chessgames.com

K Rogoff 
Photograph courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.  
Kenneth Rogoff
Number of games in database: 113
Years covered: 1968 to 2012
Last FIDE rating: 2505
Overall record: +32 -27 =53 (52.2%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      1 exhibition game, odds game, etc. is excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 English (9) 
    A15 A13 A18 A16 A19
 Sicilian (7) 
    B21 B30 B38 B85 B83
 Ruy Lopez (6) 
    C88 C68 C97 C65 C95
 English, 1 c4 e5 (5) 
    A29 A20 A22
 King's Indian (5) 
    E62 E74 E63 E60
 English, 1 c4 c5 (4) 
    A30 A34 A36
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (10) 
    B93 B52 B30 B50 B81
 Caro-Kann (8) 
    B17 B10 B12
 English, 1 c4 c5 (8) 
    A34 A30 A33
 Sicilian Najdorf (4) 
    B93
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   K Rogoff vs R Blumenfeld, 1976 1-0
   Huebner vs K Rogoff, 1976 1/2-1/2
   K Rogoff vs Timman, 1971 1-0
   Huebner vs K Rogoff, 1972 1/2-1/2
   K Rogoff vs Bisguier, 1974 1/2-1/2

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   US Championship 1974 by Phony Benoni

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Kenneth Rogoff
Search Google for Kenneth Rogoff
FIDE player card for Kenneth Rogoff


KENNETH ROGOFF
(born Mar-22-1953) United States of America

[what is this?]
Kenneth Saul Rogoff learned chess from his father at age 6, but took up the game in earnest when he got a chess set for his 13th birthday. He was soon recognised as a chess prodigy. By age 14, he was a USCF master and New York State Open Champion, and shortly thereafter became a senior master, the highest US national title. At sixteen Rogoff dropped out of high school to concentrate on chess, and spent the next several years living primarily in Europe and playing in tournaments there. However, at eighteen he made the decision to go to college and pursue a career in economics rather than to become a professional player, although he continued to play and improve for several years afterward.

Rogoff was awarded the IM title in 1974, and the GM title in 1978. He was 3rd in the World Junior Championship of 1971 and finished 2nd in the US Championship of 1975, which doubled as a Zonal competition, a half point behind Walter Shawn Browne; this result qualified him for the 1976 Interzonal at Biel where he finished 13-15th. In other tournaments he was 1st= at Norristown 1973 and 1st= at Orense in 1976.

Early in his economics career, Rogoff served as chief economist at the International Monetary Fund and also at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. He is currently the Thomas D. Cabot Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Economics at Harvard University.

Rogoff's biography in his own words: http://www.economics.harvard.edu/fa...; Rogoff's game against Magnus Carlsen in August 2012 in New York: http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp...; Article by Rogoff in Chessbase titled <Rogoff on innovation, unemployment, inequality and dislocation> with particular reference to professional chess: http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp...

Wikipedia article: Kenneth Rogoff


 page 1 of 5; games 1-25 of 113  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Larsen vs K Rogoff ½-½35 1968 Canadian OpenA02 Bird's Opening
2. K Rogoff vs S Spencer 1-020 1969 US Jnr ChpB15 Caro-Kann
3. K Rogoff vs A H Williams ½-½106 1969 World Junior Championship, B FinalA56 Benoni Defense
4. E M Green vs K Rogoff ½-½37 1969 World Junior ChB12 Caro-Kann Defense
5. J Durao vs K Rogoff 0-130 1970 MalagaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
6. H Pfleger vs K Rogoff  1-059 1970 WchT U26 17thA58 Benko Gambit
7. K Rogoff vs Z Vranesic  0-148 1970 Ontario opB83 Sicilian
8. Karpov vs K Rogoff 1-026 1971 06, Mayaguez tt-studA22 English
9. K Rogoff vs L Day ½-½21 1971 World Student OlympiadA15 English
10. Ulf Andersson vs K Rogoff 1-036 1971 OlotB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
11. Ljubojevic vs K Rogoff 1-029 1971 MalagaB50 Sicilian
12. E Paoli vs K Rogoff 1-026 1971 Liberation tournB06 Robatsch
13. V Tukmakov vs K Rogoff  1-042 1971 Liberation tournD93 Grunfeld, with Bf4 & e3
14. K Rogoff vs Timman 1-048 1971 Malaga 11/138B08 Pirc, Classical
15. J Durao vs K Rogoff  0-165 1971 MalagaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
16. K Rogoff vs V Tukmakov 1-041 1972 WchT U26 19th fin-AB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
17. K Rogoff vs Adorjan 1-030 1972 Graz Stu ttB30 Sicilian
18. Huebner vs K Rogoff ½-½12 1972 WchT U26 19th fin-AA15 English
19. L Day vs K Rogoff  ½-½23 1973 CAN-opA07 King's Indian Attack
20. E Paoli vs K Rogoff 0-139 1973 NorristownB06 Robatsch
21. Pilnik vs K Rogoff  0-156 1973 NorristownB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
22. K Rogoff vs Suttles 0-147 1973 Ottawa op-CANB06 Robatsch
23. K Rogoff vs Bisguier  ½-½77 1974 US ChampionshipE08 Catalan, Closed
24. K Rogoff vs Zuckerman  1-044 1974 US ChampionshipA15 English
25. N Weinstein vs K Rogoff  ½-½11 1974 US ChampionshipC42 Petrov Defense
 page 1 of 5; games 1-25 of 113  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Rogoff wins | Rogoff loses  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3090 OF 4460 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-26-12  goldenbear: <al wazir> Speaking as someone who researches corporate balance sheets often, you are correct. Many large corporations have effective tax rates of less than 1%. That is a fact, folks.
Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Jim Bartle: OCF: I don't think defendants are ever walked into a courtroom in handcuffs in the presence of a jury, the people who need to presume the defendants are innocent. At least not unless they've displayed violent behavior in court.>

That is essentially correct. See http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/s115.htm

Apr-26-12  King Death: < galdur: Staggering glut: 2010 corn production was a whopping 900 million tons (wikipedia). That comes to about 130 kilograms per human on the planet. So, why is anybody starving?>

It's for all them stills to produce whiskey. A big cash crop at least here in the southern USA.

Apr-26-12  King Death: <goldenbear: Speaking as someone who researches corporate balance sheets often, you are correct. Many large corporations have effective tax rates of less than 1%. That is a fact, folks.>

Where do we ordinary folks get in line for that kind of tax rate?

Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Shams: Since when did "intuitive thinker" come to mean "person terrible at math"?

http://boingboing.net/2012/04/26/sc...

"Scientists claim the way a person answers simple math problem is a good predictor of their belief in a religion."

<Q: If a baseball and bat cost $110, and the bat costs $100 more than the ball, how much does the ball cost?

If you answered $10 you are inclined to believe in religion. If you answered $5 you are inclined to disbelieve.

Why? Because, according to new research reported in tomorrow's issue of the journal Science, the $10 answer indicates that you are an intuitive thinker, and the $5 answer indicates that you solve problems analytically, rather than following your gut instinct.

Psychologists William Gervais and Ara Norenzayan, of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, predicted that people who were more analytic in thinking would tend not to believe in religion, whereas people who approach problems more intuitively would tend to be believers. Their study confirmed the hypothesis and the findings illuminate the mysterious cognitive process by which we reach decisions about our beliefs.>

Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Wow, I never knew I was inclined to disbelieve. (NB This isn't the first time I've seen that logic equivalent of a Monday POTD) Why didn't it happen? I guess I'm not stupid enough........errrrrrrr.....not analytical enough to think a bunch of mud and water got hit by lightning and magically produced Bach, Brahms, and the Beatles.
Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Shams> In other words, dumber people are more likely to be religious. Not exactly a revelation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religi...
Apr-26-12  Colonel Mortimer: <OCF> <I guess I'm not stupid enough........errrrrrrr.....not analytical enough to think a bunch of mud and water got hit by lightning and magically produced Bach, Brahms, and the Beatles.>

But you believe an all powerful being can part the Red Sea.

What a dumb contradiction.

Apr-26-12  cormier: niti nito ...
Apr-26-12  Jim Bartle: "errrrrrrr.....not analytical enough to think a bunch of mud and water got hit by lightning and magically produced Bach, Brahms, and the Beatles."

If I'm not mistaken, the theory states there were several intermediate steps.

Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <JB: If I'm not mistaken, the theory states there were several intermediate steps.>

Yes, almost all the intermediate steps took a gazillion years, very slow, very incremental, but the development of say, lungs, THAT took a few seconds. Obviously.

Apr-26-12  Jim Bartle: You've been studying, I see.
Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  twinlark: <Ohio> It took more than a few seconds. It's embarrassing to hear that from you, even if you are expressing it metaphorically.
Apr-26-12  Colonel Mortimer: It's funny how these <OCF> types are unwilling to consider scientific evidence and pass it off as 'lighting-hits-mud-and water' voodoo magic.

BUT they don't consider it magic when a little man upstairs creates the World in 6 days.

Actually it's not funny - it's a hilarious example of cognitive dissonance.

Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <PinnedPiece: ... <FSR> Because I am interested in your mind and logic abilities, I went to view your teaching videos again, and again appreciated your organization and thinking. Just to let you know I may disagree but be an appreciative fan.>

Thanks, <PinnedPiece>. I really appreciate that. And your comment beats the heck out of the people who make fun of my voice, say that the trap featured in my "Sicilian Defense: The Most Useful Trap You've Never Seen" video isn't really a trap but something only an idiot would fall into (the universe of chess idiots apparently includes experts and A players), that I'm a fish (I suppose I should've mentioned that I'm a master, but didn't want to brag), etc.

It's good to know that we can see eye to eye on chess, at least. :-)

Apr-26-12  goldenbear: <Colonel Mortimer> I've never met a scientist personally who was not MORE dogmatic than any religious leader I've ever personally known...

Incidentally, scanning the question (or actually misreading it), I thought the ball was $10. But that doesn't mean I'm bad at math; in fact, I have a very intuitive understanding of math and always have as long as I can remember. I remember an incident which occurred during my state's academic bowl championship. I had answered several questions in a row and was on quite a roll when a math question came up. Everyone always takes out pencil and paper for such questions, but I never did, preferring instead to solve the problems in my head. The questioner read: "What is 12?" when suddenly I flinched and buzzed in accidentally. Since the number 12 was the only information I had, I immediately began thinking about powers of 12. I thought 12 squared was obviously too easy, so in the 3 seconds I had to answer I solved for 12 cubed and answered "1,728". To everyone's astonishment, the answer was correct! Naturally, a bru-ha-ha ensued which ended with the other team walking out in protest, as they were convinced I had advanced knowledge of the questions.

Apr-26-12  cormier: <CM> and the 7th ... ask <diceman> .... lol ..... tks G
Apr-26-12  Jim Bartle: "Everyone always takes out pencil and paper for such questions,..."

Pencil and paper? What century was this?

Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  twinlark: I was wondering whether he'd met one.
Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <Jim Bartle: Send me the name of your account, al wazir.> She isn't cheap. And you may not be eligible to use the gaping loophole that I benefited from, the R&D tax credit. (This is *not* a deduction, but money that gets subtracted from the final tax bill. Tax credits are government's gift to private enterprise.)

I wouldn't want to do my business taxes myself -- it really does take a CPA. But the biggest tax boondoggle I ever got away with was one I devised, on my personal taxes, which I have always done myself. I donated all the physics journals I had subscribed to since grad school, decades of them, to a university (which shall remain nameless) that I had a connection with at the time, and I got the publisher, the American Institute of Physics, to write a letter averring that they had a value determined by the single-copy replacement cost -- approximately the subscription price. That year, when the University of ____ published the list of its biggest charitable donors, guess whose name led all the rest? And it didn't cost me a cent; the only downside was that I'm now on a bunch of begging lists of charitable foundations.

I told some friends about this coup and they attempted to emulate it, but alas! the AIP stopped writing those certification letters. Apparently I had killed the goose that laid the golden eggs -- but not before I got to enjoy my omelet.

Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <twinlark: It took more than a few seconds. It's embarrassing to hear that from you, even if you are expressing it metaphorically.>

Okay, so they incrementally were created, not functional, just these big old pouches with no particular use, but once they became functional, <then> it took just a few seconds.

Apr-26-12  Colonel Mortimer: Stick to world creation in a week - it's easier to comprehend.
Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <aw: I donated all the physics journals I had subscribed to since grad school, decades of them, to a university (which shall remain nameless) that I had a connection with at the time, and I got the publisher, the American Institute of Physics, to write a letter averring that they had a value determined by the single-copy replacement cost -- approximately the subscription price. >

A nameless university in the Midwest will write such a letter affirming a $10-20 value for all LP albums of classical music you might wish to donate to their music department. I am aware of a person who bought a box of them at an auction for $1 and got quite a deduction out of it.

Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <OCF>: I think we can both agree that the tax code needs revision.
Apr-26-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: <OhioChessFan> Your thinking is full of holes. 35,000 years ago the Beatles and Rolling Stones would have been wearing furry loin clothes and trying to beat each other to death with clubs, not trying to outpoint each other on the pop charts.

35,000 years is enough time for primitive man to evolve into Bach and the Beatles.

And, a few million years is enough for the rock and mud to spawn the eneoba and develop to primitive man.

I love <Roger Eberts> comments in his recent autobiography. He said "I"m a cultural Catholic", meaning that he doesn't belive in evolution, but he participates in church affairs in his community, perhaps likes gospel music feels the church can play a positive role in one's community.

A perfect answer. Be respectful of other's opionions, enjoy what their religion contributes to the community, but don't believe any silliness about water being changed into wine.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4460)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3090 OF 4460 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies