Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Mir Sultan Khan
Number of games in database: 150
Years covered: 1929 to 1935

Overall record: +76 -42 =29 (61.6%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 3 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

With the White pieces:
 Queen's Pawn Game (24) 
    D05 D02 D04 A46 E10
 Queen's Indian (7) 
    E18 E16 E12 E15 E17
 French Defense (5) 
    C01 C13 C00 C11
 Nimzo Indian (4) 
    E30 E24 E47 E33
With the Black pieces:
 Nimzo Indian (10) 
    E38 E23 E24 E56 E43
 Queen's Pawn Game (9) 
    A46 D02 A40
 Orthodox Defense (8) 
    D50 D55 D51
 Ruy Lopez (7) 
    C88 C73 C84 C79 C78
 Caro-Kann (6) 
    B15 B10 B12 B13
 Queen's Indian (5) 
    E15 E16
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Sultan Khan vs Capablanca, 1930 1-0
   Sultan Khan vs H K Mattison, 1931 1-0
   Sultan Khan vs Flohr, 1932 1-0
   Tylor vs Sultan Khan, 1933 0-1
   Sultan Khan vs Marshall, 1930 1-0
   Ahues vs Sultan Khan, 1930 0-1
   Euwe vs Sultan Khan, 1932 1/2-1/2
   Sultan Khan vs Rubinstein, 1931 1-0
   Rubinstein vs Sultan Khan, 1930 1/2-1/2
   V Soultanbeieff vs Sultan Khan, 1930 0-1

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Sultan Khan - Tartakower (1931)
   Liege (1930)
   Hastings 1930/31 (1930)
   Berne (1932)
   London (1932)
   Scarborough (1930)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Mir Sultan Khan by samsloan
   Sultan Khan: Chess Biography by jessicafischerqueen
   Berne 1932 by Tabanus
   Sultan Khan - Tartakower by Chessical
   Mir Sultan Khan - the unsung Grandmaster by MTuraga
   London International Chess Congress, 1932 by Resignation Trap
   Liege 1930 by suenteus po 147
   Hastings 1932/33 by Phony Benoni
   When Sultans played Chess by Open Defence
   Hastings 1930/31 by suenteus po 147

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Mir Sultan Khan
Search Google for Mir Sultan Khan

(born 1905, died Apr-25-1966, 60 years old) India

[what is this?]

Mir Sultan Khan was born in 1905 in Mittha in the Punjab, British India. His prowess at the Indian variety of chess brought him to the notice of Colonel Nawab Sir Umar Hayat Khan who taught him the European game.

After winning the All-India Championship in 1928 (+8, =1, -0) he went to England and quickly came to the notice of English masters William Winter and Fred Dewhurst Yates who helped him overcome his lack of theoretical knowledge. He was British Champion in 1929, 1932 and 1933.

He played on three British Empire Olympiad teams in 1930, 1931 and 1933 and participated in some international events. He was 2nd at Liege 1930, 3rd at Hastings 1930-31 and 3rd= at London 1932. In matches he beat Savielly Tartakower (+4, =5, -3) in 1931 and lost to Salomon Flohr (+1, =3, -2) in 1932. Chessmetrics ranked him sixth in the world in May 1933, behind only Alekhine, Kashdan, Flohr, Capablanca, and Euwe.

He returned to India with Sir Umar in December 1933 and played very little serious chess again. He passed away in Sargodha, Pakistan in 1966.

Wikipedia article: Mir Sultan Khan

 page 1 of 6; games 1-25 of 150  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Capablanca vs Sultan Khan 0-1241929Simul, 35bD50 Queen's Gambit Declined
2. Yates vs Sultan Khan 1-0461929Quadrangular tC17 French, Winawer, Advance
3. Sultan Khan vs Yates  0-1681929Quadrangular tE30 Nimzo-Indian, Leningrad
4. Sultan Khan vs C W Brown  0-1291929Simul, 33bA41 Queen's Pawn Game (with ...d6)
5. Sultan Khan vs E G Sergeant  1-0351930ScarboroughB29 Sicilian, Nimzovich-Rubinstein
6. Sultan Khan vs Rubinstein 0-1821930ScarboroughC77 Ruy Lopez
7. Yates vs Sultan Khan 0-1421930ScarboroughB33 Sicilian
8. Sultan Khan vs Ahues 1-0541930ScarboroughC28 Vienna Game
9. Maroczy vs Sultan Khan 1-0411930ScarboroughC01 French, Exchange
10. Sultan Khan vs Menchik 1-0251930ScarboroughB13 Caro-Kann, Exchange
11. W Winter vs Sultan Khan 1-0331930ScarboroughD50 Queen's Gambit Declined
12. Sultan Khan vs G A Thomas  1-0411930ScarboroughC22 Center Game
13. Gruenfeld vs Sultan Khan  ½-½671930ScarboroughD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
14. Sultan Khan vs Colle  0-1471930ScarboroughB03 Alekhine's Defense
15. R P Michell vs Sultan Khan 0-1961930ScarboroughD51 Queen's Gambit Declined
16. Ahues vs Sultan Khan  1-0301930Hamburg ol (Men)B30 Sicilian
17. Sultan Khan vs O Barda 1-0271930Hamburg ol (Men)C01 French, Exchange
18. K Ruben vs Sultan Khan 1-0741930Hamburg ol (Men)E15 Queen's Indian
19. S Takacs vs Sultan Khan  ½-½341930Hamburg ol (Men)A30 English, Symmetrical
20. Sultan Khan vs A Pokorny 1-0431930Hamburg ol (Men)B02 Alekhine's Defense
21. E Gilfer vs Sultan Khan 1-0161930Hamburg ol (Men)A46 Queen's Pawn Game
22. Rubinstein vs Sultan Khan 1-0421930Hamburg ol (Men)A46 Queen's Pawn Game
23. H Taubmann vs Sultan Khan  0-1341930Hamburg ol (Men)E24 Nimzo-Indian, Samisch
24. V Soultanbeieff vs Sultan Khan 0-1281930LiegeE16 Queen's Indian
25. Sultan Khan vs Weenink 1-0701930LiegeC29 Vienna Gambit
 page 1 of 6; games 1-25 of 150  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Sultan Khan wins | Sultan Khan loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-25-05  shortsight: Hey, if Sultan Khan can managed 50% against the world elite, that's already very very good. How many in the world at the time have the chance to play against the bests in the world, let alone have ~50% score? The fact still remains that he's very good, at least around top 10 at the time.
Apr-26-05  samikd: <I would have thought he or his master would have forced that upon Khan during non-tournament times> Well I dont think he was competent enough to do that. He was not a Chess Master, just an ethusiast. And I doubt if there was any competent coach in India at that time. And Khan couldnt read Chess Books himself, because was probably illeterate
Apr-26-05  wkargel: Indeed...Khan would have had to remain in England and been formally trained (including opening theory) to have become truly competative in chess events in prewar Europe. Learning to read and write would of course helped a lot, but even just being coached on the basic principles would have improved his play.

So who would have/could have coached Mir Sultan Khan in the 1930s if he had remained in England?


Apr-26-05  pazzed paun: <Shortsight> go back and LOOK at the record S.K. would more like be top 25-30. HE is one of very lowest ranked in Divinskys book lifemaps of the great masters.
Apr-27-05  shortsight: <pazzed paun> If he's top 25-30, then he shouldn't have been one the most hyped player of all time anyway. All in all, your posts sounded more like a sour grape than anything that an illiterate Indian servant can be that good.
Apr-27-05  Runemaster: Given that Sultan Khan died in 1966, he was still alive when Fide started awarding titles in 1950. Does anyone know whether Sultan Khan was given a title either in 1950 or later?

I've seen on this page that there is some argument about exactly how strong he was, but his tournament results and wins against many GMs indicate to me that he should probably have been awarded the GM title himself, and he was certainly at least of strong IM strength.

Apr-27-05  Jamespawn: His rating would qualify him as a GM. Considering he had just learned European moves and didn`t know the openings he ranked favorably with other players of the 20`s ...

Khan 2530
Marshall 2570
Tartakower 2560
Reti 2550
Janowski 2570
Mieses 2490
Yates 2470

Apr-27-05  maoam: <Jamespawn>

Learning the Western rules wouldn't be difficult for Sultan Khan, the only difference is that a pawn can advance two squares on it's first more, and pawns can be promoted to any piece.

Apr-27-05  Jamespawn: True maoam. Whats amazing to me was that he was competitive with people who had studied the openings so much more than Khan apparently did. I`m trying to learn some openings now and its really difficult. I wish I knew a better way.
Apr-27-05  Jamespawn: I thought the rules for castling were different , but I`m really not sure.
Apr-27-05  kvcs: kvcs: Regarding Mir Sultan Kahn's (MSK)
exploits and accomplishments====> has his records and
ratings. These data are generally
regarded as more comprehesive that
FIDE archives. Jeff Sonas has done
EXCELLENT work in this area. Upon
reviewing these first rate achievements,
it should be apparent to anyone that MSK
was a first rank GM for any era.

In the simplest terms:
the "Mir" was NO "mere" Master.

No one, as yet, has satisfied my query of
Monday 14 Feb 2005: "...Please let me know
you know what Mir Sultan Khan's first Chess
love is....".

....with warm regards, Molly
Chess Correspondent for KV Chess Society

Apr-27-05  Caissanist: Jeff Sonas has indeed done excellent work in researching and compiling player results, and his site is a wonderful resource. However, I don't completely agree with the results of his rating formula in this case. He has Khan at #6 in the world in June 1933, but if you review Khan's results, 10 or 15 would seem to be a fairer placing. Sonas's formula tends to overrate highly active players, and Khan was very active in 1932.
Apr-27-05  acirce: Yep, as he says on his page

<The reason I call attention to this is that it is an extremely important difference between my Chessmetrics ratings and both the FIDE and Professional schemes. In both of those, if you don't play any games, your rating doesn't change. It could be argued that there is an incentive for top players NOT to play, because they would be risking their high rating which after all is used to guide tournament invitations and even world championship seeding. If we were instead using a scheme like mine which penalizes inactivity and rewards activity, I think we would see the top players playing more frequently, which everyone (except their opponents!) would be happy about.>

I don't know if this makes any sense. Surely you're not automatically getting weaker if you don't play so is there any reason to penalize this other than some kind of punishment? And then what is the reason to do it when calculating historical ratings?

Another problem with Chessmetrics ratings are all the rapid games that still seem to be included. Mostly for modern players though of course.

Apr-27-05  Jamespawn: Molly, what do you mean by Khan`s first chess love?
Apr-27-05  kvcs: <Jamespawn>

"Apr-27-05 Jamespawn: Molly, what do
you mean by Khan`s first chess love?"

Very simple; as I am told: when Mir
Sultan Kahn learned "Chess", his
first indoctrination [love, if you will]
was NOT the international Chess we play
today, or then for that matter.

When he left India and travelled west,
he had to adapt not only to the rules,
but to the style of play, PIECE
placement(!), and main objectives of
what we today call CHESS.

In short, this 'love' has a name [both
colloquial and true]. We at KVCS want
to know if anyone else knows either or

....with warm [soon to be on vacation]
regards, Molly (Chess Correspondent, KVCS)

Apr-27-05  TheSlid: Please could someone who "gets" <kvcs> tell me wtf this and all the other stuff is about...
Apr-27-05  Jamespawn: Ask Molly she`ll tell you...if you catch her before she goes on her vacation. She answered my question. I think she is curious about the form of chess played in India , but I can`t remember the name of the game. Challangara or something like that.
Apr-27-05  ughaibu: Jamespawn: I think you'll find it's chaturanga. Try a search on the Fischer Random page, I think someone once gave a link.
Apr-27-05  TheSlid: Thanks <Jamespawn> but my question is wider, just what is Molly on about? I've tried and tried and i just can't get it.
Apr-27-05  Jamespawn: Thanks ughaibu. I couldn`t remember exactly what the game was called. When Molly sees these posts she can go and look it up or do a word search. From reading her earlier posts Slid I think I read that she reports on chess or has some interest in chess , but I can`t really remember. Click on her name and it should tell you more about her.
Apr-28-05  pazzed paun: For some reason this page seems to attract more nonsense than almost as other page!! I think the story of S.K. shows that the opening was not very important all the way into the mid 1930's and that amateurs tend to overvalue the importance of the openings!
Apr-28-05  maoam: <Jamespawn> <I thought the rules for castling were different , but I`m really not sure.>

Ah yes, I forgot that! In Indian chess I believe you have to place the king on e7, d7 or f7, a rook move, then a knight move with the king to the side the rook was on.

I agree with your point though, it's amazing that Sultan Khan could compete with players like Alekhine who made extensive study of the opening.

Apr-28-05  your brilliance: <maoam><Jamespawn> What I know of the "castling rule" for the king in Shatranj/ Indian chess is this: The king is allowed one move as a knight, period. The king must not have been moved prior to that move, but I don't recall if this special move can be used to escape from a check.

I believe this is why the so-called Indian openings involve a fianchetto. A fianchetto on the king side prepares a natural spot for the king.

Apr-28-05  pazzed paun: <maoam> S.K. could not compete with ALEKHINE!! he never even got a draw off him! THE OPENING discussions make about as much sense as a five year old give tips on the stockmarket! IN the 1930"s you did not need to know a lot of theory.
May-13-05  GBREAL: <pazzed paun> What are you talking about! S.K. was a outstanding master. Just look at his results. He never opened a book about chess and was competing in international competition after just learning the European rules! Not without defeating some of the greats too. Whats this non sense about him scoring badly against some of the greats players. Considering that he didn't play long who knows how he would have scored against these players in the future? Lets see ALekhine said Khan might have become world champion,Capablanca called him a genius Fine acknowledged him as a great player as well as Tarkatower who has 4 S.K. games in his book 500 Master games of chess 1 which was against ALekhine and was a draw! in which Alekhine was the one to force it! Had sultan khan study the chess openings (which was a major weakness) I wouldn't doubt him a being a world champion candidate. SO it obvious that he was a great player which was a sad lost to the chess world when he left.....So bringing up this trash about him being 'over-hyped' and that other crap!
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 9)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC