Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Sicilian, Najdorf (B96)
1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 a6 6 Bg5 e6
7 f4

Number of games in database: 1577
Years covered: 1937 to 2017
Overall record:
   White wins 36.2%
   Black wins 34.4%
   Draws 29.4%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Thomas Luther  14 games
Milan Matulovic  14 games
Mikhail Tal  12 games
Lev Polugaevsky  47 games
Maxime Vachier-Lagrave  26 games
Boris Gelfand  25 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Tal vs NN, 1963
Spassky vs Rashkovsky, 1973
H Westerinen vs G Sigurjonsson, 1977
Yudasin vs Kasparov, 1981
Shirov vs Anand, 2008
Z Mackic vs A Maksimenko, 1994
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 64; games 1-25 of 1,577  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. L Steiner vs Najdorf 0-133 1937 WarsawB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
2. Keres vs O Katajisto  1-034 1954 Amsterdam ol prelB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
3. J Sefc vs F Pithart  1-058 1954 CSR-chB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
4. A Laurencena vs Najdorf  0-128 1955 ARGB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
5. A Fuderer vs Panno ½-½50 1955 Gothenburg InterzonalB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
6. Geller vs Najdorf  ½-½19 1955 Gothenburg InterzonalB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
7. Keres vs Stahlberg 0-141 1955 Gothenburg InterzonalB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
8. B Rabar vs Panno  ½-½26 1955 Gothenburg InterzonalB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
9. B Rabar vs Najdorf 1-032 1955 Gothenburg InterzonalB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
10. P Santos Isain vs Najdorf  0-125 1956 MontevideoB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
11. H Bouwmeester vs Larsen  0-156 1956 CopenhagenB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
12. Ragozin vs V Borsony  1-034 1956 2nd World Correspondence Chess ChampionshipB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
13. V Zurakhov vs Spassky  ½-½40 1956 USSR ChampionshipB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
14. Keres vs Panno 1-067 1956 Amsterdam CandidatesB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
15. L A Sanchez vs Benko  ½-½50 1956 Moscow ol (Men)B96 Sicilian, Najdorf
16. C H Alexander vs Larsen 0-140 1956 Hastings 1956/57B96 Sicilian, Najdorf
17. Polugaevsky vs B Andersen 1-034 1957 Reykjavik tt stud-WMB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
18. J Zacharias vs F Rubio Aguado  0-125 1957 Sao PauloB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
19. L T Da Silva vs C Humerez Estrada  0-124 1957 Rio de Janeiro ztB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
20. Keres vs Letelier 1-029 1957 SantiagoB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
21. Tal vs Larsen 1-025 1957 ReykjavikB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
22. F Blatny vs Feuerstein  1-027 1957 WchT U26 04thB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
23. R Persitz vs Lombardy  0-141 1957 WchT U26 04thB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
24. Gipslis vs Korchnoi  0-140 1958 Ch URS (1/2 final)B96 Sicilian, Najdorf
25. J Fichtl vs Tal 0-184 1958 MunichB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
 page 1 of 64; games 1-25 of 1,577  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
May-02-04  chessplayermatthew: why dose 6 Bg5 e6 better then 6 ... e5?
May-02-04  BiLL RobeRTiE: 6...e5? cedes control of d5 with little compensation, i.e. 7. Bxf6 Qxf6 8. Nd5 or 7. Bxf6 gxf6 and White is significantly better.
Premium Chessgames Member
  refutor: will anyone else ever champion polugayevsky's 7. ...b5!? i think it might be a good try for a surprise weapon
Feb-09-05  akashic: I ran it on Fritz, black apparently gets a slightly better game after 8. e5.
Feb-09-05  BiLL RobeRTiE: Perhaps that's why 8. Qe2 is considered the best move (8. e5 dxe5 9. fxe5 Qc7 10. exf6 Qe5+ should offer little for White). Any thoughts 7...b5 in general?
Feb-15-06  reekingskunk: it's not possible to do a position search on it if you're not a member...could a member link to position search for the polugaevsky variation? that would be very helpful
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dr. Funkenstein: Just to give white players more ammo, 6. ...e5? allows 7. Nf5! and the pressure just keeps building on Black since white will castle queenside. Black can only play e5 after white plays f5 when the knight can no longer jump to f5. In the Be2 variation, Black can allow Nf5 because he can then play d5 followed by d4 with the bishop blocking the e file.

I actually was posting because I had a question about the Danner variation.

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 e6 7. f4 Be7 8. Qf3 Qa5!? 9. 0-0-0 Bd7 then usually ...Nc6 followed by a knight retreat to b3 which allows black an easier time of playing h6 and g5.

Normally 8. ...Qc7 is played followed by 9. 0-0-0 and 10. g4

My question is what if white goes ahead with his usual threat of g4 and h4? Does black have tricks based on a double attack with e5. It seems to me though this is a little hollow and white can just get on with blowing black off the board. I'd love to hear some thoughts by better players than a patzer like myself.

Premium Chessgames Member
  suenteus po 147: Just finished a game against <WannaBe> where he played the often seen 7...Qc7 and I responded with 8.Qd2, but the only problem is that 8.Qd2 is not in the database. What gives? Is it an opening blunder? Does it fall into a trap?
Apr-13-06  Open Defence: <suenteus po> I believe 8Qd2 does not sufficiently pressure the central files in the manner that Qf3 does .. hence Black can manage to equalize and probably even maintain a slight edge.. I do not believe it is a blunder losing any material .. the stronger analysts and those with Chess engines could probably take this further
Apr-13-06  AdrianP: Link to Polugaevsky variation:

Premium Chessgames Member
  suenteus po 147: <Open Defence> Thank you, that is instructive.

<AdrianP> Any reason you are highlighting the Polugaevsky variation?

Apr-13-06  AdrianP: <sp147> ...someone asked for a link to it above.
Premium Chessgames Member
  suenteus po 147: <AdrianP> Oh, sorry. I didn't see it because it was two months ago. lol
Jan-27-07  positionalgenius: I have been playing this opening more often to increase my tactical skills,with mixed results.
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: I usually play 7...Nbd7 in this case. But please keep in mind, the line is still very much transposable, and in theory.

"That's all I have to say about that." -- F. Gump

Premium Chessgames Member
  KingG: <suenteus po 147> <Just finished a game against <WannaBe> where he played the often seen 7...Qc7 and I responded with 8.Qd2, but the only problem is that 8.Qd2 is not in the database. What gives? Is it an opening blunder? Does it fall into a trap?>

click for larger view

In addition to what has already been said, i'd like to add that Qd2 is usually not a good idea in the 6.Bg5 Najorf, because it often runs into tricks based on ...Nxe4. For example, in this case Black could play 8...Be7, and now after the plausible 9.0-0-0, comes 9...h6 with the threat of 10.Bh4? Nxe4!. And if 10.Bxf6, then Black gains the two bishops. I'm not sure if this is the best continuation, but it's a possibility.

The most common form of this tactic is possibly after the moves 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.Qd2?!, which i've had a few times in blitz.

click for larger view

Black then plays 7...h6!, which leaves White with the choices of

8.Bh4? Nxe4!, and Black wins an important central pawn.

8.Bxf6 Bxf6, and Black has the two bishops.

8.Be3 Ng4!, and again Black has the two bishops.

Premium Chessgames Member
  suenteus po 147: <KingG> Thanks for those instructive little examples. I think you have some typos in your notation, but I get your meaning loud and clear :)
Premium Chessgames Member
  KingG: <suenteus po 147> You're right, I guess it should have been 8.Bxf6 Qxf6. :-)
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC