Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation (A87)
1 d4 f5 2 c4 Nf6 3 g3 g6 4 Bg2 Bg7 5 Nf3

Number of games in database: 468
Years covered: 1951 to 2019
Overall record:
   White wins 39.7%
   Black wins 28.8%
   Draws 31.4%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Evgeny Postny  4 games
Etienne Bacrot  4 games
Robert Ruck  3 games
Vladimir P Malaniuk  12 games
Evgeni Vasiukov  9 games
Zhong Zhang  8 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Tal vs Botvinnik, 1960
Karpov vs V Malaniuk, 1988
Oll vs Topalov, 1993
S Guliev vs Bacrot, 1992
Razuvaev vs Topalov, 1992
V Arbakov vs Kramnik, 1989
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 19; games 1-25 of 468  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. A Tsvetkov vs Stoltz  0-1491951Marianske Lazne / Prague ZonalA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
2. A Pytlakowski vs K Plater  ½-½231952MiedzyzdrojeA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
3. V Barata da Cruz vs W Heidenfeld  0-1371955JohannesburgA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
4. R Fuchs vs G Restrepo  ½-½201956Moscow ol (Men) fin-BA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
5. P Aguirre vs Pelikan  0-1331957Buenos AiresA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
6. E Franco Raymundo vs M Farre  ½-½261957ESP-chA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
7. K Honfi vs E Haag  ½-½621958BudapestA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
8. M Pugach vs Pelikan  ½-½461959Buenos AiresA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
9. J Zajic vs F Blatny 1-0321960CSR-chA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
10. J L Alvarez del Monte vs Letelier  1-0531960Mar del PlataA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
11. Tal vs Botvinnik 1-0411960Botvinnik - Tal World Championship MatchA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
12. J Klein vs F Casas  1-0381960Santa FeA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
13. Portisch vs Uhlmann 1-0371962Stockholm InterzonalA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
14. E Etcheverry vs R Hoen  0-1531962Varna ol (Men) fin-CA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
15. T Stadler vs A Kushnir 0-1441966URS-YUGA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
16. V Glatman vs M Yudovich Jr.  0-1301968USSRA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
17. Filip vs J Fabian 1-0461968CSR-chA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
18. A Kushnir vs N I Titorenko  0-13319686th Soviet Team CupA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
19. E Formanek vs P Karmaz 0-1351969WhitbyA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
20. Savon vs Lutikov  ½-½381969USSR ChampionshipA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
21. M Vukic vs L Espig 1-0711970EUR-chT (Men) 4thA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
22. Keene vs Matulovic  ½-½301970Siegen ol (Men) qual-BA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
23. A Kushnir vs N Alexandria  1-0571971KislovodskA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
24. Petrosian vs Matulovic 1-0401972Bosna 15thA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
25. Kraidman vs K Roehrl  1-0261972Chess Olympiad Final-BA87 Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation
 page 1 of 19; games 1-25 of 468  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  egilarne: GM Stefan Kindermann in his excellent book on the Leningrad variation, 2005, says that GM Magnus Carlsen, at that time 13 years old, more or less refuted 1 Nf3 f5?! by playing 2 d3! intending e4: Carlsen vs Dolmatov, 2004
Apr-21-07  Poisonpawns: <grijs> In trying to avoid the anti-dutch systems ,one can create so much extra work for oneself!
Apr-21-07  grijs: True <Poisonpawns>, but you need a defense against 1. e4 anyway. So, you can play the The French or the Pirc against 1. e4 and the Dutch against 1.d4, 1.c4 etc...
Apr-29-07  WTHarvey: Here are some traps and zaps in A87 miniatures:
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Is the Leningrad Dutch now the St.Petersburg Dutch?
Jul-06-07  ganstaman: <whiteshark: Is the Leningrad Dutch now the St.Petersburg Dutch?>

I've read that before -- where?

Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <ganstaman>: on a chessninja page ??
Jul-07-07  ganstaman: <whiteshark> Ah, yes, that could be it.
Jul-07-07  Tomlinsky: Korchnoi on playing the Leningrad Dutch when he was a junior: "I used to play the Leningrad System... then after one or two years I realised that NOBODY understands what happens in that system including myself. So I gave up this system and came to play only the modest d6 in the Dutch."
Jul-19-07  nummerzwei: Does anybody here have some experience with 5...d6 6.d5 in this variantionas white? It appears to me that this line leads to quite "dry" play, which reminds me mostly of the English opening. But it is called a good variation by Keene, who has also played it. I would like to learn more about this line, because I havenīt found a real system against the Dutch.

If someone plays it against me,I will answer it with c4 followed by g3 and son, but as I said before, I donīt know that much about the plans and theoretical variations of the main lines. Is there a good books about g3 against the Dutch that covers the all the normal setups by black (Leningrad, Stonewall,Classical)?

Thanks in advance, No2

Oct-21-07  Open Defence: Opening of the Day...
Mar-24-08  BirdBrain: I was reading the posts on the 2. h3 lines, and I am not a master or anything, but I have analyzed this line and found an interesting idea for Black. Of course the problem is so many players want to force their pet lines, and do not explore the intracacies of any opening. I believe to be good at the Dutch, you have to understand it. I play the Bird as well, and I used to lose consistently to my personal computer, but I came back and tried new ideas and got more solid each time with the pawn structures. A lot of lines evaluate d4 f5 h3 Nf6, but I do not believe that is near as good as playing d5! on move 2. For instance:

d4 f5 h3 d5 g4 fxg hxg Bxg Qd3 Nf6 Rxh7 does not work the same, as the king can flee via d7. If you don't like this, then don't play d5 - simply develop Nf6 g4 fxg hxg Nxg4 Qd3 g6, which is another line that prevents the Quick Queen checkmate...However, I believe the 2...d5 line offers Black more chances to dance toe to toe tactically with White, with ideas such as Qd6 and a possible 0-0-0.

Apr-12-10  xombie: The Dutch is a nuisance. Many of us QP and English players like to stifle and build quietly. But the Dutch is like a hyperactive child that you can't quieten. But it might be better to live with the activity because white seems to have decent chances of getting a good game later on. Trying to learn more about this system and broaden my knowledge of positions.
Apr-12-10  parisattack: <xombie: The Dutch is a nuisance. Many of us QP and English players like to stifle and build quietly. But the Dutch is like a hyperactive child that you can't quieten. But it might be better to live with the activity because white seems to have decent chances of getting a good game later on. Trying to learn more about this system and broaden my knowledge of positions.>

I think most of the top QP players literally drooled when their opponent played a Dutch - at that level of play its probably structurally unsound. But for us mortals it can indeed be a nuisance (and conversely, fun to play as Black). 2. Bg5 is a try if the main lines (especially the Leningrad) give you heartburn.

Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: this ugly critter gives me problems, excuse my technical language. After black gets a big pawn center, you have to be Houdini to activate the light Bishop on g2. Also, it is difficult to activate one's dark square bishop, if it is on b2, and blocked in.

While I'm advancing my queenside pawns to free up my game, black put a big Knight on e4. Sometimes, I have to play f3 to drive off the Knight, creating a permanent weakness. I look at the GM games here to see how they play against the Dutch, but it remains a headache.

Apr-13-10  parisattack: Try Petrosian-Korchnoi 1946. Petro also has to play f3 but uses it as a lever for e4, destroying Korchnoi's Stonewall. I've seen the same motif against the Leningrad.

Keene analyzes this game in Petrosian vs the Elite, Game #1.

Apr-13-10  Poisonpawns: <Parisattack Try Pertosian-Korchnoi 1946> Here is a nice video-analysis of the game.
Apr-13-10  parisattack: ,Poisonpawns: <Parisattack Try Pertosian-Korchnoi 1946> Here is a nice video-analysis of the game.;


Apr-13-10  xombie: Ah, thanks Paris. That seems interesting. I think at amateur levels, one doesn't get to encounter it often enough, which might explain it. But it still boils down to positional understanding.
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: <Paris> Most instructive! (Petrosian v. Korchnoi 1946) The stonewall gets demolished, black's light square bishop never gets activated.
Apr-13-10  parisattack: <HeMateMe: <Paris> Most instructive! (Petrosian v. Korchnoi 1946) The stonewall gets demolished, black's light square bishop never gets activated.>

I found it amazing how quickly black's 'stone' wall collapsed. Petrosian definately had the 'touch' for such things...

Apr-14-10  FHBradley: In Petrosian vs Korchnoi, 1946 black allows his DSB to be traded for free, which is generally not a good idea. If white insists on the exchange, he should be made pay for it, as in H Olafsson vs S Agdestein, 1987. I think people say the real test case for the Stonewall is the knight manoeuvre g1-h3-f4-d3, as in P Nikolic vs Short, 1987 or Anand vs P Nikolic, 2000
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Opening of the Day

Dutch, Leningrad, Main Variation (A87)
1.d4 f5 2. c4 ♘f6 3.g3 g6 4.♗g2 ♗g7 5.♘f3

click for larger view

Jun-07-12  Troller: And again today :)

Seems like Nakamura is the only top player still employing this; Kramnik was fond of it in his youth, though.

Jan-04-13  xeneizexxx: I believe that the black dark square bishop is more important than the rook in the leningrad, at least it confuses your opponent and gives you more winning chances. See: R Fontaine vs M Vachier-Lagrave, 2007
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC