page 1 of 33; games 1-25 of 810  Game   Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening 1. Staunton vs Saint Amant ½-½ 62 1843 Paris m ;HCL 15 A35 English, Symmetrical 2. Owen vs G MacDonnell   0-1 52 1862 London A35 English, Symmetrical 3. Zukertort vs J Noa ½-½ 46 1881 02.DSB-Kongress A35 English, Symmetrical 4. Swiderski vs Mieses   1-0 60 1904 DSB-14.Kongress A35 English, Symmetrical 5. Swiderski vs A H Petterson 1-0 34 1905 Barmen Masters B, GER A35 English, Symmetrical 6. Tartakower vs Salwe   ½-½ 16 1907 Carlsbad it, CZE A35 English, Symmetrical 7. Nimzowitsch vs Schlechter   ½-½ 36 1911 Karlsbad A35 English, Symmetrical 8. K Treybal vs A Haida   1-0 30 1921 Brno A35 English, Symmetrical 9. Tarrasch vs S Rosselli del Turco   0-1 48 1923 Trieste A35 English, Symmetrical 10. Hromadka vs F Jonet   1-0 60 1924 olm. qual. group1 A35 English, Symmetrical 11. Tartakower vs S Rosselli del Turco   1-0 31 1925 Baden-Baden A35 English, Symmetrical 12. Rubinstein vs J W Te Kolste   1-0 41 1925 Baden-Baden A35 English, Symmetrical 13. Reti vs M Walter   1-0 24 1925 Bratislava A35 English, Symmetrical 14. Nimzowitsch vs Capablanca ½-½ 30 1929 Karlsbad A35 English, Symmetrical 15. N Zubarev vs Ravinsky   0-1 16 1929 URS-ch06 qf3 A35 English, Symmetrical 16. P M List vs N Mannheimer   1-0 37 1930 Frankfurt GER A35 English, Symmetrical 17. Botvinnik vs A Y Model   1-0 36 1933 Leningrad masters A35 English, Symmetrical 18. Verlinsky vs Levenfish   ½-½ 50 1933 Ch URS A35 English, Symmetrical 19. Sultan Khan vs A Asgeirsson   1-0 45 1933 Folkestone A35 English, Symmetrical 20. Nimzowitsch vs H Muller   1-0 47 1934 Zurich A35 English, Symmetrical 21. I Mazel vs F Bohatirchuk   0-1 20 1934 USSR Championship A35 English, Symmetrical 22. Golombek vs Tartakower   ½-½ 47 1935 Hastings A35 English, Symmetrical 23. I Pleci vs V Fenoglio   1-0 51 1936 Mar del Plata it-03 A35 English, Symmetrical 24. Koltanowski vs H Gemmell   1-0 25 1937 simul blind 1/34 A35 English, Symmetrical 25. K Wojtyla vs K Poschauko   ½-½ 34 1938 Krakow A35 English, Symmetrical  page 1 of 33; games 1-25 of 810    REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)

Sep-24-04    Knight13: Now this kind of opening is weird way to start a english as black. Nov-12-04    Knight13: I've played this opening with my chess club friend who's rated 1095. I found out Black is not in a pretty much a good position later doing the game. My feeling about this is that it is like Black doesn't know how to play the English at all. Maybe that's not true... I don't know. Nov-13-04    An Englishman: Good Evening: Knight13, I played both sides of this position more often than any other opening. You have no idea how complex this can get (strategically or tactically) for both players. Sooner or later, one of the players will break symmetry. One good place is in the Ultra-Symmetrical English, 3.g3,g6; 4.Bg2,Bg7. At this point, White can play Nf3, e2-e3, e2-e4, d3, b3, and a3. In response to any of these moves, Black can respond with Nf6, e7-e6, e7-e5, b6 or a6! Another dense variation is 3.Nf3,Nf6; 4.d4. Overall, the Symmetrical English is one of the toughest openings to learn. You have to be equally comfortable with closed, semi-open and open positions. You have to be equally comfortable with sacrificing pawns or accepting sacrificed pawns. You have to be equally comfortable with wild complications and patient positional play to squeeze out the full point in the endgame. And I haven't even discussed what happens after 2.Nf3,Nf6. Dec-06-04    EnglishOpeningc4: <Knight13> This is a great way to attack the english but it fails when black tries to play in an attacking style. this is probably the most positional opening. Jun-13-05    suenteus po 147: Here's a nasty little trap you can fall into as black if you are like me and don't understand anything about proper development in the English Symmetrical System. This comes from my classic losses collection: 1.c4 c5 2.c3 c6 3.f3 b6 4.e4 b7 5.e5 d6 6.exd6 exd6 7.d4 cxd4 8.xd4 xd4 9.xd4 f6 10.e3 d5 11.cxd5 xd5 12.b5+ e7 13.e5# Jun-24-06    suenteus po 147: Question about a move in this opening: After 1.c4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nf3 g6 my opponent played: 4.Ne4!? Being the senseless speed player I am, I quickly responded with 4...e6, but looking over how my position labored and I almost lost the game there must be a more punishing response to this questionable knight sortie. Any thoughts or ideas are appreciated. Jun-24-06    acirce: Well, 4..e6 doesn't seem natural coupled with ..g6 but I doubt simply 4..d6 is bad and what's the point of 4.Ne4 then? Easy equality at worst. Jun-24-06    suenteus po 147: <acirce> Thanks for that. 4...d6 looks solid indeed, but I let the unorthodox move push me into a hasty reply. I don't get to play against the English much, and when I do my opponents can usually tell when I respond with a poor move like I played in the line above. Jul-05-06    xKinGKooLx: I'm not surprised that this opening has a high draw percentage, because of the symmetrical moves, but why does white have a much higher win percentage than black? The only advantage white has is the advantage of the first move, surely? This is a game where I played this opening against a friend with the black pieces and drew. Can someone comment on the game, please? 1. c4 c5 2. Nc3 Nc6 3. e3 g6 4. Nf3 Bg7 5. Ng5 Nf6 6. a3 d6 7. d4 h6 8. Nf3 cxd4 9. exd4 d5 10. Bf4 Bg4 11. Be2 Bxf3 12. Bxf3 e6 13. Nb5 O-O 14. Bd6 Ne7 15. b3 a6 16. Bxe7 Qxe7 17. Nc3 Rfd8 18. c5 Rab8 19. Ra2 1/2-1/2 (draw by agreement) Jun-19-07    nummerzwei: First of all, 5.Ng5 (intending to put the knight onto e4,right?)looks strange and should in my opinion be replaced by natural moves like 5.Be2 or 5.d4.It apparently cannot be refute outright,however. Then your 6.a3 looks like a pointless move at all, simply showing you donīt know what to do.Of course playing a3,Rb1 and b4 is a plan in most positions. But in this specific position it looks not good. A better alternative would be 6.d4 . The following moves up to move look logical and okay, but while 10.Bf4 was maybe just a matter of taste (10.h3),10...Bg4 and especially 11.BxNf3 look totally antipostional. Had your partner simply castled on the 10th move, white would have had less than no advantage. Of course there were better moves to exploit the weakening 12...e6 than 13.Nb5, because after 14...Te8 instead of the blunder 14...Ne7 which cramps the black positon even more, white would have hadto retreat (15.Nc7? QxBd6 with a big edge for black). After 17...Rfd8 (why not the other rook instead of this one?)it looks like black has a pleaseant advantage which is of courseincreased by 18.c5 ( you never castle, do you?). I do not know why your opponent preferred the pointless 18...Rab8 to an attacking move like 18...Ne4. Finally a draw was justified because neither you nor your friend didplay for a win uring your game. Was it a tournament game?

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community! If you already have an account, you should login now.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts. No personal attacks against other users. Nothing in violation of United States law. See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator. NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.