page 1 of 14; games 1-25 of 331  Game   Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening 1. Samisch vs Gruenfeld   ½-½ 22 1922 Bad Pistyan it, CZE D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 2. Colle vs Gruenfeld 1-0 57 1925 Baden-Baden D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 3. J Dobias vs Burian   1-0 63 1932 Kautsky mem D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 4. Euwe vs Alekhine 1-0 41 1935 Alekhine-Euwe World Championship Match D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 5. Tartakower vs P Frydman   1-0 24 1935 Lodz D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 6. H Friedmann vs I Solin   1-0 32 1935 Olympiad D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 7. Dake vs C H Alexander   1-0 42 1935 Olympiad D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 8. Vidmar vs Koltanowski   1-0 46 1936 Hastings D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 9. Kotov vs S Gotthilf   ½-½ 24 1938 Leningrad-ch D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 10. S Landau vs Golombek   ½-½ 34 1938 Hastings D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 11. M Suarez Davila vs De Ronde   0-1 50 1939 Buenos Aires ol (Men) prel-C D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 12. Reshevsky vs Pinkus 1-0 34 1940 New York D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 13. Reshevsky vs I A Horowitz   ½-½ 27 1941 Ch USA (match) D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 14. Fine vs Reshevsky 1-0 74 1942 New York USA speed ch (10-sec/move), USA D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 15. Kashdan vs Reshevsky 0-1 39 1942 USA-ch playoff-1pl D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 16. Reshevsky vs H Baker   1-0 30 1942 New York D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 17. S Bernstein vs Pinkus   ½-½ 61 1942 Ventnor City D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 18. Fine vs C Ruberl   1-0 27 1945 New York bf simul (8-board), USA D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 19. Vaughan vs Purdy 0-1 7 1945 corr AU D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 20. A Rothman vs Santasiere   0-1 45 1946 New York ch-USA D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 21. G Katz vs D Byrne   ½-½ 30 1946 US Open prelim D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 22. T Van Scheltinga vs Stoltz   ½-½ 33 1947 Aalborg DEN D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 23. H Herrmann vs W Laaser   1-0 36 1947 Lueneburg GER D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 24. Heitner vs Santasiere   0-1 64 1948 South Fallsburg ch-USA D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4 25. Gligoric vs Boleslavsky   ½-½ 18 1948 Saltsjobaden izt D82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4  page 1 of 14; games 1-25 of 331    REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)

a real life chess murder mystery

Sep-10-06    WTHarvey: Here is a little collection of puzzles from D82 miniatures: http://www.wtharvey.com/d82.html Mar-02-09    FiveofSwords: for me playing the gruenfeld, this line was always one of the most terrifying things to see from white. I hated playing against this. White can proceed modestly, but completely without compromise or concession, and just grind you down mercilessly while you have no conceivable method to play actively that is halfway sound. Apr-28-09    TheChessGuy: <FiveofSwords> Have you ever tried the Brinckmann Attack? 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Bf4 Bg7 5.e3 c5!? It takes the game into sharper, more tactical territory. White is not as able to put the grind on your position, which is always good. Check out the 1986 Kasparov-Karpov World Championship Match, London/Leningrad for some examples of this line, and the closely related Hungarian Attack in the Three Knights. Today, 4.Bf4 is starting to become uncommon, as it is considered to be somewhat drawish. From the statistics above, the game is drawn eleven percent more of the time than White wins. Apr-28-09    WhiteRook48: not used to 3...d5

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community! If you already have an account, you should login now.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts. No personal attacks against other users. Nothing in violation of United States law. See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator. NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.