page 1 of 42; games 1-25 of 1,046  Game   Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening 1. Goglidze vs Pirc 1-0 37 1935 Moscow B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 2. Keres vs H Heinicke ½-½ 42 1936 Bad Nauheim B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 3. V A Vasiliev vs Ragozin   0-1 40 1936 Ch Leningrad B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 4. R Charlier vs A Schwartzman   0-1 65 1936 Mar del Plata it-03 B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 5. Panov vs O Rubtsova 1-0 31 1936 Trade Unions B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 6. Tartakower vs Rossolimo   1-0 27 1936 Paris B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 7. K Richter vs Pelikan   0-1 78 1936 Podebrady B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 8. L Roedl vs J L Ormond   1-0 28 1936 Munich Olympiad B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 9. R Arlauskas vs S Gudmundsson   0-1 33 1936 Munich Olympiad B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 10. V Gergenreder vs Moskaliev 0-1 28 1937 correspondence B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 11. P Trifunovic vs O Kavlie-Jorgensen   1-0 20 1937 7th olm final B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 12. V Petrov vs J Kolski   ½-½ 39 1938 Lodz B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 13. K Richter vs Szily   1-0 35 1939 Stuttgart B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 14. A Simonson vs Denker   ½-½ 36 1940 USA Ch B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 15. C J Corte vs J Canepa   1-0 45 1942 Mar del Plata B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 16. Prins vs P Devos   0-1 43 1945 Hastings B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 17. Chekhover vs Boleslavsky   0-1 61 1945 USSR Championship B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 18. Averbakh vs Kotov ½-½ 69 1946 RUS B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 19. W Elm vs C Toerber   1-0 19 1946 Bad Harzburg GER B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 20. Unzicker vs W Fleischmann   1-0 39 1946 Regensburg GER B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 21. C J Corte vs J Traian Iliesco   1-0 40 1946 Mar del Plata ARG B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 22. Prins vs Foltys   ½-½ 25 1947 Team match NED-CZE B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 23. Unzicker vs W Ernst   1-0 32 1947 Essen GER B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 24. Prins vs Sajtar   0-1 51 1948 Karlovy Vary B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack 25. Unzicker vs H Heinicke   ½-½ 37 1949 OLdenburg B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack  page 1 of 42; games 1-25 of 1,046    REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)

Jun-28-05    vampiero: Ok, so white has an astounding winning percentage in this opening, and we can see that this defense's popularity has gone way down in the past decade. but what is it due to, late catsling for black and no castling at all lead to kingside weakness, maybe because it takes to long for the b5 and a6 pawns to move while all of whites pieces are already developed? but why dont you guys look into the 1e4 c5 2Nf3 d6 3d4 cxd4 4Nxd4 Nf6 5Nc3 Nc6 6Bg5 e6 7Qd2 Be7 80-0-0 0-0 lines becuase black is much more safe than in the d7 lines. opinions? how can black get counterplay? Mar-30-08    hamworld: " 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O 0-0" will probably just end up with a bunch of exchanges leading to a drawish endgame. Its popularity might've gone down due to drawish lines. That, or maybe players prefer other sicilian openings. The late castling isn't horrible. I think I castled in the 37-39th move and won anyway. Not an expert or anything, I just want to comment. Mar-30-08    hrvyklly: <hamworld: " 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bg5 e6 7. Qd2 Be7 8. O-O-O 0-0"> I've always thought that this is totally sound for Black (unlike other lines of the Rauzer I could mention) and I have no idea why its popularity has waned. Kramnik stopped playing (for the most part) 1...c5 and switched to 1...e5 - I remember both Kramnik and Anand playing it in the 90s - which may account for it going out of fashion . Or p'haps as it is not as sharp as the Najdorf or Sveshnikov? Any stronger players want to chip in and explain what's wrong/dubious/uncomfortable playing this as Black? Jun-27-12    fisayo123: It seems slightly inferior to the other Sicilian variations. The bishop pair isn't necessarily worth the hassle with your king stranded at the center regardless of how solid blacks pawn structure seems.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community! If you already have an account, you should login now.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts. No personal attacks against other users. Nothing in violation of United States law. See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator. NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.