chessgames.com

K Rogoff 
Photograph courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.  
Kenneth Rogoff
Number of games in database: 132
Years covered: 1968 to 2012
Last FIDE rating: 2505
Overall record: +38 -29 =64 (53.4%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      1 exhibition game, odds game, etc. is excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 English (10) 
    A15 A13 A18 A16 A19
 Sicilian (8) 
    B21 B23 B30 B38 B85
 Ruy Lopez (7) 
    C88 C68 C97 C65 C91
 English, 1 c4 e5 (5) 
    A29 A20 A22
 King's Indian (5) 
    E62 E74 E63 E60
 English, 1 c4 c5 (5) 
    A34 A30 A36
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (12) 
    B93 B30 B52 B50 B81
 Caro-Kann (11) 
    B17 B10 B13 B12
 English, 1 c4 c5 (9) 
    A30 A34 A33
 Sicilian Najdorf (5) 
    B93
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   K Rogoff vs R Blumenfeld, 1976 1-0
   Huebner vs K Rogoff, 1972 1/2-1/2
   K Rogoff vs Bisguier, 1974 1/2-1/2
   Huebner vs K Rogoff, 1976 1/2-1/2
   K Rogoff vs Timman, 1971 1-0

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   US Championship (1974)
   Lone Pine (1976)
   Lone Pine (1978)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   US Championship 1974 by Phony Benoni

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Kenneth Rogoff
Search Google for Kenneth Rogoff
FIDE player card for Kenneth Rogoff


KENNETH ROGOFF
(born Mar-22-1953) United States of America

[what is this?]
Kenneth Saul Rogoff learned chess from his father at age 6, but took up the game in earnest when he got a chess set for his 13th birthday. He was soon recognised as a chess prodigy. By age 14, he was a USCF master and New York State Open Champion, and shortly thereafter became a senior master, the highest US national title. At sixteen Rogoff dropped out of high school to concentrate on chess, and spent the next several years living primarily in Europe and playing in tournaments there. However, at eighteen he made the decision to go to college and pursue a career in economics rather than to become a professional player, although he continued to play and improve for several years afterward.

Rogoff was awarded the IM title in 1974, and the GM title in 1978. He was 3rd in the World Junior Championship of 1971 and finished 2nd in the US Championship of 1975, which doubled as a Zonal competition, a half point behind Walter Shawn Browne; this result qualified him for the 1976 Interzonal at Biel where he finished 13-15th. In other tournaments he was 1st= at Norristown 1973 and 1st= at Orense in 1976.

Early in his economics career, Rogoff served as chief economist at the International Monetary Fund and also at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. He is currently the Thomas D. Cabot Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Economics at Harvard University.

Rogoff's biography in his own words: http://www.economics.harvard.edu/fa...; Rogoff's game against Magnus Carlsen in August 2012 in New York: http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp...; Article by Rogoff in Chessbase titled <Rogoff on innovation, unemployment, inequality and dislocation> with particular reference to professional chess: http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp...

Wikipedia article: Kenneth Rogoff


 page 1 of 6; games 1-25 of 132  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Larsen vs K Rogoff ½-½35 1968 Canadian OpenA02 Bird's Opening
2. K Rogoff vs A H Williams ½-½106 1969 World Junior Championship, B FinalA56 Benoni Defense
3. E M Green vs K Rogoff ½-½37 1969 World Junior ChB12 Caro-Kann Defense
4. K Rogoff vs S Spencer 1-020 1969 US Jnr ChpB15 Caro-Kann
5. K Rogoff vs Z Vranesic  0-148 1970 Ontario opB83 Sicilian
6. J Durao vs K Rogoff 0-130 1970 MalagaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
7. H Pfleger vs K Rogoff  1-059 1970 WchT U26 17thA58 Benko Gambit
8. Ljubojevic vs K Rogoff 1-029 1971 MalagaB50 Sicilian
9. E Paoli vs K Rogoff 1-026 1971 Liberation tournB06 Robatsch
10. V Tukmakov vs K Rogoff  1-042 1971 Liberation tournD93 Grunfeld, with Bf4 & e3
11. K Rogoff vs Timman 1-048 1971 Malaga 11/138B08 Pirc, Classical
12. J Durao vs K Rogoff  0-165 1971 MalagaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
13. Karpov vs K Rogoff 1-026 1971 06, Mayaguez tt-studA22 English
14. K Rogoff vs L Day ½-½21 1971 World Student OlympiadA15 English
15. Ulf Andersson vs K Rogoff 1-036 1971 OlotB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
16. K Rogoff vs V Tukmakov 1-041 1972 WchT U26 19th fin-AB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
17. K Rogoff vs Adorjan 1-030 1972 Graz Stu ttB30 Sicilian
18. Huebner vs K Rogoff ½-½12 1972 WchT U26 19th fin-AA15 English
19. K Rogoff vs Suttles 0-147 1973 Ottawa op-CANB06 Robatsch
20. L Day vs K Rogoff  ½-½23 1973 CAN-opA07 King's Indian Attack
21. E Paoli vs K Rogoff 0-139 1973 NorristownB06 Robatsch
22. Pilnik vs K Rogoff  0-156 1973 NorristownB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
23. K Rogoff vs W Schmidt  ½-½39 1974 Rubinstein memA36 English
24. Saidy vs K Rogoff 0-136 1974 US ChampionshipA15 English
25. K Rogoff vs A Karklins  ½-½20 1974 US ChampionshipA46 Queen's Pawn Game
 page 1 of 6; games 1-25 of 132  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Rogoff wins | Rogoff loses  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2594 OF 4595 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-17-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: "International law" is a fraud. The principle on which our national government was founded, as stated in the Declaration of Independence, is that "Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." If it's good enough for us, shouldn't that principle hold for everyone else? How does that apply to international law? Have the people subject to international law given their "just consent" to those laws?

If there were a world government, to which everyone in the world was subject, with a representative legislature that enacted laws binding on all the people in the world, that legislative process might qualify as their "consent." But we don't have that. What we have is "conventions" and treaties, drawn up by diplomats from *some* of the nations of the world, signed by the heads of state of some nations (not necessarily the same ones), and ratified by legislatures (where they exist -- sometimes elected, sometimes not) of *some* countries -- again, not necessarily the same ones. And those treaties invariably have opt-out clauses, according to which, at the wish of its then-current government, a signatory nation can withdraw from the treaty by following some specified procedure after giving some specified notice, thereby freeing itself from any obligations under the provisions of the "law." You know what that resembles? It's exactly like "nullification" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interp...), the doctrine that asserts the right of a state government to "nullify" an act of the federal government if it goes against the wishes of the politically dominant members of that state's ruling body.

I repeat: International law is a fraud.

Nov-17-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  kb2ct:

Interesting development:

Occupy Los Angeles protestors seek restraining order against police.

:0)

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan...

Nov-17-11  diceman: < Jim Bartle:
Too bad we can't learn, embrace, understand. Especially after diceman's attempts to reach out to us>

Reach out????
I tell you what you are and what your lying politicians are.

If you want “reach out” find a maverick.

Nov-17-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingfu: Would that be Bart Maverick or Bret Maverick?

Do not the lefties always accuse the US of being occupiers?

What are the limits / boundaries of free speech?

Nov-17-11  I play the Fred: <Occupy Los Angeles protestors seek restraining order against police.>

Why haven't serial killers ever thought of this?

Nov-17-11  diceman: < Jim Bartle: Gingrich resigned as both Speaker and Congressman for his district after the midterm disaster of 1998>

(heh, heh)
Follow the bouncing ball.

Remember the good old days when Jim used to talk about Huckabee?

Palins voice and Trumps hair were the talk of the town, Perry, Cain, now Gingrich.

You’ll save so much time if you just wait for the nominee.

I realize you only have one god and pray in one church (Obama) So this must be confusing for you, the whole idea of “thinking” about a candidate.

(realize that all this can be derailed at anytime by a Factor email)

Even though:
ITS NOT A POULARTY CONTEST!!!
its has Jims full attention.

Nov-18-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  arifattar: Arundhati Roy "We are all Occupiers" http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentis...
Nov-18-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  brankat: <al wazir> Very true. Couldn't have said it any better myself :-)
Nov-18-11  Jim Bartle: Face it, diceman, Gingrich quit because the Republicans had a disastrous election in 1998 and they were ready to replace Gingrich as speaker.

And diceman, honestly, why do you ask "Why can't we learn, embrace, understand?" when all you do is make repetitive attacks, largely fact-free, on those who disagree with you?

Nov-18-11  Petrosianic: That's exactly what happened. I don't know if it'll affect his nomination chances now, but it is what happened then.

Pelosi presided over an even bigger disaster, yet the captain of the Titanic was nominated for another run. I'm not sure what that says about the state of politics in 2010 vs. 1998.

Nov-18-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Gingrich is on his third marriage. He divorced twice and has admitted cheating on at least one wife. If you recall, he explained (during the present campaign) that he did so because he was working so hard on improving the country. He also served his first wife with divorce papers while she was in the hospital with cancer, then left her and their kids destitute. His soon to be ex-wife went on welfare. Your classic GOP family values. According to a Vanity Fair article some years back, he and one of his mistresses only had oral sex, so that if he was asked if they'd slept together, he could say no. Shades of "I have not had sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky."
Nov-18-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  kb2ct:

Ry Cooder--Wall Street Part Of Town

:0)

http://soundcloud.com/dj-dan-buskir...

Nov-18-11  Petrosianic: We settled this in the 90's. Not only does sex not matter, but crimes committed in the name of covering up sex don't matter either. He may or may not get the nomination, but this probably won't affect it, as the bar has been lowered across the board. Everybody wants to lower it for their side but not the other, but it just doesn't work that way.
Nov-18-11  cormier: <<<<Lk 19:45-48> Jesus entered the temple area and proceeded to drive out those who were selling things, saying to them,
"It is written, My house shall be a house of prayer,
but you have made it a den of thieves.">

And every day he was teaching in the temple area.>
The chief priests, the scribes, and the leaders of the people, meanwhile, were seeking to put him to death,
but they could find no way to accomplish their purpose because all the people were hanging on his words.>
Nov-18-11  cormier: Tens of thousands of Islamists jammed Tahrir Square here Friday to protest attempts by Egypt's military rulers to hold onto power
Nov-18-11  Zorts: al wazir <Anyone who refuses to use ignore...also wears a 'hair shirt', turns the thermostat down to 55, and lives on a diet of raw vegetables.>

Hilarious! Do these 'hair shirts' really exist? Does anybody wear them; except for maybe Michael Behe, William Dembski, and ID promoters?

Nov-18-11  diceman: < Jim Bartle:
Too bad we can't learn, embrace, understand. Especially after diceman's attempts to reach out to us>

(heh, heh)
Obviously Jim you’ve never been a conservative around liberals, reaching out could lose you an appendage.

<Colonel Mortimer: Taking out the Tea Party would do far more for world peace than taking out Iran.>

Liberals are always so very, very, nice.

<goldenbear:I must say <diceman> impresses me. He doesn't seem the least bit bothered by being attacked. I think it's admirable.>

Attacked?
Wow, it must have been BobCrisp, Patzer or Pinned Piece. (we know how nice liberals are)

Nov-18-11  diceman: <A man who said he planned to firebomb Macy’s was arrested on Wednesday on charges of making terrorist threats, after a video of remarks he had made at an Occupy Wall street protest in Manhattan surfaced online.

In the video, which the police showed at a briefing, the man, Nkrumah Tinsley, 29, spoke Tuesday outside Zuccotti Park and referred to Thursday, which protest organizers have planned as a day of demonstration. He said, “In a few days you’re going to see what a Molotov cocktail can do to Macy’s.”>

(if he hates the rich, why wouldn’t he choose Nordstrom’s)

Wow, firebomb Macys with a Molotov cocktail, that must be some of that “reaching out” Jim B talks about.

Why cant conservatives be as kind and caring as liberals?

Such deep, deep, deep, thinkers,
changing the world, one threat at a time.

(remember when the Tea Party leveled JC Penny’s, that was fun)

Nov-18-11  diceman: <OWS Protesters Chant ‘Follow Those Kids!’ As Small Children Try To Go To School On Wall Street

Tiny Tots, Some As Young As 4, Overwhelmed By Hostility, Crush Of Humanity>

Must be more of that “reaching out”, maybe the kids parents had jobs and were part of the evil capitalism?

People who work and make money, having children, both despicable, and insidious.

Nov-18-11  ControlledDemolition: I'd rather have a breakfast at <Tiffany's> than a cocktail at <Macy's>.
Nov-18-11  Petrosianic: How about a bottle in front of me?
Nov-18-11  ControlledDemolition: <<Occupy Los Angeles protestors>>

Did they ever protest the occupation of Los Angeles by Mexicans? Or did they just move to the suburbs?

Nov-18-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <ControlledDemolition: <<Occupy Los Angeles protestors>>

Did they ever protest the occupation of Los Angeles by Mexicans? Or did they just move to the suburbs?>

We stole California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Texas from Mexico. If the Mexicans try to steal them back, that's only fair.

Nov-18-11  Petrosianic: <We stole California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Texas from Mexico. If the Mexicans try to steal them back, that's only fair.>

Actually, it's not, considering that they stole it from the Indians originally. If they later had it stolen from them, then THAT'S fair.

Nov-18-11  ControlledDemolition: <We stole California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Texas from Mexico.>

More exactly, you fought and won them. Question is, why aren't you prepared to fight for them now?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4595)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2594 OF 4595 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies