chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

  
Rybka (Computer)
Number of games in database: 190
Years covered: 2005 to 2014
Overall record: +120 -26 =34 (76.1%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      10 exhibition games, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (23) 
    B90 B97 B80 B91 B22
 Ruy Lopez (19) 
    C92 C78 C84 C99 C76
 Sicilian Najdorf (11) 
    B90 B97 B91
 Ruy Lopez, Closed (10) 
    C92 C84 C99 C88 C96
 Petrov (6) 
    C42 C43
 Semi-Slav (5) 
    D43 D45 D46 D44
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (31) 
    B51 B92 B28 B47 B40
 Semi-Slav (8) 
    D47 D43 D44
 French Defense (7) 
    C16 C03 C18 C11 C14
 Sicilian Najdorf (6) 
    B92 B90 B96 B98
 Grunfeld (5) 
    D91 D85 D78 D97 D79
 Sicilian Taimanov (4) 
    B47 B48 B49
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Stockfish vs Rybka, 2009 0-1
   Rybka vs Shredder, 2009 1-0
   Rybka vs Deep Sjeng, 2009 1-0
   Rybka vs Shredder, 2007 1-0
   Rybka vs Pandix, 2010 1-0
   Deep Junior vs Rybka, 2010 0-1
   Rybka vs HIARCS, 2010 1-0
   The King vs Rybka, 2006 0-1
   Deep Gandalf vs Rybka, 2006 0-1
   Rybka vs Diep, 2007 1-0

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   6th International CSVN Tournament (2006)
   17th World Computer Chess Championship (2009)
   15th World Computer Chess Championship (2007)
   Paderborn Computer Championship (2006)
   10th International Computer Tournament (2010)
   Clash of the Computer Titans (2007)
   WCCC 2006 (2006)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   2012/2013/2014 Tournaments by wanabe2000
   Computer - GM games 2003-2007 by biglo
   nTCEC Computer Chess Tournament by shoshonte
   Brilliancies by computers by ryanpd
   Odds games #3 by WhiteRook48
   Brilliant games from chess computers by gabriel112000
   tea4twonty's favorite games by tea4twonty

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Rybka (Computer)
Search Google for Rybka (Computer)


RYBKA (COMPUTER)
(born 2004) Czech Republic

[what is this?]
Rybka (Czech for "little fish") is a computer chess engine designed by IM Vasik G Rajlich. It supports both single processor and SMP systems. Iweta Radziewicz Rajlich is the main tester & Hans van der Zijden is one of her operators. Jeroen Noomen & Jiri Dufek co-authored her opening book. At the WCCC 2006 (2006), Rybka, playing under the name Rajlich, tied for 2nd place with Shredder (Computer), and behind the champion, Junior (Computer). Rybka won the 15th World Computer Chess Championship in Amsterdam, 2007 and the 16th World Computer Chess Championship in Beijing, September 28th to October 5th 2008 with 8.0/9 (+7 -0 =2). During 2009-10, she also became the World Computer Speed Chess Champion.

In 2011, the International Computer Games Association (ICGA) ruled that Raljich had plagiarized two other programs, Crafty and Fruit, disqualified him for life from competing in the World Computer Chess Championship and all other ICGA events, and stripped Rybka of the championship titles it had won in 2006 through 2010.


 page 1 of 8; games 1-25 of 190  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Rybka vs Shredder ½-½57 2005 IPCCCB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
2. Rybka vs Gandalf 1-046 2005 ?B12 Caro-Kann Defense
3. Spike vs Rybka 1-069 2005 15. IPCCCE39 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Pirc Variation
4. Zappa vs Rybka 0-177 2005 IPCCCE12 Queen's Indian
5. Rybka vs Jonny 1-021 2005 Blitz:110'C69 Ruy Lopez, Exchange, Gligoric Variation, 6.d4
6. Ikarus vs Rybka 0-157 2005 IPCCCB00 Uncommon King's Pawn Opening
7. Rybka vs Argonaut 1-037 2005 IPCCCC68 Ruy Lopez, Exchange
8. Ant vs Rybka 0-134 2006 6th International CSVN TournamentA58 Benko Gambit
9. GridChess vs Rybka  0-157 2006 Paderborn Computer ChampionshipD97 Grunfeld, Russian
10. Rybka vs L Rojas  1-052 2006 Copa Entel ,D90 Grunfeld
11. Shredder vs Rybka 1-053 2006 WCCC 2006C44 King's Pawn Game
12. Rybka vs Slow Chess Blitz  1-057 2006 CCRL 40/40D43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
13. Zor Champ vs Rybka 1-087 2006 CSS/Pal Freestyle Tourney Final (45+5)B92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation
14. Rybka vs Granda Zuniga 1-047 2006 Torre ENTEL PCSB19 Caro-Kann, Classical
15. Rybka vs IsiChess 1-051 2006 26th Dutch CCC95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer
16. Rybka vs M Flores 1-025 2006 Copa Entel ,E10 Queen's Pawn Game
17. The King vs Rybka 0-178 2006 6th International CSVN TournamentB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
18. Rybka vs Jonny ½-½66 2006 WCCC 2006C92 Ruy Lopez, Closed
19. Shredder vs Rybka 0-148 2006 26th Dutch CCB47 Sicilian, Taimanov (Bastrikov) Variation
20. Rybka vs Deep Gandalf 1-057 2006 6th International CSVN TournamentC42 Petrov Defense
21. Rybka vs Jonny 1-052 2006 Paderborn Computer ChampionshipC42 Petrov Defense
22. R Felgaer vs Rybka  0-138 2006 Copa Entel ,B51 Sicilian, Canal-Sokolsky (Rossolimo) Attack
23. Rybka vs Diep 1-058 2006 WCCC 2006B91 Sicilian, Najdorf, Zagreb (Fianchetto) Variation
24. Ikarus vs Rybka 0-171 2006 WCCC 2006B40 Sicilian
25. The Baron vs Rybka  0-169 2006 26th Dutch CCA46 Queen's Pawn Game
 page 1 of 8; games 1-25 of 190  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Rybka wins | Rybka loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 63 OF 79 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-25-09  Pawnsgambit: Rybka will completely destroy Anands and Kramniks of this world. In a 12 game match Top shot GMs would hardly be able to draw 2-4 games; Rybka has never been beaten by a human in classical time control.
Jun-25-09  Pawnsgambit: I would still like to see engines running and beating GMs without table bases and opening books.
Jun-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <Pawnsgambit> I occasionally play in the engine room on Playchess with a Rybka without an opening book and TBs - exclusively against humans. So far it is unbeaten (there were some draws though and no GM played it, but a couple of IMs (all IMs were beaten btw, the draws were all against ~2200s by repetition nearly in the opening).
Jul-06-09  Dionyseus: Highendman is the first centaur to beat the Rybka 4 beta cluster:

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybka...

Here's the clean pgn:

[Event "Friendly Game, 60m + 30s"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2009.07.05"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Highendman, Centaur"]
[Black "Rechenschieber, Rybka 3g55 cluster"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C43"]
[PlyCount "144"]
[EventDate "2009.07.05"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bd3 d5 5. Nxe5 Nd7 6. Nxd7 Bxd7 7. O-O Bd6 8. c4 c6 9. cxd5 cxd5 10. Nc3 Nxc3 11. bxc3 O-O 12. Qh5 f5 13. Qf3 Kh8 14. Bd2 Qa5 15. Rfe1 Rae8 16. a4 Rxe1+ 17. Rxe1 Bc6 18. Bc2 Qb6 19. Bc1 Qc7 20. h4 h6 21. g4 Qf7 22. g5 hxg5 23. hxg5 g6 24. Bf4 Bxf4 25. Qxf4 Re8 26. Rxe8+ Qxe8 27. Qe5+ Kh7 28. Bb3 a5 29. Qf6 Qd7 30. Kh2 Qg7 31. Qe5 Qxe5+ 32. dxe5 Kg7 33. Kg3 Kf8 34. f4 b6 35. Kf2 Kf7 36. Ke3 Ke7 37. Kd4 Ke6 38. Bd1 Ke7 39. Bf3 Bxa4 40. Bxd5 Be8 41. c4 Kd7 42. c5 bxc5+ 43. Kxc5 Ke7 44. Kb6 a4 45. Ka5 Kf8 46. Kb4 Bd7 47. Bf3 Ke8 48. Bd1 Kf8 49. Bxa4 Bc8 50. Kc5 Ke7 51. Bb3 Ba6 52. Bg8 Be2 53. e6 Bf3 54. Bf7 Be4 55. Kd4 Bf3 56. Bxg6 Kxe6 57. Bh7 Bh5 58. Kc5 Bg4 59. Bg8+ Kd7 60. Kd5 Ke7 61. Ke5 Kf8 62. Be6 Kg7 63. Bxf5 Be2 64. Be4 Kf8 65. f5 Ke8 66. f6 Bc4 67. g6 Bf7 68. g7 Kd7 69. Bd5 Ke8 70. Bxf7+ Kxf7 71. Kf5 Ke8 72. g8=Q+ Kd7 1-0

According to Highendman, the game is won from move 32.

Jul-08-09  Isbjorn: Does anyone know if there has been any recent computer chess tournament where the chess programs did not use an opening book? Or what Rybka's estimated rating is when it doesn't use its opening book?
Jul-08-09  blacksburg: that would be interesting, computer tournament with no opening books.

don't worry about rybka, it would still destroy 99.99% of humans with no opening book and giving pawn and move odds. :)

Jul-11-09  Dionyseus: The Rybka team has issued an open challenge to anyone with a quad or better, or a FIDE rating over 2000, to play against the Rybka 4 beta running on their cluster monster:

http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybka...

So far the cluster with Rybka 4 beta has lost only one game out of 24 against top centaurs. +9-1=14

Jul-11-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SamAtoms1980: I would love to do this, but all I have is a single processor with Fritz 6 running on it. Even if we'd be cannon fodder I'd like to see just what makes Rybka so dominant over every other engine. But if I were to ask, I'd probably be laughed off.
Jul-11-09  Dionyseus: The Rybka 4 beta cluster just lost another game, to the same centaur! This is the first time Rybka 4 beta has lost with the white pieces, a great achievement by Highendman:

[Event "60m + 1s, unrated"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2009.07.11"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Rechenschieber, Rybka 3g55 cluster A"]
[Black "Highendman"]
[Result "0-1"]
[PlyCount "105"]
[EventDate "2009.07.11"]
[EventType "rapid"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3 e5 7. Nb3 Be6 8. f3 h5 9. Qd2 Nbd7 10. Nd5 Bxd5 11. exd5 g6 12. Be2 Bg7 13. h3 h4 14. O-O O-O 15. Rfe1 Rc8 16. Rac1 Nh5 17. Na5 Qc7 18. c4 Ng3 19. c5 dxc5 20. b4 Qb6 21. bxc5 Rxc5 22. Nc4 Qd8 23. Bxc5 Nxc5 24. Ne3 Ne6 25. Bd3 Nf4 26. Kh2 Qd6 27. Be4 Rd8 28. Nc4 Qf6 29. Na5 Rd7 30. Rb1 Qg5 31. Nxb7 f5 32. Nc5 fxe4 33. fxe4 Rd8 34. Nxa6 Bf8 35. Nb4 Rb8 36. a3 Bc5 37. Rb3 Kg7 38. Rf3 Rxb4 39. axb4 Bxb4 40. Qf2 Bxe1 41. Qxe1 Nxe4 42. Qg1 Kh6 43. d6 Nxd6 44. g4 hxg3+ 45. Rxg3 Qd8 46. Rb3 Nf5 47. Qf2 Qd1 48. Ra3 Qd6 49. Qa2 e4 50. Ra6 Qd3 51. Ra3 Qd4 52. Ra8 Nh4 53. Ra3 0-1

Jul-28-09  newzild: I drew a blitz game with Rybka once when I turned off the opening book. It played a bad line of the Spanish and I won a pawn. Later I returned the pawn to get a draw by threefold repetition. This was one of only about seven games I've ever played with Rybka, and I'm only rated 2050-odd. So I'm not sure if it would "beat 99.99999 per cent of humans with its opening book turned off."
Jul-30-09  aragorn69: Any free version of Rybka available on the net??
(Sorry if this has been asked before: too lazy to scroll back all those pages :-) )
Jul-30-09  myschkin: . . .

http://www.chess.com/download/downl...

Aug-02-09  myschkin: . . .

Rybka wins Chess960 Computer World Championship (Mainz)

http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp...

Aug-02-09  jhoro: <aragorn69: Any free version of Rybka available on the net?? (Sorry if this has been asked before: too lazy to scroll back all those pages :-) )>

you can actually download for free Rybka 2.2n2 for free from Rybka Chess directly

http://www.rybkachess.com/index.php...

Aug-02-09  kingsindian2006: checking out kibitzing on rybka's page is a nice surprise, its one of the few pages where u dont see people critizing games and saying a computer says try this or that. what a relief on the eyes
Aug-03-09  squlpt: <newzild> You'll find that drawing Rybka (while an excellent and rare accomplishment) is much much easier than defeating it
Aug-28-09  kooley782: A lot of people say that it is impossible to beat the best computer. It's hard to think of anything much further from the truth. A human at its very best could beat a computer at its very best. No computer is "impossible" to defeat, not even Rybka.
Sep-11-09  ex0duz: I was just having an interesting conversation online and someone just said this..

<Ofcourse there is an optimal play. We just don't know it yet. And no human has any chance at all against Rybka 3 in a tournament game, which has approx. 3300 rating, compared to top human ~ 2800.>

I'm arguing against it, and saying that there is no optimal play yet, because i don't think that the game is solved or can be considered as such with current software/hardware. He's basically saying that we have no chance at all against an approximately 3300 rating machine. Is this true? This conversation is interesting and i thought you guys would know a hell of a lot about it and could share some information with a chess/A.I 'noobie' like myself.

When was the last time a human beat the most powerful programs at classical time?

Can someone give me a list of all the most recent times in competition that humans won? What year, who played what, location, prizemoney, whatever.

Also, whatever other stats you think would be interesting. Like overall percentage of draws, wins, losses, or anything else similar.

Thanks a lot guys. Appreciate it.

Sep-11-09  zanshin: <ex0duz> You need to take engine ELO ratings with a grain of salt because they are estimated against other engines - the same way human ELOs are calculated by play against other humans. I think it's fair to say that engine ELOs are inflated because the manufacturers use a high baseline for marketing purposes. There are simply not enough engine vs GM matches to get reliable ELO ratings for most engines. Also, all engines tend to have the same shortcomings. They are not addressed because there is no need to (since engines are evaluated against each other).

Having said that, check out this link:
http://www.rybkachess.com/index.php... It shows some matches between Rybka and human GMs. Note that the GMs are given handicap odds. My opinion is that Rybka would achieve an ELO of about 2800 to 2900 if evaluated against human GMs at tournament time controls (using reasonable hardware and opening book).

Nov-10-09  whatthefat: <zanshin: My opinion is that Rybka would achieve an ELO of about 2800 to 2900 if evaluated against human GMs at tournament time controls (using reasonable hardware and opening book).>

It would be a fascinating experiment (one that some might argue Danailov has already done :P). My feeling is that Rybka would do better than that. I would expect it to win at least half of its games and draw the rest, which against 2750 opposition would mean a performance of over 2940. A rating of 3300 on the other hand seems a bit silly. Even a +9 =1 -0 result in a 6 player double round robin would only equate to a 3200 performance.

Dec-14-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: <HIARCS?> <SHREDDER?>

Are there any chess engines on the near or even distant horizon that can compete with Rybka?

Thanks

Dec-15-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  RandomVisitor: At 40 moves/120 minutes tournament time control, here are the top engines running on quad processors: CEGT list:

Rybka 3 - Elo 3166
Naum 4 - Elo 3105
Rybka 2.3.2a - Elo 3070
Deep Fritz 11 - Elo 3014

Dec-15-09  mrandersson: Played a game last night on chessbase played a guy who was a guest but i think he was a cheat. can any 1 else say for sure the other person i played was a guy using a computer? Im not fischer of course but this guy was very comp like lets say.[Event "chessbase"] [Site "chessbase"]
[Date "2009.12.15"]
[EventDate "?"]
[Round "na"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "guest"]
[Black "owensdefence"]
[ECO ""]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "1560"]
[PlyCount "137"]

e4 b6 Bb7 Bg5 Bxe4 d5 f6 Nc3 Bxg2 Bxg2 fxg5 Qe2 Nf6 0-0-0 a6 Nf3 h6 Qd3 Kf7 Ne5+ Kg8 Rh1-g1 b5 Bh3 g4 Bxg4 Nxg4 Nxg4 b4 Ne4 a5 d6 c6 Qb3+ e6 Ngf6+ Kf7 Qf3 g5 Qh5+ Kg7 Nxg5 Qxf6 Ne4+ Qg5 Nxg5 hxg5 Rxg5 Kf6 Qg6++ 1-0

Dec-15-09  whatthefat: <mrandersson>

Given Black was completely lost out of the opening it's hard to say. I think it can at least be said that White was a fairly strong player given the accuracy of the finish (17.d6! and 18.Qb3+!) but I don't see any concrete evidence to suggest cheating. What was the time control anyway?

Dec-15-09  mrandersson: Time control was 3 mins each way with 2 seconds added on. Maybe the guy was a strong player but after the game i watched a few move of his games. He won them all and all under the 25 move mark. My fritz 6 gave his move quite a few ! marks.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 79)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 63 OF 79 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies