (D40)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 22 more Grischuk/W So games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
May-22-19  torrefan: The best game of the tournament
May-22-19  Junbalansag: It is like watching an action movie where bombs explode, grenades are thrown and rapid fires are exchanged from the time the curtain opens. I was literally glued to my screen the whole fight. Thanks to the two warriors Grischuk and So for entertaining us. More games like this would revive interest in this ancient game. More power to both of you.
May-22-19  Junbalansag: It could have been the best finale for this tournament!
May-22-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: homerun pawn! 1-0

Grischuk, you made my day!

May-22-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Took a while, but Black's pawn weaknesses proved ruinous in the end.
May-22-19  gokusano: <perfidious: Took a while, but Black's pawn weaknesses proved ruinous in the end.> Black's move 4. ... c5 is passive. From there on, white's keep pressuring black and black cannot do anything to snatch the initiative. In fact, after 10. Ng5 by white, black has to give up his light square bishop and bear the position with a double isolani pawn.
May-22-19  torrefan: Great analysis by GM Goku
May-22-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: <May-22-19 Bugrit: It's not ok.wesley cried in the press conference.>

true?

May-22-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: The Crying Prodigal Son

1-0

May-23-19  Junbalansag: I'd like to see the video where So cried. Can anyone post the link?
May-23-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  mike1: Grischuk got him with So's own style.
May-23-19  Kapmigs: <Thanks to the two warriors Grischuk and So for entertaining us. >

I do not think they played to entertain us. They played to win and earn more money.

Chess is just business, says so

May-23-19  maelith: <gokusano: ... c5 is passive. >

c5 the semi tarrasch is a respected opening and many great players have played and won with it.

May-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: If the database is correct, 14...Ke7 is the first original move of the game. Curious position after 16...Rxd8--White has one pawn less and remains badly undeveloped, but also has at least adequate compensation for the gambit, thanks to having two pawns vs. Black's four. Petrosian would have enjoyed watching his theory of pawn islands proven correct again.
May-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <An Englishman> <Petrosian would have enjoyed watching his theory of pawn islands proven correct again.>

Petrosian's theory? If I recall correctly, Capablanca already mentioned it in one of his books (_Chess Fundamentals_, maybe).

May-24-19  Nina Myers: So's weaknesses fall back on him.
May-24-19  gokusano: <maelith: <gokusano: ... c5 is passive. > c5 the semi tarrasch is a respected opening and many great players have played and won with it.> Stats please.
May-24-19  epistle: passive moves can also win games
May-24-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <gokusano>
<Stats please.> From the "explore this opening" link above, clicking one move back to Black's 4th:

4...c5 35.2% White wins, 47% Drawn, 17.8% Black wins out of 1888 games.

Most winning move for Black:
4...a6
30.5% W, 36.6% D, 32.9% B out of 243 games.

Based on that, are you going to argue that 4...a6 is more active than 4...c5 here?

May-25-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: It's ironic that someone has already shown the way to equalize with Black in this line (despite the lousy pawn structure) in a model game against So himself - W So vs Wei Yi, 2017 (there's also Ding Liren vs Wei Yi, 2014). Black brought the king to the Q-side to defend the weaknesses there, combined with pressure along the f-file.

For some reason So played 14...Ke7 instead of Kc7, and as a result 17.Be3 becomes considerably stronger for tactical reasons - Black would like to counter with Ng4 or Nd5, but with the king on e7, Ng4 is met by Bg5+ and Nd5 just drops the a7 pawn (with the king on c7, Bxa7 would not be a threat since it loses a piece to Ra8, but here there's Bc5+). Even then, So should have tried the active 17...Rd5. Instead, after the super-passive 17...Ra8, Black has to waste another tempo in the next move to defend the weak c6 pawn with the king (again, on the wrong square), and by that stage his position is already difficult.

Jun-12-19  gokusano: <beatgiant>, thanks for posting the statistics. Just proved my point that the 4. ... c5 move possesses weakness.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Schara-v.Hennig-Gambit Style - 7.e4 Counter
from 98_D40-D42_Semi-Tarrasch by whiteshark
QGD: Semi-Tarrasch Def (D40) 1-0 Qless Middlegame
from E F G Players that Fredthebear Read by fredthebear
via Semi-Tarrasch; 7.e4
from 98_D32_Schara-v.Hennig-Gambit by whiteshark
QGD: Semi-Tarrasch Def (D40) 1-0 Qless Middlegame
from Tar Pools Fredthebear Stepped In by fredthebear
#99 - So outplayed
from So's failures by Nina Myers


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC