Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Dutch (A90)
1 d4 f5 2 c4 Nf6 3 g3 e6 4 Bg2

Number of games in database: 1685
Years covered: 1873 to 2019
Overall record:
   White wins 43.0%
   Black wins 23.3%
   Draws 33.7%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Alexander Beliavsky  9 games
Loek van Wely  9 games
Margeir Petursson  8 games
Teimour Radjabov  25 games
Igor V Glek  22 games
Simen Agdestein  21 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Euwe vs Alekhine, 1935
Petrosian vs Korchnoi, 1946
Alekhine vs Tartakower, 1930
Bogoljubov vs Alekhine, 1922
Kotov vs Bondarevsky, 1936
H Steiner vs Botvinnik, 1946
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 68; games 1-25 of 1,685  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Robert Smith vs C M Fisher 1-0411873Fisher-Smith MatchA90 Dutch
2. Robert Smith vs C M Fisher 0-1271873Fisher-Smith MatchA90 Dutch
3. Robert Smith vs C M Fisher 0-1371873Fisher-Smith MatchA90 Dutch
4. Tinsley vs W Pollock 1-0521895HastingsA90 Dutch
5. C Curt vs C S Howell  1-0271904Brooklyn CC chA90 Dutch
6. C Curt vs E Delmar  1-0461907NYSCA Mid-Summer MeetingA90 Dutch
7. Loman vs Ed. Lasker  ½-½381913ScheveningenA90 Dutch
8. Alekhine vs Tartakower ½-½571921The HagueA90 Dutch
9. P F Johner vs Tarrasch 0-1281922Bad PistyanA90 Dutch
10. O Antze vs O Wegemund  1-040192222. DSB KongressA90 Dutch
11. Bogoljubov vs Alekhine 0-1531922HastingsA90 Dutch
12. Tarrasch vs J Mieses ½-½821922Teplitz-SchönauA90 Dutch
13. Rubinstein vs Kmoch 1-0331922ViennaA90 Dutch
14. Gyula Patay vs S R Wolf  ½-½611923ViennaA90 Dutch
15. G Norman vs J Mieses  0-1341924Hastings 1923/24A90 Dutch
16. Bogoljubov vs Tartakower 1-0651924New YorkA90 Dutch
17. Bogoljubov vs J Mieses 1-0351925Baden-BadenA90 Dutch
18. Gruenfeld vs Carlos Torre 0-1131925Baden-BadenA90 Dutch
19. Tarrasch vs Carlos Torre  ½-½311925Baden-BadenA90 Dutch
20. V Vukovic vs Tartakower  0-1551927KecskemetA90 Dutch
21. Carls vs S Rosselli del Turco  1-0501928Wch AmateurA90 Dutch
22. Gilg vs Tartakower  ½-½401929KarlsbadA90 Dutch
23. A Sergeiev vs Ilyin-Zhenevsky  0-1531930Leningrad - Moscow MatchA90 Dutch
24. Alekhine vs Tartakower 1-0501930San RemoA90 Dutch
25. J Araiza Munoz vs Znosko-Borovsky  0-1331930NiceA90 Dutch
 page 1 of 68; games 1-25 of 1,685  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-02-04  Taidanii: So, what do we think about the Dutch, team?
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Their shoes are not good;)
Mar-02-04  BiLL RobeRTiE: Seems like an improved King's Indian to me (no tempi wasted unlocking the f-pawn.) Dunno why more people don't play it, Leningrad especially.
Mar-02-04  Taidanii: The only down side, it seems, is the lack of development on the queenside.
Mar-02-04  matein8: I think that Black's winning percentage with the Dutch provides a clue on how good the opening is.
Mar-02-04  Prophylaxis: "Seems like an improved King's Indian to me (no tempi wasted unlocking the f-pawn.)"

...f5 is not thematic in all KID structures. In some, ...c6 and/or ...b5 is a more reliable way of attacking white's center. Black's main idea in the KID is different than from her idea in the Dutch. In the KID, black lets white play e4 and create a large pawn center to restrain, blockade, and then attack with breaks like ...f5. In the Dutch Leningrad, white is never allowed to play e4 at all, at least not in the opening. Playing ...f5 on the first turn however allows white to adjust accordingly to black's setup with g3, Bg2.

Mar-02-04  Taidanii: <I think that Black's winning percentage with the Dutch provides a clue on how good the opening is.>

98% of games give white the advantage in any opening/defense variation. The fact that Black's percentage is lower proves absolutely nothing.

Mar-02-04  matein8: <Taidanii> Compare it to Black's winning percentage of other defenses such as the Nimzo: Nimzo-Indian (E20)
Mar-02-04  Taidanii: <matain8> e4 and d4 defences are completely different, you know this.
Mar-02-04  matein8: <Taidanii> The Dutch Defense and the Nimzo are both defenses against d4.
Mar-02-04  OneBadDog: Unless you're playing someone over 2200, openings really don't matter that much. The Dutch is a perfectly good defense to 1 d4.
Mar-02-04  Taidanii: <maitin8> When did I ever say the Dutch wasnt a d4 defence?
Mar-02-04  matein8: <Taidanii> I must have misunderstood you because I didn't know what you were implying by mentioning that e4 and d4 defenses are different.

The Dutch defense is very aggressive, much more aggressive than its e4 twin, the Sicilian defense. If you are an aggressive player, you might like it. If you can get good results and have fun with an opening, any opening, then you should play it.

Mar-02-04  Taidanii: <matein8> It's alright. I was just meaning that different white openings may infact dictate the succesion of a defence.

Well, being female, I generally have a passive personality. Something along the lines of the KID would better suit my playing style.

Mar-03-04  BiLL RobeRTiE: Prophylaxis, I thought that might be it. Thanks for verifying that. Still I think the Dutch offers good kingside attacking chances, maybe even better than the mainline Kings Indian with 10...f5.
Sep-10-04  Giancarlo: If white does not finachtto the King-side in the dutch, he may as well be opening the door for a black blood bath.

Without it,(Bg2)Black can easily finnachetto on b7 and the attacks are merciless. Just check out some of Bottvinnik's games where Black doesn't do a KSF. Black is dominant.

Jul-06-07  mokru: I wouldn't knock a statistical advantage, I really believe they imply the soundness of an opening. Is the dutch opening primarily for games where white plays an immediate d4? If white begins with c4, can black force white to play d4?
Jul-06-07  ganstaman: <mokru> No, black can never really force white to do anything (and vice versa, I believe). However, positions will likely be reached where white has nothing better than to play d4. Else, black can play ...e5 and claim more central space with a good game.

The Dutch certainly entails a risk, but I think that if you work a bit to really understand it, it will pay off.

Jul-07-07  Poisonpawns: In the Dutch you will either knockout your opponent or he will knock you out ;-)
Jul-22-07  consafo: a good thing about the dutch defence is you can you use it against a lot of opening systems
May-19-19  M van Wingerden: Hello,

Im new on this page and i don't play chess for that long (like 2 years now) and i have a question about the dutch.

I adopted the Dutch, but it seems i always have trouble developing the light squared bishop as black. I tryed playing Bd7 Be8 followed by Bh5 but it seems way to slow. I also tryed b6 Bb7/Ba6 which seems to be a good place for the Bishop, but then i always have troubles with my e6 pawn, which is hanging most of the times. Do you guys have any tips/advice for this?

Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: Hi <M van Wingerden> !

It is a very relevant question you pose.
Which also could indicate you are improving.

Firstly :All openings have their drawbacks,as I suppose you now.E.g. in french it is also the bishop,Kings Indian-lack of space,Benoni: sometimes running out of moves and so on.

I have played the Dutch Stonewall a lot and somehow it seemed better suited to me than the classical Dutch.:

Bd6,Nf6,0-0,Nbd7 then perhaps Qe7 or Qe8 and around here it is often time to do something about the c8problem.(Or sometimes Nf6-e4 first). So as it may seem it will depend on the situation on the board.(As cliché like kit may sound:).And by going deep finding some litterature which could illustrate the subject mixed by playing your own games,you will develop a deeper feeling understanding of which route b7 or d7the bishop shall take(unless the attack is in full swing and it is fine on c8). In roughly terms:When your opponent is restricting your Dutch attack it goes to b7.And if you have the initiative it is better on d7(e8-h5).Or on c8 (it is a fast piece after all:).And let us not forget: if white plays sloppy,black can sometimes go e5(and postponing the problemon c8).

One bonus information : If you want to avoid the Staunton go 1-e6.Almost nobody plays 2.e4 !

I hope it gives you food for thought and/or inspiration.

May-19-19  M van Wingerden: Thanks for you tips and advice Mr. Moronovich. I will take this with me in my games!
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: I am happy if you can use some of it <Man van Wingerden> and wish you luck with your work!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC