chessgames.com

  
Marmaduke Wyvill
Number of games in database: 28
Years covered: 1846 to 1859
Overall record: +12 -14 =2 (46.4%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 English (9) 
    A13 A10
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (10) 
    B21 B20 B46 B34 B44
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Anderssen vs Wyvill, 1851 0-1
   Wyvill vs E Lowe, 1851 1-0
   H Kennedy vs Wyvill, 1851 0-1
   Wyvill vs H Kennedy, 1851 1/2-1/2

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   WCC Index [London 1851] by suenteus po 147

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Marmaduke Wyvill
Search Google® for Marmaduke Wyvill


MARMADUKE WYVILL
(born 1814, died Jun-1896) United Kingdom

[what is this?]
Marmaduke Wyvill born 1814 was an English Member of Parliament who finished 2nd to Adolf Anderssen at the London Tournament in 1851.

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 28  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Wyvill vs Dubois 0-134 1846 Odds MatchC02 French, Advance
2. H Kennedy vs Wyvill 0-152 1851 4, London2 m3B54 Sicilian
3. Anderssen vs Wyvill 1-026 1851 1, London4 m1B20 Sicilian
4. Anderssen vs Wyvill 1-024 1851 07, LondonB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
5. H Kennedy vs Wyvill 0-128 1851 8, London2 m3B34 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto
6. Wyvill vs Anderssen 1-049 1851 6, London4 m1A10 English
7. E Lowe vs Wyvill 0-129 1851 01, LondonC00 French Defense
8. Wyvill vs H Kennedy 0-135 1851 3, London2 m3A13 English
9. E Williams vs Wyvill 0-150 1851 5, London3 m2A00 Uncommon Opening
10. Anderssen vs Wyvill 1-020 1851 07, LondonB20 Sicilian
11. Wyvill vs H Kennedy 1-036 1851 7, London2 m3A13 English
12. Wyvill vs Anderssen 0-127 1851 4, London4 m1A10 English
13. H Kennedy vs Wyvill 1-065 1851 2, London2 m3A03 Bird's Opening
14. Wyvill vs E Williams 1-037 1851 4, London3 m2A13 English
15. Wyvill vs E Williams 0-135 1851 03, LondonA13 English
16. H Kennedy vs Wyvill 1-037 1851 6, London2 m3B46 Sicilian, Taimanov Variation
17. Anderssen vs Wyvill 0-140 1851 3, London4 m1B44 Sicilian
18. Wyvill vs H Kennedy 1-057 1851 1, London2 m3A13 English
19. E Williams vs Wyvill 1-036 1851 3, London3 m2B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
20. Wyvill vs E Williams 1-036 1851 03, LondonA13 English
21. Wyvill vs H Kennedy ½-½62 1851 5, London2 m3A13 English
22. Wyvill vs Anderssen ½-½50 1851 2, London4 m1D32 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
23. Wyvill vs E Lowe 1-041 1851 2, London1 m5A20 English
24. E Williams vs Wyvill 1-032 1851 1, London3 m2B21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
25. Wyvill vs H Kennedy 0-120 1851 LondonC33 King's Gambit Accepted
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 28  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Wyvill wins | Wyvill loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-08-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: Marmaduke Wyvill
Aug-08-03   Cyphelium: Now that's a cool name if I ever heard one.
Apr-10-04   morphyvsfischer: The very first English Opening specialist too...
Apr-10-04   ruylopez900: Marmaduke had something going with the c-file...
Apr-30-04   valerianus: Marmaduke Wyvill juggled a career in the British Parliament with a nearly wonderful upset elimination of Anderssen in London 1851 (wow!).
Jan-21-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Knight13: Information from Wikipedia:

Marmaduke Wyvill (1815 - 1896) was a leading English chess master.

He made it through to the final of the first international chess tournament, held in London in 1851, but lost to Adolf Anderssen, 4.5-2.5.

Wyvill was elected Member of Parliament for Richmond, North Yorkshire in 1847.

In a chess game, Wyvill formation refers to a pawn formation in which White has no b pawn, a pawn at c3 and c4, and the d-pawn at d4 or d5 (Some authorities require a Black pawn to be at c5). White's c4 pawn is a weakness because it cannot be supported by other pawns.

Jan-05-06   BIDMONFA: Marmaduke Wyvill

WYVILL, Marmaduke
http://www.bidmonfa.com/wyvill_m.htm
_

Jul-31-06   sneaky pete: Is Marmaduke a name or a title? Is he related to the olde English breakfast table regular Marmaduke Chivers?
Jul-31-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <sneaky pete>

http://123-baby-names.com/origin_me...

Jul-31-06   sneaky pete: <chancho> Thanks, <leader of the seas>, who would have imagined? The <duke> part led me to believe it was a title rather than a name, but MP Wyvill was obviously just a commoner, not a Lord.
Sep-01-08   myschkin: . . .

<Marmaduke Wyvill> war ein englischer Aristokrat, Politiker und Schachmeister.

Der Stammsitz seiner Familie war Constable Burton Hall in North Yorkshire.

In den Jahren 1847 bis 1868 war er Abgeordner im britischen Parlament. Im Jahr 1851 nahm er in London am ersten internationalen Schachturnier in der Geschichte teil und wurde Zweiter hinter dem preußischen Meister Adolf Anderssen, der fortan als weltbester Schachspieler galt. Der ansonsten mit Lob sparsame Howard Staunton bezeichnete Wyvill daraufhin als einen der besten Spieler Englands.

Wyvill konzentrierte sich anschließend auf seine politische Laufbahn und hörte auf, ernsthaft Schach zu spielen. Es war ihm bis zu seinem Rückzug vom Schach möglich, sich mit den besten Spielern seiner Zeit zu messen, hierunter mit so glanzvollen Namen wie Louis Charles Mahe De La Bourdonnais, Lionel Adalbert Bagration Felix Kieseritsky, Henry Thomas Buckle und Daniel Harrwitz.

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marmad...

The Wyvill's of Constable Burton
http://www.wyvill.com/

Jul-27-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Knight13: A great player who unfortunately quit playing competitive/professional chess for the sake of other reasons, probably politics (Parliament).

A politically educated talent AND very strong chess master.

Now that's impressive.

Aug-02-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Knight13: K after examining all of his games, I must admit that they aren't that high quality or very instructive. Errors and stupid blunders everywhere; you're definitely better off learning from great players of modern era than him, but if you wanna have fun then sure run through Wyvill's games.

I'm surprised that at his skill level he reached SECOND in 1851 international tournament AHEAD of Staunton and others. If you believe in luck in chess, this is the time to use it as explanation!

Aug-02-09   YoungEd: I don't read German, so forgive me if this is already part of the post that <myschkin> left, but Staunton complained mightily about the slowness of Wyvill's play, suggesting that Wyvill managed to win his games principally through outsitting his opponents.
Aug-03-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  percyblakeney: <Staunton complained mightily about the slowness of Wyvill's play, suggesting that Wyvill managed to win his games principally through outsitting his opponents>

I think he said that about Elijah Williams but he would probably have said it about Wyvill too if he had lost against him :-) Staunton meant that only his <physical suffering could explain the result, against a player he could ordinarily defeat at P+2 odds> after Williams allegedly spent hours on some positions.

Williams won a 17-game match against Horwitz, and Staunton commented about the disadvantage Horwitz suffered from when playing <any opponent who seeks to irritate or exhaust him by protracting the games unnecessarily>. According to Horwitz none of the games took more than five hours, and most of them were finished in two.

Spinrad writes in his article on the subject that many sided with Williams in the dispute, and Staunton seems to have been rather slow himself in the 1851 tournament. Anderssen wrote that a game between Staunton and Horwitz took 11½ hours, and Kieseritzky singled out Staunton as playing slow games.

http://www.chesscafe.com/text/spinr...

Aug-03-09   YoungEd: Hi, <percyblakeny>-- You are right; I misremembered the names. Thanks for the correction and info.
Aug-03-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Knight13: Of course, people might've disliked Staunton more than any other player in the tournament and so sided against him.

Note that Staunton intended to organize the tournament in order to attract the best players from around the world, and create brilliant games so that it will be talked about for centuries to come, but most importantly, he himself walking out as the winner of the tournament.

Guess what? Staunton didn't win the tournament. Most of the games sucked. No, it will not be talked about for centuries for its brilliancy either; most of the games weren't that good.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | new kibitzing | chessforums | new games | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2009, Chessgames.com
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies