chessgames.com

Fischer 
The Championship Season: Bobby Fischer in 1972.  
Robert James Fischer
Number of games in database: 983
Years covered: 1953 to 1992
Last FIDE rating: 2780
Highest rating achieved in database: 2785
Overall record: +417 -85 =246 (72.2%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      235 exhibition games, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (182) 
    B90 B32 B88 B44 B57
 Ruy Lopez (118) 
    C92 C69 C95 C97 C98
 Ruy Lopez, Closed (76) 
    C92 C95 C97 C98 C89
 French Defense (65) 
    C19 C11 C18 C16 C15
 Caro-Kann (52) 
    B10 B11 B18 B14 B17
 French Winawer (38) 
    C19 C18 C16 C15 C17
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (118) 
    B92 B99 B97 B90 B93
 King's Indian (115) 
    E62 E80 E97 E60 E67
 Sicilian Najdorf (77) 
    B92 B99 B97 B90 B93
 Nimzo Indian (23) 
    E45 E46 E40 E43 E21
 Grunfeld (20) 
    D79 D86 D98 D80 D85
 English (18) 
    A16 A15 A10 A19
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   D Byrne vs Fischer, 1956 0-1
   R Byrne vs Fischer, 1963 0-1
   Fischer vs Spassky, 1972 1-0
   Fischer vs Myagmarsuren, 1967 1-0
   Fischer vs Fine, 1963 1-0
   Fischer vs Tal, 1961 1-0
   Spassky vs Fischer, 1972 0-1
   Fischer vs Benko, 1963 1-0
   Letelier vs Fischer, 1960 0-1
   Fischer vs Panno, 1970 1-0

WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS: [what is this?]
   Fischer-Spassky World Championship Match (1972)

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Zurich (1959)
   Mar del Plata (1960)
   Stockholm Interzonal (1962)
   Curacao Candidates (1962)
   US Championship 1963/64 (1963)
   Havana (1965)
   Skopje (1967)
   Vinkovci (1968)
   Netanya (1968)
   Rovinj/Zagreb (1970)
   Palma de Mallorca Interzonal (1970)
   Fischer-Spassky (1992)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Fischer vs The Russians by wanabe2000
   Match Fischer! by amadeus
   Bobby Fischer: Selected Games from 1955-1992 by wanabe2000
   Russians versus Fischer by TheFocus
   Bjelica_125 by Gottschalk
   Russians versus Fischer by Anatoly21
   Robert Fischer's Best Games by KingG
   Fischer Favorites by atrifix
   Fischer's Finest by morphyvsfischer
   fischer best games by brager
   Bobby Fischer Rediscovered (Andy Soltis) by AdrianP
   Games by Fisher by gothic
   Bobby Fischer's Road to the World Championship by WeakSquare
   Guess-the-Move Chess: 1960-1979 (Part 1) by Anatoly21

GAMES ANNOTATED BY FISCHER: [what is this?]
   Morphy vs Duke Karl / Count Isouard, 1858
   R Byrne vs Fischer, 1963
   Petrosian vs Pachman, 1961
   Korchnoi vs Fischer, 1970
   Zukertort vs Steinitz, 1886
   >> 18 GAMES ANNOTATED BY FISCHER

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Robert James Fischer
Search Google for Robert James Fischer


ROBERT JAMES FISCHER
(born Mar-09-1943, died Jan-17-2008) United States of America (citizen of Iceland)

[what is this?]
Robert James ("Bobby") Fischer was born on March 9, 1943 in Chicago. At 13, he won the stunning brilliancy D Byrne vs Fischer, 1956, which Hans Kmoch christened "The Game of the Century." At 14, he won the US Championship, becoming the youngest player ever to do so.

Fischer's victory qualified him for the 1958 Portorož Interzonal. He tied for 5th–6th, which sufficed to advance him to the Candidates Tournament to decide the challenger to World Champion Mikhail Botvinnik. It also made him, at 15, the youngest grandmaster ever - a record that stood until Judit Polgar broke it in 1991. At the Candidates tournament, held in Bled/Zagreb/Belgrade, Yugoslavia, Fischer finished fifth out of eight, the top non-Soviet player.

Fischer won the US Championship all eight times he played, in each case by at least a point. In the US Championship 1963/64 (1963) he achieved the only perfect score (11-0) in the history of the tournament.

In 1962, he won the Stockholm Interzonal 2½ points ahead of Efim Geller and Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian. This made him one of the favorites to win the Candidates Tournament at Curaçao, but he only finished fourth, behind Petrosian, Geller, and Paul Keres.

In a famous article in Sports Illustrated, The Russians Have Fixed World Chess, Fischer accused the Soviets of cheating: Petrosian, Geller, and Keres had drawn all 12 of the games among themselves at Curaçao. Because of this, he refused to play in the next Candidates cycle. He did play in the 1967 Sousse Interzonal, but left it while leading, because of a scheduling dispute occasioned by Fischer's refusal to play on Saturday, his Sabbath.

In 1970 he won the Palma de Mallorca Interzonal by a record 3½ points. The following year, he shocked the chess world by sweeping the Fischer-Taimanov Candidates Match (1971) and the Fischer-Larsen Candidates Match (1971) by identical 6-0 scores. He also won the first game of his Candidates final against former World Champion Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian, giving him a modern record of 20 consecutive wins at the highest level of competition. He beat Petrosian by 6½-2½ to advance to the World Championship match against reigning champion Boris Spassky. This also gave him a FIDE rating of 2785, making him at that time the highest-rated player in history.

In Reykjavik, he won the Fischer-Spassky World Championship Match (1972) by 12½-8½ to become the 11th World Chess Champion. In 1975, Fischer forfeited his title after FIDE refused to meet his conditions for a World Championship match with Anatoly Karpov. He then vanished from the public eye for nearly 20 years.

After ending his competitive career, he proposed a new variant of chess and a modified chess timing system. His idea of adding a time increment after each move is now standard, and his variant "Fischerandom" (or "Chess960") is gaining in popularity.(2)

Fischer resurfaced in 1992 to play a match against his old rival Spassky in Yugoslavia, which he won 10-5 with 15 draws. This action allegedly violated U.S. Treasury Department regulations that forbade transacting business with Yugoslavia. Fischer evaded authorities for twelve years until July 13, 2004, when he was arrested in Japan. On March 22, 2005, he was granted Icelandic citizenship and finally freed from Japan. He died of renal failure in Iceland on January 17, 2008 at the age of 64.

Fischer's anthology, My 60 Memorable Games, was published in 1969. It has been described as a "classic of objective and painstaking analysis"1 and is regarded as one of the great classics of chess literature.

(1) Hooper & Whyld. The Oxford Companion to Chess. 1992

(2) Wikipedia article: Bobby Fischer

(3) User: jessicafischerqueen 's YouTube documentary of Fischer http://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...


 page 1 of 40; games 1-25 of 983  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. D Mayers vs Fischer 1-017 1953 Blitz GameC33 King's Gambit Accepted
2. J Altusky vs Fischer 0-18 1954 Offhand GameC71 Ruy Lopez
3. Fischer vs J Altusky 1-012 1954 Offhand GameE90 King's Indian
4. Fischer vs K Warner 0-128 1955 Lincoln ch-US jrB58 Sicilian
5. J Thomason vs Fischer 0-123 1955 Lincoln ch-US jrE90 King's Indian
6. Fischer vs V Pupols 0-144 1955 Lincoln ch-US jrC40 King's Knight Opening
7. Fischer vs D Ames ½-½28 1955 Lincoln ch-US jrC47 Four Knights
8. A Humphrey vs Fischer ½-½33 1955 US Amateur ChE61 King's Indian
9. W Whisler vs Fischer ½-½25 1955 Lincoln ch-US jrE76 King's Indian, Four Pawns Attack
10. A W Conger vs Fischer 1-012 1955 Correspondence GameE70 King's Indian
11. R Sobel vs Fischer 1-027 1956 Montreal CA-openA49 King's Indian, Fianchetto without c4
12. Fischer vs H Matthai ½-½108 1956 Montreal CA-openB77 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack
13. Fischer vs K Vine ½-½36 1956 New York ManhattanB32 Sicilian
14. B Owens vs Fischer ½-½43 1956 57th US OpenE68 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Classical Variation, 8.e4
15. A Turner vs Fischer 1-053 1956 New York ManhattanE68 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Classical Variation, 8.e4
16. Fischer vs M Fox 0-162 1956 Montreal CA-openA07 King's Indian Attack
17. J F Donovan vs Fischer 0-140 1956 57th US OpenE94 King's Indian, Orthodox
18. Fischer vs S Popel ½-½38 1956 57th US OpenA07 King's Indian Attack
19. K Blake vs Fischer 0-120 1956 Philadelphia ch-jr (09)B59 Sicilian, Boleslavsky Variation, 7.Nb3
20. K Smith vs Fischer ½-½51 1956 57th US OpenB95 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6...e6
21. Fischer vs P Lapiken 1-019 1956 57th US OpenA07 King's Indian Attack
22. Fischer vs W Stevens ½-½20 1956 57th US OpenC82 Ruy Lopez, Open
23. Feuerstein vs Fischer ½-½22 1956 Eastern States OpenE68 King's Indian, Fianchetto, Classical Variation, 8.e4
24. E Nash vs Fischer 0-148 1956 WashingtonB95 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6...e6
25. J Tamargo vs Fischer 0-140 1956 New York ManhattanB22 Sicilian, Alapin
 page 1 of 40; games 1-25 of 983  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Fischer wins | Fischer loses  
 

Now on DVD

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 365 OF 1810 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-02-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: chanco, I'm just trying to explain Fischer's logic, not embrace it.

I'm not saying that Karpov's claim to the crown was illegitimate--I'm saying that SOME people think it was, Fischer being primary among them! I pointed this out to explain why he might call his match with Spassky a "World Championship Match." You might claim that to disregard Karpov as a world champion is delusional--and perhaps it is--but as soon as one accepts that proposition then to label Fischer-Spassky '92 a World Championship match makes perfect sense.

Jun-03-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <sneaky> Point taken.
Jun-03-05  Elvis in Chicago: < Cecil Brown: Hi Elvis, I'm a big fan. I saw a photo of you recently where you looked like you'd let yourself go a little, say it isn't so! http://www.prosoundweb.com/fun/Phot...
>

Quite possibley the most frightening Elvis photo ever taken.
Jun-03-05  Chesschatology: <sneaky>
Have you considered changing your name to "Monopoly on sanity". It's really very selfish of you to hog all the good sense on this page.
Jun-03-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: Fischer played Spassky in 92 without using The Najdorf once. He either got tired of that defense, or simply did not know the latest theory of the Najdorf at that time.
Jun-03-05  Chesschatology: <chancho>

Or he avoided a defence that Boris S. would have spent weeks preparing for, gaining a psychological advantage, staying clear of any TNs and catching his opponent by suprise?

Jun-03-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <chesschatology> When ever Fischer played it in the past, he was bound to run into a TN against a Tal, Spassky, etc. That is why World class players prepare for their games by doing the research.
Jun-03-05  Chesschatology: <chancho> Of course. But he avoided a shed-load of them by steering clear of the Najdorf, switching to d4 in several games and generally zigging when Spasshy expected him to zag. In a sense he took advantage of his reputation as a player with a narrow and predictable opening repetoire, which almost certainly had led Spassky to bring his theoretical ordnance to bear on a narrow field.
Jun-03-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: I understand what your saying <Chesschatology>,Though playing one Najdorf Sicilian would not have been a major catastrophe in the match.
Jun-03-05  OneBadDog: Fischer is kind of like Joe Namath-they both went to the top only once, but everybody still makes a big deal about it.
Jun-04-05  buscher07: Hey, did everyone see this article: http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp...

It is kind of interesting.
Have a nice day!! :)

Jun-04-05  WMD: If a study were to suggest that certain groups have below average IQs, would it too make it into the hallowed pages of the New York Times?
Jun-04-05  buscher07: lol. That is a good one! ;)
Jun-05-05  AlChess: CHESS WARS. About BOBBY FISCHER. On the HISTORY Channel,Sky TV. Its on at 8:00am and repeated at 9:00am History Channel+1Hr. Its on later on today Monday 6th june 2005. For All Chess Fans. Its 12:20am from england where this is posted from. Enjoy all
Jun-05-05  MoonlitKnight: <WMD> Excellent point. That NYT article is about as objective as a Fischer radio interview.
Jun-05-05  Renfro the STRANGE: < OneBadDog>

Well, Fischer didn't end up a drunk like Namath.

It's probably the only bad thing that hasn't involved Fischer!

Jun-06-05  RookFile: Just catching up. I congratulate
square dance for being man enough to
admit that Karpov had a rematch clause.

You can say whatever you want about Fischer, but to beat him, all you had to do was be ahead by at least 9 to 8.

Karpov got the rules changed to say
that you had to beat him AND allow a
rematch with your title on the line.

Most GM's will say that Karpov enjoyed
the larger 'champion's advantage'.

Jun-06-05  ughaibu: RookFile: Wrong! to beat Fischer the score had to be 10-8 and Karpov didn't bring back the rematch clause, FIDE did and as a direct consequence of trying to accomodate Fischer's requested match format.
Jun-06-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Joshka: <rookfile> <but to beat him,all you had to do was just be ahead 9-8> This is incorrect. With the score 9-8 in Karpov's favor, another result (draws not counting) would have had to have happened. A Fischer win, and the match would have been drawn at 9-9 and Champion retaining his title. A Karpov win and Karpov would have won the match 10-8. I have always been in favor of the 2pt. cushion to determine the worthy winner.
Jun-06-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Joshka: <alchess> Please give a review here on the History channel docu!..here in my neck of the woods, it seems it won't be covered.
Jun-06-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: The game Fischer vs. R Byrne U.S. championship 1963-64, was sheer genius! I like that game a heck of a lot more than his game against Byrne's older brother, although that was a brilliant game too and he was thirteen when he played it.
Jun-06-05  RookFile: Yes, of course, I know that the final
result had to be 10 to 8, what I'm
saying was, you had to be "ahead" by
at least 9 to 8 before the last decisive game, and you had to win it. Being "ahead" by 9 to 8 implies that the match is not over, especially when everybody understand that the
winner is the first to win 10 games.
OK?

If you are the better player - remember, that is what this is all about - this is really no big deal.

Just to clarify, if I had a vote, I
also would have voted against Fischer's 9 to 9 clause as well. Why should the champion have an advantage? But.... this advantage isn't as big of a deal as the rematch clause.

I find ughaibu's remark that "Karpov
didn't bring back the rematch clause,
FIDE did" to be especially humorous,
in view of the fact that when I brought this up a week or so ago, he didn't know whether Karpov had a rematch clause or not. He said we needed to ask Keene. But suddenly, I guess he's the great expert on this subject now.

Let's look at an excerpt from an
interview with Yuri Averbakh, and see what Averbakh has to say:

Averbakh: It was top secret, but Ed Edmondson was the one who organized this return match clause for Karpov! I was present during the negotiations for the Karpov-Korchnoi match. Our federation wanted to have 24 games or a maximum of 30, and Edmondson pressed for six wins. At the FIDE congress in Caracas in 1977 Karpov demanded a rematch clause for accepting six wins. Edmondson helped him get it.

Did you get that? "Karpov demanded
a rematch clause". As 'compensation'
for accepting the 6 wins proposal.
The interview is saying that Ed
Edmondson would not have pressed for
the rematch clause if Karpov hadn't
demanded it!

You can google this by typing
in: Averbakh, Evans, Fischer, rematch
and you'll see the interview.

Jun-06-05  OneBadDog: What were Edmondson's motivations for his pushing for the rematch clause?
Jun-06-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: Traditionally, the champion enjoys draw odds advantage; with the format "first to 6 wins" with an unlimited number of games this disappears. Therefore, the rematch clause was reinstated as a compromise. <Honza Cervenka> wrote a very informative post on this matter on this page May 26.
Jun-06-05  RookFile: Well, you can just read the interview
with Yuri Averbakh.

http://www.worldchessnetwork.com/En...

Btw, acirce, did you directly admit
that you were wrong about the Karpov
rematch clause?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 1810)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 365 OF 1810 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies