chessgames.com

Steinitz 
 
Wilhelm Steinitz
Number of games in database: 886
Years covered: 1859 to 1899
Overall record: +468 -195 =155 (66.7%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      68 exhibition games, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Vienna Opening (88) 
    C25 C29 C28 C26
 French Defense (76) 
    C00 C11 C01 C02 C13
 King's Gambit Accepted (48) 
    C39 C37 C38 C33 C35
 French (46) 
    C00 C11 C13 C10 C12
 King's Gambit Declined (32) 
    C30 C31
 Evans Gambit (24) 
    C51 C52
With the Black pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (122) 
    C62 C70 C60 C64 C65
 Evans Gambit (73) 
    C52 C51
 Giuoco Piano (34) 
    C50 C53 C54
 King's Gambit Accepted (25) 
    C33 C39 C38 C34 C37
 Scotch Game (21) 
    C45
 Three Knights (15) 
    C46
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Steinitz vs Von Bardeleben, 1895 1-0
   Steinitz vs Chigorin, 1892 1-0
   Zukertort vs Steinitz, 1886 0-1
   Steinitz vs Paulsen, 1870 1-0
   Dubois vs Steinitz, 1862 0-1
   Steinitz vs Rock, 1863 1-0
   Steinitz vs Mongredien, 1862 1-0
   Steinitz vs Mongredien, 1863 1-0
   M Hewitt vs Steinitz, 1866 0-1
   Steinitz vs Bird, 1866 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Steinitz-Zukertort World Championship Match (1886)
   Steinitz-Chigorin World Championship Match (1889)
   Steinitz-Gunsberg World Championship Match (1890)
   Steinitz-Chigorin World Championship Rematch (1892)
   Lasker-Steinitz World Championship (1894)
   Lasker-Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Anderssen-Steinitz (1866)
   Paris (1867)
   Baden-Baden (1870)
   Vienna (1873)
   Vienna (1882)
   London (1883)
   2nd City Chess Club Tournament (1894)
   Hastings (1895)
   St. Petersburg 1895-96 (1895)
   Nuremberg (1896)
   Vienna (1898)
   London (1899)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Match Steinitz! by amadeus
   The Dark Side by lonchaney
   World championship games A-Z by kevin86
   the rivals 1 by ughaibu
   Wilhelm Steinitz's Best Games by KingG
   Match Chigorin! by amadeus
   Vienna 1898 by suenteus po 147
   Vienna 1882 by suenteus po 147
   fav Lasker & Steinitz games by guoduke
   London 1883 by suenteus po 147
   Vienna 1873 by suenteus po 147
   Steintz's 25 wins in a row by offramp
   WCC Index [Steinitz-Chigorin 1892] by suenteus po 147
   1892 World Chess Championship by Penguincw

GAMES ANNOTATED BY STEINITZ: [what is this?]
   Showalter vs Gossip, 1889
   Chigorin vs Gunsberg, 1889
   J McConnell vs Steinitz, 1886
   Burn vs N MacLeod, 1889
   Pillsbury vs Schlechter, 1895
   >> 130 GAMES ANNOTATED BY STEINITZ

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Wilhelm Steinitz
Search Google for Wilhelm Steinitz


WILHELM STEINITZ
(born May-17-1836, died Aug-12-1900) Austria (citizen of United States of America)

[what is this?]
Wilhelm Steinitz was the first official World Champion of chess.

Background

The last of thirteen sons of a hardware retailer, he was born in Prague in what was then the Kingdom of Bohemia within the Austrian Empire and which is now within the Czech republic. Like his father he was a Talmudic scholar, but then he left to study mathematics in the Vienna Polytechnic. He eventually dropped out of the Polytechnic to play chess professionally. Soon after he played in the London tournament of 1862, settling in London for over twenty years and making his living at the London Chess Club. He emigrated to the USA in 1883, taking out US citizenship, living in New York for the rest of his life, and changing his first name to “William”.

Matches

He was recognized as the world's leading player, and considered to be the world champion by many, after he defeated the then-acknowledged number one chess player in the world (now that Paul Morphy had retired), Adolf Anderssen, in a match in 1866 which he won by 8-6. However, it was not until his victory in the Steinitz-Zukertort World Championship Match (1886) – where he sat beside a US flag - that he was recognised as the first undisputed world chess champion. He successfully defended his title three times in the Steinitz-Chigorin World Championship Match (1889), the Steinitz-Gunsberg World Championship Match (1890), and in the Steinitz-Chigorin World Championship Rematch (1892). In 1894, Emanuel Lasker won the crown from Steinitz by winning the Lasker-Steinitz World Championship (1894) and retained it by winning the Lasker-Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896).

Steinitz was always an extremely successful match player. Between 1860 and 1897, he played 36 matches, winning every serious match with the exception of his two matches against Lasker. Some of the prominent players of the day that he defeated in match play other than in his world championship matches included Max Lange, Serafino Dubois, Frederic Deacon, Dionisio M Martinez, Joseph Henry Blackburne, Anderssen, Augustus Mongredien, Henry Edward Bird, Johannes Zukertort, George Henry Mackenzie, and Celso Golmayo Zupide.

Tournaments

Steinitz was more adept at winning matches than tournaments in his early years, a factor, which alongside his prolonged absences from competition chess after 1873, may have prevented more widespread recognition of his dominance of chess as world champion until the first “official” world championship match in 1886. Nevertheless, between 1859 and his death in 1900, the only tournament in which he did not win prize money was his final tournament in London in 1899. His wins include the Vienna Championship of 1861 which he won with 30/31 and earned him the nickname the “Austrian Morphy”, the London Championship of 1862, Dublin 1865 (equal first with George Alcock MacDonnell), London 1872, equal first at Vienna 1873 and 1882 (the latter was the strongest tournament to that time, and Steinitz had just returned from 9 years of absence from tournament chess), and first in the New York Championship of 1894. Other successes include 3rd and 2nd at the Vienna Championships of 1859 and 1860 respectively, 2nd at Dundee in 1867, 3rd in Paris in 1867, 2nd in Baden Baden in 1870, 2nd in London in 1883, 5th at the famous Hastings super tournament in 1895, 2nd at the sextuple round robin St Petersburg quadrangular tournament behind Lasker and ahead of Harry Nelson Pillsbury and Mikhail Chigorin, 6th at Nuremburg in 1896, and 4th at Vienna in 1898.

Steinitz’s Legacy

The extent of Steinitz’s dominance in world chess is evident from the fact that between 1866, when he beat Adolf Anderssen, and 1894, when he relinquished the world crown to Emanuel Lasker in 1894, Steinitz won all his matches, sometimes by wide margins. His worst tournament performance in that period was third place in Paris in 1867. This period of Steinitz’s career was closely examined by Chessmetrics exponent and advocate, Jeff Sonas, who wrote an article in 2005 in which he found that Steinitz was further ahead of his contemporaries in the 1870s than Robert James Fischer was in his peak period (1970–1972), that he had the third-highest total number of years as the world's top player, behind Emanuel Lasker and Garry Kasparov , and that he placed 7th in a comparison the length of time great players were ranked in the world's top three.

Yet, despite his pre-eminence in chess for those decades in the late 19th century, Steinitz’s main contribution to chess was as its first true theoretician. He rose to prominence in the 1860s on the back of highly competent handling of the romantic attacking style of chess that had been popularised by Morphy and Anderssen and which characterised the style of the era. However, in the Vienna tournament of 1873, he introduced a new positional style of play which not only commenced his run of 25 consecutive high level victories, but profoundly transformed the way chess was played from shortly after that time, when its efficacy was embraced by the chess world. It enabled him to establish his complete dominance over his long time rival, Johannes Zukertort, and to easily win the first official match for the World Championship.

Lasker summarised Steinitz’s ideas as follows:

"In the beginning of the game ignore the search for combinations, abstain from violent moves, aim for small advantages, accumulate them, and only after having attained these ends search for the combination – and then with all the power of will and intellect, because then the combination must exist, however deeply hidden."

Although these ideas were controversial and fiercely debated for some years in what has become known as the <Ink Wars>, Lasker and the next generation of the world’s best players acknowledged their debt to him.

"He was a thinker worthy of a seat in the halls of a University. A player, as the world believed he was, he was not; his studious temperament made that impossible; and thus he was conquered by a player ..." - <Emanuel Lasker>.

"He understood more about the use of squares than did Morphy, and contributed a great deal more to chess theory.' - <Bobby Fischer>.

Sources: Wikipedia article: Wilhelm Steinitz and <jessicafischerqueen>'s YouTube documentary http://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis... - in turn sourced mainly from <Kurt Landsberger's> biography "Bohemian Caesar."

Steinitz played on the following consultation teams: Steinitz / Bird / Blackburne, Steinitz / Boden, Burn / Steinitz / Zukertort, Steinitz / Allies, Steinitz / Zukertort, Schiffers / Steinitz, Steinitz / Chigorin, Steinitz / Blackburne & Blackburne / Steinitz / De Vere.


 page 1 of 36; games 1-25 of 886  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Steinitz vs Lenhof 1-032 1859 Vienna (Austria)C52 Evans Gambit
2. Steinitz vs Meitner 1-034 1859 ViennaC52 Evans Gambit
3. Lenhof vs Steinitz 0-145 1859 ViennaC23 Bishop's Opening
4. E Pilhal vs Steinitz 0-121 1859 ViennaC53 Giuoco Piano
5. Hamppe vs Steinitz 0-123 1859 ViennaC29 Vienna Gambit
6. Hamppe vs Steinitz 0-128 1859 ViennaC38 King's Gambit Accepted
7. E Jenay vs Steinitz 1-022 1860 Vienna m1C53 Giuoco Piano
8. Steinitz vs Lang 1-023 1860 Vienna m2C44 King's Pawn Game
9. Hamppe vs Steinitz 0-131 1860 ViennaC25 Vienna
10. Steinitz vs NN 1-012 1860 UnknownC25 Vienna
11. Steinitz vs Strauss 1-029 1860 Vienna (Austria)C52 Evans Gambit
12. Steinitz vs E Jenay 0-132 1860 Vienna m1A13 English
13. Steinitz vs F Nowotny 1-031 1860 UnknownC55 Two Knights Defense
14. Steinitz vs Reiner 1-019 1860 Vienna (Austria)C51 Evans Gambit
15. Steinitz vs Reiner 1-032 1860 Vienna m4C51 Evans Gambit
16. Steinitz vs Lang 1-029 1860 ViennaC25 Vienna
17. Steinitz vs E Jenay 1-033 1860 Vienna m1D32 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
18. Steinitz vs Meitner 1-026 1860 Vienna (Austria)C55 Two Knights Defense
19. Strauss vs Steinitz 0-131 1860 Vienna m3C51 Evans Gambit
20. E Jenay vs Steinitz 0-135 1860 Vienna m1C44 King's Pawn Game
21. Steinitz vs Lang 1-019 1860 ViennaC37 King's Gambit Accepted
22. Reiner vs Steinitz 0-118 1860 Vienna (Austria)C44 King's Pawn Game
23. Steinitz vs Strauss 1-033 1860 Vienna m3C29 Vienna Gambit
24. Steinitz vs NN 1-015 1861 Casual Game000 Chess variants
25. Steinitz vs NN 1-031 1861 London 5C30 King's Gambit Declined
 page 1 of 36; games 1-25 of 886  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Steinitz wins | Steinitz loses  
 

A free online guide presented by Chessgames.com

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 30 OF 38 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-16-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  brankat: <karpova> You may be right. Actually I was looking at the quotes from the census, not the one from the Gaige's "Personalia".

But then, it may be interesting to wonder why A.Alekhine wife Grace Wishart was not included. After all, she was a pretty good chess player. Won a Paris Championship for Women, if I remember this correctly.

Jan-04-09  WhiteRook48: Steinitz! Your page's been neglected! Well? no kibitzing for over a month?
Jan-24-09  Karpova: Oscar Conrad Mueller: <‘The question whether chess was exhaustible, or even near exhaustion, was often discussed at Simpson’s when Steinitz remarked on more than one occasion: “The game itself, I think, is fairly inexhaustible, but the players, of course, are easily exhausted.” He also said, frequently: “Slow chess is good chess.” In recent years I have often been told that Steinitz was rather irritable and morose. I always found him, on the contrary, very amiable, but of a rather quiet and retiring disposition.’>

From page 483 of the November 1932 "BCM".

Source: C.N. 5970
http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Jan-24-09  WhiteRook48: interesting that he died in 1900
Jan-25-09  zdigyigy: Would you let this man babysit your children??
Feb-01-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Quote of the Day

<Chess is a scientific game and its literature ought to be placed on the basis of the strictest truthfulness, which is the foundation of all scientific research.>

-- Steinitz

What is a 'scientific game'?

Mar-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Quote of the Day

"He always sought completely original lines and didn't mind getting into cramped quarters if he thought that his position was essentially sound."

-- Bobby Fischer (<on Steinitz>)

(from Kelly Atkins)
http://www.gmchess.com/

Apr-04-09  jackpawn: I'm going to open a can of worms here, but in my opinion if Morphy didn't retire prematurely Steinitz would be a relatively minor footnote today. Morphy would have been the best player in the world until the arrival of Lasker.
Apr-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: I think Steinitz' closed game would have been the perfect foil for Morphy's attacks..it would have been a good contest
Apr-21-09  Fanacas: Steinitz would have never been a minor footnoot maybe morphy whould have beaten him but steintiz is the father of mordern chess unlike morphy he took is idea's of postitinal chess and taught it to the world and showed it was the best way to play.
Apr-21-09  WhiteRook48: Steinitz despised the fianchetto
Apr-22-09  Fanacas: Sorry what i called modern is called clasical now but steinitz himself lasker tarrasch could it modern in his time. (i didnt mean the hypermodern movment or chess.)
May-14-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  talisman: happy birthday william!
what does william steinitz, doestoevsky, and don mossi have in common?
May-21-09  Fanacas: No idea what do they have in common ?
May-29-09  Fanacas: Anyone ever plays his variatoin of the vienn athe steinitz gambit where th eking goes to e2 ?
May-29-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  talisman: <Fanacas> Looks!
May-29-09  Fanacas: Steinitz vs Paulsen, 1870 like here
Jul-30-09  theagenbiteofinwit: <my opinion if Morphy didn't retire prematurely Steinitz would be a relatively minor footnote today.>

Probably not. Nimzowitsch is genrally considered to be under the shadow of not one, but two legends, yet his contributions to the game have hardly made him a footnote.

Serious programmers who work with the goal of solving chess are basically providing proof of Steinitz's theory of chess. (I know programmers who quote Steinitz' theory when discussing tablebases and the distinct possibility that perfectly played chess is in fact 1.5-1.5)

Whether or not Morphy had the chance to stomp him doesn't change the influence he still bears on the game. That influence has increased, interestingly enough, as computer science has come into play.

Aug-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  BishopBerkeley: (This is a near-duplicate post to one I made over on the Emanuel Lasker message board. I post it here because Wilhelm Steinitz was, to a significant degree, an inspiration for Dr. Lasker's philosophy of Chess and of life....)

Some of you may know that Dr. Emanuel Lasker wrote a book of philosophy titled "Struggle". This book has been out of print for many years, and getting a copy of it has been difficult (believe me, I have tried!)

Surprisingly, I am delighted to see that very recently the book has become available as a digital download at no cost! (Having been published in 1907, it is in the public domain in nearly all countries.)

Our own User: SBC has written a very good piece about it here:

http://blog.chess.com/view/laskers-...

It is indeed interesting to compare Dr. Lasker's philosophical thought to that of his friend and fellow genius Albert Einstein . (A good summary of Einstein's spiritual philosophy will be found here: http://www.100bestwebsites.org/alt/... )

For those who would like to download a complete copy of Dr. Lasker's philosophical book, you may do so from this link:

http://tinyurl.com/ntbk7n

with the specific download link being

http://dds.crl.edu/loadStream.asp?i...

The book is in PDF format, and the file size is about 1 MB.

I find the section titled "The Problem" (from pages 5-12) to be particularly interesting.

But be forewarned, you will look in vain for any Chess diagrams in it! But you will find much else that is worthwhile.

As I understand it, Dr. Lasker believed his book was a generalization of his Chess philosophy to life in the broadest sense. He attributed the great synthesis of Chess theory to Wilhelm Steinitz , and believe that that great Chess luminary had developed his theory after long study of the Chessgames of Paul Morphy . (See the last long quote on this page for details: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Paul_M... )

If any of you happen to read all or a portion of this intriguing book, I hope you may share your thoughts here.

Hope you are all in good spirits....

(: B Bishop Berkeley B :)

Aug-04-09  sneaky pete: Nihil obstat.
Nov-09-09  vonKrolock: A biography, from 1936, by M. Levidov (1891-1942), author also from a monography on Jonathan Swift that appeared in 1939 - This work, "Wilhelm Steinitz", available online (plain text -and with a link to another virtual library with the same book - bot with the original in Russian) http://az.lib.ru/l/lewidow_m_j/text...
Nov-19-09  theagenbiteofinwit: <BishopBerkeley> I can't thank you enough for providing that link.
Dec-06-09  Bjornemann: Thank you so much for the link to this very interesting book, BishopBerkeley!
Dec-22-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Maatalkko: I was commenting on an unrelated topic when I realized a particular virtue of Steinitz; he defended his title, voluntarily, far more often than the other pre-WWII World Champions. The only credible challengers he didn't face in his eight year reign were Blackburne (whom I'm sure he would have beaten) and Tarrasch (whom I also think would have lost). Did either of them make a serious effort to arrange a match? Either way, five matches in eight years is unparalleled except for Kasparov and Karpov, and Kasparov was obligated to play each of those matches. So I think Steinitz's sportsmanship is underrated and deserves a shout-out.
Dec-23-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: Why are there no games here played by Steinitz after 1899??? He lost the title in 1894 (it says) and presumably played for several years thereafter.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 38)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 30 OF 38 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies