Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Sicilian, Najdorf (B94)
1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 a6 6 Bg5

Number of games in database: 984
Years covered: 1940 to 2017
Overall record:
   White wins 36.8%
   Black wins 39.2%
   Draws 24.0%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Mikhail Tal  11 games
Alexander Motylev  8 games
Dragoljub Velimirovic  8 games
Anton Korobov  17 games
David J Eggleston  10 games
Zhou Jianchao  10 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Spassky vs Petrosian, 1969
A Volokitin vs Mamedyarov, 2012
M Stean vs Browne, 1974
Nikitin vs Tal, 1959
Nezhmetdinov vs Petrosian, 1954
Tal vs Korchnoi, 1959
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 40; games 1-25 of 984  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Konstantinopolsky vs E Gerstenfeld  1-044 1940 Lvov corrB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
2. D Ackerman vs R Pohle  1-035 1949 50th US OpenB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
3. N Bergqvist vs Pilnik 0-142 1950 Dubrovnik olmB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
4. V Liublinsky vs Kotov  0-140 1952 Ch MoscowB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
5. Tal vs A Darznieks 1-030 1953 Riga chB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
6. Krogius vs G Borisenko 1-020 1953 USSR Team ChB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
7. L Barden vs Sajtar  ½-½22 1954 Amsterdam ol (Men) fin-AB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
8. Byvshev vs Tolush 0-136 1954 Leningrad ch-cityB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
9. Bronstein vs B Milic 1-041 1954 BelgradeB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
10. Eigil Pedersen vs Sajtar  ½-½23 1954 Prague ztB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
11. Bronstein vs B Rabar  ½-½17 1954 BelgradeB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
12. Nezhmetdinov vs L Shamkovich 1-034 1954 URS-ch sfB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
13. Nezhmetdinov vs Vvedensky 1-039 1954 USSR Team ChB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
14. L Schmid vs Edmund Adam  1-017 1954 Dyckhoff mem-A corr5456B94 Sicilian, Najdorf
15. Nezhmetdinov vs Petrosian 0-144 1954 URS-ch21 Kiev ,URS-chB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
16. Byvshev vs Furman  1-042 1954 21st Soviet ChampionshipB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
17. E Joppen vs B Rabar  1-035 1954 Amsterdam ol (Men)B94 Sicilian, Najdorf
18. Keres vs Sajtar 1-020 1954 Amsterdam ol finalB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
19. R Bogdanovic vs B Rabar  ½-½16 1955 YUG-chB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
20. A Bannik vs S G Lebedev  1-050 1955 URS-ch 1LB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
21. M Bertok vs E Paoli  1-068 1955 LjubljanaB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
22. B Rabar vs Udovcic  1-030 1955 YUG-chB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
23. L Shamkovich vs E Kuzminykh  1-050 1955 Ch URS (1/2 final)B94 Sicilian, Najdorf
24. Janosevic vs M Bertok  0-142 1955 YUG-chB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
25. E Paoli vs B Milic  1-046 1955 LjubljanaB94 Sicilian, Najdorf
 page 1 of 40; games 1-25 of 984  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-03-04  Backward Development: no notable games for such a theoretical line as this?? i would recommend spassky-fischer, a good polugaevsky line, and of course a kasparov win.
Dec-04-04  Backward Development:
Never mind, i just explored some more and came to the conclusion that this code is for lines in which black avoids the main lines... sorry for the 'slander'.
Premium Chessgames Member Right, most of the notables are found here Sicilian, Najdorf (B96). In any case, we have no control over what is "notable", it's determined simply by the number of appearances in game collections.
Dec-04-04  Backward Development: gotcha. wow, do you guys have a 'rapid response team'? i just wrote my last post about...a minute and a half ago! pretty impressive...
Oct-01-06  hicetnunc: Does anybody know a refutation of 6.Bg5 e5?!
Dec-06-06  notyetagm: From GM Danny King's Najdorf update at

<Game 6, Mueller-Kasimdzhanov features a system that is growing in popularity:

click for larger view

I know that Tony has discussed this before, but I'm bringing you up-to-date with the latest games and giving my own views. I find this system attractive, not least because of an important practical consideration: it comes fairly soon in the game so there is less chance of White deviating and avoiding it. Moreover, in securing the e5 square for the knight, the idea has a sound positional basis.>

[Event "Mainz Ordix open"]
[Site ""]
[Date "2006.??.??"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Müller, Matthias"]
[Black "Kasimdzhanov, Rustam"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "2401"]
[BlackElo "2672"]
[NIC "SI 6.2"]
[ECO "B94"]
[PlyCount "60"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 Nbd7 7. f4 e6 8. Qf3 h6 9. Bh4 e5 10. Nf5 exf4 11. O-O-O g5 12. Bf2 Ne5 13. Qe2 Bxf5 14. exf5 Bg7 15. h4 Qe7 16. hxg5 hxg5 17. Rxh8+ Bxh8 18. Qd2 O-O-O 19. Bb6 Re8 20. Qxd6 Qxd6 21. Rxd6 Ned7 22. Bg1 Ng4 23. Rd1 Bxc3 24. bxc3 Ne3 25. Bxe3 Rxe3 26. Kd2 Nc5 27. Bc4 f6 28. Rh1 Re5 29. Rh7 Rxf5 30. Rf7 f3 0-1

Apr-17-08  sentriclecub: Can someone explain further the pros/cons beyond what this amateur sees.

<> of 6...e6
P-is the most popular reply
P-adds better coverage to the center
P-very flexible
C-pins the knight
C-black has 1 piece developed to white's 3
C-Qa5 can lead to doubled f-pawns after Bxf6

<> 6...Nbd7
P-develops a piece
P-knight can attack e5 twice when white plays f4
P-Qa5 works good to scare white and unbook him
C-blocks in the light square bishop
C-slower to castle by one tempo

Premium Chessgames Member
  KingG: <sentriclecub> Counting against 6...Nbd7 is also the fact that it might be a bit premature to commit the knight to d7. That is not only because you might want to put it on c6, but also because you weaken the e6 square by blocking in the bishop. This could leave you vulnerable to sacrifices on e6, since 7.Bc4 is the most popular reply to 6...Nbd7. By the way, this may also be the reason that 6...e6 is more popular: White finds it more difficult to place both his bishops on their ideal attacking squares c4 and g5. Of course, there is nothing preventing 6...e6 7.Bc4, but Black then finds it easier to equalise then after 6...Nbd7 7.Bc4.

In any case, I don't think generalities help that much in these positions. 6...e6 is more popular simply because analysis and practice indicates that it's a better move. Even Petrosian played 6...Nbd7, so I don't think there is anything obviously wrong about it. However, I must say that in sharp positions I like to have the option of castling as quickly as possible, even if I don't end up using it.

Apr-18-08  sentriclecub: Thanks KingG, what a fast reply. I think I'll go with 6...e6 next time I face Bg5 on
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC