chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Ding Liren vs Magnus Carlsen
Sinquefield Cup Tiebreaks (2019) (blitz), St Louis, MO USA, rd 3, Aug-29
English Opening: Agincourt Defense. Catalan Defense Accepted (A13)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 54 more Ding Liren/Carlsen games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To access more information about the players (more games, favorite openings, statistics, sometimes a biography and photograph), click their highlighted names at the top of this page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-30-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: ***

Here after 71.Ra7


click for larger view

Carlsen could have claimed a draw indicating he was going to play 71...Re1 (matching the position after Black moves 67 and 69 ) he also let the chance go by on move 73. (four fold rep!)

if he was wrong he would have lost on the spot, but his claim would have been valid though very sharp and alert with seconds to realise what was going on. It's not uncommon to see it missed at speed chess.

I'm sure he knows at this level with electronic boards and the video you can claim a threefold rep even though you have no personal score.

Somehow I'm reminded of this Carlsen vs E Inarkiev, 2017 though in this Ding game he cannot appeal after the fact.

Off to the land of 'if's, buts, hindsight and supposition' we go. (where I have an up to date passport.)

If Carlsen had drawn this then he had no need to take chances in game 2 with White.

Also Ding may have been shattered for allowing the three-fold rep in a won position and lost the the next game.

Then all this speculation about Carlsen being unfit, too old, has no girlfriend and bored would never have appeared. (The same claims in various forms pop up every time he has lost a game since becoming the Champ.)

OK back to the real world. Carlsen lost. Ding played the better Chess in the play-off and the 2nd game Carlsen vs Ding Liren, 2019 was quite exceptional. Bravo!

***

Aug-30-19  sceptic: <sally> He had another chance to claim 3-fold as late as move 85, though then he would have scarcely had time to stop the clocks. Compare positions after moves 81, 83 and 85.

The annotations to the score here are wrong, however. They show that 3-fold was claimable at every move after 71. Ra7 Re1, which was not the case. Also it was claimable BEFORE 71... Re1.

I believe you forfeit in blitz if you stop the clocks to claim 3-fold, and are not correct.

Aug-31-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi sceptic,

Missed any later three-folds, did not got that far. The correct procedure would be to stop the clocks and tell arbiter I am going to play 71...Re1 creating 3 fold rep. It seems to be on here.

You are correct, spotting it with so little time would be close to unhuman.

I also think you forfeit with an incorrect claim though in some cases if it wrong you give an extra 3 minutes to your opponent, a lifetime at this level.

Balls of brass by Ding actually playing to flag Carlsen. Magnus would not have been to happy with that though he himself has done it in the past. 'What goes around on the chessboard, comes around on the chessboard' Caissa, she said that.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: BLITZ. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Sinquefield cup 2019
by jcgandjc


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC