Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

K Rogoff 
Kenneth S Rogoff
Number of games in database: 132
Years covered: 1968 to 2012
Last FIDE rating: 2505
Overall record: +38 -29 =64 (53.4%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      1 exhibition game, odds game, etc. is excluded from this statistic.

With the White pieces:
 English (10) 
    A15 A13 A18 A16 A19
 Sicilian (8) 
    B21 B23 B38 B30 B85
 Ruy Lopez (7) 
    C68 C95 C65 C88 C97
 English, 1 c4 e5 (5) 
    A20 A29 A22
 King's Indian (5) 
    E62 E74 E63 E60
 English, 1 c4 c5 (5) 
    A30 A34 A36
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (12) 
    B93 B30 B60 B52 B85
 Caro-Kann (11) 
    B17 B10 B12 B13
 English, 1 c4 c5 (9) 
    A30 A34 A33
 Sicilian Najdorf (5) 
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   K Rogoff vs R Blumenfeld, 1976 1-0
   K Rogoff vs A H Williams, 1969 1/2-1/2
   Huebner vs K Rogoff, 1972 1/2-1/2
   K Rogoff vs Smejkal, 1976 1-0
   K Rogoff vs Larsen, 1976 1/2-1/2
   K Rogoff vs O Castro, 1976 1-0
   K Rogoff vs Timman, 1971 1-0
   K Rogoff vs Bisguier, 1974 1/2-1/2
   Sosonko vs K Rogoff, 1976 1/2-1/2
   Tal vs K Rogoff, 1976 1/2-1/2

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Lone Pine (1978)
   Lone Pine (1976)
   US Championship (1974)
   Biel Interzonal (1976)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Ken Rogoff Chess Highlights by GumboGambit
   US Championship 1978 by suenteus po 147
   US Championship 1975 by suenteus po 147
   US Championship 1974 by Phony Benoni

   K Rogoff vs Carlsen (Aug-28-12) 1/2-1/2, blitz

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Kenneth S Rogoff
Search Google for Kenneth S Rogoff
FIDE player card for Kenneth S Rogoff

(born Mar-22-1953, 63 years old) United States of America

[what is this?]
Kenneth Saul Rogoff learned chess from his father at age six, but only took up the game in earnest when he received a chess set for his 13th birthday. He was soon recognised as a chess prodigy. By age 14, he was a USCF master and New York State Open Champion, and shortly thereafter became a senior master, the highest US national title. At sixteen, Rogoff dropped out of high school to concentrate on chess, and spent the next several years living primarily in Europe and playing in tournaments there. When eighteen, he made the decision to go to college and pursue a career in economics rather than to become a professional player, although he continued to play and improve for several years afterward.

Rogoff was awarded the IM title in 1974 and the GM title in 1978. He came third in the World Junior Championship of 1971 and finished second in the US Championship of 1975, which doubled as a Zonal competition, one-half point behind Walter Shawn Browne; this result qualified him for the 1976 Interzonal at Biel, where he finished 13-15th. In other tournaments he finished equal first at Norristown 1973 and Orense 1976.

Early in his economics career, Rogoff served as chief economist at the International Monetary Fund and also at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. He is currently the Thomas D. Cabot Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Economics at Harvard University.

Rogoff's biography in his own words:; Rogoff's game against Magnus Carlsen in August 2012 in New York:; Article by Rogoff in Chessbase titled <Rogoff on innovation, unemployment, inequality and dislocation> with particular reference to professional chess:

Wikipedia article: Kenneth Rogoff

 page 1 of 6; games 1-25 of 132  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Larsen vs K Rogoff ½-½35 1968 Canadian OpenA02 Bird's Opening
2. E M Green vs K Rogoff ½-½37 1969 World Junior ChB12 Caro-Kann Defense
3. K Rogoff vs A H Williams ½-½106 1969 World Junior Championship, B FinalA56 Benoni Defense
4. K Rogoff vs S Spencer 1-020 1969 US Jnr ChpB15 Caro-Kann
5. K Rogoff vs Z Vranesic  0-148 1970 Ontario opB83 Sicilian
6. J Durao vs K Rogoff 0-130 1970 MalagaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
7. H Pfleger vs K Rogoff  1-059 1970 WchT U26 17thA58 Benko Gambit
8. E Paoli vs K Rogoff 1-026 1971 Liberation tournB06 Robatsch
9. Ljubojevic vs K Rogoff 1-029 1971 MalagaB50 Sicilian
10. V Tukmakov vs K Rogoff  1-042 1971 Liberation tournD93 Grunfeld, with Bf4 & e3
11. Karpov vs K Rogoff 1-026 1971 06, Mayaguez tt-studA22 English
12. J Durao vs K Rogoff  0-165 1971 MalagaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
13. Ulf Andersson vs K Rogoff 1-036 1971 OlotB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
14. K Rogoff vs L Day ½-½21 1971 World Student OlympiadA15 English
15. K Rogoff vs Timman 1-048 1971 Malaga 11/138B08 Pirc, Classical
16. Huebner vs K Rogoff ½-½12 1972 WchT U26 19th fin-AA15 English
17. K Rogoff vs Adorjan 1-030 1972 Graz Stu ttB30 Sicilian
18. K Rogoff vs V Tukmakov 1-041 1972 WchT U26 19th fin-AB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
19. K Rogoff vs Suttles 0-147 1973 Ottawa op-CANB06 Robatsch
20. L Day vs K Rogoff  ½-½23 1973 CAN-opA07 King's Indian Attack
21. Pilnik vs K Rogoff  0-156 1973 NorristownB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
22. E Paoli vs K Rogoff 0-139 1973 NorristownB06 Robatsch
23. Saidy vs K Rogoff 0-136 1974 US ChampionshipA15 English
24. K Rogoff vs Bisguier  ½-½77 1974 US ChampionshipE08 Catalan, Closed
25. K Rogoff vs Zuckerman  1-044 1974 US ChampionshipA15 English
 page 1 of 6; games 1-25 of 132  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Rogoff wins | Rogoff loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8880 OF 8880 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: <saffuna: ...

Right. Experts who will likely soon be President of the United States.>

There is a difference between an expert and a runner for US president. But what do you want? Expert advice? A speech of a potential future US president? Or an <Irada> wisdom at 10 cents per word?

Oct-27-16  saffuna: <The fee is halved for corporations, who will lower their tax burden by 50% on the money paid to Bill or Hill. >

You think corporations pay 50% on profits? Fortune 500 corporations pay around an average of 20%. Some don't pay any at all.

<I don't mind her speaking for their foundation and getting paid, but during an election campaign she shouldn't be speaking for personal income.>

She doesn't. She stopped making paid speeches when she declared for the presidency. The only candidate I know who continued making paid speeches while a candidate was Ben Carson.

Oct-27-16  Petrosianic: <A couple of people I spoke to went and said it was very good, plus a question and answer period at the end.>

Did he repeat the old "Scotty Dealing Drugs" yarn?"

<All that, and for a lot less than $100K, I imagine.>

100... K!?

Oct-27-16  saffuna: <There is a difference between an expert and a runner for US president. But what do you want? Expert advice? A speech of a potential future US president? >

Potential US president.

Though Bill Clinton also receives huge fees, and I doubt he will be president again.

Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <john barleycorn: Hillary Clinton got 69 today. Bill, enjoy if you can>

When Bill said, "I have never had sex with that woman", I thought he meant with Hillary.

Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: <She doesn't. She stopped making paid speeches when she declared for the presidency>

Then what are you complaining about? The monies then go to her foundation. By law, to remain tax exempt, they have to distribute such monies, 90-95% of it, within a year, to charitable causes. Theirs is probably one of the most scrutinized foundations in the world. Every FOX commentator trying to make their bones is sniffing at the Dems, particularly the Clintons, for something they can use on air. The foundation is a job to keep Chel out of the house.

Oct-27-16  saffuna: <Then what are you complaining about? The monies then go to her foundation. >

No, that is not right. They were personal income.

Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: <saffuna: ...

Potential US president. ...>

Ok, do not let Trump know about it.

Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: < TheFocus: ...
When Bill said, "I have never had sex with that woman", I thought he meant with Hillary.>

Because numbers above 10 give her serious problems?

Premium Chessgames Member
  cormier: Gospel: "It can not be that a prophet perish outside of Jerusalem"
Premium Chessgames Member
Oct-27-16  ljfyffe: <OCF> and < diceman> sure know how to deal with 'liberal liars'; they simply out lie them.
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <saffuna....if (Clinton) really wants to be President as much as it appears, she should have avoided these appearances of conflict.>

Come to ordinary people, you are correct of course, but she inhabits that rarefied world of 'special privilege'.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Boomie: ->

<Payback? Russia Gets Hacked, Revealing Putin Aide's Secrets>

If history has taught us anything, it's that anyone can be hacked. No matter how *secure* Clinton's email server was, it could have been hacked. So we are quibbling over how easy it was to hack her email? Why do we waste time over such inconsequential issues when we should be discussing policies and records?

Oct-27-16  saffuna: How about the "Purloined Letter" strategy?

Set up an account with absolutely no security. Hackers will see it and figure, "There can't be anything important there, otherwise it would be protected."

Premium Chessgames Member


Running Count:

"yes": 6

"no": 3


Vote in my forum if you have an informed opinion, and also if you are merely a crank.

All votes are counted, and multiple votes accepted.

Vote now, vote often.

Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Bill Jeff was a voice of reason as president. We bombed the S* out of Serbia to get Milosevic out, but did not put troops in Serbia. We were part of the UN peacekeeping force in Bosnia, but that was to keep combatants separated. When a company of Russian infantry showed up (to provide moral support for their fellow serbs) our field commander immediately moved his guys five miles away from the Russians. All good moves.

I expect the same reasoned, conservative strategy from Hillary. If a no fly zone means we have to shoot down a Russian MIG or supply plane, then we can't have a no fly zone. World peace (and survival of our species) is more important than the present plight of the Syrians.

I think Hillary spoke about "a no fly zone" just to have something concrete to hang her hat on, in the debate, something that was related to helping the civilians and refugees in the area. Trump is apparently doing well with military voters so Hillary had to at least have something that showed a willingness to act, should it be necessary. Cooler heads will prevail, when she can settle into the job.

If they do put up such a zone they better be damn sure in advance that Russia isn't planning on crossing it.

I think Trump has promised an expansion of the military, which is why he has the support of a lot of senior people. They know Trump probably couldn't find Syria on the map unless there were plans to build a hotel or golf course there, they just like him because he'll appropriate money their way.

Oct-27-16  saffuna: Trump complains that it was illegal for NBC to release the Access Hollywood video.

Trump criticizes the contents of the Wikileaks emails in every speech.

No contradicion there, no way.

Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <saffuna: If people want to pay Hillary Clinton $300K to give a speech, knowing she is a likely future president, it's fair to ask what those people expect in return.>

You might better ask <If people want to pay George W. Bush $100K to give a speech, knowing he will never again hold office, it's fair to ask what those people expect in return.>

<Since 2009, POLITICO has found, Bush has given at least 200 paid speeches and probably many more, typically pocketing $100,000 to $175,000 per appearance. The part-time work, which rarely requires more than an hour on stage, has earned him tens of millions of dollars.>

Oct-27-16  saffuna: I guess I haven't kept up with the going rate for speeches by former or future US presidents.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Boomie: If there needs to be a no fly zone, it should apply to the Turks. They have no business being in Syria in the first place. Plus they are bombing the Kurds, who are the only ones actually fighting ISIS on the ground. The Russians were invited by the Syrians. Nobody else has any legal standing to be there.

The US has no business in Syria and is primarily responsible for creating the whole mess there. The US dismissed the Iraqi army, which fed the IS ranks with military men bent on revenge. There would be no ISIS without them. Then they compounded the situation by trying to overthrow the Syrian government by using al Qaida remnants. This created the current chaotic situation there. Does anyone know what the US interests in all this is? None of it makes any sense to me.

Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <Armed antigovernment protesters led by Ammon and Ryan Bundy were acquitted Thursday of federal conspiracy and weapons charges stemming from the takeover of a federally owned wildlife sanctuary in Oregon last winter.

The surprise acquittals of all seven defendants in Federal District Court was a blow to government prosecutors, who had argued that the Bundys and five of their followers used force and threats of violence to occupy the reserve. But the jury appeared swayed by the defendants’ contention that they were protesting government overreach and posed no threat to the public.>

But the acquittal refutes the Bundys' charge of government overreach.

Oct-27-16  saffuna: Right. At least they can't claim they were railroaded.

But one of the lawyers was tackled by marshals at the end of the session for refusing to stop arguing about the manner of release of the defendants.

They'd been acquitted. Total success. Then scream about the way they will be released.

Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Its odd, when SC justice Clarence Thomas is in the news, it's usually bad news:


Oct-28-16  Colonel Mortimer: <jessicafischerqueen: WILL HILL-DAWG START WORLD WAR III?>


<A Clinton presidency for its part should know better than overestimate Russia’s financial “weakness.”

The national debt of Russia is only 17.7 percent of GDP; for the US it is a whopping 104.17 percent of GDP, or $19.2 trillion. Russia in 2015 had a trade surplus of $150 billion, while the US had a trade deficit of $531.5 billion. The current account surplus of Russia was 5.1 percent of GDP, or 65.8 billion, while the US ran a current account deficit of 484.1 billion, or 2.7 percent of GDP.

Besides, Russia has all the natural resources it needs; unlike the US government, which believes it needs an empire of bases overseas and ten aircraft carrier task forces to secure the resources it lacks.

Moreover, as much as the Pentagon may continue to be infested by neocon cells, sound generals are also able to identify key Russian signals – such as the unveiling of the RS-28 Sarmat nuclear missile, which NATO calls Satan 2. The Sarmat delivers monster warheads of 40 megatons; boasts a top speed of seven kilometers per second; and is able to outfox any anti-missile shield system anywhere.>

That's why Hillary will be 'instructed' to keep her powder dry.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 8880)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8880 OF 8880 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2016, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies