chessgames.com
Two Knights (C58)
1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bc4 Nf6 4 Ng5 d5 5 exd5 Na5

Number of games in database: 402
Years covered: 1835 to 2009
Overall record:
   White wins 43.3%
   Black wins 38.6%
   Draws 18.2%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
PRACTITIONERS
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Enrico Paoli  15 games
John Van der Wiel  7 games
Adolf Anderssen  6 games
Mikhail Chigorin  5 games
Mark Hebden  4 games
Bogdan Sliwa  4 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Bronstein vs E Rojahn, 1956
Bogoljubov vs Euwe, 1941
Anderssen vs Falkbeer, 1851
De Riviere vs Morphy, 1863
Balk vs Barnes, 1926
Steinitz vs Chigorin, 1892
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 17; games 1-25 of 402  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. W Wayte vs E Williams 0-121 1835 EnglandC58 Two Knights
2. Anderssen vs Von Der Lasa 0-134 1846 BreslauC58 Two Knights
3. Dufresne vs Von Der Lasa 1-020 1850 BerlinC58 Two Knights
4. Anderssen vs Falkbeer 1-041 1851 BerlinC58 Two Knights
5. Kieseritzky vs Anderssen  1-038 1851 LondonC58 Two Knights
6. Anderssen vs Zytogorski 1-034 1851 LondonC58 Two Knights
7. Cochrane vs Mohishunder  1-037 1856 CalcuttaC58 Two Knights
8. Fiske / Fuller / Perrin vs Morphy 1-049 1857 Hoboken, USAC58 Two Knights
9. Morphy vs S Boden 1-050 1858 London (England)C58 Two Knights
10. Morphy vs P Maude 1-034 1859 LondonC58 Two Knights
11. De Riviere vs Morphy 0-154 1859 LondonC58 Two Knights
12. Morphy vs Mongredien  1-029 1859 ParisC58 Two Knights
13. NN vs Paulsen 0-118 1859 UnknownC58 Two Knights
14. F Deacon vs Kolisch 0-124 1860 LondonC58 Two Knights
15. De Riviere vs Anderssen  1-039 1860 ParisC58 Two Knights
16. Horwitz vs E Pindar 0-123 1861 ManchesterC58 Two Knights
17. Anderssen vs Dufresne 0-132 1861 RotterdamC58 Two Knights
18. Anderssen vs NN  1-033 1861 RotterdamC58 Two Knights
19. Steinitz vs F Burden 0-135 1862 LondonC58 Two Knights
20. De Riviere vs Morphy 0-120 1863 ParisC58 Two Knights
21. J Minckwitz vs R Schurig  1-052 1865 LeipzigC58 Two Knights
22. Schiffers vs A Schulz  0-124 1866 St PetersburgC58 Two Knights
23. De Vere vs E D'Andre 1-026 1867 ParisC58 Two Knights
24. I Turgenyev vs Kolisch 0-120 1870 Baden-Baden +C58 Two Knights
25. Anderssen vs E Schallopp 1-027 1877 Leipzig OffhandC58 Two Knights
 page 1 of 17; games 1-25 of 402  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

heart failure community and support group

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing >
Aug-13-03   Shadout Mapes: No, I play 5.O-O with either 5...Bc5 6.e5 (Max Lange) or 5...Nxe4 6.Re1 etc. I've analyzed all the lines and found at least equal positions in all. They make for exciting games. Anyone want me to spew out some analysis, just ask.
Aug-13-03   PVS: My main opening system as white featured the Scotch Gambit-Classical Two Knights Defence-Max Lange Attack.
Aug-13-03   Emil Tyson: Tony Miles blitzed John Nunn in 1969 in a superb 20-move Max Lange Attack at the British Under-18 Championship.
Aug-13-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: <Shadout Mapes> I play 4. d4 as well as 4. Ng5 depending on my opponent and my assessment of which line will give them the most problems. I've had good results with both lines, but prefer 4.d4 against stronger players.
Jan-10-04   youngplayer11: <Shadout Mapes>i play 4.d4 too.i also play two knights as black and find 4.d4 very iratating be couse white gets the gambit possibilitys instead of black.thats why i dont play 4.Ng5
Jan-10-04   BiLL RobeRTiE: The practical problem of playing 1...e5 is the fact that White can choose to bore you with lines like 4. d3 versus Two Knights. I enjoy playing the black side of the Ruy, Ng5 two knights, two knights with d4, and king's gambit, but the fact that the majority of players will opt for a more boring continuation has driven me back to the dragon.
Jan-10-04   Benjamin Lau: Bronstein vs E Rojan, 1956 is an interesting two knights game.
Feb-14-06   Bobak Zahmat: Interesting. When the above position arires on the board White wins 42,7% and Black 40,1%. So there is a tiny chance to draw the game after reaching the mentioned position.
Feb-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  refutor: <bobak> that's mostly because half the games were from pre-1900. and the other half are played in the brazilian girls U10 championship :)
Feb-14-06   Bobak Zahmat: <refutor> Still, this position should be analysed well, before we judge too fast about the it.
Feb-14-06   Bobak Zahmat: Even the great Adolf Anderssen had some trouble with playing this Defense with White. Out of six games he has lost two.
Feb-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  micartouse: <Bobak> If you haven't already, take a look at 5 ... Nd4!? (right into the center) instead of the above 5 ... Na5!? There are many fun and respectable lines springing from the "Fritz Variation."

A common snare: 6. d6?! Qxd6 7. Nxf7 (7. Bxf7+ Ke7 intending ... h6) Qc6 8. Nxh8? (8. 0-0 is still much better for Black) Qxg2 9. Rf1 Qe4+ 10. Be2 Nf3#.

There are many other wild variations as well after 6. c3 b5. Very good practical opening I think and it doesn't require too much prep.

Feb-14-06   Bobak Zahmat: <micartouse> I like 5. ... Na5 more than the move Nd4. Because after 6.c3 Nf5 White has the better game with d4!?
Feb-14-06   Bobak Zahmat: <micartouse> The move 6.d6 isn't that strong. White will lose the initiative and probably the game with your continuation.
Feb-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  micartouse: <Bobak> True, Na5 is a great move too, I was just throwing it out there for anyone into "somewhat sound" gambits for Black.

I agree that in the Fritz, 6. c3 is the best option for White, but 6 ... b5! not ... Nf5? Then for instance, 7. cxd4 bxc4 8. dxe5 Qxd5!

White rarely knows 7. Bf1! is best, and even then Black has a little (but not enough) compensation for the pawn.

Anyone who plays the Fritz at class level will not be disappointed if they like risky sharp chess.

Feb-14-06   Bobak Zahmat: <micartouse> It is quite right that not everyone could find 7.Bf1! But if one takes enough to think it through this move should be seen, because it is actually forced.
Feb-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  micartouse: <But if one takes enough to think it through this move should be seen, because it is actually forced.> Not to be overly picky, but there are other moves such as 7. Bd3 that retain the pawn for White and seem more correct, and such moves are more commonly seen in practical play. So 7. Bf1 is not forced by any means.

Even after 7. Bf1, Black gets some tricky attacking options. I will let the point go though; I just think gambit lovers have a sound gambit in the Fritz and an easy one to play. Anyone under 2100, and probably a little over will find it a safe bet. :)

Feb-14-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  refutor: morozevich played 7.Bd3 Morozevich vs Timman, 1996
Mar-02-06   trumbull0042: What are the main strategies for Black, who is down two pawns, in the following line: 1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Nf6
4. Ng5 d5
5. exd5 Na5
6. Bb5+ c6
7. dxc6 bxc6
8. Qf3 Rb8
9. Bxc6+ Nxc6
10. Qxc6+ Nd7
11. d3 Be7 ?

Thanks for your help.

Mar-02-06   trumbull0042:


click for larger view

Mar-13-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  refutor: i agree trumbull...this is one of the main reasons why i don't play the "mainline" of the two knights as Black and prefer 6. ...Bd7, which is more passive but playable
Jul-16-08   jon01: My opponent went to a trap that loses queen in the opening.

[Event "2337848"]
[Site "kurnik"]
[Date "2008.07.16"]
[Round "4"]
[White "jon01"]
[Black "lokatorki"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Time "13:15:03"]
[TimeControl "180"]
[WhiteElo "1705"]
[BlackElo "1811"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Na5 6. Bb5+ c6 7. dxc6 bxc6 8. Qf3 h6 9. Ne4 Qd5 10. Nxf6+ gxf6 11. Qxd5 Be6 12. Bxc6+ 1-0

Feb-20-09   FiveofSwords: <micartouse> The fritz variation is perfectly playable for either side, for anyone with rating less than about 3500.
Feb-20-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  drkodos: trumbull0042: What are the main strategies for Black, who is down two pawns, in the following line: 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6
3. Bc4 Nf6
4. Ng5 d5
5. exd5 Na5
6. Bb5+ c6
7. dxc6 bxc6
8. Qf3 Rb8
9. Bxc6+ Nxc6
10. Qxc6+ Nd7
11. d3 Be7 ?

I take black side of this ANYDAY.

Wow, here is some "comp"

12. Ne4 Rb6
13. Qa4 f5
14. Ng6 0-0
15. Nd2 Nc5

Stick that on your silicon chipset and see if it doesn't show Black is almost equal.

Now many possibilities as Black has initaive, better piece develop and a King to attack. It is winning? No it is equal with some Chess to play!

For instance,

16. Qa5 Bb7 ?!
17. Nc4? Nxd3+ !

This 'tabiya' position of the Two Knights after 10. ...Be7 is one of the most important in chess to play because it really is fantastic demonstration of positional compensation for sacrificed material when no regaining material is to be had immediately.

Learn to play this as Black and your chess will get better in many, MANY positions.

Feb-20-09   chessman95: I've never tried this before as black, but I might play it in a few Two Knights games that I play. Looks like a fairly solid option.
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing >
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | new kibitzing | chessforums | new games | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2009, Chessgames.com
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies