page 1 of 15; games 1-25 of 357  Game   Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening 1. S Johnston vs H Voigt   0-1 44 1904 Chicago CC-Franklin CC A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 2. Colle vs Yates   0-1 27 1927 fin-B A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 3. Reti vs G Norman   ½-½ 31 1927 Hastings 2627 A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 4. Capablanca vs Spielmann ½-½ 30 1928 5, Budapest A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 5. G A Thomas vs Marshall   0-1 25 1929 Karlsbad A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 6. Nimzowitsch vs Rubinstein 0-1 30 1930 San Remo A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 7. Alekhine vs E Steiner 1-0 36 1931 Praha ol (17) A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 8. W Winter vs Menchik 1-0 27 1936 Hastings A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 9. I Raud vs Keres   ½-½ 42 1938 Tallinn ,Est team ch (25.02.38) A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 10. R Navarro vs Keres   0-1 22 1943 Madrid (20.10.43) A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 11. C Kottnauer vs F Vasicek   1-0 27 1943 Zlin A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 12. M Beilin vs Keres   0-1 37 1945 Tallinn ,Kalev-Daugava team m (02.09.45) A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 13. Nerzesov vs Keres 0-1 19 1946 Tbilisi (26.03.46) A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 14. Kholmov vs Keres 0-1 40 1947 Moscow A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 15. Taimanov vs Pachman   ½-½ 33 1952 13 Saltsjobaden A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 16. Petrosian vs Keres ½-½ 41 1953 Zurich A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 17. R Bobecov vs Keres   0-1 39 1954 Amsterdam ol final (17.09.54) A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 18. Filip vs Stahlberg   ½-½ 11 1954 Bucharest A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 19. Filip vs Pachman   ½-½ 39 1954 CSR-ch m A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 20. G Lorson vs A Nielsen   ½-½ 21 1954 Amsterdam ol (Men) A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 21. G Kluger vs J Hajtun   ½-½ 18 1954 HUN-ch 10th A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 22. E Dodero vs Najdorf   0-1 61 1955 Buenos Aires ARG ch A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 23. Kurkletis vs Vasiukov 0-1 11 1957 USSR A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 24. Bannik vs Bastrikov   1-0 35 1957 URS-ch sf A32 English, Symmetrical Variation 25. I Asmundsson vs Feuerstein   0-1 41 1957 WchT U26 04th A32 English, Symmetrical Variation  page 1 of 15; games 1-25 of 357    REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)

Jan-12-02    Sneaky: Black wins more than White in this variation!! Feb-13-04    marcus13: Because to be in this opening whit cannot continues by Nf3 because it would be an atoher opening. This is the reason why Black win all thoses games. Jun-19-07    nummerzwei: I have to admit that I do not understand your comment. You perhaps only typed to fast, but I donīt think it is not desirable for white to move his knight back to f3 in this line. I suppose you meant Nc3, butif black continues differently than 5...Nc6 (A33), for example with 5...Bb4, itīs still A32.(There are in fact some Nimzo-Indian games starting with 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Nf3 c5 5.g3 cxd4 listed under A32.) Iīm looking forward to your answer. Sep-06-07    simsim: We have the following definitions: A33: 1. c4 c5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 cd4 4. Nd4 e6 5. Nc3 Nc6 and A32: 1. c4 c5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 cd4 4. Nd4 e6 The Nimzo-lines that occur after 5. Nc3 Lb4 are not the mainlines, but rather non-critical sidelines. Together with all other white's 5. move deviations, A32 contains a lot of second rate moves. Only 5.g3 seems like a first rate move, but its performance is not overwhelming. I think this explains the bad statistic for white in this variation. Sep-06-07    Domdaniel: <simsim> -- <I think this explains the bad statistic for white in this variation.> This is true, up to a point. But Black has consistently scored well in both the A32 and A33 lines, especially in the last ten or twenty years. I used to play the English most of the time as White, but I gave it up, largely because of the Symmetrical Variation. I recall Ray Keene saying some years ago that he'd come to the conclusion that 3.d4 was a mistake (eg, 1.c4 c5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4). I think the Closed Symmetrical, where White avoids playing d4, is still OK, but can lead to very dull drawish positions. May-04-08    Phony Benoni: Modern Benoni players who are frustrated by 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.Nf3 should take heart from this variation. You might not get to play your pride and joy, but you can get a good position as compensation.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community! If you already have an account, you should login now.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts. No personal attacks against other users. Nothing in violation of United States law. See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator. NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.