Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

English, Mikenas-Carls (A18)
1 c4 Nf6 2 Nc3 e6 3 e4

Number of games in database: 1043
Years covered: 1903 to 2019
Overall record:
   White wins 44.8%
   Black wins 18.9%
   Draws 36.3%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Viktor Korchnoi  16 games
Simon Kim Williams  11 games
Hikaru Nakamura  10 games
Eduardas Rozentalis  9 games
Arkadij Naiditsch  9 games
Artur Yusupov  8 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Filguth vs A De La Garza Madero, 1980
Tartakower vs R Frentz, 1933
Joel Benjamin vs N Gamboa, 1995
T Mantia vs T Trogdon, 1979
C H Alexander vs Fine, 1936
P Nikolic vs Yusupov, 1989
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 42; games 1-25 of 1,043  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. J F Heemskerk vs J De Soyres  1-0501903DCA Congress 31stA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
2. Carls vs A Brinckmann ½-½81192121. DSB KongressA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
3. Carls vs H Johner 1-02819271st olm finalA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
4. W F Wertheim vs A Sacconi  ½-½231928OlympiadA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
5. Y Porat vs H Mueller  ½-½191928OlympiadA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
6. Kan vs K Vygodchikov  ½-½411929USSR ChampionshipA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
7. Carls vs K Kullberg  1-0351930Hamburg ol (Men)A18 English, Mikenas-Carls
8. J Gudmundsson vs Duchamp  1-0681930Hamburg ol (Men)A18 English, Mikenas-Carls
9. Nimzowitsch vs Weenink ½-½351930LiegeA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
10. Nimzowitsch vs P List 1-0401930FrankfurtA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
11. J Mieses vs G A Thomas  0-1331930FrankfurtA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
12. Carls vs O Antze  1-0271931Bremen Club ChampionshipA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
13. Nimzowitsch vs B Kostic ½-½401931BledA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
14. Nimzowitsch vs Flohr 1-0421931BledA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
15. Flohr vs G A Thomas 1-0341931Hastings 1931/32A18 English, Mikenas-Carls
16. W Winter vs Milner-Barry  ½-½331932LondonA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
17. Carls vs Bogoljubov  ½-½341933Bad Pyrmont D-chA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
18. H Mueller vs G Rogmann  ½-½441933Siegen GERA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
19. Nimzowitsch vs Bjorn Nielsen  1-0431933Copenhagen PolitikenA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
20. P Vaitonis vs M Monticelli  0-1361933OlympiadA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
21. Opocensky vs Duchamp ½-½371933OlympiadA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
22. Flohr vs Kashdan 1-0301933OlympiadA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
23. Tartakower vs R Frentz 1-0351933ParisA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
24. Carls vs L Schmitt  1-0301934GER-ch 2ndA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
25. Tartakower vs M Golmayo De La Torriente  ½-½221934SitgesA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
 page 1 of 42; games 1-25 of 1,043  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-13-04  marcus13: It looks like that this opening ted to transpose whit queen indian defence.
Aug-22-04  fgh: Does somebody know about a good refutation of this line for black?
Sep-12-04  themindset: 3...c5
the sicilian variation, let white over-extend and attack on the flanks.
Dec-02-04  EnglishOpeningc4: ...c5? cant white just create a maroczy bind
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: EnglishOpeningc4, Black might enjoy playing against the Bind. This isn't the best place anyway. One line versus 3...c5 involves a pawn sac: 4.e5,Ng8; 5.Nf3!?,Nc6; 6.d4!?,cd4; 7.Nxd4,Nxe5; 8.Ndb5. Wild & wooly, study the theory long and hard before venturing upon this.
Dec-02-05  Chess Addict: I don't understand this opening. In an opening book that I just read, the following variation is seen:

1. c4 Nf6
2. Nc3 e6
3. e4 d5
4. e5 d4
5. exf6 dxc3
6. Qxf6 bxc3
7. d4 e5!
Evaluation: =
But why? What's a good reputation against this line?

Premium Chessgames Member
  Robin01: I played the following line (OTB) with the black pieces the other day and obtained a draw. 1. c4 Nf6
2. Nc3 e6
3. e4 d5
4. e5 d4
5. exf6 dxc3
6. fxg7 cxd2+
7. Bxd2 Bxg7
8. Qc2 Nc6
9. Nf3 Qe7
Premium Chessgames Member
  Robin01: I believe “obtained” is not the correct term here. The end result of my game was a draw. I was playing for a win. I can post more of the game if anyone is interested.
Jan-21-06  Chess Addict: What is the best refutation against the line above? Thanks.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Chess Addict

<Evaluation: =
But why? What's a good reputation against this line?>

click for larger view

(By the way, you meant to say 6.bxc3 Qxf6)

Looks about even to me. Let's pretend we were in a consultation/correspondence game and it's our move (White) right now. Since we have no pieces developed we probably should concentrate on candidate moves that facilitate that.

A few moves can be discarded immediately: 8.Bd3 8.Qc2 8.Bd2 and even 8.Qb3 are all senseless pawn giveaways. 8.dxe5? is suicide. 8.Nh3 is absurd. 8.Bb2 is very anti-positional, creating a 'big pawn' out of the bishop like that.

8.Nf3 looks a little fishy because of ...e4 but maybe it's plausible. I guess a critical variation would be how you deal with 8.Nf3 e4 9.Ne5 Bd6. Looks pretty comfy for Black.

8.Be2 is possible, but sure looks timid, and it's just delaying the Nf3/e4 situation.

8.Be3 is also possible but defensive. I tend to like it because it seems like a super solid move, and might allow 9.Qb3 in some lines.

In summary, if you have the White pieces and your top candidate moves on move 9 look timid and defensive, you probably have squandered the advantage of moving first.

Jan-21-06  AgentRgent: <Sneaky> You didn't consider 8. Qe2
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Oh right, I actually thought of that move but I considered it so important I would save it for the end, then I ended up leaving it out. Andbody want to tackle it? Seems like f4 might be a threat in that position.
Jan-22-06  AgentRgent: Perhaps something like 8. Qe2 Nc6 9. d5 Ne7 10. Nf3 Ng6 11. Bg5 Qf5 12. h4 This looks pretty good for white, with h5 as a possible threat.

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Naturally the first thing I look at is a speculative pawn sac such as 8...Bd6?!; 9.f4,e4; 10.Qxe4+,Kd8.

I recommend you don't take my idea too seriously.

Incidentally, 8.Qf3,Qxf3; 9.Nxf3,exd4; 10.cxd4,Bb4+; 11.Bd2,Bxd2; 12.Kxd2 looks =.

Jan-22-06  Chess Addict: I have an idea.
How about Nf3 with the idea of Bg5 and the Queen will be tied to the defense of the threat Rd8#.
Dec-18-06  2021: According to NCO, it's called the Flohr-Mikenas system.
Premium Chessgames Member
  gambitfan: OPOD 07/04/2007
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Opening of the Day

English, Mikenas-Carls
1.c4 ♘f6 2.♘c3 e6 3.e4

click for larger view

White as holes on d3 and d4, while black can weaken their d6 square by playing 3...c5.

Oct-02-13  Kikoman: <Opening of the Day>

English, Mikenas-Carls
1. c4 Nf6 2. Nc3 e6 3. e4

click for larger view

Opening Explorer

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC