page 1 of 20; games 1-25 of 487  Game   Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening 1. E R Lundin vs Fine 0-1 29 1937 Stockholm it, SWE E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 2. S Landau vs Pirc   0-1 66 1939 Hastings 1938/39 E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 3. Szabo vs E Melngailis   1-0 61 1939 Kemeri E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 4. Menchik vs Graf-Stevenson 1-0 74 1939 Women's World Championship E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 5. Alatortsev vs Levenfish   ½-½ 51 1940 Leningrad (Russia) E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 6. C Vlagsma vs Kmoch   ½-½ 35 1940 Rotterdam KB E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 7. Lilienthal vs Boleslavsky   0-1 39 1942 10 Kuibyshev ,HCL 32 E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 8. Ravinsky vs Ragozin   0-1 40 1942 Ch Moscow E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 9. B Ratner vs Ragozin   ½-½ 58 1945 USSR Championship E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 10. Kotov vs Estrin ½-½ 37 1946 Ch Moscow E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 11. Lilienthal vs Averbakh ½-½ 28 1946 RUS E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 12. Smyslov vs Averbakh 1-0 68 1946 Moscow E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 13. Pachman vs Ragozin   ½-½ 57 1947 Moscow E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 14. M Raizman vs G Abrahams   0-1 51 1947 Hastings 1946/47 E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 15. G H Gudmundsson vs G Abrahams   ½-½ 20 1947 Hastings 1946/47 E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 16. Levenfish vs Taimanov   0-1 40 1948 USSR Championship E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 17. Ragozin vs Bondarevsky   0-1 64 1948 USSR Championship E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 18. Taimanov vs Tolush   ½-½ 37 1948 USSR Championship E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 19. Levenfish vs Bondarevsky 1-0 34 1948 USSR Championship E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 20. Kotov vs T Florian   1-0 36 1949 Match \\ E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 21. Levenfish vs Taimanov   ½-½ 43 1949 Ch URS (1/2 final) E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 22. Levenfish vs Lilienthal ½-½ 40 1949 USSR Championship E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 23. Ragozin vs Szabo   0-1 41 1949 Budapest (Hungary) E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 24. Ragozin vs Smyslov 0-1 41 1949 USSR Championship E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 25. G Hartleb vs A Sandrin   ½-½ 76 1949 50th US Open E53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3  page 1 of 20; games 1-25 of 487    REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)

Mar-31-05    dac1990: Opening question, or debate: after 7.0-0, which is better, 7. ...Nc6, or 7. ...dxc4? I'm trying to add the Nimzo to my repetoire, but I don't know which to use, and what kind of game both lead to. Mar-31-05    Helloween: It depends on what type of middlegame position you are aiming for. 7...dxc4 followed by 8...Nbd7 leads to more open positions, Black often playing b7-b6 and fianchettoing his Light Bishop or putting it on e6 - Kramnik vs Anand, 2001 7...Nc6 is the ultimate main line which leads to more closed positions with the centre often blocked. The Light Bishop often goes on f5. White has more choices in this line, especially at move 11, and if he can can open the position he will usually have a big advantage as in Kramnik vs Tiviakov, 2001. Here is an example of Black exploiting the closed centre in this line - Cherepkov vs Tseshkovsky, 1968. Notice the ineffectiveness of White's Dark Bishop locked behind the pawn chain. Here is an example of Black exploiting the closed centre in this line. Notice the ineffectiveness of White's Dark Bishop locked behind the pawn chain.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community! If you already have an account, you should login now.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts. No personal attacks against other users. Nothing in violation of United States law. See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator. NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.