< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 7 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Apr-28-04 | | iron maiden: When did Kavalek leave Czechloslovakia and come to America? Around 1970, wasn't it? |
|
Apr-28-04 | | WMD: Kavalek "emigrated to Germany in 1968, settled in Washington DC two years later, and became a US citizen." |
|
May-27-04 | | WMD: Kavalek was sacked by Nigel Short as his coach during the 1993 WC match against Kasparov. Short's side of things can be read in Lawson's book The Inner Game. Kavalek struck back with The Kavalek Files which appeared in the BCM in 1994. |
|
May-27-04 | | AdrianP: <WMD> I've read the Inner Game but had not heard of the Kavalek files... what did Kavalek have to say about the whole thing? |
|
May-27-04 | | Jim Bartle: From what I remember from what I assume is more or less the same article in Inside Chess, a lot of the breakup related to money, which openings to play, and Lawson's role. The article I remember included an awful lot of great stuff on how top players prepare for matches, especially opening preparation. (I think they concentrated on the Marshall as black, then Kasparov never allowed Short to play it.) |
|
May-27-04 | | WMD: Yes, the material sounds very similar. In the BCM, six articles appeared over consecutive months. The first five focused on Short/Kavalek's opening preparation and how it impacted on the match itself. Kavalek takes most of the credit for himself and does not paint Short in a particularly favourable light. In the sixth instalment, Kavalek addresses the break-up directly and has harsh words for his ex-pupil. |
|
May-27-04 | | Jim Bartle: Sounds identical. |
|
May-27-04 | | WMD: "On September 13 I was analysing with Speelman and Hübner, showing them what I had found in the Sicilian Rauzer featured in game 2 of the match. Suddenly Rea Short and Michael Stean appeared. After the other two seconds left, they informed me that Nigel wished me to depart for the United States. I was to leave the hotel within twenty four hours. "Nigel was nowhere in sight. Obviously it would have been interesting to hear what he had to say. I was not sure what his actual reason was. But, in any event, it was useless to argue. We had made an agreement in Reston that if we ever ran into problems, we should sit down and talk about them. Instead, as I learned later, Nigel had followed the biblical admonition that "the guilty flee where no man pursueth" and hid out on Dominic Lawson's sofa. To play really safe, he should have been under it. "In Dominic Lawson's book on the match he writes that when he asked Rea why they did not talk about the problems with me, she said: "I am going to be all sweetness and light, the model of hypocrisy. He will not know what I am thinking. But when the time comes, I will act. And so will Nigel." Obviously, under these circumstances, a working relationship was no longer possible. "Jonathon Speelman was disappointed that Short lacked the courage to speak to me about it personally, and Robert Hübner, when I asked him what Short's problem was, simply said to me: "It's emotional."" |
|
May-27-04
 | | Gypsy: Daniel King (How Good is Your Chess?, 1993) writes this about Short: "The fight through the final of the World Championship has brought out a sense of purpose in Nigel Short which was previously lacking. He concentrated all his efforts on the Candidates matches, preparing with a thoroughness which is perhaps customary in Eastern Europe, but is unknown to most other English chess professionals. "A good example of his change in approach is his play in the opening. Whereas a few years ago his main aim in this phase of the game would have been to avoid a theoretical struggle, he now actively courts one." Sounds to me that Kavalek did a stellar job and Short was a blody fool to sac him. Its probably not coincidental that Short's playing strength has been slowly ebbing since. Short has plenty of chess talent; flaw is in his character. |
|
Jun-07-04 | | WMD: When Short changed his mind and decided to make himself available for the English team for the 1994 Olympiad in Moscow (after the PCA, in the guise of Kasparov, stepped in to bail out FIDE), one of his conditions was the removal of Murray Chandler as the team captain: "My objections to Chandler were simple: over the past several months he, in his capacity as Editor of the British Chess Magazine, has published and continues to publish articles which are not only damaging to me professionally but are untrue and abusive. I refer specifically to the so-called Kavalek Files although these were by no means the only biased and profoundly unfair articles on me to have appeared in his magazine. This point was readily conceded by three of the four selectors (Michael Adams, Bob Wade and Simon Brown. I did not speak to Nunn) in telephone conversations to me. Even Chandler himself, also in a telephone conversation to me, admitted the Kavalek Files were "unethical" although he was unable to acknowledge that the publishing of them was equally so. It is difficult to see how I could trust or have confidence in the integrity of such a person as captain." (Chess, November 1994) |
|
Oct-11-04
 | | Joshka: Has Kavalek ever published or spoken about how his "training match' with Fischer prior to Bobby's match in '72 went? Also I have read (don't recall now where) that Kavalek actually replaced Lombardy as Bobby's helper or maybe second, for most of the latter games in that first Spassky match in '72? Kavalek would really be entitled to write about Bobby and give his version of happenings if this were all true. |
|
Oct-11-04 | | iron maiden: Training match with Fischer? I never heard of any such thing, though I did read that there were rumors (from unreliable sources) that Spassky and Karpov played a training match prior to the WC in Iceland. |
|
Oct-12-04
 | | Joshka: <iron maiden> Yes....it's in one of my many chess books...I just have to find it again...I think I know where I read about it...and when I do will give you the info....in fact this statement about their training match in this book is the only reference I have ever found. |
|
Oct-12-04
 | | keypusher: In Brad Darrasch's Bobby Fischer v. the Rest of the World it's reported that Fischer wound up working more with Kavelek than Lombardy. No idea if it is true. I read somewhere (maybe Darrasch again?) that Karpov, when he came to the US in 1972 for the San Antonio tournament, confirmed that he had played a training match with Spassky and added "I didn't lose." Given his subsequent record against Spassky, I can well believe it. |
|
Oct-12-04
 | | Joshka: <iron maiden> <keypusher> Allright the quote is in Gufeld's book "Bobby Fischer from chess genius to Legend" page 82. After Karpov had beaten Korchnoi in the candidates Finals from 1974...."Bobby played a private training match with GM L. Kavalek, which was soon joined by IM Bernard Zuckerman."....I apologize for thinking it was in preparation for Spassky in 1972. |
|
Oct-12-04 | | WMD: <I read somewhere (maybe Darrasch again?) that Karpov, when he came to the US in 1972 for the San Antonio tournament, confirmed that he had played a training match with Spassky and added "I didn't lose." Given his subsequent record against Spassky, I can well believe it.> This is contradicted by what Karpov wrote in his autobiography, Karpov on Karpov (and quoted in Russians vs Fischer): "Then suddenly - imagine - I received an invitation to attend the
Spassky training session... This was an honour. True, my star too was rising swiftly, my name already carried considerable weight, and I had received my share of support. But all this was new to me, and the backstage preparations for a world title match seemed to me something like a secret altar. To be there, to peer into this holy of holies was something I could not have imagined a mere year earlier... And so I went to the Spassky session. "Of course I was not allowed anywhere near the holy of holies. I was
considered a chance person and potentially dangerous. Therefore I
was only occasionally invited to take part in some trite and non-essential analysis of one of Fischer's games. "I was amazed to see Spassky doing nothing.
"Usually the morning would begin with him enthusiastically recounting,
over breakfast, another episeode from the Greek myths, which he loved
dearly and read before going to bed. Then there would be tennis. Then
something else. Anything except chess. At the time he was expounding the 'theory' of a clear head. With a clear head and refreshed, he would,
with his talent, outplay anyone. This theory had been invented by his coach
Bondarevsky so as somehow to justify the World Champion's pathological
laziness. Although I too consider myself lazy, Spassky's laziness astonished me. I was certainly not impressed by the fact that he had been able to win his match with Petrosian after such 'preparation.' With all due credit to Petrosian, I felt even then that the experience of the match with him could not be simply extrapolated to the coming match with Fischer. These were not just different people; Fischer symbolized the coming of an entirely new type of chess. Was this not obvious?... "Toward the end of the training session, Spassky - wishing to test his
form - decided to play a few games with me. In the first he asked me
to open with the Ruy Lopez. I had the white pieces and soon obtained
a won position, but - overplayed my hand and lost. Spassky liked the
game. He decided that he was in excellent form and that there was no
point in continuing the test. My participation in that last training
session before the match was practically confined to that one game." |
|
Oct-12-04
 | | keypusher: Thanks, <WMD>, for the correction. I had never heard that story. Very interesting about Spassky! |
|
Oct-13-04
 | | cu8sfan: I recently read "Bobby Fischer Goes to War" and that's what they say, too, that Spassky was lazy and didn't work very hard on his preparation. Maybe if he would have Fischer might never have become World Champion. |
|
Feb-18-05 | | Albertan: GM Kavalek writes a column for the Washington Post which you can read at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy... |
|
Feb-18-05 | | Appaz: Why not put such links to chess columns in the biography <cg.com> ? |
|
Apr-09-05 | | Caissanist: Nice story about how Kavalek made it to the west, from TWIC. Looks like he calculated all the variations correctly and made the right move. http://www.chesscenter.com/twic/eve... |
|
Apr-30-05
 | | offramp: Here is one of my favourite games of his: Portisch vs Kavalek, 1975 |
|
Apr-30-05 | | ChessHistorian: What does he do now? |
|
Apr-30-05 | | Caissanist: I was actually reminded of that exact game when I read the story of how he made it to the west. In both cases he faced what seemed to be a hopeless position against a very strong but rather unimaginative adversary, and so decided to do something "crazy" that his opponent could not possibly have planned for. To me, it takes the same kind of mind to sacrifice a queen for a bishop out of the opening as it does to spend all your tournament winnings on vodka (to use for bribes). Or, more to the point, to do it successfully. |
|
Jun-18-05 | | Where is my mind: Does Lubomir Kavalek still write his chess column @ washingtonpost.com? The last one was posted april 18. |
|
 |
 |
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 7 ·
Later Kibitzing> |