Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Frank James Marshall
Number of games in database: 1,353
Years covered: 1893 to 1944

Overall record: +530 -336 =413 (57.6%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 74 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

With the White pieces:
 Orthodox Defense (136) 
    D51 D63 D50 D61 D60
 Queen's Pawn Game (71) 
    D00 A46 D02 A45 A40
 Tarrasch Defense (65) 
    D32 D33 D34
 Queen's Gambit Declined (39) 
    D31 D37 D06 D30 D38
 French Defense (31) 
    C01 C10 C11 C12 C13
 Center Game (28) 
    C21 C22
With the Black pieces:
 Petrov (92) 
    C42 C43
 Ruy Lopez (79) 
    C63 C62 C77 C89 C90
 Queen's Pawn Game (64) 
    D02 D00 D05 A46 E10
 Four Knights (53) 
    C49 C48 C47
 French Defense (42) 
    C11 C12 C01 C00 C14
 Queen's Gambit Declined (35) 
    D30 D38 D06 D37 D31
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   S Levitsky vs Marshall, 1912 0-1
   Marshall vs G Marco, 1904 1-0
   Marshall vs Burn, 1900 1-0
   Janowski vs Marshall, 1912 0-1
   Marshall vs Stodie, 1920 1-0
   Marshall vs H Rogosin, 1940 1-0
   E M Jackson vs Marshall, 1899 0-1
   Marshall vs Von Scheve, 1904 1-0
   Marshall vs Capablanca, 1909 1-0
   Marshall vs Bogoljubov, 1924 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Lasker - Marshall World Championship Match (1907)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Scheveningen (1905)
   Cambridge Springs (1904)
   15th DSB Kongress (Nuremberg) (1906)
   Monte Carlo (1904)
   Janowski - Marshall, Match 2 (1905)
   New York Masters (1911)
   Vienna (1903)
   New York Masters (1915)
   Paris (1900)
   Ostend (Championship) (1907)
   Moscow (1925)
   Karlsbad (1911)
   Monte Carlo (1902)
   Monte Carlo (1903)
   Ostend (1905)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   MARSHALL'S BEST GAMES OF CHESS/hitsujyun by fredthebear
   My Fifty Years of Chess (Marshall) by Qindarka
   Veliki majstori saha 14 MARSHALL (Petrovic) by Chessdreamer
   M&M players... it's a mixed bag by fredthebear
   Janowski vs. Marshall Matches by sjw2214
   Janowski vs. Marshall Matches by Phony Benoni
   Marshall Martials by chocobonbon
   1900s Grandmasters Annointed by fredthebear
   American Chess Bulletin 1904 by Phony Benoni

   Marshall vs Burn, 1900
   Marshall vs R Short, 1894
   J L McCudden vs Marshall, 1934
   Kevitz vs Marshall, 1937
   Santasiere vs Marshall, 1941

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Frank James Marshall
Search Google for Frank James Marshall

(born Aug-10-1877, died Nov-09-1944, 67 years old) United States of America

[what is this?]

Frank James Marshall, born in New York City on August 10, 1877, was United States champion from 1909-1936 and a respected international competitor for the first quarter of the 20th century.

He began international play by winning the Minor tournament at London 1899. In his major tournament debut at Paris 1900, Marshall finished =3rd with Geza Maroczy, defeating World Champion Emanuel Lasker in their individual game.

Known for an aggressive style and an ability to get out of trouble that earned him the nickname "The Great Swindler", Marshall recorded both high finishes and disappointing results in elite tournaments. For example, his best result came at Cambridge Springs 1904 where he finished 2.0 points ahead of Lasker and David Janowski. On the other hand, he finished in mid-field at Ostend 1905. His other successes at this time, which included 1st at Schevenigen 1905, 3rd at Barmen 1905 (1/2-point behind Janowski and Maroczy), and first at Nuremberg 1906 helped him find backing for the Lasker - Marshall World Championship Match (1907). However, he lost this match heavily by a score of +0 -8 =7. He suffered another disaster in Capablanca - Marshall (1909) (+1 -8 =14), but continued to be a dangerous and respected opponent in international play for many years. One of his best results came when he won the Havana tournament of 1913, edging out Capablanca by half a point.

Marshall won the US Championship by defeating Jackson Whipps Showalter in a 1909 match (+7 -2 =3). He defended the title once, against Edward Lasker in 1923 (+5 -4 =9), finally relinquishing it voluntarily in 1936 to allow the championship to be decided by tournament play.

Several opening variations are named after him, most notably Ruy Lopez, Marshall (C89). Though his use of it in Capablanca vs Marshall, 1918 resulted in a loss, the gambit is still studied today and has been played by some of the world's leading players. Many prominent players avoid it as White, believing that there is no way to get a meaningful advantage against it. Another important and well-respected gambit, also referred to as the Marshall Gambit, arises after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c6 4.e4 dxe4 5.Nxe4 Bb4+ 6.Bd2 Qxd4 7.Bxb4 Qxe4+.

notes: Marshall played consultation chess on the teams of Lasker / Chigorin / Marshall / Teichmann & Marshall / Allies.

Wikipedia article: Frank Marshall (chess player)

Last updated: 2018-02-05 06:21:22

 page 1 of 55; games 1-25 of 1,354  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Steinitz vs Marshall 1-0261893SimulC03 French, Tarrasch
2. Pillsbury vs Marshall 0-1291894Blindfold simulC31 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit
3. Marshall vs R Short 1-0181894ch Montreal CCC51 Evans Gambit
4. Pillsbury vs Marshall 0-1341894Blindfold simul, 10bD06 Queen's Gambit Declined
5. R Short vs Marshall 0-1221895freeC51 Evans Gambit
6. V Sournin vs Marshall 0-1341896New YorkA80 Dutch
7. Marshall vs W Napier 0-1231896Napier - MarshallC29 Vienna Gambit
8. W Napier vs Marshall 1-0471896Napier - MarshallB01 Scandinavian
9. Marshall vs W Napier 0-1771896Napier - MarshallC55 Two Knights Defense
10. W Napier vs Marshall ½-½751896Napier - MarshallC02 French, Advance
11. Marshall vs W Napier ½-½721896Napier - MarshallC50 Giuoco Piano
12. W Napier vs Marshall 1-0351896Napier - MarshallB06 Robatsch
13. Marshall vs W Napier 0-1341896Napier - MarshallC45 Scotch Game
14. W Napier vs Marshall 1-0681896Napier - MarshallC00 French Defense
15. Marshall vs W Napier 1-0271896Napier - MarshallD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
16. W Napier vs Marshall ½-½751896Napier - MarshallC00 French Defense
17. Marshall vs W Napier 0-1381896Napier - MarshallA84 Dutch
18. Marshall vs S G Ruth 0-1361897Ch CityD63 Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense
19. Marshall vs H Hansen  0-1351897freeC44 King's Pawn Game
20. Marshall vs W Napier 1-0541897Ch CityD01 Richter-Veresov Attack
21. H Helms vs Marshall 1-0341897SimulD00 Queen's Pawn Game
22. Marshall vs W Napier 1-0461897Ch CityA80 Dutch
23. W Napier vs Marshall 1-0651897Ch CityC02 French, Advance
24. Marshall vs H Helms 0-1331897Ch CityC44 King's Pawn Game
25. H McMahon vs Marshall 0-171897Ch CityC43 Petrov, Modern Attack
 page 1 of 55; games 1-25 of 1,354  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Marshall wins | Marshall loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 13 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-05-15  RookFile: Marshall is right about the King's Gambit. I know a player who played the King's Gambit for upwards of 20 years. He said that the only thing he never saw was the "main line" ( 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 etc. )
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Zanzibar> Not sure I am reading your figures correctly. 3.Bc4 is three times more popular than 3.Nf3 among 2400-rated players? That's surprising (and a tribute to Fischer's influence). What kind of sample size are we talking about here?
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <keypusher> Damn, I reversed those numbers.

Good catch... I'd delete my bad post and repost with the correction.


Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Well, <RookFile>, SCID has a couple of opening books to look at - <ELO2400> and <GM2600>

where we can look at recent high level play.

<1.e4 e5> vs <1.e4 c5> _______ (21% 49%) vs (26% 44%)

KGA vs KGD __________________ (74% 26%) vs (100% 0%)

KGA knight vs bishop __________ (76% 23%) vs (56% 44%)

Then we have Black's move 3, so let's list several options for the two books

3...g5 ____ 27% _______ 3...g5 ____ 75%
3...d6 ____ 20% _______ 3...Be7 ___ 25%
3...d5 ____ 16%
3...Be7 ___ 14%
3...Ne7 ___ 12%
3...Nf6 ____ 6%
3...h6 _____ 5%

So it seems at some of GM's do play 3...g5 as Black.

The Tree Window gives a few top games for reference:

Nakamura vs D Andreikin, 2010

<Zvjaginsev, Vadim (2643) -- Akopian, Vladimir (2688) 11. EICC Men playoff (2.3) Rijeka CRO> (and I thought Akopian only played the French!)

Fedorov vs Shirov, 2000

Morozevich vs A Aleksandrov, 2000

Short vs Shirov, 1997

Short vs D Howell, 2010

* * * * *


Fedorov vs Ivanchuk, 2001

Fedorov vs Adams, 1997

Nunn vs Timman, 1995

Black seems to do pretty well in this sample of games.

Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <keypusher> The question about the sample size is also good.

I'll have to do a little research and report back. I think I knew it once upon a time...

Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <Taken from the copyright notice of the source:

Files that are copyrighted by respective authors :

Book files (performance.bin and varied.bin): Marc Lacrosse

Book files (Elo2400.bin and gm2600.bin): Pascal Georges

Database files : Pascal Georges>

Georges took over SCID from Hudson.

Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Finding out about the SCID opening books is not easy. They were made with polyglot (a tool created by Fabien Letouzey, the guy who wrote Fruit and open sourced it - basically creating the world of engines that we know today).

The opening books probably haven't been tweaked for years now. The exact data sets used for their creation, and the stats, aren't documented in the obvious place (e.g. the README.txt file in the books directory).

Jul-06-15  RookFile: Well, if you're a chess professional, you can prepare 3...g5 in the King's Gambit. I think the rest of us hackers can content ourselves with either 2...Bc5 or an early ...d5 break, as Marshall says. I was an ...e5 player for many years, maybe I saw a grand total of 10 King's Gambits.
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <RookFile> I'm lucky if I make hacker rank myself.

Your (or Marshall's) suggestion to play a KGD with 2...d5 or 2...Bc5 is a good one, and FCO agrees

<In a way, these words are still valid today. Somehow or other, the King's Gambit seems to elude rational judgement. Coundess refutations of 2 f4 have been claimed, but each and every time the opening has survived the onslaught. It remains a source of inspiration to those who have courage and imagination. And even those who do not dare to play it, can learn a great deal from the wealth of variations this opening has to offer. There is only one theme here, yet it is an eternal one, the theme that no chess-player can avoid: the battle between the initiative and a material advantage.

The most prominent of these variations start with 2...exf4, the King's Gambit Accepted, but several other moves have also grown into full-blown variations, most notably 2...d5, the Falkbeer Counter-Gambit, and 2...!.c5, the principal form of the King's Gambit Declined.>

Anybody can bone up on the 3...g5 defense - White and Black. It's a question of temperament whether or not one wants to play it.

I agree that most White players don't play the King's Gambit, but it certainly shows up on FICS a lot, and I've certainly been crushed enough times as Black to confirm this fact. But for me, it's always a bit of a thrill to play the KGA out as Black and get a win.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: While known to respond to the KG with 2....d5 once or twice, I generally preferred acceptance with the Becker line (3....h6), which typically transposed into the Classical without allowing White to play down the main line of the Kieseritsky, via a move order such as 4.d4 g5 5.Bc4 d6 6.0-0 Bg7.

My guess is that the KG player to whom <RookFile> refers was Rich Daly; the one time we met at the board, the game avoided the transposition into the main line of the Classical above, as he went in for a quick h4, hxg5 and exchange of rooks.

Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: You can see Kingcrusher playing White against the Becker here:

It's a 5-min blitz, and a little sloppy. But worth a watch, and many of the mistakes make for good little side lessons (e.g. why 44...Ke7 fails whereas 44...Kf7 wins for Black).

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Uncopyrightable is the longest word in English with no repeat letters.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Happy Birthday Frank!!

Thanks for the swindles.

Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: Marshall was such a strong player defeating the likes of Janowski, Capa (twice), Pillsbury & Chigorin. Of course Capa beat him many times but you can't beat a World Chess Champ twice unless you're an extremely strong player. I still have fond memories of going to the Marshall Chess Club in NYC back in '95 & playing in a tournament there!
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <Of course Capa beat him many times but you can't beat a World Chess Champ twice unless you're an extremely strong player.>

Or extremely lucky.

Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: from Essay on Chess by Anthony Santasiere..

<So finally dear Frank had to die. (We all knew that towards the end he had a serious heart condition.) He had gone to Jersey City, alone, to play in a game of Bingo. Afterwards, walking on the street, he dropped dead. I went to the widow at once to console her. She was dry-eyed, and said, "Thank God! San - I gave him new underwear only this morning.">


Nov-24-15  ljfyffe: Soltis claims that Marshall
won the Montreal Club Chess Championship in 1893
but my research indicates that he only won the <handicap> tournament.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: From the <Mechanics Institute Newsletter #722>: The following forgotten Frank Marshall simul game was discovered by <Eduardo Bauza Mercere>.

Danish Gambit C44
Frank James Marshall–Edmund Bayly Seymour
Philadelphia (simul) December 12, 1916

1. e4 e5 2. d4 exd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Bc4 cxb2 5.Bxb2 d6 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. O-O Be6 8. Bxe6 fxe6 9. Qb3 Qd7 10. Ng5 Nd8 11. Nd2 h6 12. Nh3 Nf6 13. Nf4 Qf7 14. Rac1 c6 15. g3 e5 16. Nd5 cxd5 17. f4 d4 18. Nc4 Nc6 19. fxe5 dxe5 20. Qb5 Qc7 21. Nxe5 Qxe5 22. Qxb7 Rb8 23. Qxc6+ Nd7 24. Qg6+ Kd8 25. Rf5 Qd6 26. Qxd6 Bxd6 27. Bxd4 Rg8 28. Rd1 ˝-˝

Source: <Philadelphia Inquirer>, October 21, 1917, page 6.

Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Near the conclusion of the <Marshall--Showalter (1909)> match, Marshall is quoted as saying he planned to retire from professional chess after playing in then upcoming Hamburg International Tournament.

Good thing it was either a misquote, or Marshall later changed his mind.

From Nov. 23, 1909 Cincinnati Enquirer:

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I think Marshall, more than any other top player, tried for piece activity above everything else. He would give up loads of pawns to get his knights, and secondarily his bishops, into good attacking positions. When it works out it is a Mt-St-Helens-like apocalypse of attack.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Happy birthday, Frank Marshall.

I hope you are swindling everyone in Chess Heaven.

Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: < offramp: Uncopyrightable is the longest word in English with no repeat letters.>

You should copyright that.

Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Wouldn't "uncopyrightables" have one more?
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: < tamar: Wouldn't "uncopyrightables" have one more?>

Is that even a word? A noun? Things that are uncopyrightable?

Who decides if a string of letters is a word or not? OED?

Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: copyrightables


plural of copyrightable

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 14)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 13 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC