chessgames.com

Lasker 
 
Emanuel Lasker
Number of games in database: 1,092
Years covered: 1889 to 1940
Overall record: +360 -89 =180 (71.5%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      463 exhibition games, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (174) 
    C68 C62 C66 C67 C64
 French Defense (78) 
    C11 C12 C13 C01 C14
 French (55) 
    C11 C12 C13 C00 C10
 King's Gambit Accepted (48) 
    C39 C33 C38 C37 C35
 Sicilian (48) 
    B45 B34 B40 B32 B58
 King's Gambit Declined (30) 
    C30 C31 C32
With the Black pieces:
 Ruy Lopez (106) 
    C65 C66 C67 C79 C77
 Orthodox Defense (51) 
    D53 D63 D52 D50 D60
 Queen's Pawn Game (31) 
    D05 D02 D00 D04 A46
 Giuoco Piano (31) 
    C50 C53 C54
 Sicilian (28) 
    B34 B73 B45 B32 B33
 Four Knights (21) 
    C49 C47 C48
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Lasker vs J Bauer, 1889 1-0
   Lasker vs Capablanca, 1914 1-0
   Pillsbury vs Lasker, 1896 0-1
   Lasker vs W Napier, 1904 1-0
   Marshall vs Lasker, 1907 0-1
   Euwe vs Lasker, 1934 0-1
   Lasker vs Steinitz, 1894 1-0
   Lasker vs Schlechter, 1910 1-0
   Steinitz vs Lasker, 1896 0-1
   Tarrasch vs Lasker, 1908 0-1

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Lasker-Steinitz World Championship (1894)
   Lasker-Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896)
   Lasker-Marshall World Championship Match (1907)
   Lasker-Tarrasch World Championship Match (1908)
   Lasker-Schlechter World Championship Match (1910)
   Lasker-Janowski World Championship Match (1910)
   Lasker-Capablanca World Championship Match (1921)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   St. Petersburg 1895-96 (1895)
   Hastings (1895)
   Nuremberg (1896)
   London (1899)
   Paris (1900)
   Cambridge Springs (1904)
   Lasker-Janowski (1909)
   St Petersburg (1909)
   St Petersburg (1914)
   New York (1924)
   Moscow (1925)
   Zurich (1934)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Match Lasker! by amadeus
   The Lion King by chocobonbon
   lasker best games by brager
   Why Lasker Matters by Andrew Soltis by keypusher
   Selected Lasker by LaBourdonnaisdeux
   the informal Lasker by ughaibu
   All Hail Emanuel by iron maiden
   World Champions A-Z part 2 Lasker by kevin86
   Lasker vs the World Champions Decisive Games by visayanbraindoctor
   Lasker by vidra
   fav Lasker & Steinitz games by guoduke
   Match Steinitz! by amadeus
   4-Ruy Lopez by classicalwin2
   Emanuel Lasker's Best Games by KingG

GAMES ANNOTATED BY LASKER: [what is this?]
   Rubinstein vs Lasker, 1909
   Rubinstein vs Salwe, 1908
   Spielmann vs Rubinstein, 1909
   Tartakower vs Schlechter, 1909
   Rubinstein vs Mieses, 1909
   >> 81 GAMES ANNOTATED BY LASKER

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Emanuel Lasker
Search Google for Emanuel Lasker


EMANUEL LASKER
(born Dec-24-1868, died Jan-11-1941) Germany

[what is this?]
Emanuel Lasker was the second "official" World Chess Champion, reigning for a record 27 years after he defeated the first World Champion, Wilhelm Steinitz, in 1894.

Statistician Jeff Sonas of Chessmetrics writes, "if you look across players' entire careers, there is a significant amount of statistical evidence to support the claim that Emanuel Lasker was, in fact, the most dominant player of all time." By Sonas' reckoning, Lasker was the No. 1 player in the world for a total of 24.3 years between 1890 and 1926.

Background

He was born in what was then Berlinchen (literally "little Berlin") in Prussia, and which is now Barlinek in Poland. In 1880, he went to school in Berlin, where he lived with his older brother Berthold Lasker, who was studying medicine, and who taught him how to play chess. By Chessmetrics' analysis, Berthold was one of the world's top ten players in the early 1890s.

Tournaments

Soon after Lasker obtained his abitur in Landsberg an der Warthe, now a Polish town named Gorzow Wielkopolski, the teenager's first tournament success came when he won the Café Kaiserhof's annual Winter tournament 1888/89, winning all 20 games. Soon afterwards, he tied with Emil von Feyerfeil with 12/15 (+11 -2 =2) at the second division tournament of the sixth DSB Congress in Breslau, defeating von Feyerfeil in the one game play-off.* Also in 1889, he came second with 6/8 (+5 -1 =2) behind Amos Burn at the Amsterdam "A" (stronger) tournament, ahead of James Mason and Isidor Gunsberg, two of the strongest players of that time. In 1890 he finished third in Graz behind Gyula Makovetz and Johann Hermann Bauer, then shared first prize with his brother Berthold in a tournament in Berlin. In spring 1892, he won two tournaments in London, the second and stronger of these without losing a game. At New York 1893, he won all thirteen games, one of a small number of significant tournaments in history in which a player achieved a perfect score.

After Lasker won the title, he answered his critics who considered that the title match was by an unproven player against an aging champion by being on the leader board in every tournament before World War I, including wins at St Petersburg in 1895-96, Nurenberg 1896, London 1899, Paris 1900 ahead of Harry Nelson Pillsbury (by 2 points with a score of +14 −1 =1), Trenton Falls 1906, and St Petersburg in 1914. He also came 3rd at Hastings 1895 (this relatively poor result possibly occurring during convalescence after nearly dying from typhus), 2nd at Cambridge Springs in 1904, and =1st at the Chigorin Memorial tournament in St Petersburg in 1909. In 1918, a few months after the war, Lasker won a quadrangular tournament in Berlin against Akiba Rubinstein, Carl Schlechter and Siegbert Tarrasch.

After he lost the title in 1921, Lasker was still in the top rank of players, winning at Moravská Ostrava in 1923 ahead of Richard Reti, Ernst Gruenfeld, Alexey Sergeevich Selezniev, Savielly Tartakower, and Max Euwe. His last tournament win was at New York 1924, where he scored 80% and finished 1.5 points ahead of Jose Raul Capablanca, followed by Alexander Alekhine and Frank James Marshall. In 1925, he came 2nd at Moscow behind Efim Bogoljubov and ahead of Capablanca, Marshall, Tartakower, and Carlos Torre Repetto. There followed a long hiatus from chess caused by his intention to retire from the game, but he re-emerged into front line chess in 1934 placing 5th in Zurich behind Alekhine, Euwe, Salomon Flohr and Bogoljubow and ahead of Ossip Bernstein, Aron Nimzowitsch, and Gideon Stahlberg. In Moscow in 1935, he was 3rd, undefeated, a half point behind Mikhail Botvinnik and Flohr and ahead of Capablanca, Rudolf Spielmann, Ilia Abramovich Kan, Grigory Levenfish, Andre Lilienthal, and Viacheslav Ragozin. Reuben Fine hailed the 66-year-old Lasker's performance as "a biological miracle". In 1936, Lasker placed 6th in Moscow and finished his career later that year at Nottingham when he came =7th with 8.5/14 (+6 -3 =5), his last-round game being the following stylish win: Lasker vs C H Alexander, 1936.

Matches

Non-title matches 1889 saw his long career in match play commence, one which only ceased upon relinquishing his title in 1921. He won nearly of his matches, apart from a few drawn mini-matches, including a drawn one-game play-off match against his brother Berthold in Berlin in 1890, losing only exhibition matches with Mikhail Chigorin, Carl Schlechter and Marshall, and a knight-odds match against Nellie Showalter, Jackson Showalter's wife. In 1889, he defeated Curt von Bardeleben (+1 =2) and in 1889-90 he beat Jacques Mieses (+5 =3). In 1890, he defeated Henry Edward Bird (+7 -2 =3) and N Miniati (+3 =2 -0), and in 1891 he beat Francis Joseph Lee (+1 =1) and Berthold Englisch (+2 =3). 1892 and 1893 saw Lasker getting into his stride into the lead up to his title match with Steinitz, beating Bird a second time (5-0), Joseph Henry Blackburne (+6 =4), Jackson Whipps Showalter (+6 -2 =2) and Celso Golmayo Zupide (+2 =1). In 1892, Lasker toured and played a series of mini-matches against leading players in the Manhattan, Brooklyn and Franklin Chess Clubs. At the Manhattan Chess Club, he played a series of three-game matches, defeating James Moore Hanham, Gustave Simonson, David Graham Baird, Charles B Isaacson, Albert Hodges, Eugene Delmar, John S Ryan and John Washington Baird; of the 24 games he played against these players he won 21, losing one to Hodges and drawing one each with Simonson and Delmar. At the Brooklyn Chess Club, Lasker played two mini-matches of two games each, winning each game against Abel Edward Blackmar and William M De Visser, and drew the first game of an unfinished match against Philip Richardson. Lasker finished 1892 at the Franklin Chess Club by playing 5 mini-matches of two games each against its leading players, winning every game against Dion M Martinez, Alfred K Robinson, Gustavus Charles Reichhelm and Hermann G Voigt and drawing a match (+1 -1) with Walter Penn Shipley. Shipley offered cash bonuses if he could stipulate the openings and taking up the challenge, Lasker played the Two Knight's Defense and won in 38 moves, while in the second game, Shipley won as Black in 24 moves against Lasker playing the White end of a Vienna Gambit, Steinitz variation (Opening Explorer). Shipley, who counted both Lasker and Steinitz as his friends, was instrumental in arranging the Philadelphia leg of the Lasker-Steinitz match, that being games 9, 10 and 11. 29 years later, Shipley was also the referee of Lasker’s title match with Capablanca. In 1892-3, Lasker also played and won some other matches against lesser players including Andres Clemente Vasquez (3-0), A Ponce (first name Albert) (2-0) and Alfred K Ettlinger (5-0). Also in 1893, Mrs. Nellie Showalter, wife of Jackson Showalter and one of the leading women players in the USA, defeated Lasker 5-2 in a match receiving Knight odds.

These matches pushed Lasker to the forefront of chess, and after being peremptorily refused a match by Tarrasch, he defeated Steinitz for the world title in 1894 after spreadeagling the field at New York 1893. While he was World Champion, Lasker played some non-title matches, the earliest of which was a six-game exhibition match against Chigorin in 1903 which he lost 2.5-3.5 (+1 -2 =3); the match was intended as a rigorous test of the Rice Gambit, which was the stipulated opening in each game. In the midst of his four title defenses that were held between 1907 and 1910, Lasker played and won what appears to have been a short training match against Abraham Speijer (+2 =1) in 1908. Also in 1908, he played another Rice Gambit-testing match, this time against Schlechter, again losing, this time by 1-4 (+0 =2 -3), apparently prompting a rethink of the Rice Gambit as a viable weapon.** In 1909 he drew a short match (2 wins 2 losses) against David Janowski and several months later they played a longer match that Lasker easily won (7 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss). Lasker accepted a return match and they played a title match in 1910 (details below). In 1914, he drew a 2 game exhibition match against Bernstein (+1 -1) and in 1916, he defeated Tarrasch in another, clearly non-title, match by 5.5-0.5. After Lasker lost his title in 1921, he is not known to have played another match until he lost a two-game exhibition match (=1 -1) against Marshall in 1940, a few months before he died. A match between Dr. Lasker and Dr. Vidmar had been planned for 1925, but it did not eventuate.***

World Championship matches The Lasker-Steinitz World Championship (1894) was played in New York, Philadelphia, and Montreal. Lasker won with 10 wins, 5 losses and 4 draws. Lasker also won the Lasker-Steinitz World Championship Rematch (1896), played in Moscow, with 10 wins, 2 losses, and 5 draws. At one stage when Rudolf Rezso Charousek ‘s star was in the ascendant, Lasker was convinced he would eventually play a title match with the Hungarian master; unfortunately, Charousek died from tuberculosis in 1900, aged 26, before this could happen. As it turned out, he did not play another World Championship for 11 years until the Lasker-Marshall World Championship Match (1907), which was played in New York, Philadelphia, Washington, Baltimore, Chicago, Memphis. Lasker won this easily, remaining undefeated with 8 wins and 7 draws.

After a prolonged period of frosty relations due to Tarrasch’s peremptory dismissal of Lasker’s offer for a match, Lasker accepted Tarrasch’s challenge for the title, and the Lasker-Tarrasch World Championship Match (1908) was played in Düsseldorf and Munich, with Lasker winning with 8 wins 3 losses and five draws. In 1910, Lasker came close to losing his title when he was trailing by a full point at the tenth and last game of the Lasker-Schlechter World Championship Match (1910) (the match being played in Vienna and Berlin); Schlechter held the advantage and could have drawn the game with ease on several occasions, however, he pursued a win, ultimately blundering a Queen endgame to relinquish his match lead and allow Lasker to retain the title. Some months later, the Lasker-Janowski World Championship Match (1910) - played in Berlin - was Lasker’s final successful defense of his title, winning with 8 wins and 3 draws.

In 1912 Lasker and Rubinstein, agreed to play a World Championship match in the fall of 1914 but the match was cancelled when World War I broke out. The war delayed all further title match negotiations until Lasker finally relinquished his title upon resigning from the Lasker-Capablanca World Championship Match (1921) in Havana while trailing by four games.

Life, legacy and testimonials

Lasker’s extended absences from chess were due to his pursuit of other activities, including mathematics and philosophy. He spent the last years of the 19th century writing his doctorate. Between 1902 and 1907, he played only at Cambridge Springs, using his time in the US. It was during this period that he introduced the notion of a primary ideal, which corresponds to an irreducible variety and plays a role similar to prime powers in the prime decomposition of an integer. He proved the primary decomposition theorem for an ideal of a polynomial ring in terms of primary ideals in a paper Zur Theorie der Moduln und Ideale published in volume 60 of Mathematische Annalen in 1905. A commutative ring R is now called a 'Lasker ring' if every ideal of R can be represented as an intersection of a finite number of primary ideals. Lasker's results on the decomposition of ideals into primary ideals was the foundation on which Emmy Noether built an abstract theory which developed ring theory into a major mathematical topic and provided the foundations of modern algebraic geometry. Noether's Idealtheorie in Ringbereichen (1921) was of fundamental importance in the development of modern algebra, generalising Lasker's results by giving the decomposition of ideals into intersections of primary ideals in any commutative ring with ascending chain condition.****

After Lasker lost his title, he spent a considerable amount of time playing bridge and intended to retire. However, he returned to chess in the mid-thirties as he needed to raise money after the Nazis had confiscated his properties and life savings. After the tournament in Moscow in 1936, the Laskers were encouraged to stay on and Emanuel accepted an invitation to become a member of the Moscow Academy of Science to pursue his mathematical studies, with both he and his wife, Martha, taking up permanent residence in Moscow. At this time, he also renounced his German citizenship and took on Soviet citizenship. Although Stalin's purges prompted the Laskers to migrate to the USA in 1937, it is unclear whether they ever renounced their Soviet citizenship.

Lasker counted Albert Einstein amongst his friends. He published several chess books but as he was also a mathematician, games theorist, philosopher and even playwright, he published books in all these fields, except for the play which was performed on one occasion. As a youth, his parents had recognised his potential and sent him to study in Berlin where he also learned to play serious chess. After he graduated from high school, he studied mathematics and philosophy at the universities in Berlin, Göttingen and Heidelberg. Lasker died in the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York in 1941, aged 72, and was buried in the Beth Olom Cemetery in Queens. He was survived by his wife and his sister, Lotta. On May 6, 2008, Dr. Lasker was among the first 40 German sportsmen to be elected into the "Hall of Fame des Deutschen Sports".

******

"It is not possible to learn much from him. One can only stand and wonder." - <Max Euwe> Euwe lost all three of his games against Lasker, the most lopsided result between any two world champions.

"My chess hero" - <Viktor Korchnoi>

"The greatest of the champions was, of course, Emanuel Lasker" - <Mikhail Tal>

"Lies and hypocrisy do not survive for long on the chessboard. The creative combination lies bare the presumption of a lie, while the merciless fact, culminating in a checkmate, contradicts the hypocrite." – <Emanuel Lasker>

*******

* E von Feyerfeil vs Lasker, 1889** http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/... *** User: Karpova: Emanuel Lasker ****http://www.gap-system.org/~history/...

Sources: Article about Lasker by J J O'Connor and E F Robertson http://www.gap-system.org/~history/...; Obituary from the Times of London: http://www.gap-system.org/~history/...

Notes Lasker played on the following consultation chess teams Em. Lasker / MacDonnell, Lasker / Taubenhaus, Em. Lasker / Maroczy, Em. Lasker / I Rice, Em. Lasker / Barasz / Breyer, Lasker / Pillsbury, Lasker/Chigorin/Marshall/Teichmann, W Lasker Em / Ward Higgins, Emanuel Lasker / Heinrich Wolf, H Lasker Em / Keidanski & L Lasker Em / Lasek.

Wikipedia article: Emanuel Lasker
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...


 page 1 of 44; games 1-25 of 1,092  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. L Mabillis vs Lasker  0-124 1889 Breslau HauptturnierC60 Ruy Lopez
2. Lasker vs Von Bardeleben 1-047 1889 Berlin m 8990B06 Robatsch
3. Lasker vs Burn ½-½15 1889 AmsterdamC01 French, Exchange
4. Mieses vs Lasker ½-½60 1889 MatchC25 Vienna
5. Von Bardeleben vs Lasker  ½-½27 1889 Berlin m 8990D53 Queen's Gambit Declined
6. E von Feyerfeil vs Lasker 0-147 1889 Hauptturnier play offD00 Queen's Pawn Game
7. R Leather vs Lasker 0-156 1889 AmsterdamA07 King's Indian Attack
8. Gunsberg vs Lasker 0-135 1889 AmsterdamC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
9. Lasker vs Lipke 1-047 1889 Breslau (Poland)C26 Vienna
10. Lasker vs J Mason ½-½38 1889 AmsterdamC47 Four Knights
11. V Tietz vs Lasker 0-140 1889 German Chess Congress, Hauptturnier AC79 Ruy Lopez, Steinitz Defense Deferred
12. L Van Vliet vs Lasker 1-024 1889 AmsterdamC41 Philidor Defense
13. E von Feyerfeil vs Lasker  1-042 1889 Breslau HauptturnierC30 King's Gambit Declined
14. Lasker vs Mieses 1-037 1889 MatchA84 Dutch
15. Lasker vs A Van Foreest 1-050 1889 AmsterdamA04 Reti Opening
16. Loman vs Lasker 0-122 1889 AmsterdamC79 Ruy Lopez, Steinitz Defense Deferred
17. Lasker vs J Bauer 1-038 1889 AmsterdamA03 Bird's Opening
18. Von Bardeleben vs Lasker 1-050 1889 BerlinC26 Vienna
19. A Reif vs Lasker  0-113 1889 Breslau HauptturnierA02 Bird's Opening
20. Mieses vs Lasker 0-128 1889 Berlin (Germany)C25 Vienna
21. Lasker vs Von Popiel 0-121 1889 Berlin gameC26 Vienna
22. Bird vs Lasker 0-122 1890 Lasker - BirdA03 Bird's Opening
23. Lasker vs Bird 1-038 1890 Lasker - BirdA81 Dutch
24. Lasker vs Von Scheve  1-026 1890 BerlinC45 Scotch Game
25. Lasker vs Mieses 1-039 1890 MatchD21 Queen's Gambit Accepted
 page 1 of 44; games 1-25 of 1,092  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Lasker wins | Lasker loses  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 21 OF 70 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-02-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: <PaulLovric> Sometimes only the blind can see.

:)

Oct-02-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: <PaulLovric>, the version of the story I heard was that Lasker was watching a man play for money, who gave all of his opponents Knight odds, played the Muzio Gambit in every game, and won all the time. So Lasker, concealing his identity, played Black versus the Muzio, took Knight odds--and lost.

Then he challenged his vanquisher at double the normal stakes, but insisted that he (Lasker) play White and give Knight odds. His gullible foe took the bait, and Lasker played the Muzio Gambit and proceeded to reel off a string of wins (and pick up lots of money). Finally, his opponent asked how this could have happened. Lasker told him that the Muzio Gambit is unsound *unless* White gives odds of the Queen Knight. In many variations, said Lasker, White must spend a tempo on Nb1-c3 for no other reason than enable the development of the Ra1. That tempo spent is decisive. With Knight odds, there is no Nb1 to get in the way, White saves a vital tempo, and therefore White wins.

As Lasker walked away with his winnings (and still not revealing his identity) a friend who was with him whispered, "Is any of that rubbish true?"

Lasker whispered back, "I have no idea. But if you're hungry, I'm buying lunch."

Oct-02-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  PaulLovric: <An Englishman> Brilliant
Nov-05-05  FHBradley: Something worth looking at with nice pictures:

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...

Nov-05-05  paladin at large: <FHBradley> Yes, indeed, thanks very much.
Nov-12-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  PhilFeeley: Why is there nothing between 1925 and 1934? I have a report of a simul he gave in Seattle in 1926, but none of the games are here (he won twenty-four, lost two and drew four). Here is one of the wins for an opponent:

Lasker,E - Maltby,F [C50] Simul Seattle, 18.03.1926
1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 Bc5 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.Bc4 Nf6 5.d3 d6 6.Bg5 h6 7.Bh4 Bb4 8.Nd2 g5 9.Bg3 Be6 10.h4 Kd7 11.hxg5 hxg5 12.Bxe6+ fxe6 13.Rxh8 Qxh8 14.Nf1 Rf8 15.a3 Ba5 16.f3 Nh5 17.Bf2 Nf4 18.g3 Nh3 19.Be3 Qf6 20.Nh2 Nd4 21.Bxd4 exd4 22.b4 dxc3 23.bxa5 Qe5 24.Nf1 Ng1 25.Kf2 Nxf3 26.Qxf3 Rxf3+ 27.Kxf3 Qxa5 28.Ne3 b5 29.Kg4 Qb6 30.Re1 Qc5 31.Nd1 a5 32.Rh1 b4 33.axb4 axb4 34.Kf3 b3 35.Ne3 b2 36.Nc4 Qb4 0–1

Nov-12-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <PhilFeeley> Have about 40 games from 1926 to 1934. Just about all simuls. Can submit to CG, but the headers need a little work.
Nov-12-05  ughaibu: Calli: There's at least the Tartakower game missing from Saint Petersburg 1909, if you have any of those could you send them in please.
Nov-13-05  iron maiden: Also missing from Petersburg 1909 are Lasker's wins against Bernstein, Perlis, Cohn, Forgacs and Speyer. I have the Forgacs game in descriptive, but I can't find the others anywhere.
Nov-23-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: Who has the record among the World chess champions for title defenses?
Nov-23-05  iron maiden: As the bio indicates, it's Lasker: against Steinitz (1896), Marshall (1907), Tarrasch (1908), Janowsky (twice, in 1909 and 1911), and Schlechter (1910). Kasparov is second with five defenses.
Nov-23-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  GoldenKnight: I thought it was Tarrasch he defended against twice. I have not read in Hannak's biography (in German or English) that Lasker ever defended against Janowski. That book has all of Lasker's tournament results and all of his match results (any matches at all). I'll take another look when I get home tonight to make sure.
Nov-23-05  percyblakeney: Lasker defended his title against Janowski, but some claim it was only once. The 1909 match finished less than two months before Lasker-Schlechter started and it is sometimes said to have been an exhibition match:

http://www.mark-weeks.com/chess/09l...

Nov-23-05  WMD: Six title defences: Steinitz (1896), Marshall (1907), Tarrasch (1908), Schlechter (1910), Janowski (1910) and Capablanca (1921).

Janowski(1909) and Tarrasch (1916) were non-title exhibition matches.

Nov-23-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  GoldenKnight: <WMD> If you could give me a reference on the 1916 Tarrasch match I would appreciate it. Both the Hannak book (I think) and George Koltanowski (whom I heard say this personally) indicated that both Tarrasch matches were title matches
Nov-23-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: So that would be five successful title defenses(He lost to Capablanca) So that would tie him with Kasparov.
Nov-23-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <GoldenKnight> The second match was a six game non title match.It says so in Hannak's bio of Lasker pg.192.
Nov-23-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  GoldenKnight: Since, as it seems to me, opinions on both Fischer and Capablanca approach religious fervor, I would rather post this on Lasker's page than Capablanca's.

For those who think Capablanca was the greatest player ever, consider this. Capablanca never came out ahead of Lasker in any tournament they played in together until 1936 in the two tournaments they played in together that year. These were the last two tournaments Lasker ever played in. He was near 70 by then.

Nov-23-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  GoldenKnight: <chancho> Ok, I give in. Thanks.
Nov-23-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <GoldenKnight> You're welcome.
Nov-23-05  offramp: <WMD: Six title defences: Steinitz (1896), Marshall (1907), Tarrasch (1908), Schlechter (1910), Janowski (1910) and Capablanca (1921). Janowski(1909) and Tarrasch (1916) were non-title exhibition matches.>

And that coincides *exactly* with my beliefs.

Nov-23-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <offramp> Six total defenses,yes. But only five SUCCESSFUL defenses.He lost the sixth to Capablanca.
Nov-25-05  Pawsome: <FHBradley> thanks for a fine reference. Here's a quote from it that caught my eye: "Finally, guest of honor Edzard Reuter spoke about the role of chess as lasting idea in a world, in which globalization and neoliberal capitalism will only be transient episodes." We can only hope that it will be thus!
Nov-27-05  pazzed paun: Andy Soltis is publishing a book in March 2006 called "Why Lasker still matters"- If you could write a chapter in the book what would you put in?
Nov-27-05  ughaibu: I would put in a chapter criticising Soltis' articles about Zurich 1953 and particularly his annotation of the Geller game.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 70)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 21 OF 70 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies