chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

H Runde 
Photograph copyright © 2007 Raymond Boger.  
Hans Arild Runde
Number of games in database: 19
Years covered: 1997 to 2008
Last FIDE rating: 1990
Highest rating achieved in database: 2054
Overall record: +7 -5 =7 (55.3%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.

Repertoire Explorer
Most played openings
B29 Sicilian, Nimzovich-Rubinstein (2 games)

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Hans Arild Runde
Search Google for Hans Arild Runde
FIDE player card for Hans Arild Runde


HANS ARILD RUNDE
(born Jul-07-1972, 42 years old) Norway

[what is this?]
Contributor to Chessgames.com as User: frogbert. Fan of Magnus Carlsen since 2001. From April 2008 to August 2011, Runde maintained an unofficial version of live FIDE ratings of leading grandmasters at http://chess.liverating.org/.

On January 1, 2010, Henrik Carlsen wrote "We would also like to thank the many chess enthusiasts contributing to chess as spectators and commentators, ..., chess blogs (with significant contributions from for instance Hans Arild Runde ...)". (Source: http://blog.magnuschess.com/1262373...)


 page 1 of 1; 19 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. H Runde vs A Groenn  ½-½55 1997 ASKOs KM , gr. AB06 Robatsch
2. O Hole vs H Runde  ½-½41 2000 ASKOs HTA04 Reti Opening
3. H Runde vs T Gabrielsen  0-146 2001 ASKOs PinseB03 Alekhine's Defense
4. C F Ekeberg vs H Runde  ½-½66 2001 Teams East 00/01, 1. divA11 English, Caro-Kann Defensive System
5. Carlsen vs H Runde 1-032 2002 Astlandserien 01/02 div. 1, ASKO II - AskerB29 Sicilian, Nimzovich-Rubinstein
6. E Hagesaether vs H Runde  ½-½56 2002 NOR Ch RorosA08 King's Indian Attack
7. H Runde vs S Johannessen 0-126 2002 Teams East 01/02, 1.div.B47 Sicilian, Taimanov (Bastrikov) Variation
8. H Runde vs B Thanke  1-043 2002 Teams East 01/02, 1.div.B86 Sicilian, Fischer-Sozin Attack
9. H Runde vs K Stokke  1-051 2002 Troll MastersB27 Sicilian
10. H Runde vs M Jensen 1-024 2003 ASKOs KM , gr. AB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
11. B Thanke vs H Runde 0-138 2003 NOR Team Champ , OpenB29 Sicilian, Nimzovich-Rubinstein
12. H Runde vs B Egede-Nissen  ½-½69 2005 Teams East 04/05, 2.divB01 Scandinavian
13. G Henriksen vs H Runde 0-146 2005 NOR Team Champ , OpenE13 Queen's Indian, 4.Nc3, Main line
14. H Runde vs N A Mellem  1-042 2005 ASKOs KM , gr. AB41 Sicilian, Kan
15. O Hole vs H Runde  ½-½34 2006 ASKOs KM , Gr AD43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
16. K Trygstad vs H Runde  1-060 2006 Teams East 05/06, 1. divB43 Sicilian, Kan, 5.Nc3
17. H Borchgrevink vs H Runde  ½-½52 2006 NOR Team ChampE12 Queen's Indian
18. J Aulin-Jansson vs H Runde 1-050 2007 NOR Team ChampE15 Queen's Indian
19. H Runde vs O Moen 1-038 2008 Norwegian Club ChampionshipC78 Ruy Lopez
 page 1 of 1; 19 games  PGN Download 
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Runde wins | Runde loses  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 215 OF 242 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-11-12  frogbert: far away from any title that have any meaning, imho. and at a rate of around 10 classical (rated) games per year i should be happy to maintain my skills/rating at the current level.

btw, i've never been serious about improving at chess - even as a student i played only 25-30 games per year (at most) and spent more time organizing chess and otherwise helping with stuff in the club than actually studying chess. when i occasionally pick a chess book from the shelf these days, it's just because i enjoy reading about stuff, not because i have any ambition of improving. my "chess career" (as a player) was basically over before it started, since i put my feet in a chess club for the first time when i was 20. :o)

Mar-19-12  frogbert: copy of cg.com-forum post

---

<I don't envy <cg>'s job trying to keep the peace...and they are trying.>

yes, they probably are, but there are a couple of problems.

1) they are seemingly understaffed, at least in some sense.

2) the available tools and the "technical" structure of the site (forums, pages) make it hard to handle the kind of issues we're seeing; maybe a more distributed form of "moderation" could've been implementable if there was more structure to build it upon.

3) the apparant tendency to "reward" those who make the most noise in the cg.com-forum (regardless of reason) does not scale very well - it inevitably leads to more new issues than it solves.

4) it appears that a more revolutional "root cause analysis" might be needed, where one is willing to rethink a couple of factors that currently seem to be outside the scope of consideration.

returning to us, the users and kibitzers of this site, i think there are a few things most of us would do good to consider. most of the problems i observe around here are due to the following, imo:

1) there seems to be a worrying lack of tolerance for people who hold different opinions and beliefs than oneself, and way too many arguments go personal instead of focusing on the topic of debate. discuss what the other kibitzers say and argue, not who you think they are and what you assume are their motives. (because a) you don't know, and b) it's inflammatory)

2) there also seems to be a considerable tendency for passing judgment and making accusations instead of giving others the benefit of the doubt or leaving room/time for people to change their ways. there aren't bad people or good people - we're all human beings and we do good things most of the time and bad things some of the time. the big majority tries to do their best most of the time.

3) if all of us would mainly watch ourselves and make sure to keep our own path clean, we could safely leave to the site administration to take care of the few missteps that people are bound to make. we don't need private lynch mobs, "troops" or "site patrols" who think it's their task to take care of "unwanted behaviour". we don't need their cheerleaders either. those initiatives make the problem worse, not better; blow the whistle or write an email to the admins and *accept* what they choose to do (or not do) about it.

4) and if you absolutely need to interfere with how other people here behave, then try watching your *friends' behaviour* and be a friendly corrective for those who already respect and believe in you. if you can't convince a friend to change his/her ways, you can forget about making someone you openly despise listen to what you have to say.

those were my 2 cents.

Mar-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Bureaucrat: Excellent post.
Mar-21-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: Hey Frogbert, its me nemesistic iv'e just changed my username to my real name... Am i still okay to post the odd "immortal" here? ;)
Mar-21-12  frogbert: even normal chess games, like the ones we mortals play, are welcome. :o)

btw, i hope you've read the post of mine above/below from march 19th. being my friend *might* result in honest and sincere comments, also on other things than your chess games. but if you're up for it, then no problem!

Mar-21-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: Oh...Im up for it alright :)
Mar-21-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: BTW, what happened to Rogge's forum? I liked that guy.
Mar-21-12  frogbert: nothing happened, he simply keeps it clean. technically he considers it an area for pms (private messages, not prime ministers). hence, don't invest too heavily in posts there, unless you make copies or don't care if everything's suddenly gone tomrrow. :o)
Mar-21-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: No i don't care about that, im not trying to rack up a post count, its just i looked a few days ago and there was the "There is no kibitzing on this page yet" message!

And you've lost me with Prime Minister's... Tell me another time lol ;)

Mar-21-12  frogbert: yes, pray and tell, minister!
Mar-21-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  rogge: <MarkFinan> Hi, <frog>'s right. I even commented on your game, but no one replied, and eventually I cleaned up the place :)
Mar-21-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: <rogge> I must have missed that mate, but it was only a 300 second blitz game (and i cant play at those time controls!) so i didn't think anyone else but you and frogbert would look at it, but thanks for taking the time to look anyway..

Iv'e got loads of games from the last few years written down somewhere, so if you like i could post one of my best efforts?

Oh yeh, in my dad's attic iv'e got all my old tourney games from when i was a kid (i were stronger then than i am now), and even somewhere a game against GM Short (a loss in a simul) and a game against ex British champ Brian Eley (a win in a simul)... They'll be all P-QB4 style notations, because they're all mid 80's games... I'll dig them out when iv'e got the time :)

Mar-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  rogge: <Iv'e got loads of games from the last few years written down somewhere, so if you like i could post one of my best efforts?> Sure, any time. I fed the beast and had Rybka look at the game you posted, which probably is the best I can offer :)

Btw like others have said, I didn't like <Lennonfan> much, <Nemesistic> and <MarkFinan> are far better ;)

Mar-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: Well Lennonfan had an agenda..bless him lol

But, we live and learn.

My first username here was actually markcf, so iv'e never *really* tried hiding who i am, i was just naive!

Well you just don't think of chess players as the argumentitive type, but they were pre conceived idea's i guess... If you understand me lol..

Anyway Rogge, i will post the odd game at your yard i appreciate that..

Mar-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  rogge: I just read your bio, <Mark>, and I'm impressed with your honesty. Well done!
Mar-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  soldal: Here's a song for you, Mark. Good luck!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIza...

Mar-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: Thanks guy's.. I really do appreciate your kind words..

I can't change the past (they *drill* that into you in rehab!), but i can affect the present, to alter my future for the better..

BTW I do now consider my "problems" to be long behind me, so i just want to come here and talk chess, and no doubt football, conspiracy theories, site politics etc.. But the more i think of "chess wars" (of which im guilty!)... The more i literally LOL... Who cares what the next guy's doing, as long as they arne't bothering me..

:)

Mar-25-12  frogbert: i can delete this at any time, but here's the score:

[Date "2012.03.25"]
[Round "?"]
[White "White"]
[Black "frogbert"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "1598"]
[BlackElo "0P"]
[ECO "B29"]
[TimeControl "1200"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. e5 Nd5 4. d4 cxd4 5. Qxd4 e6 6. Bc4 Nc6 7. Qd1 d6 8. exd6 Bxd6 9. O-O Nb6 10. Bb3 O-O 11. Bg5 Qc7 12. Nc3 a6 13. Re1 h6 14. Be3 Na5 15. Ne4 Bb4 16. c3 Be7 17. Bxb6 Qxb6 18. Qc2 Nxb3 19. axb3 Bd7 20. Rad1 Rfd8 21. Ne5 Be8 22. b4 Qc7 23. Nf3 Bc6 24. Rxd8+ Rxd8 25. Ned2 Bf6 26. Rd1 Qd7 27. Kf1 Bxf3 28. gxf3 Qb5+ 29. Kg1 Qg5+ 30. Kf1 Qf4 31. Kg1 Be5 32. Nf1 Bd6 33. Rd4 Qxf3 34. Ng3 Be7 35. Rxd8+ Bxd8 36. Qa4 Bb6 37. Qc2 g6 38. c4 Bd4 39. Qd2 e5 40. Nf1 Kg7 41. Ne3 Qe4 42. c5 Qb1+ 43. Kg2 Qxb2 44. Qxb2 Bxb2 45. Nc4 Bc3 46. Nd6 Bxb4 47. Nxb7 Kf6 48. c6 Ke7 49. Kf3 f5 50. Ke2 Bd6 white resigns 0-1


click for larger view

33... Qxf3 was no blunder after all. i have Qc6 ... :o)

Mar-25-12  frogbert: here i missed a decisive manouver:


click for larger view

(black to move)

Mar-25-12  frogbert:


click for larger view

theory here is 7. Qe4 btw, but i return the favour here:


click for larger view

just 9... 0-0 is better than what i played. you still can't win the pawn on d5 due to the discovered check.

Mar-25-12  frogbert: apparently i should've played Ne5 both on move 13 and 14, and you should've tried Ne4 both on move 13 and 14. i.e. also here, after i played 13... h6:


click for larger view

Mar-25-12  frogbert: hah. i <did> indeed blunder, but this one i didn't see at all. nice combo for white here!


click for larger view

white to play and win!

Mar-25-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: No mate, keep it up if you like..

You know when your having one of them days, when you just cant see *nothing*... I'm having one of them!

If you look back at that handle, i was beating 2200+ last year!!

And check out the "progress graph"!

So i wouldn't look too far into this game as a level of my current strength, i can play much much better, as you can see if you go to the fics database..

Well.... I made about 3 key blunders, and ended up with a lost endgame, although i did think at one point i may be able to promote the c pawn!

I'd love to give you a 60 min game though?? Maybe not today though lol..

Mar-25-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: Nf6+ (?)

i saw it and was going to go for it, but you put a bishop on e7, and thats the *only* real idea i had!!

Mar-25-12  frogbert: we could play a 60 min game some day, but today i'm to worn out already. slept too little tonight, only 3-4 hours or so.

i think the clearest strategical mistakes maybe came on move 17 and 18 when you allowed me to get the bishop pair. compare


click for larger view

with this:


click for larger view

and then we both made some tactical oversights, of course.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 242)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 215 OF 242 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies