Number of games in database: 55
Years covered: 1849 to 1863
Overall record: +28 -22 =5 (55.5%)*
* Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
Most played openings
|B27|| ||Sicilian (4 games)||C51|| ||Evans Gambit (4 games)||C33|| ||King's Gambit Accepted (4 games)||C39|| ||King's Gambit Accepted (3 games)||B21|| ||Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4 (3 games)||B40|| ||Sicilian (3 games)||C52|| ||Evans Gambit (3 games)||C40|| ||King's Knight Opening (3 games)||C25|| ||Vienna (2 games)||A20|| ||English (2 games)|
Search Sacrifice Explorer for Frederic Deacon
Search Google for Frederic Deacon
| page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 55
| page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 55
|Dec-20-06|| ||jaime gallegos: this man defeated Steinitz, Blackburne, and Morphy ! he deserve a biography on this place !|
|Dec-20-06|| ||keypusher: <jaime gallegos> This man made up most of his famous "wins." <SBC> could probably write an interesting bio, though.|
|Jan-02-09|| ||YJGYJ: I agree that Deacon needs a Bio but even a search on the internet has very few answers as to who he was.|
|Jul-23-09|| ||myschkin: . . .
Frederic Deacon (1829-1875) from Belgium.
|May-02-14|| ||Gottschalk: He was the first master to gain success with the Elephant gambit 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 d5|
|Apr-03-15|| ||MissScarlett: An account of the Deacon-Morphy controversy: http://www.edochess.ca/batgirl/morp...|
But if everything's so clear, why are there three Morphy-Deacon games here?
|Apr-03-15|| ||OhioChessFan: From <SBC> link:
<Staunton, who published the games, at worst knowing they were forgeries or at least accepting them without question, whereas they should have raised a red flag>
I have a problem with this claim. Is <SBC> a historical mind reader? How does she know Stauntion accepted them without question? What, exactly, is required of a person to do before publishing a game before they can be accused of doing so without question? Why, exactly, should those games have raised a red flag? Who pursued the cousin and the waiter to see if they'd verify the account? Is <SB> dismissing those claimed witnesses "without question"? Why does Mr. Deacon provide so much detail when almost all fraudulent claims are made in the most vague terms?
Spot an error? Please
suggest your correction
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- Don't post personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2015, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by