chessgames.com
Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4 (B93)
1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 a6 6 f4

Number of games in database: 2007
Years covered: 1949 to 2014
Overall record:
   White wins 36.9%
   Black wins 29.9%
   Draws 33.2%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
PRACTITIONERS
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Andrei Sokolov  27 games
Gyula Sax  20 games
Vitaly Tseshkovsky  19 games
Boris Gelfand  20 games
Ljubomir Ljubojevic  19 games
Nick DeFirmian  18 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Tal vs M Pasman, 1953
Ivanchuk vs Kasparov, 1994
Ravinsky vs G Ilivitsky, 1952
Anand vs Kasparov, 1992
Szabo vs Petrosian, 1952
Van der Wiel vs Browne, 1980
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 81; games 1-25 of 2,007  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Geller vs Taimanov ½-½73 1949 USSR ChampionshipB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
2. Nezhmetdinov vs Aronin 1-030 1950 URS chB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
3. Suetin vs Aronin  0-141 1950 USSR ChampionshipB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
4. J Pogats vs C Kottnauer  ½-½41 1950 Szczawno Zdroj it, POLB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
5. Averbakh vs C Kottnauer 0-1102 1950 Szczawno Zdroj it, POLB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
6. Foltys vs Reshevsky  0-140 1950 AmsterdamB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
7. C Kottnauer vs Szabados  1-032 1950 AmsterdamB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
8. Pilnik vs Szabados  1-071 1950 AmsterdamB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
9. Nezhmetdinov vs V Soloviev  ½-½33 1950 GorkyB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
10. Averbakh vs Bronstein 0-142 1951 USSR ChampionshipB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
11. Pinkus vs Larry Evans  0-161 1951 New York, USA ChB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
12. E Pedersen vs Pachman  0-141 1951 Marianske Lazne - PrahaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
13. Gligoric vs Pirc  1-028 1951 Bad Pyrmont ztB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
14. Gligoric vs E Kuebart  1-063 1951 Bad Pyrmont ztB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
15. J De Moura vs Gligoric 0-124 1951 Bad Pyrmont ztB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
16. H Kramer vs E Paoli  1-071 1951 Bad Pyrmont ztB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
17. J De Moura vs E Paoli  1-027 1951 Bad Pyrmont ztB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
18. E Paoli vs P Lob  1-027 1951 ITA-SUIB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
19. E Paoli vs E Romani  ½-½44 1951 Reggio EmiliaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
20. C J Corte vs C F Juarez  1-039 1951 Buenos AiresB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
21. Shocron vs O Garibaldi  ½-½41 1951 Buenos AiresB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
22. E German vs W De Oliveira  1-027 1951 FortalezaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
23. Janosevic vs M Germek  1-035 1951 SarajevoB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
24. J Moura vs A Pomar-Salamanca  ½-½22 1951 MadridB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
25. J Sanz vs R Toran Albero  ½-½28 1951 MadridB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
 page 1 of 81; games 1-25 of 2,007  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-23-03  dicoAMS: i'm unable to go through the games please help.
Oct-11-04  AdrianP: What's the current state of theory in the 6. f4 Najdorf - it doesn't seem to be played much at top level anymore.

What's the recommended mainline: 6...e5 7. Nf3 Nbd7 ...?

Oct-12-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: <AdrianP> I think it had an upsurge when Nunn and Gallagher recommended it in <Beating the Sicilian>.. And yes, that would be the main line. 6..e5 7.Nf3 Nbd7 8.a4 Be7 9.Bd3 0-0 10.0-0 something like that. The pawn-grabbing 10..exf4 11.Bxf4 Qb6+ 12.Kh1 Qxb2 is dangerous but interesting.
Oct-12-04  AdrianP: Thanks <acirce> that's v. helpful. I noticed that Leko ventured an outing with this against Kasparov Leko vs Kasparov, 1999 but the game ended in a draw, but am surprised to see pretty much nothing else at top-level in the last 5 years.
Oct-12-04  Dick Brain: The line <acirce> gives as the main line is the main line given by NCO, and it is a fairly recent treatment (not worrying about Bc4 for White). There are many other contunuations that are still used, but that is the popular one when Black wants to steer into Boleslavsky hole positions. 6...e6 going to the Scheveningen is a very common move and 6...Qc7 intending ...g6 later is pretty popular. Also, I don't think either 6...g6 or 6...Nbd7 have been refuted.

IIRC 6. f4 got somewhat popular in the 1970's when some English players had some successes with it. Maybe <acrice> is right that 6. f4 had another surge in the 90's in some quarters, but not in these parts: I haven't seen anyone around here take it up. Still, you would or course be smart to have a little something prepared for somebody who has studied Beating the Sicilian.

Oct-12-04  AdrianP: Thanks <Dick Brain>, helpful as well. <Still, you would of course be smart to have a little something prepared for somebody who has studied Beating the Sicilian.> Is there any particular line you recommend?
Oct-13-04  Dick Brain: <AdrianP> Look at Browne's games with the B93 Sicilian here on chessgames.com for several good ideas on how to combat this as Black.
Oct-26-04  AdrianP: <Dick Brain> Thanks. As a token of gratitude here's a Velimorovic Attack Classic from Christiansens Rocking the Ramparts for your collection...!

Nunn vs C W Pritchett, 1986

Christiansen gives two more Velimorovic Attack Classics namely Szmetan v Garcia, Malaga 1976 and Boto v Bostic, Bosnia 2001 but I cannot find these either on this database or on my Megabase.

Aug-03-05  farrooj: What's wrong with 6..e5 7Nf3 Be6, followed by Nc6 and d5?
Aug-03-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Willem Wallekers: <farrooj: What's wrong with 6..e5 7Nf3 Be6?> 8. f5 & 9.Bc4
Aug-03-05  russep: I think that this variation favours white from the time 6.f4 is played. It seems solid for white and hard for black especially if white plays a4, and all of blacks counterplay must be in the centre.
Feb-05-06  BaranDuin: <acirce:The pawn-grabbing 10..exf4 11.Bxf4 Qb6+ 12.Kh1 Qxb2 is dangerous but interesting.>

Isn't 12. Qd4 better? Black can't take on b2 (Rfb1 traps the queen) and after ...Qxd4 13. Nxd4 Ne5 14. Bd5 White seems to have a space advantage.

Sep-17-08  hicetnunc: I've just played this line by accident in a blitz game - do you guys think it's viable for black ? : 6.f4 Qc7 7.Nf3 g6 8.e5 dxe5 8.fxe5 Ng4 9.Nd5 Qa5+ (not in chessgames.com database but it creates weaknesses) 10.b4 Qd8 11.h3 e6 12.Nc3 Qc7 13.hxg4 Qc3+ 14.Bd2 Qc7
Oct-15-10  GilesFarnaby: <AdrianP: What's the current state of theory in the 6. f4 Najdorf - it doesn't seem to be played much at top level anymore.

What's the recommended mainline: 6...e5 7. Nf3 Nbd7 ...?>

You´re right about it not being very popular, ´tho it has kind of resurrected this year at GM (not super-GM generally) level, with goods results for white, you maybe want to look up at World Cup games.

Statistically the best way to respond to an early Najdorf f4 is with the classicals e6 or e5.

If the f4 is played in lieu of the traditional f3 beggining the English Attack the main line has been simplifying with exf4, but an early open game in Najdorf generally satisfies White´s better diagonals, so I would rather advice you taking the initiative with Ng4, a very good line for Black in rapid games(amongst other things because of the surprise factor), in long games it has a poor record due to the fact that the weaknesses that it created in white´s position are utterly defensible with some care and strategic instinct; in blitz/rapid games playing the Ng4 line usually means going ahead in the clock, and we know how important is that!


click for larger view

See for example this game, where black doesn´t fully allow the board to be completely opened (otherwise white´s bishops will roll over black knights´ impotence:

[Event "EU-chT (Men)"]
[Site "Debrecen"]
[Date "1992.??.??"]
[Round "9"]
[White "Brunner, Lucas"]
[Black "Kuczynski, Robert"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B90"]
[WhiteElo "2500"]
[BlackElo "2500"]
[PlyCount "68"]
[EventDate "1992.11.??"]
[EventType "team"]
[EventRounds "9"]
[EventCountry "HUN"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "1999.07.01"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3 e5 7. Nb3 Be6 8. f4 Ng4 9. Bd2 Qb6 10. Qf3 exf4 11. Qxf4 Nd7 12. Be2 Nge5 13. O-O-O Rc8 14. Be3 Qc7 15. Nd4 b5 16. Kb1 Nf6 17. a3 Be7 18. Nf5 Bxf5 19. exf5 O-O 20. Bd4 Rfe8 21. g4 Qc6 22. g5 Nd5 23. Nxd5 Qxd5 24. h4 Qc6 25. Bc3 a5 26. f6 Bf8 27. fxg7 Bxg7 28. Rhf1 b4 29. axb4 axb4 30. Qxb4 Rb8 31. Qd4 Rec8 32. Rf3 Qb7 33. Rdf1 Rxc3 34. Qxc3 Nxf3 0-1

I have spoken about the pawn-storming possibilities of f4 here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVi_...

<dicoAMS: i'm unable to go through the games please help.>

Maybe you want to take a look at my free video tutorial from the very beggining:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxdQ...

Anyway, any questions you have I´ll be attentive in case I can help/cooperate with something

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies