chessgames.com
Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation (B28)
1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 a6

Number of games in database: 1499
Years covered: 1858 to 2014
Overall record:
   White wins 37.0%
   Black wins 36.4%
   Draws 26.7%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
PRACTITIONERS
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Efim Geller  8 games
Alexey Suetin  6 games
Fernando Braga  5 games
Mark Taimanov  24 games
Istvan Csom  22 games
Bojan Kurajica  15 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Anand vs Morozevich, 2004
Zsofia Polgar vs A Rabczewsky, 1989
Sadvakasov vs S Tatai, 1999
NN vs Pandolfini, 1967
V Liberzon vs Taimanov, 1967
B Pietrusiak vs Velimirovic, 1964
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 60; games 1-25 of 1,499  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Cochrane vs Somacarana  0-129 1858 CalcuttaB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
2. Cochrane vs Somacarana  1-059 1858 CalcuttaB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
3. S Passmore vs E O Jones  ½-½46 1900 LondonB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
4. Breyer vs M Brody  ½-½12 1913 BudapestB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
5. K Sterk vs M Brody ½-½59 1913 Aus-Hun ChampionshipB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
6. Reti vs Tartakower  0-141 1919 Vienna mB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
7. Spielmann vs Tartakower 1-075 1921 Vienna mB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
8. Euwe vs Tartakower 0-136 1922 LondonB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
9. G Tregaskis vs B Kostic  0-133 1922 WestonB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
10. J Blake vs Colle  1-038 1924 Hastings 1923/24B28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
11. J A Seitz vs Colle  1-051 1924 Hastings 1923/24B28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
12. Yates vs J A Seitz  1-049 1924 Hastings 1923/24B28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
13. L Dewing vs J A Seitz  0-134 1924 Hastings-A 2425B28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
14. Keres vs T Gauffin 1-021 1935 HelsinkiB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
15. O Kaila vs B Tot 1-022 1936 Munich ol (Men)B28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
16. S Lazare vs G Lamparter  1-060 1939 Melbourne InvitationalB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
17. M Radojcic vs B Tot  0-147 1947 Ljubljana ch-YUGB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
18. Pilnik vs Euwe  ½-½27 1948 New YorkB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
19. S Rubinstein vs Rubinstein  1-052 1948 Training GameB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
20. J Sefc vs O'Kelly  ½-½69 1949 Tr.TepliceB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
21. J Platt vs O'Kelly  ½-½26 1949 Trencianske Teplice (Slovakia)B28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
22. Simagin vs G Barcza  ½-½72 1949 Budapest (Hungary)B28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
23. G Stalda vs Szabo 0-141 1949 VeniceB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
24. E Walther vs Rossolimo 0-125 1949 OldenburgB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
25. Wade vs O'Kelly  0-157 1949 OldenburgB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
 page 1 of 60; games 1-25 of 1,499  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-10-05  BiLL RobeRTiE: <chessboyhaha> It's definitely a mistake, and you definitely are horrible at both chess and English.
May-11-05  chessboyhaha: BiLL RobeRTiE, try to live in the South America, try to have 11 and try to write in English with 11 years old living in South America
May-11-05  chessboyhaha: What line refutor?
May-11-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  refutor: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 a6 3.d4? is a mistake, see the previous posts
May-11-05  BiLL RobeRTiE: <chessboyhaha> Your national origins are superfluous. My point is, your posts are both incorrect with regards to chess and difficult to decipher.
May-31-05  rudysanford: I noticed that 4. Bc4 is almost never played- similar to Rossolimo but targeting the other side. Isn't putting pressure on f7 advisable or is it thought to be too soon for that?
May-31-05  e4Newman: for Bc4 check out the sozin variation
Jul-20-05  chessboyhaha: no it's not, what other move in his place?
Oct-13-05  AlexanderMorphy: this can quite easily transform into the najdorf!
Mar-31-07  Knight13: <refutor: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 a6 3.d4? is a mistake> I think he means Black might now play ...cxd4 and instead plays ...e6..
Mar-31-07  Knight13: <I think he means Black might now play ...cxd4 and instead plays ...e6..> meant "might not play" not "might now play."
Mar-31-07  HannibalSchlecter: IM Andrew Martin calls 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 a6. 3.c3! the acid test of the O'Kelly Sicilian. White's idea is to play a c3 or Alapin Siclian where the move 3.a6 would be rendered useless. White seems to be scoring well with it.
May-21-07  foolishmovesss: The only reason I play the O'Kelly, is to get into the dragon with out having to deal with a Yugoslav. Transposition into the Najdorf is also nice as you never face the english attack. The Maroczy bind is difficult to play against if you dont watch whats happening, but black has a fine game. The O'Kelly is great for book players who don't really know what is happening.

Oh and yes 3) d4 is a pretty bad mistake, I have beat a few experts who didn't know not to play it.

May-21-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: <foolish> I don't understand. ...a6 is not part of Dragon main lines, so you should be in trouble against any Yugoslav Attack. The O'Kelly is a good route to Kan/Paulsen/Schven/Najdorf, but a poor choice if you want a main line Dragon.
May-21-07  foolishmovesss: I guess thats what I am saying Eric. I don't want it to be a main line really. I saw it somewhere called the dragondorf, basically a dragon with a6 of course. I believe I have seen it played my Nakumura.

I could be wrong.

Jan-27-08  omarbaguio: HELLO
IS THERE ANY BOOKS ON O'Kelly Variation ASIDE FROM EVERYMAN DANGEROUS WEAPONS !!!!
Mar-19-08  Edwin Meyer: That would be; Sicilian defense: O'Kelly Variation by W. John Lutes.
Jun-13-09  Edwin M: Opening for White According to Anand 1. e4, Vol. 8.
Jul-09-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: I like the O'Kelly but 3. c3 spoils some of the fun. I think 2. ...e6 and Kan/Taimanov/Schveningen is more accurate.
Jul-09-09  WhiteRook48: I don't get 3 c4 in this line
Jul-09-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Shams: <I don't get 3 c4 in this line> Simply transposing to the Maroczy Bind. 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 is a line where 2...a6 is better, since to block ...b7-b5 white has to play a2-a4.
Jul-09-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: I never worried about the 3. c4 variation...Black can come out OK, especially with ...e5 in many lines.
Apr-21-11  Lambda: <I don't get 3 c4 in this line> c2-c4 is a useful restraining move for white against the open Sicilian, it blunts the black attack down the c-file and makes the classical Sicilian freeing move ...d5 difficult to achieve. The reason black plays ...Nf6 early on in most Sicilian main lines is to force white to develop the knight to c3 and thus block the c2-c4 advance.
Feb-17-12  Penguincw: Opening of the Day

Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 a6


click for larger view

I'm assuming the plan is b5.

Dec-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: <refutor: 3.d4 is a mistake in this line>

Certainly much less than optimal. As Black has not committed to ...e6, he gets a quite easy-to-play Pelikan. Yet amazing how many player's as White even at the master-level continue to play 3. d4.

< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies