chessgames.com

Gelfand 
 
Boris Gelfand
Number of games in database: 2,438
Years covered: 1982 to 2013
Last FIDE rating: 2744
Highest rating achieved in database: 2761
Overall record: +504 -258 =1008 (56.9%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      668 exhibition games, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Semi-Slav (113) 
    D45 D47 D46 D43 D44
 Queen's Indian (111) 
    E12 E15 E17 E16 E13
 Slav (104) 
    D15 D17 D10 D11 D16
 King's Indian (98) 
    E92 E94 E97 E98 E73
 Grunfeld (73) 
    D85 D80 D76 D91 D70
 Queen's Gambit Declined (73) 
    D37 D38 D31 D39 D30
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (378) 
    B90 B92 B23 B96 B30
 Sicilian Najdorf (209) 
    B90 B92 B96 B93 B91
 Petrov (123) 
    C42 C43
 King's Indian (112) 
    E97 E94 E81 E60 E92
 Slav (88) 
    D12 D11 D17 D19 D10
 Semi-Slav (87) 
    D43 D45 D47 D44 D48
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Gelfand vs Shirov, 1998 1-0
   Mamedyarov vs Gelfand, 2011 0-1
   Gelfand vs Kramnik, 1994 1-0
   Gelfand vs Jobava, 2011 1-0
   Gelfand vs Anand, 1993 1-0
   Gelfand vs Salov, 1996 1-0
   Karjakin vs Gelfand, 2009 0-1
   Gelfand vs Adams, 2013 1-0
   Shabalov vs Gelfand, 2004 0-1
   Gelfand vs Kramnik, 1994 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   FIDE World Championship Knockout Tournament (2001)
   FIDE World Championship Tournament (2007)
   Anand-Gelfand World Chess Championship (2012)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Rubinstein Memorial (2000)
   Bermuda Round Robin (2004)
   FIDE World Cup (2005)
   16th Amber Tournament (Blindfold) (2007)
   Pivdenny Bank Chess Cup (2007)
   Pivdenny Bank Chess Cup (2008)
   Karen Asrian Memorial (2008)
   2008 Olympiad (2008)
   World Cup (2009)
   FIDE Jermuk Grand Prix (2009)
   Rising Stars vs Experience (2010)
   20th Amber Tournament (Blindfold) (2011)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Match Gelfand! by amadeus
   Boris Gelfand: My Most Memorable Games by Resignation Trap
   Boris in the najdorf by deepthinker
   Najdorf - 6. Be3 by pcmvtal
   USSR Championship 1989 by suenteus po 147
   Fide 2007 world cup by King mega
   Tilburg Interpolis 1990 by suenteus po 147
   Biel 1995 by suenteus po 147

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Boris Gelfand
Search Google for Boris Gelfand
FIDE player card for Boris Gelfand


BORIS GELFAND
(born Jun-24-1968) Belarus (citizen of Israel)

[what is this?]
Boris Gelfand was born in Minsk in Belarus (formerly part of the USSR), and emigrated to Israel in 1998 where he currently resides. He was awarded the IM title in 1987 and the GM title in 1989.

Championships

<Age> Gelfand won the Junior Championship of the Soviet Union with 9/11 in January 1985, at the age of 16, a half point ahead of Vassily Ivanchuk. He came =1st (2nd on count back to Joel Lautier) in the World Junior Championship in 1988 and became European Junior Champion in 1989.

<World> In 1990, Gelfand won the Manila Interzonal to qualify as a Candidate for the 1993 World Championship. At the 1991 Candidates, he prevailed over Predrag Nikolic , but was then defeated in the quarter final by eventual Candidates winner and championship challenger Nigel Short. He qualified for the FIDE 1994 Candidates event by winning the last Interzonal in Biel, beating Michael Adams and Vladimir Kramnik only to lose to Anatoly Karpov in the finals.

Gelfand competed in all the knockout tournaments that either determined the World Championship, or was part of the World Championship cycle apart from the 2004 tournament in Tripoli. In the knockout tournament that was held in Groningen in 1997, he defeated Lautier in round three, where he was seeded directly because of his results in the last FIDE cycle, and then beat Vladislav Tkachiev and Alexey Dreev before bowing out to the winner of the tournament, Viswanathan Anand . In the world championship knockout tournament of 1999 held in Las Vegas, Gelfand was seeded into the second round where he defeated Jonathan Speelman , and then beat Lautier in round three before losing to the eventual winner, Alexander Khalifman . In 1999 in New Delhi, he was again seeded into round 2 where he defeated Emir Dizdarevic , and then Jeroen Piket in round three before he was defeated by Alexey Shirov in round four. In the 2001-02 knockout tournament held in Moscow, Gelfand lost to Peter Svidler in round 5 after defeating Alexis Cabrera , Leinier Dominguez Perez , Aleksander Delchev and Zurab Azmaiparashvili . He played in the 8-player 2002 Dortmund Tournament, which was the Candidates for the Classical World Chess Championship match in 2004, but failed to reach the semi-finals after coming third in the quadrangular round robin preliminary round.

Gelfand finished 6th at the FIDE World Cup (2005) , which produced 10 Candidates for the 2007 Candidates tournament, defeating Watu Kobese , Ruben Felgaer , Levan Pantsulaia , and Dreev in the preliminary rounds. In the two rounds of matches at the 2007 Candidates, Gelfand won both the Candidates Match: Gelfand-Kasimdzhanov (2007) and the Candidates Match: Gelfand vs Kamsky (2007) to qualify for the FIDE World Championship Tournament (2007) in Mexico City, where he tied for second with Kramnik, a point behind the winner, Anand. Subsequently, he won the World Cup (2009) by defeating Judit Polgar , the then reigning World Junior Champion Maxime Vachier-Lagrave , Dmitry Jakovenko , and Sergey Karjakin to reach the final, where he then faced former FIDE World Champion Ruslan Ponomariov , winning the match 7-5 in a playoff. In doing so he qualified for the World Championship Candidates (2011) for another shot at the World Championship in 2012. He played and defeated Shakhriyar Mamedyarov by 2.5-1.5 (+1 =3 -0) in the first round of the World Championship Candidates (2011), moving into the semi final where defeated Gata Kamsky in the tiebreaker; the result was 2-2 (+0 -0 =4) in the classical games, 2-2 (+1 -1 =2) in the rapid tiebreaker, and 1.5-0.5 in his favour in the blitz tiebreaker. He faced Alexander Grischuk in the final match, and after five draws, Gelfand won the sixth and final game thus gaining the right to challenge Viswanathan Anand for the world crown. The Anand-Gelfand World Chess Championship (2012) was played in Moscow in May 2012, and Gelfand lost in the rapid game tiebreaker 1.5-2.5 (-1 =3) after drawing the 12 games played under classical time controls 6-6 (+1 -1 =10). As the loser in the World Championship match, he qualified to play in the World Championship Candidates (2013) in London, where he placed a rating-enhancing 5th with 6.5/14 (+2 -3 =9).

Gelfand's 2014 World Championship campaign started well when he placed =1st alongside Veselin Topalov and Shakhriyar Mamedyarov at the FIDE Grand Prix London (2012), scoring 7/11 (+4 -1 =6; TPR 2836) and netting GP 140 points from the event. However, his 10th out of 12 placement at the FIDE Grand Prix Tashkent (2012) earned him only 30 Grand Prix points, for a combined tally of 170 points. Despite the poor showing in Tashkent, Gelfand is still in the running, with two more Grand Prixs events in which to improve his standing.

Tournaments

Gelfand has an imposing tournament record dating back to the late 80s. He won or came =1st at Klajpeda 1988, Majorca (GMA) 1989, Moscow 1992, Wijk aan Zee 1992, Manila 1993, Chalkidiki 1993, Biel 1993, Dos Hermanas 1994, Debrecen and Belgrade in 1995, Vienna and Tilburg in 1996, Polanica Zdroj in 1998 and 2000, and Malmö in 1999. He also won at Pamplona Tournament (2004) . In 2005, he was =1st with Pentala Harikrishna at the Bermuda International (2005) and 1st at 38th Biel Chess Festival (2005). In 2010 he was in the Experience Team that narrowly lost against the Rising Stars at the Rising Stars vs Experience (2010), although he top scored in the tournament with 7/10. He also won outright first with 7/10 at the 2010 NH Tournament in the Netherlands.

Other strong results include 2nd at Linares 1990, 3rd at Tilburg 1990, 3rd at the Reggio Emilia of 1991/92, 2nd in the category 16 tournament in Munich 1993, 3rd at Dortmund in 1996, 2nd in the 14th Dr Milan Vidmar Memorial tournament in Slovenia, 3rd at Biel 2001, 2nd at the category 18 tournament in Cannes in 2002 behind Topalov, =3rd at Dortmund Sparkassen (2006) , and 4th at the Tal Memorial (2006) a half point behind joint leaders, Ponomariov, Peter Leko and Levon Aronian. In 2009, he came 2nd behind Ivanchuk at Bazna Tournament (2009) . Also in 2010, he came 2nd in the King's Tournament (2010) behind Magnus Carlsen . In the lead up to his World Championship contest with Anand, Gelfand competed at the category 21 Tata Steel (2012) tournament at Wijk aan Zee, finishing 9th out of 13, scoring 5/13 (+2 -5 =6; TPR 2675). In April/May 2013, he came =1st with 5.5/9 at the category 20 Alekhine Memorial (2013), coming 2nd on tiebreak behind Aronian.

Gelfand’s results in the FIDE Grand Prix 2008-2010 were modest, coming 11th.

Olympiads

Gelfand played in ten Chess Olympiads, representing the Soviet Union once (1990), Belarus twice (1994 and 1996), and Israel seven times (2000-2012). In 1990, he won the team gold medal playing board 2 for Soviet Union, in the Olympiad (2008) held in Dresden, he won the team silver medal and also individual silver medal playing board 1 for Israel and in the Chess Olympiad (2010) held in Khantiy Mansiysk, he won team bronze playing board 1 for Israel.

Team

Gelfand is a team player and has participated in the German Bundesliga, and team championships in Israel, Spain, Poland, and Russia. He has also been part of the European Team Championships, the European Club Cup, the Russian Club Cup and the World Team Championships in 2005 and 2009. One of his best results was assisting his Moscow team ShSM-64 to win the Russian Team Championships (2010) with 16 out of a possible 18 match points. Playing for SHSM-64, he won team bronze at the 28th European Club Cup (2012) concluded in October 2012.

Match

Outside of the world championship cycle, Gelfand has played matches in France against Etienne Bacrot in 2002 which he lost 2.5-3.5, and a drawn match (2-2) against David Navara in the Czech Republic in 2006.

Rapids

Like most top players, Gelfand is a skilled rapid player. He was =1st with Kramnik in the rapid play section of the 2001 Amber event, and outright 1st in the 2002 edition of Amber's rapid play section. He came first in the 2002 Cap d'Agde, defeating Karpov in the final. In 2003, he defeated Polgar in the George Marx Rapid Match (2003) and in 2007, he came =1st at the Villa de Canada de Calatrava (2007) , following up with =1st at the Pivdenny Bank Chess Cup (2008) in Odessa. He also won the 2009 ACP World Rapid Cup (2009) with a 3-1 win over Svidler in the finals and won the Leko-Gelfand Match (2010) rapid match in Hungary by 4.5-3.5. Most recently, he defeated Aronian in the Leon Rapid (2010).

Ratings

Gelfand rating as of 1 June 2013 is:

<Classical> 2755, and is therefore Israel's top player and number 12 in the world;

<Rapid> 2728 (world #20); and

<Blitz> 2694 (world #42).

Other

In 2005, Gelfand published a book titled My Most Memorable Games.

Interview: Part 1 - http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...; Part 2 - http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail... and Part 3 - http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail... Live rating list: http://www.2700chess.com/ Extended biography of Gelfand at the official FIDE 2012 World Championship website: http://moscow2012.fide.com/en/prese... Article by the Indian Express dated 6 May 2012: http://www.indianexpress.com/news/m...


 page 1 of 98; games 1-25 of 2,438  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Gelfand vs Veremeichik 0-147 1982 MinskE12 Queen's Indian
2. Gelfand vs A Kovalev  0-138 1983 BLR-chB62 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer
3. B Itkis vs Gelfand  1-040 1983 BLR-chA48 King's Indian
4. Gelfand vs Veremeichik  1-059 1983 BLR-chA46 Queen's Pawn Game
5. B Maryasin vs Gelfand 1-066 1983 BLR-chB95 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6...e6
6. Gelfand vs V Litvinov  1-037 1983 BLR-chB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
7. S Yuferov vs Gelfand  1-054 1983 BLR-chA54 Old Indian, Ukrainian Variation, 4.Nf3
8. V Dydyshko vs Gelfand  1-041 1983 BLR-chE94 King's Indian, Orthodox
9. Gelfand vs B Malisov  1-056 1983 BLR-chB07 Pirc
10. P Korzubov vs Gelfand 0-157 1983 BLR-chB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
11. T Tabatadze vs Gelfand  ½-½55 1985 LeningradB87 Sicilian, Fischer-Sozin with ...a6 and ...b5
12. M Golubev vs Gelfand ½-½49 1985 KlaipedaB87 Sicilian, Fischer-Sozin with ...a6 and ...b5
13. Gelfand vs Ivanchuk ½-½19 1985 USSRC05 French, Tarrasch
14. S Temirbaev vs Gelfand  1-053 1985 URSE76 King's Indian, Four Pawns Attack
15. Gelfand vs Ulibin 1-030 1985 YurmalaC03 French, Tarrasch
16. Gelfand vs Glek  ½-½32 1985 tE73 King's Indian
17. S Gross vs Gelfand  0-144 1986 It (cat.9)A25 English
18. Gelfand vs M Sorokin 1-041 1986 USSRE09 Catalan, Closed
19. V Dydyshko vs Gelfand  0-144 1986 MinskE83 King's Indian, Samisch
20. P Martynov vs Gelfand 0-154 1986 Sochi (Russia)B90 Sicilian, Najdorf
21. Gelfand vs Psakhis  ½-½61 1986 MinskC07 French, Tarrasch
22. D Ruzele vs Gelfand  0-137 1986 It ( cat. 12 )E83 King's Indian, Samisch
23. Gelfand vs A Kosten  0-137 1986 It (cat.9)C05 French, Tarrasch
24. Gelfand vs Ivanchuk  ½-½40 1986 USSRE04 Catalan, Open, 5.Nf3
25. S Zagrebelny vs Gelfand ½-½31 1986 MinskB92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation
 page 1 of 98; games 1-25 of 2,438  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Gelfand wins | Gelfand loses  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 26 OF 28 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-01-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Anand looked unhappy playing against Gelfand, and I don't know if it was his own poor form, or Gelfand's "faceless" style, to borrow Botvinnik's description of Schlechter, that was the cause.

Gelfand played extremely correctly, without ever burning his bridges. His ...c4 in the twelfth game is to me the memorable characteristic move of the match. The move itself does not promise much, but is very hard to refute!

Game after game he put Anand to the decision by getting his ideas in first, so that he controlled the tactics, even if it meant he was slightly worse.

Jun-01-12  Petrosianic: Anand made little effort to put the pressure on him. A Draw-with-Black strategy coupled with 25 moves draws with White just doesn't put a top GM to the test like a more dynamic approach might. Anand was a better player, but didn't create situations where his superior ability could be brought to bear. The result; an overtime squeaker.
Jun-01-12  solskytz: <Troller>

I concur!!

Not to mention that also in the rapids the guy wasn't really inferior - creating very serious chances in 3 out of 4 games, making Anand sweat in general, and losing in a game where he could have changed the result at many points.

Not that clear cut!!

But losing is losing, ofc

Anyway, I still wait to see how he will fare, with all of his new preparations and repertoire, in the next candidates cycle

Jun-01-12  solskytz: I'll be very pleased, finally, to see Ivanchuk battling it out for the WC next time - and I root for either him, or Gelfand or the top 3. It won't be boring (and I regret that Nakamura isn't in, which would make it perfect)
Jun-01-12  solskytz: <HeMateMe>

I tend to disagree with this viewpoint. Carlsen isn't (yet?) a clearly superior player - and that is what makes the next WCC so exciting.

He's really great!! But so are Aronian and Kramnik, and to a somewhat lesser extent, the others (Nakamura among them, who isn't participating..)

Jun-01-12  solskytz: <Eyal> to be frank I feel that 20-25 percent each, is way to generous for Carlsen and Aronian, when Kramnik, Radjabov, Grischuk, Gelfand and Ivanchuk - but especially Kramnik, are also participating (for some reason I'm not so convinced about Svidler... so maybe he's the winner next time?)

Go Gelfand!!

Jun-01-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <Anand made little effort to put the pressure on him. A Draw-with-Black strategy coupled with 25 moves draws with White just doesn't put a top GM to the test like a more dynamic approach might.>

The "25 moves draws with White" had a lot to do with the superb quality of Gelfand's preparation and opening play - it's not that Anand was just lazy or unambitious. When he had real winning chances (and the game wasn't over after 17 moves...), as in game 3, he had no problem to go on playing. And there he missed a win in time trouble that resulted mainly from the long time Gelfand made him burn on the clock in the opening.

As Ganguly (one of Anand's seconds) admitted in his review of the match, Gelfand kept surprising them with Black. In games 1, 5, and 10 he equalized quickly without much trouble (with the Grunfeld, Sveshnikov, and the 5...e5 idea against the 5.b3 Rossolimo, respectively) - Anand just didn't manage to generate any real pressure. The position at the end of game 5 is completely dead, and in games 1 & 10 if anyone has a very slight edge it's Black. In game 12 Anand did manage to catch Gelfand in the opening with a nuance on the move order of game 10, but Gelfand came up otb with 10...c4 which managed to neutralize White's play. Anand could have shown a little more fighting spirit in that game and played on for more than 22 moves, but it's not like objectively he had serious winning chances; the main surprise about the early draw offer was due of the big advantage on the clock that he had at that point.

Game 8 was a different story, of course... And this immediate equalizing of the score may have saved Anand, who would have been otherwise under enormous pressure in the final games.

Jun-01-12  Petrosianic: <The "25 moves draws with White" had a lot to do with the superb quality of Gelfand's preparation and opening play - it's not that Anand was just lazy or unambitious. When he had real winning chances (and the game wasn't over after 17 moves...), as in game 3, he had no problem to go on playing.>

The thing is, you can't give up trying that early. If you say "Well, it's Move 20, and I still haven't got an edge. Let's call it a draw." You have to work a little harder to get that edge, especially if you feel sure you can't lose the game by continuing. You also need to play lines that give the opponent more opportunity to go wrong. Granted, you might go wrong also, but the odds are in the better player's favor.

Jun-01-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <The thing is, you can't give up trying that early. If you say "Well, it's Move 20, and I still haven't got an edge. Let's call it a draw." You have to work a little harder to get that edge, especially if you feel sure you can't lose the game by continuing.>

But all this can be relevant, if at all, only to game 12 (where Anand may have been influenced by a confidence in his chances at the rapid games), not as a description of Anand's play with White throughout the whole match. Sometimes games just play themselves out quickly – in game 5 the final position, with the BOOC and no Q-side pawns, is really dead (after the forced queen exchange to follow); it would have been a pure formality to go on. In games 1 & 10, if a continuation could risk anyone, it's likelier to be White than Black. Even if there was something irritating about the short draws from the viewpoint of a chess fan (and I can certainly identify with this sentiment), there's simply nothing in the nature of the positions to give any serious indication that Anand would have gained anything in any of his four short draws with White by going on. So I don't think this can be given as a serious reason for why Anand didn't do better in the match.

<You also need to play lines that give the opponent more opportunity to go wrong. Granted, you might go wrong also, but the odds are in the better player's favor.>

Again, you're not giving enough credit to the quality of Gelfand’s opening prep. Most of Anand's basic opening choices were quite aggressive and potentially very tricky for Black. Both the Grunfeld games went into very sharp positions. His readiness for entering the Sicilian was aggressive (Anand didn't know Gelfand was going to pull the Sveshnikov – judging by the latter's usual opening repertoire, it was more likely to expect the Najdorf). His ideas in the Rossolimo, as game 12 (as well as the 2nd tiebreak game, btw) showed, were quite aggressive. Gelfand just managed very skillfully to neutralize him most of the time (in 4 out of the 6 classical games).

Jun-01-12  Petrosianic: <Again, you're not giving enough credit to the quality of Gelfand’s opening prep.>

All right, well let's do two things. First, let's draw a distinction between Zero Advantage and All Played Out. Then, tell me which games you think qualify. I'm perfectly happy with Game 9. You say you're happy with Game 5. Which others are you happy with?

With the whole world watching, you can play on a while even with Zero Advantage, as long as your opponent doesn't have a game that he can close his eyes and let play itself. Which of the others do you think are that drawn?

I'm decidedly unhappy with Game 1. That might have burned out to a draw in a few moves, but it was still worthwhile to play on a bit longer just to make sure.

Jun-01-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: First, let's make clear that I'm talking only about Anand's 6 games with White, because it's the claim about the "25 moves draws with White" as seriously hurting Anand's chances in the match that I'm disagreeing with.

Well, I suppose there are no complaints about game 8, which was decisive, and about game 3, where Black forced a draw by perpetual check. I already said what I think about game 5. Now, I was somewhat disappointed with the conclusions of the three other games, but in two of them for reasons that actually go in the opposite direction to that of your argument. In game 1 it was clear that if anyone was fighting for a win it's Black, and the general surprise was about why Gelfand agreed so easily to a draw. In game 10 there were some chances for Black related to the a-pawn passer if White doesn't play carefully – not very difficult to neutralize, but still something. So I'm not enthusiastic about the general approach of <both> players in those games, but in terms of overall hypothetical (and very small) chances missed, I think Gelfand might have been the actual loser here rather than Anand.

Jun-01-12  frogbert: <but I wouldn't give even [carlsen & aronian] more than 20-25% [chance] each.>

eyal, i would give them even less, actually.

Jun-01-12  frogbert: <also in the rapids [gelfand] wasn't really inferior>

i don't think it would be a stretch to say that gelfand maybe played even *better* than anand, at least for most of these 4 rapid games. of course, one might also say that he did so by investing too much time without capitalizing on the positions that this strategy brought him.

Jun-02-12  wordfunph: a touching homecoming celebration by Boris..

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...

Jun-02-12  shach matov: Congratulations to Boris, this was a victory in every sense of the word. Anand's statement that basically this was one of the toughest matches of his life speaks volumes.
Jun-02-12  MORPHYEUS: If Gelfand maintained his composure in the rapids, he would have been the world champion.

It's not his destiny.

Jun-02-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ken MacGillivray: <Call Me TC><: Here's a word: LOSER> wish I had the chess skills to be such a LOSER and come home with prizemoney of $1.02 million. On second thoughts, forget the money, wish I had the skills to win the right to be world champion challenger, that would be reward enough
Jun-04-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <wordfunph: a touching homecoming celebration by Boris.. > Yes, indeed. :D
Jun-08-12  Chessinfinite: Well done Boris Gelfand !. Great performance to hold Viswanathan Anand in the match to equal. Best wishes to Gelfand from india..
Jun-09-12  voyager39: Yes, Gelfand has done exceptionally well. Nobody expected Boris to win the candidates in the first place. Aronian and Kramnik were the favourites. Even Topalov, Grischuk and Radjabov were considered better prospects. Yet Boris won.

The only achievement I would attribute to Anand is that he did well not to underestimate Boris. In terms of hard work, quality of play and nerves, they were both equal.

As Anand himself pointed out - a lot of elite players just couldn't digest the fact that Boris could play with such nerves of steel and with such ambition and authority. Full marks to Boris and he is a real hero who deserves his place in the Chess hall of fame.

Jun-09-12  voyager39: <frogbert> <I don't think it would be a stretch to say that gelfand maybe played even *better* than anand, at least for most of these 4 rapid games. Of course, one might also say that he did so by investing too much time without capitalizing on the positions that this strategy brought him> I totally agree. It was simply a time issue. Given a few more minutes - the result could have been exactly the opposite.

IMHO we need to change something here. We can't have "time" as a decisive factor in a game that is all about "intelligence". Like I keep saying - it's like a "power cut" being the most memorable part of the episode. That's sad.

Jun-10-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  dx9293: Wow, so Gelfand refused help from Kasparov on ethical grounds. Kudos to him.

<http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/b...>

Jun-10-12  Mr. Bojangles: <IMHO we need to change something here. We can't have "time" as a decisive factor in a game that is all about "intelligence". >

Who told u chess is all about intelligence?? Which rule book or manual did u find that?

Chess is simply a game. End of.

Jun-10-12  Mr. Bojangles: Thx dx9293, it was a pleasure reading Gefy's interview.

I have the highest respect possible for the man.

Jun-10-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: Calculation, intuition, positional understanding... but not intelligence (which is first to be defined!).

After all, even computer can play, and usually they say intelligence is what separates us from the machines.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 28)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 26 OF 28 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies