chessgames.com

Kamsky 
 
Gata Kamsky
Number of games in database: 1,401
Years covered: 1986 to 2013
Last FIDE rating: 2741
Highest rating achieved in database: 2762
Overall record: +385 -206 =500 (58.2%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      310 exhibition games, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (160) 
    B90 B47 B33 B97 B32
 Ruy Lopez (92) 
    C78 C91 C67 C65 C80
 Queen's Pawn Game (79) 
    A46 D02 A45 E00 E10
 French Defense (49) 
    C11 C18 C10 C16 C02
 Sicilian Najdorf (43) 
    B90 B97 B96 B91 B92
 Ruy Lopez, Closed (39) 
    C91 C84 C92 C89 C85
With the Black pieces:
 Slav (132) 
    D15 D10 D11 D12 D14
 Ruy Lopez (104) 
    C95 C84 C78 C89 C60
 Sicilian (87) 
    B42 B43 B40 B90 B41
 Grunfeld (76) 
    D85 D86 D97 D94 D96
 Ruy Lopez, Closed (67) 
    C95 C84 C89 C92 C88
 Sicilian Kan (47) 
    B42 B43 B41
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Kamsky vs Kramnik, 1994 1-0
   Kramnik vs Kamsky, 1994 0-1
   Kamsky vs Short, 1994 1-0
   Kamsky vs Shirov, 2007 1-0
   Kamsky vs Karpov, 1996 1-0
   Kamsky vs Lautier, 1993 1-0
   Kamsky vs Topalov, 2009 1-0
   Jobava vs Kamsky, 2012 0-1
   Kamsky vs Kasparov, 1992 1-0
   Kamsky vs Svidler, 2006 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World Championship (1996)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Match Kamsky! by amadeus
   Kamsky! by larrewl
   Melody Amber 1994 by amadeus
   Melody Amber 1995 by amadeus
   1.d4 London System Games by fredthebear
   Tilburg Interpolis 1990 by suenteus po 147
   Games analyzed by YouRang by YouRang
   Tilburg Interpolis 1991 by suenteus po 147
   Linares 1994 by suenteus po 147

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Gata Kamsky
Search Google for Gata Kamsky
FIDE player card for Gata Kamsky


GATA KAMSKY
(born Jun-02-1974) Russia (citizen of United States of America)

[what is this?]
Grandmaster (1990); World Championship challenger (1995).

Gata Kamsky was born June 2nd, 1974 in Novokuznetsk, Siberia and now lives in New York. After beginning his chess career in Russia, defeating GM Mark Taimanov in a tournament game at the age of 12, and winning USSR Junior Championships in 1987(1) (jointly with Boris Alterman) and 1988(2) (jointly with Mikhail Ulibin), Kamsky relocated to the United States in 1989, shortly after which he won the Buffalo Open. In July 1990 he became the youngest player ever to be rated in FIDE's world top ten, moving straight into the number 8 position from outside the top 100 while still untitled, representing three unique and as yet unsurpassed feats. After a short while spent adjusting to this level of opposition, Kamsky scored some major tournament triumphs, including Tilburg 1990, the U.S. Championship of 1991(3), Buenos Aires 1993, clear first at Las Palmas 1994, and shared first in 1995 at Dos Hermanas. He reached his peak world ranking of number 4 between July 1995 and January 1996.

Kamsky's initial participation in the world championship cycle was to qualify for the right to contest the 1990 Interzonal in Manila, where he scored 5.5/13. Three years later he contested both the FIDE and PCA Interzonals that were held in Groningen and Biel respectively, coming third in both events and thereby qualifying for both sets of Candidates matches. He reached the finals of the 1994-1995 PCA World Championship Candidates' matches, eliminating Vladimir Kramnik and Nigel Short before losing to Viswanathan Anand. In the simultaneous FIDE Candidates he met with even greater success, defeating Paul Van der Sterren, Anand and Valery Salov and qualifying for a match with Anatoly Karpov. After losing the match, Kamsky announced his retirement from professional chess in order to study medicine and law. This period of inactivity was punctuated by his participation in the 1999 World Championship Knockout Tournament, where he lost in the first round to the eventual winner, Alexander Khalifman.

In 2004 he returned to active competition in the New York Masters rapid competition before entering the U.S. Championship in San Diego, California, scoring 5.5 points from nine games. The following year he was undefeated in the HB Global Challenge held in Minneapolis, and placed ninth at the FIDE World Cup (2005), defeating Zhao Jun, Dmitry Bocharov, Ilya Smirin and Alexander Grischuk in the preliminary rounds. He therefore qualified once more for the Candidates' matches. In the 2007 round of matches, he eliminated Etienne Bacrot in the preliminary round but lost the final to Boris Gelfand. He rebounded in the next World Championship cycle by winning the World Chess Cup (2007). Undefeated throughout the seven-round event, he beat Ahmed Adly, Boris Avrukh, Kiril D Georgiev, Peter Svidler, Ruslan Ponomariov and Magnus Carlsen in the preliminary rounds before beating Alexey Shirov in the final to qualify for a match with Veselin Topalov in 2008. Topalov emerged victorious by a 4.5-2.5 margin and thereby gained the right to play Viswanathan Anand in a match for the title. Although he unexpectedly bowed out of the World Cup (2009) in the third round to Wesley So, on the basis of his match against Topalov, FIDE seeded him into the 2011 Candidates Tournament where he again faced Topalov, this time defeating Topalov by 2.5-1.5 (+1 =3 -0) to move into the semi finals against Gelfand. Kamsky conceded the semi final match in the blitz playoff by 1.5-0.5 after drawing the classical games 2-2 (+0 -0 =4) and the rapid games 2-2 (+1 -1 =2). Kamsky qualified by reason of his rating to participate in the World Cup (2011) where he defeated Diego Rafael Di Berardino, Rustam Kasimdzhanov and Ian Nepomniachtchi in the first three rounds but lost to the eventual winner Peter Svidler in the Round of Sixteen (round 4).

Following his success at the 2005 FIDE World Cup, further successes in 2006, including second place at the MTel Masters (2006) behind Topalov, and a bronze medal with the U.S. team at 37th Chess Olympiad (2006), helped reestablish his position as one of the world's leading players. In 2010 he won the Reggio Emilia (2009) (which finished in January 2010), the U.S. Championship for the second time in 19 years, the Philadelphia Open (2010), the President's Cup in Baku, represented the USA on 2nd board at the Chess Olympiad (2010), and won the Baku Open (2010). August 2010 also saw Kamsky becoming the world rapid champion when he won clear first at the World Rapid Chess Championship (Mainz Chess Classic) with 10.0/11, defeating world #5 and defending champion Levon Aronian, 2004 FIDE champion Rustam Kasimdzhanov, and Sergey Karjakin en route to the title. 2011 also saw him successfully defend his national title, winning his pool (US Championship (Group A) (2011)) and defeating Yury Shulman in the 2 game mini-match final for the title. This victory may have also contributed to his battle fitness in his successful match against Veselin Topalov. Subsequent to this, he won the 39th World Open (2011) on tiebreak from Michael Adams and played board 1 for the USA at the World Chess Team Championship (2011), scoring 5.5/9 and winning an individual bronze. Kamsky has since scored 7/13 (+3 -2 =8) at Tata Steel (2012) and was runner-up in the US Championship (2012) and in the inaugural ACP Golden Classic (2012), which showcased longer classical time controls and pre-computer style adjournments. In August 2012, he was outright winner of the 2012 Washington International and later that month he represented the USA in the Chess Olympiad (2012) scoring 8.5/11 and winning an individual bronze on 2nd board. In October 2012, Kamsky won team and individual gold playing board four for SOCAR Baku at the 28th European Club Cup (2012); this result propelled him to the top of the rating list for the Americas. However a poor 3.5/11 at the FIDE Grand Prix Tashkent (2012) subsequently cost significant ratings points. Vugar Gashimov 's continued absence from chess due to ill health has resulted in Kamsky replacing him in the Grand Prix series 2012-13, starting with the FIDE Grand Prix Zug (2013) in Switzerland.

2013 started with a modest 7.5/10 (=5th) at the Tradewise Gibraltar (2013). He scored 5.5/11 placing =5th at the FIDE Grand Prix Zug (2013), which when combined with his poor start to the GP series in Tashkent, has left his contention for the top 2 - and qualification for the 2014 Candidates tournament - in jeopardy. In May, he placed =1st in the US Chess Championships (2013) with Alejandro Ramirez-Alvarez, winning 2-1 in the 3rd game Armegeddon of the rapid game tiebreaker and the US national title for the fourth time.

As of 1 May 2013, Kamsky's standard FIDE rating was 2741, making him the number 2 player in the Americas and number 18 in the world. His rapid rating is 2762 (world #8) and his blitz rating is 2734 (world #21).

Kamsky has been a member of chessgames.com since early 2010, his userid being: User: DarkNolan

Live rating list: http://www.2700chess.com/

(1) [rusbase-1] (2) [rusbase-2] (3) http://graeme.50webs.com/chesschamp...

Wikipedia article: Gata Kamsky


 page 1 of 57; games 1-25 of 1,401  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. V Belikov vs Kamsky  0-142 1986 SochiJ-BB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
2. Kamsky vs K Aseev 1-031 1986 ViliandiA46 Queen's Pawn Game
3. Akopian vs Kamsky 1-034 1986 USSRB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
4. Kamsky vs Sakaev  0-145 1986 SochiJ-BB86 Sicilian, Fischer-Sozin Attack
5. Shirov vs Kamsky 1-039 1986 Sochi (Russia)C69 Ruy Lopez, Exchange, Gligoric Variation, 6.d4
6. Kamsky vs Tiviakov  0-168 1986 DaugavpilsB70 Sicilian, Dragon Variation
7. D Burmenko vs Kamsky  1-054 1986 SochiJ-BD11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
8. Kamsky vs F Sideif-Sade 1-046 1987 PavlodarB44 Sicilian
9. G Zaitshik vs Kamsky 0-156 1987 PavlodarD78 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.O-O c6
10. V Osnos vs Kamsky  ½-½24 1987 Leningrad-chD75 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.cd Nxd5, 7.O-O c5, 8.dxc5
11. Dreev vs Kamsky 1-056 1987 Pavlodar (Kazakhstan)C44 King's Pawn Game
12. Kamsky vs Y Dokhoian 0-161 1987 PavlodarC02 French, Advance
13. A Graf vs Kamsky  ½-½33 1987 PavlodarA25 English
14. Shirov vs Kamsky 1-029 1987 KapsukasD44 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
15. Kamsky vs Chekhov 1-062 1987 PavlodarB03 Alekhine's Defense
16. Kamsky vs P Fossan 1-018 1987 InnsbruckB12 Caro-Kann Defense
17. V Nasybullin vs Kamsky 0-140 1987 PavlodarA48 King's Indian
18. Kamsky vs I Novikov 0-129 1987 PavlodarD03 Torre Attack (Tartakower Variation)
19. Kamsky vs S Ivanov 0-145 1987 USSRD49 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav, Meran
20. Kamsky vs Yermolinsky  0-131 1987 PavlodarA48 King's Indian
21. Kamsky vs K Agapov 0-141 1987 LeningradA43 Old Benoni
22. D Komarov vs Kamsky  1-040 1987 USSRD44 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
23. Kamsky vs B Asanov  1-042 1988 Ch URS ( 1/2 )B77 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack
24. H Odeev vs Kamsky  ½-½41 1988 Ivano_FrankovskC46 Three Knights
25. Y Yakovich vs Kamsky  1-053 1988 Ch URS ( 1/2 )D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted
 page 1 of 57; games 1-25 of 1,401  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Kamsky wins | Kamsky loses  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 91 OF 133 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-09-09  kulangot: In all tournaments that Kamsky participated,since winning the world cup in 2007,his results were pretty equal,balance and fair.I believe it's part of his strategy against his match with Topalov.Not showing his true strength ,just like Anand who had his Bilbao act.Kamsky in 6.
Feb-09-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Strongest Force: Ever since i read about Gata and that Mossad agent, i get visions of the movie: Casino Royale and how the different opposing sides wanted to win at all costs and would do absolutely anything to win/get the money.

When you think about it, this match is for much more than ONE match and 125,000 dollars. The winner will be able to more easily obtain future invitations into the best tournaments. Also, the money will no doubt double for the Anand match. Remember the World Cup? Nobody expected Kamsky to win that. He can obviously dig deep within himself to bring forth the stuff he needs to overcome any circumstances.

Feb-10-09  Dionyseus: < Kamsky wants to bring an expert from the Mossad (Israel Intelligence Agency) to check the playing venue >

I doubt the Mossad, perhaps the best secret agents in the world, would bother with a chess match.

Feb-10-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: For the right price who knows... Mossad agent's have a sense of humor too. Just the very idea of it is intriguing. Imagine him accepting the job and there's a later incident where he is told to investigate any offending toilets for hidden tech. I can picture the Mossad guy laughing his ass off. This match might top Elista in total Loconess, what with Danailov and horror of horrors! Roustam!
Feb-10-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: < Kamsky wants to bring an expert from the Mossad (Israel Intelligence Agency) to check the playing venue >

probably due to their highly praised technical expertise with toilets ?

Feb-10-09  whiskeyrebel: Will Gata win? I just made my first "chess bookie" wager ever..on Kamsky of course. I bet the max amount.
Feb-10-09  blacksburg: oh no....
Feb-10-09  Jim Bartle: Unfortunately for comedic value, the "news" of the intrepid Mossad agent appears to come only via Danailov, which creates a lot of doubt.

However if Rustam is there and gets involved, it'll be an all-timer no matter what.

Feb-10-09  dumbgai: Keep betting on Kamsky guys, it just improves my odds.
Feb-10-09  kulangot: Jim Bartle is right.The "news" on Mossad agent only came from Danailov's mouth.I think it's just one of his psychological tricks against Kamsky.
Feb-10-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Strongest Force: If the technology depicted in the last two Bond movies are any indication, Kamsky has every right to worry. Being somewhat of a techie myself, i know that the miniature gadgets like the micro computers and cell phones can do more than we think...especially for the elite intelligence agencies. Just think what the right "brain waves" can do.
Feb-10-09  Jim Bartle: So if Kamsky sees John Cleese walking around the match site...
Feb-10-09  drkodos: Riverbeast, I have marked your words.

I think that if Kamsky can handle Topalov's opening prep, it will be a very good match. Too bad it will be only 8 games, as I see that playing in Topalov's favor. Kamsky, if given time, I belive would crack Topalov's prep, but with only 4 game each color, Top will probable have serious novelties prepared each game.

Between the two, I assert Topalov has contibuted more to opening theory, and will once again be in better postion to do so.

Kamsky, if he can catch him out in simplified positions, will grind him. Simple postions (which we both agree are the most difficult to actually master and play) could be Topalov's undoing.

At this stage, one week out, I still calling it Topalov and have more than just chess bucks that will be lost if he loses.

So long as I only lose chessbucks and/or $ and not a finger or other appendage, I can remain rhetorically arrogant about the whole thing. lol

Feb-10-09  laskersteinitz: http://rules.chessdom.com/kamsky-to... says: "The colors shall be reversed after game 4. (The player getting the white color in game 1 shall play game 5 with the black color)." What a bizarre arrangement. So each player will play four games in a row as White and Black?
Feb-10-09  iron maiden: No, it's just that the player who draws black in games 2 and 4 will also play black in games 5 and 7. This system has been used in the last two championship matches, Elista and Bonn (in the former it actually led to Kramnik playing three blacks in a row around the forfeited game 5). All that changes from the traditional match format is that if you now draw one color in the even-numbered games in the first half of the match, you get that color in the odd-numbered games in the second half, instead of playing it in every single even-numbered game.
Feb-11-09  dumbgai: I always thought that this color reversal system favors the player getting White in the first and last games.
Feb-11-09  cuendillar: <umbgai: I always thought that this color reversal system favors the player getting White in the first and last games.> That would make sense. In a way those are the most important games of the match. It's obviously advantageous to have white in the final game, but also in the first one to improve the chances of an early point.
Feb-11-09  VaselineTopLove: Perhaps Kamsky's gonna get Mossad Agent Zohan Dvir to help him out ;))
Feb-11-09  dumbgai: You don't mess with the Gata!
Feb-11-09  laskersteinitz: Do you think Kamsky will be present at the Foxwoods tournament, April 8-12, 2009?
Feb-11-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Strongest Force: That Foxwoods tournament is going to be a monster. I hear it through the grape-vine that a few of the top European players are thinking of going to this tournament and maybe a couple of the other US events.
Feb-11-09  Riverbeast: <Strongest force> Good news....Now I think I'm going to enter Foxwoods, so I can wax them
Feb-11-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Strongest Force: River, one of those guys you might be able to beat due to sleep deprivation alone: king Loek. :) From past experiences, you should know what i am referring to. :)
Feb-11-09  VaselineTopLove: <In a way those are the most important games of the match.>

I think the first game tends not to be as important as the last, especially when scores are level before the last game is played or if a player is at -1 and needs to win the last game to level.

In the first game, both players try to play a bit cautiously trying to gauge each other's preparation and to get into the mood for the real fight later on. But with matches consisting fewer and fewer games, each game counts and so players may try to play decisively rather than draw.

Feb-11-09  Riverbeast: <Strongest Force> I played Van wely a blitz game once, in an impromptu blitz tournament held in the skittles room after the New York Open.

He won.....And I've been plotting my revenge ever since

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 133)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 91 OF 133 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies