chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense (D57)
1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 Bg5 Be7 5 e3 O-O 6 Nf3 h6
7 Bh4 Ne4 8 Bxe7 Qxe7

Number of games in database: 151
Years covered: 1927 to 2014
Overall record:
   White wins 35.1%
   Black wins 16.6%
   Draws 48.3%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
PRACTITIONERS
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Miguel Najdorf  3 games
Ludek Pachman  3 games
Vadim Malakhatko  3 games
Erich Eliskases  6 games
Jan Hein Donner  4 games
V Liberzon  4 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Deep Fritz vs Kramnik, 2002
Ivanchuk vs Jakovenko, 2010
Gligoric vs Keres, 1958
Topalov vs Anand, 2010
Euwe vs E Eliskases, 1938
R Grau vs E Eliskases, 1939
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 7; games 1-25 of 151  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. G Norman vs G A Thomas  1-055 1927 Hastings 1926/27D57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
2. Vidmar vs K Treybal  ½-½31 1934 UjpestD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
3. E Eliskases vs Gruenfeld ½-½27 1934 UjpestD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
4. Gruenfeld vs L Steiner  ½-½30 1934 UjpestD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
5. Euwe vs E Eliskases  0-142 1935 ?D57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
6. Vidmar vs Stahlberg  ½-½24 1935 OlympiadD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
7. Fine vs A N Towsen  1-037 1935 ACF CongressD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
8. Euwe vs E Eliskases 0-150 1938 NoordwijkD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
9. S Landau vs G A Thomas 1-052 1938 Hastings 1938/39D57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
10. A Dahke vs J Gadalinski  ½-½47 1938 KrakowD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
11. G van Doesburgh vs R Broadbent  0-150 1938 ENG-NEDD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
12. R Grau vs E Eliskases  0-138 1939 Buenos Aires ol-finD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
13. Kieninger vs E Eliskases  ½-½36 1939 GER Ch 6thD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
14. Najdorf vs W Cruz  1-037 1939 Buenos Aires ol f-A ;HCL 37D57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
15. Stahlberg vs L Piazzini 1-033 1939 Buenos AiresD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
16. S Landau vs E Spanjaard  1-027 1939 Baarn IID57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
17. Foltys vs P Vaitonis  ½-½33 1939 Buenos Aires ol (Men) f-AD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
18. E Eliskases vs Vidmar  ½-½44 1939 StuttgartD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
19. Bogoljubov vs E Eliskases  ½-½54 1939 StuttgartD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
20. J Vinuesa vs J M Cristia  0-128 1939 RosarioD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
21. Gilg vs R Keller  0-142 1940 GER Ch 7thD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
22. Guimard vs E Eliskases  0-139 1941 Mar del Plata D57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
23. M Brunoehler vs H G Lachmann  1-050 1941 GER-chD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
24. Stahlberg vs M Czerniak  1-051 1941 Buenos Aires CirculoD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
25. P Frydman vs B Schneidermann  1-032 1941 Aguas de Sao PedroD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
 page 1 of 7; games 1-25 of 151  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

from the Chessgames Store

Kibitzer's Corner
May-17-04  popski: Again one of those openings where author didn't use it. Lasker defence and there is no Lasker games with this opening?! Also somewhere they call this opening Lasker system, why difference in naming?
Oct-06-04  themindset: also, the diagram doesn't match the opening at all. there should be a black Knight on e4 and a white pawn on c4 and a black pawn on d5 ......
Oct-06-04  Whitehat1963: They should call this the "Eliskases Defense." He has five of the first nine uses of it as black, and he won four of those five and drew the remaining game. Not bad for someone I've never heard of, using a defense I've never seen before today. But to call it the "Lasker Defense," why?
Oct-06-04  ughaibu: Eliskases was a strong player: Eliskases vs Capablanca, 1937
Feb-16-05  Dudley: Lasker invented this line for Black and he did use it-check the database.
Feb-16-05  Dudley: I checked the database and the Lasker games are under D53-the only difference is that he played 6..Ne4 and left out ...h6. The move ...Ne4 is characteristic of the Lasker defense.
Feb-16-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  IMlday: Lasker tried to leave out ..h6 so he would have the h6 square for a Rook later.
Feb-17-05  Dudley: That makes sense. It's kind of a spoiler opening but I guess White maintains at least a small edge. I can't get over the massive statistical advantage for White in almost all lines of the QGD.
Mar-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gypsy: <They should call this the "Eliskases Defense." ... Not bad for someone I've never heard of ...> Eliskases star shone the brightest right before WW2. Bright enough that there were already negotiations going for him getting a title-shot against Alekhine.
Jun-20-05  vampiero: i like this defence, its actually one of my favorites. Especially when i'm not in the mood for any tense tactical positions, i try to use this to simplify the position in hopes of a draw in the endgame, or maybe even a win
Jun-21-05  vampiero: one the Queens Gambit Declined DVD that Kasparov put out, he has a special segment on the Laskers defence and he says that instead of playing ... Ne4 cxd4 Nxc3 bxc3 exd4 to simplify, one could play ...Ne4 Rc1 to complicate things, followed by Nxc3 Rxc3 dxc4 Bxc4
Jun-21-05  maoam: That's the approach Karpov tried in his match with Yusupov (probably the strongest player to use this line regularly) after getting nothing from 9.Qc2 or cxd5 (see Karpov vs Yusupov, 1989 , Karpov vs Yusupov, 1989, and Karpov vs Yusupov, 1989).
Jun-22-05  vampiero: theory wise, what is the general goal for white in the Rc1 or the cxd4 Nxc3 bxc3 exd4 variations? or the goal for black?
Jun-22-05  Assassinater: < Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense (D57) 1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 Bg5 Be7 5 e3 0-0 6 Nf3 h6 7 Bh4 Ne4 8 Bxe7 Qxe7 >

What happened to the knight on e4 in the picture?

Jun-23-05  vampiero: well in the picture, they continued it with one of the more popular lines, going cxd4 Nxc3 bxc3, and thats the picture, generally the next move is exd4
Jun-29-05  aw1988: The Lasker Defense (there is also one in the Evans' Gambit) is one of those openings where the idea of "black to equalize" is seen full force.
Jul-09-06  James Demery: Does anyone know of any games where Lasker played this defense? I understand he didn`t play h6 whuch does create a weakness.
Jul-09-06  James Demery: Did I really spell which as whuch?
Jul-10-06  FHBradley: <James Demery:> He played it at least against Marshall on a couple of occasion in 1907, but without h6. The opening moves would be 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. e3 Ne4. I didn't check the chessgames.com-database for these games.
Jul-10-06  FHBradley: <James Demery:>

Marshall vs Lasker, 1907

Marshall vs Lasker, 1907

Marshall vs Lasker, 1907

Jul-10-06  James Demery: Thanks FHB. I remember that first game was the game of the day , but I totally missed that it was Lasker`s Defense. Thanks again.
Dec-26-07  Cactus: <cg.com> The opening moves shown totally don't match the position diagram :P
Aug-28-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  parisattack: Close to bulletproof! White gets the slightest edge but if he presses (Topalov-Anand) it can backfire on him.
Sep-06-13  Penguincw: Opening of the Day

Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e3 O-O 6.Nf3 h6 7.Bh4 Ne4 8.Bxe7 Qxe7

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies