chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack (B81)
1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 e6 6 g4

Number of games in database: 1747
Years covered: 1938 to 2014
Overall record:
   White wins 44.0%
   Black wins 24.9%
   Draws 31.1%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
PRACTITIONERS
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Ljubomir Ljubojevic  24 games
Nigel Short  21 games
John Nunn  20 games
Mihai Suba  46 games
Ulf Andersson  31 games
Gyula Sax  28 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Karpov vs Sax, 1983
Karpov vs Dorfman, 1976
Karpov vs Hort, 1971
R Cardoso vs Petrosian, 1975
A Kosten vs Adorjan, 1988
J D Tisdall vs Judit Polgar, 1988
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 70; games 1-25 of 1,747  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. K Plater vs K Wojtyla 1-037 1938 Krakow (composition)B81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
2. Keres vs Bogoljubov 1-032 1943 SalzburgB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
3. O'Kelly vs M Christoffel 1-041 1946 GroningenB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
4. O'Kelly vs Stoltz 0-154 1946 GroningenB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
5. Keres vs K Plater  ½-½41 1947 MoscowB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
6. Simagin vs O Bogatyrev  ½-½40 1947 Ch MoscowB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
7. W Kuppe vs H Herrmann  ½-½33 1947 Lueneburg GERB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
8. O'Kelly vs Stahlberg  0-137 1948 Mar del PlataB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
9. Foguelman vs H Huguet  0-169 1951 ARG-chB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
10. B De Greiff vs Schmid  1-048 1954 Amsterdam ol (Men) pre-IVB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
11. R Fuchs vs Filip  1-059 1957 GothaB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
12. Krogius vs Petrosian  ½-½26 1958 USSR ChampionshipB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
13. Fischer vs Najdorf ½-½59 1960 Leipzig ol finB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
14. Jansa vs J Kozma 1-029 1960 Marianske LazneB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
15. Keres vs P Clarke 1-056 1960 Leipzig olB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
16. L Alster vs J Rejfir  1-052 1960 CSR-chB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
17. Bagirov vs A Movshovich 1-015 1960 28th USSR Ch Semi-finalsB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
18. Szabo vs P Clarke 0-134 1961 Hastings 1960/61B81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
19. Velimirovic vs A Shmit  0-130 1961 YUG-URSB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
20. K Darga vs M Bertok  1-043 1961 BledB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
21. Fischer / Barden vs Penrose / Clarke ½-½46 1961 BBCB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
22. Szabo vs B Milic  1-057 1961 Marianske Lazne ztB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
23. M Mihaljcisin vs M Bertok  ½-½34 1961 YUG-chB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
24. M Mihaljcisin vs J Stupica  1-040 1961 YUG-chB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
25. C Kottnauer vs F Parr  1-062 1962 Whitby British chB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
 page 1 of 70; games 1-25 of 1,747  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-16-04  PinkPanther: <Benjamin Lau>
Yes, that's the English Attack, although the example provided by Refutor was slightly more typical, but the Lutz-Berkes game was an English Attack nonetheless.
Feb-16-04  Benjamin Lau: PP: thanks, I don't play the English attack nor do I know much theory in the e4 lines so it was a hopeful guess on my part. What is the reputation of the English attack at the GM level?
Feb-16-04  PinkPanther: Well, I'm no GM but judging by the frequency with which it's played, I can tell you they think there's something to it. It's basically a race between the two pawnstorms, black's pawns on the queenside and white's pawns on the kingside. If white's attack is quicker then you get a game like the one between Kasparov and Van Wely that Refutor posted, but if Black's attack is quicker you get a game like this, where Grischuk got absolutely toasted on the queenside Grischuk vs Kasparov, 2001
Feb-16-04  Benjamin Lau: PP, thanks.
Feb-17-04  Gower: Zorro: Yes the yugoslav is a very sharp line against the dragon, but I would consider it the critical test, even if it is what black expects. The dragon is currently in trouble theoretically. Look in any chess book and it will give the yugoslav as the critical line in the dragon.
Jun-27-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hanada: <Phoenix>
The most critical refutation of ...Ng5, or at least the most fun is Bc5!?...the Traxler Counter Attack...AKA the Wilkes-Barre Variation.

I think the most critical answer to the Ruy Lopez is the Marshal Attack.

For the Caro-Kann, I like the Fantasy Variation.....1)e4 c6 2)d2 d5 3)f3....

For the Quens gambit, i just say screw it and play the KID. Alows for alot of flexibilty and creativity.

For the English...i just say screw it and and play the KID.....

:)

Jun-28-04  Shadout Mapes: <PP> Interesting, I found that the first 11 moves of the Kasparov - Van Wely game were column 19 of the Scheviningen in MCO. But I get it, it's more of an idea than a variation, a Saemisch/Yugoslav Attack for the Najdorf.
Aug-02-04  russep: what is the traxler attack?
Aug-02-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  refutor: traxler is 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 Bc5?! it's hardly a refutation
Aug-02-04  russep: thanks
Aug-07-04  joeyam30: wla lng!...hehehe
Oct-14-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hanada: <Refutor> With best play by both sides the Traxler is pretty much a forced draw. While it may not be a refutation it certainly a line that is a playable alternative to other choices.....mentioned below. Also, i forgot the name of the opening but it goes like this:

1)e4 e5 2)Nf3 Nc6 3)Bc4 Nf6 4)Ng5 d5 5)exd5 b5! ...is also awesome.

Oct-14-04  maoam: <Hanada>

I think that's the Ulvestad variation.

Oct-14-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: <Traxler> Has anybody looked at Heisman's CD from a few years ago? He claims to have made new important discoveries leading to crucial re-evaluations with computer help, something that indeed seems logical in such a tactical line. http://seagaard.dk/review/eng/sw_op... sums up some of the main results:

<White can still get a small but safe advantage by 5.Bxf7+, Ke7 6.Bd5 as stated by both Estrin and Cramer.

5.Nxf7, Bxf2+ 6.Kf1 is highly complex: Heisman found some improvements over Cramer in the critical 6...Qe7 7.Nxh8, d5 8.exd5, Nd4 9.d6!? that means that here 9...Qxd6 is properbly best with an unclear result.

After 5.Nxf7, Bxf2+ 6.Kxf2, Nxe4+ 7.Kg1 the best road for black is 7...Qh4 8.g3, Nxg3 9.Nxh8, Nd4! with at least a draw.

After 5.Nxf7, Bxf2+ 6.Kxf2, Nxe4+ 7.Ke3 is not losing as Estrin thought, but not winning either as some recent analysis has claimed. Highly complicated lines with the white king running around in the middle of the board. Unclear.

5.d4!? is an relatively easy way for white to avoid the main lines and get complex play where both sides can go wrong. Heismans analysis points to approximate equality.>

Oct-14-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hanada: <Acirce) Nice post.
Dec-21-04  Backward Development: I think that the most critical test for the najdorf may be the Be2 lines. Bg5 is certainly the most traumatic, but theory is theory and once you've got it, you have every hope to gain at least equality. but with the Be2, the 'pure najdorf'(...e5) white's attacks aren't based on tactical lines, he prefers a more positional approach, and when he does attack the kingside, it's in a more methodical approach. the restraint common within the system is rather annoying also.

i used to play the scheveningen move order, but the keres attack put me on the najdorf because after the ...h6 g5 hg Bxg5 lines, they are basically the Bg5 najdorf lines with less counterplay for black. while not a refutation, it does make it almost toothless.

Jun-12-05  BaranDuin: Hello,

I played a nice game with this line against the Accoona chess engine. Although the play is far from perfect, I like the finish.

Accoona still has much to learn before it can even think of avoid being totally cruhed by Kashimdzhanov.

PGN follows

[Event "Casual game"]
[Date "2005.06.12"]
[White "Baranduin"]
[Black "Accoona"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B81"]
[PlyCount "37"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e6 6. g4 h6 7. g5 hxg5 8. Bxg5 Bd7 9. Qd2 Nc6 10. O-O-O Nxd4 11. Qxd4 e5 12. Qe3 Ng4 13. Qd2 f6 14. Be3 Rxh2 15. Rxh2 Nxh2 16. Be2 Ng4 17. Nd5 Nxe3 18. Bh5+ g6 19. Bxg6# 1-0

Oct-12-05  AlexanderMorphy: i am not very fond of this opening, i prefer the najdorf...and so do the GM's!
Oct-12-05  csmath: Well, it is not bad opening for the white, according to statistics. :-)

Oct-13-05  AlexanderMorphy: yes it's not a bad opening, but the classical Scheveningen is more affective according to me!
Mar-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  suenteus po 147: Is 6.g4 the Keres attack? What I mean is, does g4 have to be played on the sixth move in this position of the Scheveningen, or is it possible to play a delayed Keres Attack in a position resulting from, say, the Najdorf? What would the benefits or drawbacks from such an approach?

For those of you who consider answering, I've just started playing both sides of the Sicilian, so I'm as clueless as they come. Thanks in advance for any help!

Mar-09-06  euripides: <suenteus> In the Najdorf 6 Be3 e6 7 g4 is usually called the Perenyi. It can transpose into the Keres attack, but Black can also play 7...e5 This gives positions different from the Keres attack often involving an early piece sacrifice by White, and is generally though better than 6...e5 in the Keres attack because White doesn't have the possibility of Bb5+.
Mar-09-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  suenteus po 147: <euripides> Thanks. I will have to look into those positions.
Jul-30-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  ganstaman: So how are things going with this opening -- ok for black, or should this be avoided? Anyone know the latest word?

In 2007, it seems to have scored +5 =3 -12 (so looks very good for black) by this database, but if anyone knows of certain lines to be avoided (from black's perspective), I'd like to not play something bad.

Jun-22-10  Catfriend: AFAIK it's quite dangerous, one of the main reasons Scheveningen isn't played frequently these days.

Here's an interesting correspondence game (2 days/ move) in the 6..Nc6 variation (considered dubious for Black):

[Event "27th GK tournament"]
[Site "http://gameknot.com"]
[Date "2005.12.02"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Catfriend"]
[Black "NN"]
[Result "1-0"]
[TimeControl "1/172800"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. g4 Nc6?! <(Stronger, according to theory, is 6..h6)> 7. g5 Nd7 8. Ndb5 <(Aggressive, and in my eyes - suiting the opening. 8.Be3 is perfectly fine, of course)> Nb6 <(Imprecise. 8..Ne5 is to be preferred)> 9. Bf4 e5 10. Be3 <(That's not a tempo waste, as Bf4, provoking e5, creates weaknesses in Black's pawn structure.)> a6 11. Bxb6!? <(The aggression goes on! 11.Na3 is the stable choice.)> Qxb6 12. Nd5 Qa5+ 13. Nbc3 Be6 14. Rg1 <(h4 is more consistent, but I've got a specific attack in mind.>) Rc8 15. Rg3 Nb4 16. Be2 <(At first glance, it looks like Black gets a comfortable Q-side pressure, his next move counter-punching White's K-wing...)> h6 17. g6 f5 18. Nf6+! <(Aye, there's the rub! Ignoring the sacrifice should, in the long run, serve Black well, but it's a very unpleasant move to make in a corr.game. The game might continue like that: 18..Kd8 19.a3 Na2 20.b4 Nxc3 21.Rxc3 Qa4 22.Rxc8 Bxc8 23.Qd5 with complications galore.)> gxf6 19. exf5! <(Even better than 19.g7 Bxg7 20.Rxg7 Rc6. Now, after the game move, 19..Bxf5 20.g7 Bxg7 21.Qxd6!! Nxc2+ 22.Kd2 Bg6 23.Qe6+ Kd8 24.Qd6+ Ke8 [to make sure Black never castles] 25.Bh5! wins for White. Another retreat with the bishop, 19..Bg8, falls short to 20.g7 Bxg7 21.Bh5+ Bf7 22.Rxg7. Relatively best would be to play 19..Bc4 20.g7 Bxg7 21.Bh5+ Kd7 22.Rxg7+ Kc6 23.Bf3+ d5, where Black can defend his monarch for a while)> Bd7? 20. g7 Bxg7 21. Rxg7 d5 22. a3 <(All more or less forced, till now.)> d4 <22..Nc6? 23.Bb5!! axb5 24.Qxd5 Rc7 25.Rg8+ Rxg8 26.Qxg8+ Ke7 27.0-0-0! and White's won. f.e. 27..b4 28.Qg7+ Ke8 29.Ne4 or 27..Bxf5 28.Nd5+ )> 23. axb4 Qxb4 24. Ra3 <(24.Bh5+ is possible as well. )> Qf8 25. Bh5+ Kd8 26. Rf7 Qg8 27. Ne4 (<27.Ne2 is the safe choice, but I was eager to finish the attack. )> Qg2 (<Perhaps, 27..Bc6 was worth considering. )> 28. Nd6 Rc7 29. Rg3 Qh1+ 30. Ke2?! <(30.Kd2 was safer, as will be seen. )> Qc6 <(After 30..Qxh2 31.Bf3, for example, the queen is weak. )> 31. Rxf6 Qxc2+ 32. Qd2 Rh7? <(Loses patience. 32..Qb1 prolongs the defense. )> 33. Rg8+ Ke7 34. Rfg6 Rf7 35. Qxc2 <(The queens just complicate things, creating all sorts of disturbances and threats. White's advantage is much easier to convert into a win without them. )> Rxc2+ 36. Kd1 Rxb2 37. Nxf7 Bxf5 38. R6g7 Ke6 39. Nxh6 Rb1+ <(The last throes. )> 40. Ke2 Rb2+ 41. Kf1 Rb1+ 42. Kg2 Be4+ 43. f3 <(Black's absolutely lost. He's a rook and a piece down, and now even his bishop's gone. Saving him by 43..Rb2+ 44.Kg3 Bc6 faces mate: 45.Rd8 and there's no escape. )> 1-0

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies