chessgames.com
Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack (B14)
1 e4 c6 2 d4 d5 3 exd5 cxd5 4 c4 Nf6 5 Nc3 e6

Number of games in database: 2158
Years covered: 1866 to 2009
Overall record:
   White wins 37.8%
   Black wins 24.0%
   Draws 38.2%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
PRACTITIONERS
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Judit Polgar  35 games
Mark Hebden  33 games
Sveshnikov  27 games
Alexey Dreev  27 games
Anatoli Karpov  24 games
Vlastimil Hort  19 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Fischer vs Euwe, 1960
Judit Polgar vs Karpov, 1993
Tal vs Botvinnik, 1966
Kamsky vs Karpov, 1996
Nimzowitsch vs Alekhine, 1931
Miles vs Yusupov, 1985
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 87; games 1-25 of 2,158  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Owen vs Mapes 1-023 1866 USA ChampionshipB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
2. Zukertort vs J Schwarz  1-043 1881 02.DSB-KongressB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
3. Wittek vs J Schwarz  1-063 1881 DSB-02.KongressB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
4. Teichmann vs Mieses 1-022 1908 PragueB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
5. J Perlis vs Duras  ½-½67 1909 St. Petersburg (Russia)B14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
6. Mieses vs Schlechter  ½-½32 1912 DSB-18.KongressB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
7. Duras vs Kolar  1-019 1923 Prague simB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
8. Ed Lasker vs H R Bigelow  1-035 1923 9th American Chess CongressB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
9. O Krause vs Nimzowitsch ½-½33 1924 Correspondence Game -1925B14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
10. Alekhine vs Tartakower  ½-½56 1925 Paris (02)B14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
11. Alekhine vs L L Colman 1-026 1926 Buenos AiresB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
12. B Kostic vs Flohr  ½-½16 1931 BledB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
13. Verlinsky vs A Budo  1-025 1931 URS-ch07B14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
14. Nimzowitsch vs Alekhine 0-136 1931 Bled,B14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
15. Alekhine vs Euwe ½-½70 1932 Bern (05)B14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
16. Alekhine vs Sultan Khan 1-034 1932 Bern (01)B14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
17. Alekhine vs W Winter 1-037 1932 London (03)B14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
18. Alekhine vs McCombie 1-033 1932 London-Empire SocialB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
19. Alekhine vs J A Solares 0-134 1932 Mexico City War DeptB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
20. Dake vs Alekhine 1-038 1932 Pasadena (10)B14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
21. H Von Hennig vs E Hahn  1-032 1932 Bad Ems GERB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
22. Riumin vs Kan 1-034 1932 MoscowB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
23. Alekhine vs Tampboelon/Moersid/S  1-039 1933 BandungB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
24. Botvinnik vs Flohr 0-140 1933 RussiaB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
25. Botvinnik vs Flohr 1-033 1933 RussiaB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
 page 1 of 87; games 1-25 of 2,158  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Secrets of Opening Surprises

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing >
Nov-20-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: <kriegspiel> The ECO code system is badly implemented and causes a lot of problems like this. As for the names, they are hierarchical, so it is perfectly OK to have a "Modern Defense" or "Modern Variation" of the Panov.

Names are much better than ECO codes for classifying and Chessgames is working to implement a named opening classification.

Nov-20-05   Kriegspiel: <Eric Schiller> I just think of the Modern Defense as a completely different opening (e.g., A42). Also, doesn't the word "Defense" in both "Caro-Kann Defense" and "Modern Defense Mieses Line" refer to Black's portion of play here? So how can it be both? And what is the Mieses Line?

Thanks,

Kriegspiel

Dec-08-05   popski: This is somehow strange opening. I think you need good nerves for this. First you isolate your own pawn and after you don't have a feeling that you have some kind of initiative... First four moves looks so promising, but after everything start to melt and you have to watch on your own annoying isolated pawn all the time, because if you lost this one, you are in a big trouble. It's also hard to find weak points in a black position after casteling. I don't feel comfortable with this opening...
Dec-08-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: <Kriegspiel> The name of an opening refers to the position of the board, independent of color. By convention, most Defenses are Black openings, but the word "Attack" is used for both sides. The names are a hierarchy, just as in biology there are groups and subgroups, each of which has a name.
Dec-08-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: <popski> You seem to think isolated pawns are a bad thing. Tarrasch and many others have proven otherwise. Having an IQP means having plenty of mobility for pieces, and wide open attacking files. I play both sides of IQP positions, but prefer to have the isolated pawn, as in the Tarrasch Defense.
Dec-08-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: have to try this out next time <sueteus po 147> brings out the CK opening. =)
Dec-09-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  suenteus po 147: <WannaBe> I've had some good experience with the Panov-Botvinnik as black. In fact, I'm undefeated in it. Of course years of experience playing the QGD has helped, I think.
Dec-09-05   Averageguy: Hello, I was wondering as an aggressive player who dislikes opening theory which line is more for me as white, the main-line Caro-Kann or the Panov-Botvinnik attack?
Dec-09-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <Averageguy> Panov. The feel of that is similar to lots of other IQP positions. And attacking players find the main-line quite anoying.
Dec-09-05   Averageguy: <Gypsy> Thanks for your reccomendation, I'll give it a go. However, I don't really agree that aggresive players get annoyed with the main-line. I've won some good games with it (best was a win against my 1988 rated club champ).
Dec-09-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <Averageguy> If you are an attacking player, how can you go wrong following Alekhine (or Tal). Good luck!

As for the main-line: My father played CK all his life to the great chagrin of his club- and tournament buddies. I am glad to hear that the main-line does not get under your skin; many an 1.e4 attacking player groans quietly when consenting to enter it for the umpteenth time.

Dec-09-05   Akavall: Funny, but I think exchange variation of Caro-Kann gives white a pretty good attack. While black has to move pawns on the Queen's side, white just sets up an attack. It is definitly good for someone who doesn't like theory.
Dec-09-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <Akavall> Yes, you either get a Catalan- or Carlsbad pawn structure with collors reversed. It generally is a pleasant game for Black as long as he/she know what they are doing. For instance in the Carlsbad, as Black I would forego a minority attack on the Q-side in favor of f6 and e5. (Even without the f6, e5 brings about a rough equality.)
Dec-10-05   Akavall: If Black goes for g6 line, then there is no attack. My guess is that white should start playing on the queen's side, before Black can play f6, e5. If white just sits there black will get a really good play. Honestly, I am not sure what is a right plan for white, people play g6 line very rarely against me.
Jun-11-06   e4Newman: i love this as white, although I don't see the ck as much as other kp defenses

as white, i always exchange and push c4

there are other openings i'll play white or black, such as ruy lopez, but not this one

Aug-06-06   soughzin: This looks more like a queen's gambit than most e4 stuff. I'd like to avoid all the normal caro stuff but do you think a solely e4 player would feel uncomfortable in the resulting positions?
Aug-06-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  euripides: <soughzin> I'm not an e4 player, but I wouldn't have thought so. The isolated queen's pawn positions are generally quite good for launching direct king's side attacks.
Dec-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Karpova: <soughzin: This looks more like a queen's gambit than most e4 stuff. I'd like to avoid all the normal caro stuff but do you think a solely e4 player would feel uncomfortable in the resulting positions?> That's why Karpov likes it so much. He plays the same stuff against 1.d4
Dec-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <soughzin: This looks more like a queen's gambit than most e4 stuff> Or like a Nimzo-Indian - after 6.Nf3 Bb4.
Dec-10-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiskeyrebel: I'm really happy playing this as black. People who play this as white seem to expect that I'm going to crumble in fear of an attack. I'm cautious and work towards a superior endgame. My W-L ratio against players in the 1800-2200 range as black is good. There are some traps you need to prepare for if you play this as black though, uhh..and I'm not sure if I'd feel as confident playing somebody over 2200. Then again, I'd try it anyway. Plenty of GM'S are happy with blacks prospects. Book up, my C-K friends.
Apr-01-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  gambitfan: Opening of the day (01/04/2007)
Apr-01-07   Kwesi: Maybe its an April Fool because it actually could be a Nimzo Indian instead of a Caro-Kann.
Apr-09-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  gambitfan: This opening is very important for the theme of the ISOLANI (Isolated Pawn).

Game Collection: ISOLANI

Sep-15-07   WTHarvey: Here are some crucial positions in miniature Panov-Botvinnik games: http://www.wtharvey.com/b14.html
Jun-02-08   Alphastar: I really don't like the lines starting with 5. ..e6. It's too passive for me I guess. I much prefer 5. ..Nc6, usually followed by 6. Nf3 Bg4.
Jump directly to page #    (enter number from 1 to 3)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing >
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | new kibitzing | chessforums | new games | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2009, Chessgames.com
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies