chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Sicilian (B89)
1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 e6 6 Bc4 Nc6
7 Be3

Number of games in database: 1132
Years covered: 1949 to 2017
Overall record:
   White wins 39.5%
   Black wins 32.3%
   Draws 28.2%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
PRACTITIONERS
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Dragoljub Velimirovic  38 games
Nick DeFirmian  25 games
John Nunn  19 games
Enrico Paoli  20 games
Dimitri Gurevich  20 games
Petar Popovic  13 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
W A Brown vs R Kneebone, 1985
A Ostapenko vs Yartsev, 1969
Velimirovic vs J Sofrevski, 1965
Fischer vs Geller, 1967
A Rubezov vs G Borisenko, 1960
Fischer vs Korchnoi, 1962
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 46; games 1-25 of 1,132  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Tartakower vs Pachman  ½-½41 1949 SouthseaB89 Sicilian
2. Geller vs J Vatnikov 1-018 1950 USSR Ch. Semi-FinalB89 Sicilian
3. Rossolimo vs L Marini  ½-½21 1950 Mar del PlataB89 Sicilian
4. Estrin vs Aronin  ½-½31 1950 GorkyB89 Sicilian
5. J Vesely vs Sajtar  ½-½22 1953 CSR-ch PragueB89 Sicilian
6. J Sefc vs J Jezek  1-038 1953 PragueB89 Sicilian
7. R McLellan vs K M Colby 1-031 1955 56th US OpenB89 Sicilian
8. R Cross vs Z Kovacs  1-028 1955 56th US OpenB89 Sicilian
9. R Cross vs Larry Evans  0-141 1955 56th US OpenB89 Sicilian
10. N Padevsky vs Botvinnik 0-125 1956 Alekhine MemorialB89 Sicilian
11. J Klovans vs Y Sakharov  1-032 1959 MoscowB89 Sicilian
12. Y Nikolaevsky vs Geller  0-146 1959 KievB89 Sicilian
13. J Fabian vs J Rejfir  ½-½104 1959 Cerveny KostelecB89 Sicilian
14. Lutikov vs Krogius  ½-½30 1959 USSR ChampionshipB89 Sicilian
15. Nezhmetdinov vs Krogius ½-½30 1959 USSR ChampionshipB89 Sicilian
16. A Rubezov vs G Borisenko 0-137 1960 USSR Correspondence ChampionshipB89 Sicilian
17. R Flores Alvarez vs Julio Bolbochan  1-039 1960 Sao Paulo (Brazil)B89 Sicilian
18. H Silva Nazzari vs E Kaszdan  1-040 1961 URUB89 Sicilian
19. I Bilek vs Petrosian 0-119 1961 EUR-chT (Men) 2ndB89 Sicilian
20. W Bialas vs C Clemens  ½-½21 1961 FRG-ch 06thB89 Sicilian
21. A Khasin vs Y Kots  1-032 1961 USSR Championship 1961bB89 Sicilian
22. Parma vs C Bielicki  1-020 1962 Mar del PlataB89 Sicilian
23. Velimirovic vs A Bradvarevic 1-024 1962 YUG-chB89 Sicilian
24. R Bogdanovic vs J Rejfir  1-050 1962 SarajevoB89 Sicilian
25. Fischer vs Korchnoi 0-145 1962 Curacao CandidatesB89 Sicilian
 page 1 of 46; games 1-25 of 1,132  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-01-04  russep: Isn't this the velimirovic attack against the classical scilian?
Aug-02-04  BiLL RobeRTiE: Scores would indicate otherwise, I suppose. ;) I have a question about this opening, too! After 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Bc4 e6 7. Bb3 Be7 8. Be3 0-0 9. Qe2 a6 10. 0-0-0 Qc7 11. g4 Nxd4, why does White so often play 12. Rxd4 (instead of 12. Bxd4)? Reducing the rook's mobility seems pretty illogical, especially when White's other choice puts his QB on what looks to me like its optimal square. Thanks!
Aug-02-04  PinkPanther: <russep>
Yes, it is.
Aug-02-04  russep: how come this site doesn't give it the proper name then?
Aug-02-04  Dick Brain: <russep> I think we need a few more moves until it becomes definitely a Velimirovic attack since it could still transpose into other versions of the Sozin. Wait at least until White castles queenside.
Aug-02-04  OneBadDog: I love the Velimirovic Attack. This is an honorable openining, unlike the Caro-Kann.
Aug-02-04  PinkPanther: <russep>
You're really supposed to play Qe2 before it's officially called the Velimirovic Attack, but whatever.
Aug-02-04  Dick Brain: <BiLL RobeRTiE> 12. Bxd4?! will lose the g-pawn after ...e5 although it will give White an open line against the black king. After 12. Rxd4 e5?! white can gain time with 13. Rc4 attacking the Queen. To avoid this decision, White sometimes plays 11. Rg1 instead of 11. g4.

You are right in principle that having a Bishop(rather than a Rook) on d4 pointed against the Black king would be a terrifying threat that would have to be dealt directly by black and not ignored.

Still, there is an intersting attacking possibility for such a rook on d4: sometimes White will sacrifice a pawn by playing e5!? which allows the rook a path to h4 and opens a jumping square on e4 for a knight. Very scary for Black. See Bronstein's and Velimirovic's games in my collection of Velimirovic attack games.

Aug-02-04  BiLL RobeRTiE: <Dick Brain> Thanks a lot! :)
Aug-03-04  OneBadDog: What is the soundest response to the Velimirovic, the lines where black castles or the lines where black delys castling?
Aug-07-04  Dick Brain: I prefer castling. If you don't you'll soon see a knight sac -> Nf5! in order to open up the d5 square for the other knight. Very scary. Actually, that can happen if you are castled as well, and there it's only about half as scary even though it might be equally strong.
Apr-11-06  WTHarvey: Here are 20 traps and zaps from Sicilian (B89) miniatures: http://www.wtharvey.com/b89.html What's the best move?
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC