chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

E Schiller 
photo courtesy of ericschiller.com  
Eric Schiller
Number of games in database: 728
Years covered: 1969 to 2012
Last FIDE rating: 2031
Highest rating achieved in database: 2370
Overall record: +350 -163 =159 (63.9%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      56 exhibition games, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Queen's Pawn Game (66) 
    A46 D05 D02 A40 A45
 Sicilian (42) 
    B22 B90 B31 B23 B70
 French Defense (39) 
    C15 C11 C00 C01 C10
 King's Indian (27) 
    E60 E61 E73 E74 E76
 French Winawer (23) 
    C15
 Caro-Kann (18) 
    B12 B15 B13 B18 B14
With the Black pieces:
 Caro-Kann (61) 
    B18 B12 B19 B10 B17
 Tarrasch Defense (55) 
    D32 D34 D33
 Robatsch (40) 
    B06
 Queen's Pawn Game (30) 
    D02 D00 A40 A41 D05
 Sicilian (27) 
    B42 B43 B41 B22 B23
 Queen's Gambit Declined (16) 
    D31 D30 D36
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   E Schiller vs M Arne, 1995 1-0
   Reshevsky vs E Schiller, 1972 0-1
   S Siyuan vs E Schiller, 2005 1/2-1/2
   L Tamarkin vs E Schiller, 1979 0-1
   B Udare vs E Schiller, 1991 0-1
   E Schiller vs Busch, 1970 1-0
   Coffey vs E Schiller, 1986 0-1
   E Schiller vs Ronning, 1984 1-0
   Reito vs E Schiller, 1983 0-1
   A Mengarini vs E Schiller, 1980 0-1

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Gibtelecom Chess Festival (2006)
   Tradewise Gibraltar (2012)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Annotated Games by LGTiger
   US Open 1996, Alexandria by Phony Benoni
   Annotated Caro-Kans by Petrocephalon
   Dr. Schiller -CarokannBlack by activateinnerchess
   Tarrasch Defense Rules! by Eric Schiller

GAMES ANNOTATED BY SCHILLER: [what is this?]
   Denker vs A R Shayne, 1945
   E Schiller vs M Arne, 1995
   D D van Geet vs Guyt, 1967
   Golden Executive / Houdini vs Hosea / Schiller / Wall, 2011
   L Shamkovich vs V Zheliandinov, 1959
   >> 185 GAMES ANNOTATED BY SCHILLER

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Eric Schiller
Search Google for Eric Schiller
FIDE player card for Eric Schiller


ERIC SCHILLER
(born Mar-20-1955, 59 years old) United States of America

[what is this?]
Eric Andrew Schiller was born in New York. He has served as an international organizer for FIDE, and also an international arbiter most notably for the Kramnik-Kasparov World Championship match. Mr. Schiller also captained several Pan-American Intercollegiate teams, as well as the World Youth Championship in Chicago.

Over-the-board accomplishments include obtaining the USCF Life Master, and FIDE Master titles. He won the 1974 Illinois State Championship, and the 1995 Calchess State Championship. Schiller has also established himself as a prolific and popular author of a wide range of chess books.

http://www.ericschiller.com/

Wikipedia article: Eric Schiller


 page 1 of 30; games 1-25 of 728  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. E Schiller vs H Pack 1-03 1969 Port Washington (skittles)C20 King's Pawn Game
2. E Schiller vs Heeley 1-019 1970 Eastern High School ChampionshipC00 French Defense
3. E Schiller vs Freedman 1-051 1970 SmithtownD15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
4. Frank vs E Schiller 0-17 1970 New YorkC43 Petrov, Modern Attack
5. R Gruchacz vs E Schiller ½-½37 1970 New York Junior ChampionshipB20 Sicilian
6. Chaiken vs E Schiller 0-119 1970 New YorkC23 Bishop's Opening
7. E Schiller vs J Tompkins 1-023 1970 New York City ReserveC57 Two Knights
8. E Schiller vs Busch 1-011 1970 New YorkC57 Two Knights
9. E Schiller vs Flamberg 1-028 1970 Eastern High School ChampionshipC30 King's Gambit Declined
10. Roman vs E Schiller 0-111 1970 New YorkC50 Giuoco Piano
11. E Schiller vs V Klemm 1-015 1971 Manhattan Chess Club ChampionshipB99 Sicilian, Najdorf, 7...Be7 Main line
12. E Schiller vs J Jacobs 1-029 1971 Eastern H.S. ChampionshipA07 King's Indian Attack
13. E Schiller vs A Draifinger 1-031 1971 Eastern High School ChampionshipC00 French Defense
14. E Schiller vs J Jacobs 0-126 1971 Continental JuniorA02 Bird's Opening
15. Lombardy vs E Schiller ½-½36 1971 Simultaneous ExhibitionA52 Budapest Gambit
16. Solomon vs E Schiller 0-133 1971 Eastern High School ChampionshipB41 Sicilian, Kan
17. Gheorghiu vs E Schiller 1-042 1971 Simultaneous ExhibitionA31 English, Symmetrical, Benoni Formation
18. E Schiller vs Bornack 1-025 1971 Manhattan Chess Club ChampionshipB98 Sicilian, Najdorf
19. Reshevsky vs E Schiller 0-142 1972 Simultaneous Exhibition, Manhattan Chess ClubD25 Queen's Gambit Accepted
20. E Schiller vs Reents 1-039 1973 Illinois Junior ChampionshipD41 Queen's Gambit Declined, Semi-Tarrasch
21. E Schiller vs Zacher 1-021 1973 Chicago ChampionshipA80 Dutch
22. T Knight vs E Schiller 0-124 1974 IllinoisE23 Nimzo-Indian, Spielmann
23. Hill vs E Schiller 0-131 1974 IllinoisE07 Catalan, Closed
24. E Schiller vs Polikoff 1-030 1975 IllinoisD86 Grunfeld, Exchange
25. E Schiller vs J Hastings 1-022 1975 University of ChicagoD36 Queen's Gambit Declined, Exchange, Positional line, 6.Qc2
 page 1 of 30; games 1-25 of 728  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Schiller wins | Schiller loses  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 109 OF 110 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: All I saw was a reference to a tweet on the Nakamura page. Not much context.

<Book and Twitter
Edition Olms has published a book
titled Figthing Chess with Hikaru
Nakamura by Karsten
Müller/Raymund Stolze.

GM Nakamura's reaction on Twitter
suggests that he is not really happy:

"It is truly disgusting that people are
allowed to write books and profit
off of our games without our
permission".>

Cited from Chess Today.

May-26-12  DanielBryant: Based on that comment, we just can't jump to any conclusions regarding legal opinions or the like. If he actually does threaten legal action at some point, that would change.
May-26-12  Petrosianic: Calling it disgusting doesn't imply that he thinks it <is> illegal. He might just be saying that it <should be> illegal.

I don't know if I agree with him on that or not. I can see arguments on both sides.

May-26-12  MORPHYEUS: <Petrosianic: Calling it disgusting doesn't imply that he thinks it <is> illegal. He might just be saying that it <should be> illegal.>

Correct. It's very disgusting, specially if he was planning to right his own book. The money should go to him, not to somebody.

May-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Shams: Whether you like Nakamura or not, he's definitely a "somebody".
May-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: Morphyeus: Say I research and write a biography of, say, Manny Pacquiao. You think I should pay him for it? That would be news to a few thousand writers and publishers around the world.
May-26-12  MORPHYEUS: <Jim Bartle>. My argument is more on understanding why Nakamura reacted that way. If i was planning my own book and the other guy beat me to it, without me being compensated one cent, i'll feel disgusted too.

I'm just saying Nakamura is just being a normal guy.

May-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: OK, he can be upset, but really without much justification. <Unless> the other book falsely implies he was one of the authors, or participated in some way.
May-26-12  Petrosianic: Well, Fischer was upset that they used his name in "Searching For Bobby Fischer" without "permission". I put "permission" in quotes, because legally they didn't need his permission. He was a public figure. Naka is unhappy for a similar reason.

Fischer was kind of dotty on such matters, and believed that anything he didn't like was "illegal". In fact, it was not illegal to use his name in that movie. But on the other hand, I can see why he wouldn't like it. Every public person was a private person before he became a public one, and is used to thinking of himself that way. If someone wrote a book on your life story without consulting you on it or getting your okay, you probably wouldn't be happy about it. It sounds like that's why Naka is unhappy. Even if the book isn't illegal, it seems a bit discourteous.

Now, on the other hand, if the author had asked for Naka's blessing, and/or input, and he'd said "Sorry, I haven't got the time", and they went ahead and wrote it anyway, I wouldn't have any sympathy for Naka. But I have a little sympathy this way, even though I'm pretty sure the law is on the author's side.

May-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: At the same time, there's been an entire industry of books on Fischer's games, in many languages, and I've never heard him complain about not being paid or asked for permission in those.

The only time he was upset was when M60MG was published in the Soviet Union and he was never paid any royalties. In that case he had every right to be angry. I think the organizer of the 1992 Spassky match paid Fischer $100,000 to cover those missing royalties.

May-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Shams: <Petrosianic><Now, on the other hand, if the author had asked for Naka's blessing, and/or input, and he'd said "Sorry, I haven't got the time", and they went ahead and wrote it anyway, I wouldn't have any sympathy for Naka.>

I assume in suggesting the author ask for Nakamura's blessing and/or input, you are imagining a joint business venture with a sharing of book proceeds. (If not, it would seem even more offensive.) Isn't that asking a lot? I doubt writers make much on books like this.

As noted, he's a public figure. He's lucky that chess is popular such that he can make a living at it. This is what comes with that popularity, as I see it. He can't have it both ways. If he's smart, he gets out in front and capitalizes on his own success. In this respect at least, Kasparov is a great role model.

May-27-12  rilkefan: Part or most of the issue for me is the use of someone else's work product. Writing a biography of Naka (based on reading public articles by a wide variety of reporters and analysts, and interviews conducted by the writer), is different than publishing a work the majority of content of which is by someone else. This book erodes the value of a work by Naka.

Re the IP of the various other players in a game collection, I consider that fair use. If player X publishes a book, The Worst Games of Y, or even My Victories Over Y, that would be different.

May-27-12  rilkefan: <<Shams>: I assume in suggesting the author ask for Nakamura's blessing and/or input, you are imagining a joint business venture with a sharing of book proceeds.>

If Müller had simply written to Naka and said, "I'm thinking about writing a book about your games based on my own analysis, will that cramp your style?", I might not have a different view but certainly there could be less question of offense.

May-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Shams: <rilkefan> I'm open to having my mind changed, but I'm having a hard time seeing an injury here.

With the proliferation of super-strong engines, annotating a chess game isn't the esoteric labor of love it once was. I think the real value from a reader's perspective lies in hearing the thought of the players: why that opening, that day, against that opponent? Why zig instead of zagging at a critical point? Only Nakamura can write that book.

May-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: Seems to me the same reasoning could be applied to Lionel Messi or Michael Jordan. Writing a book about one of them is hardly different than a book about a chessplayer. And anybody can write a book about an athlete without the athlete's permission.

The one important difference is that a chess book can reproduce the game exactly, while a book on football and basketball can only describe (inadequately) what happened during the game.

May-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  SteinitzLives: I think the issue may be the game scores. Several year ago some top players wanted to copywright their game scores, and they were laughed out of court. Football and basketball teams cannot copywright their box scores, and that is what a chess game score is, a record of what happened.

Now if he has been mis-represented, libeled or slandered in some way, that's a different story.

Their may be some fair competition issues if Naka was working on his own book, but I think there is little there. Naka needs an agent, not to mention a coach. If he does not get an agent, others will keep making money off of him.

Naka needs to take the risk of trusting a professional that he is paying for service, to help him. People do it all the time

May-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Shams: Ok, the cover and the title are a bit much. I'll concede that.

<SteinitzLives><I think the issue may be the game scores.>

The rest of your paragraph shows why the game scores are not the issue, does it not?

May-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  SteinitzLives: Yes game scores are the issue, which does not mean legitimate or illegitimate. The legal field of Intellectual property known as IP (patents, trademarks and copyrights, etc.) has tons of legal practitioners, because the related issues that come up can be so contentious, and with much to gain or lose. Some good-sized law firms do nothing but IP law.
Jun-23-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: Schiller time control:
I propose a new time control to speed up games while preserving quality. Most games these days don’t require time in the prepared portions of openings or in technical positions in endgames. One minute per move is enough. However, more tome is needed when the opening goes outt of book and for developing a strategy and for deciding whether to tnter an endgame. So I propse a control of one minute per move with each player getting three exceptions per game. This keeps the games to about the same for most xports broadcasts and allows for two games per day. Each player has 60 seconds to make each move except that this limit may be exceeded three times per game. On one occasion the player may take up to ten minutes and on two occasions up to 5 minutes. The clock will count down from 60 seconds and when that is expired will automatically switch to 6-minute mode (assuming the player has one left) and light a 5-minute flag. If the 5 minutes are exhausted it will add another 5 minutes if the 10-minute exemption has not been used and light the to-minute indicator and reset the 5-minute indicator, otherwise it will indicate loss on time. When all three indicators are lit, using up 60 seconds results in a loss on time.

Advantages:
• Games last 3-4 hours maximum, usually 2 hours if 40 moves. • No long waits for spectators, but enough time for meaningful commentary. • Decent quality games, since most moves can be made quickly • Can be modified for playoff Armageddon style with Black receiving one extra 5-minute think or White losing one. • Tension for spectators as clock drops below ten seconds • Clocks always show real time remaining, no delay confusion

Jul-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: I've just finished a new book on the Blackmar-Diuemer Gambit focusing on checkmating tactics. It will be published by Ishi Press in a few weeks and will also be available on Kindle.
Jul-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: <Eric Schiller> thanks for the update.

Blackmar Diemer Gambit Bogoljubow Variation 5...g6 Second Edition: A Chess Works Publication by Eric Schiller

http://www.amazon.com/Blackmar-Diem...

Jul-25-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  sbevan: <Eric Schiller: A time control for public chess>

FM Schiller, IMHO this proposal is truly excellent. Well thought out, well reasoned. I hope it draws support but most importantly I hope it's implemented.

Dec-24-12  brankat: Dear Eric!

May You have a very Happy Holiday Season!

Dec-24-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: Merry Christmas <Eric> !

And all the best for the New Year !

Mar-20-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  waustad: Happy birthday. You still have a couple more years as a quintagenerian!
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 110)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 109 OF 110 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies