Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Louis Stumpers
Number of games in database: 55
Years covered: 1932 to 1969
Overall record: +13 -32 =10 (32.7%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.

Repertoire Explorer
Most played openings
D94 Grunfeld (3 games)
E60 King's Indian Defense (2 games)
B59 Sicilian, Boleslavsky Variation, 7.Nb3 (2 games)
C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense (2 games)
D45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav (2 games)

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Louis Stumpers
Search Google for Louis Stumpers

(born Aug-30-1911, died Sep-27-2003, 92 years old) Netherlands

[what is this?]

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 55  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. L Stumpers vs J Lehr  1-019 1932 EindhovenD18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
2. Prins vs L Stumpers  1-039 1936 NED-ch prelimB20 Sicilian
3. E Sapira vs L Stumpers 0-125 1938 NBSB - FlandersD94 Grunfeld
4. L Stumpers vs E Spanjaard  1-055 1938 Dutch Ch prelimE02 Catalan, Open, 5.Qa4
5. H van Steenis vs L Stumpers  1-025 1939 NED-ch11B02 Alekhine's Defense
6. J van den Bosch vs L Stumpers  ½-½58 1939 NED-ch11A48 King's Indian
7. L Stumpers vs S Landau 0-141 1939 NED-ch11D33 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
8. A Wijnans vs L Stumpers  1-036 1939 NED-chB05 Alekhine's Defense, Modern
9. L Stumpers vs H Kramer  0-136 1940 HilversumE25 Nimzo-Indian, Samisch
10. A J van den Hoek vs L Stumpers  1-027 1941 BondswedstrijdenB10 Caro-Kann
11. T van Scheltinga vs L Stumpers 1-035 1942 NED-ch12D94 Grunfeld
12. L Stumpers vs Euwe 0-130 1946 NED-ch prelim IE60 King's Indian Defense
13. W Wolthuis vs L Stumpers  ½-½52 1946 NED-ch prelim IC58 Two Knights
14. C B van den Berg vs L Stumpers  1-058 1946 NED-ch prelim ID19 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
15. L Stumpers vs H van Steenis 0-124 1946 NED-ch prelim ID28 Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical
16. G Fontein vs L Stumpers  ½-½26 1946 NED-ch prelim ID94 Grunfeld
17. L Stumpers vs Cortlever  ½-½50 1946 NED-ch prelim IE60 King's Indian Defense
18. L Stumpers vs J H Marwitz  1-040 1946 NED-ch prelim ID31 Queen's Gambit Declined
19. Tartakower vs L Stumpers 1-024 1947 Int BD74 Neo-Grunfeld, Nxd5, 7.O-O
20. L Stumpers vs H van Steenis  0-133 1947 Int BD23 Queen's Gambit Accepted
21. L Stumpers vs Grob 1-060 1947 Int BA55 Old Indian, Main line
22. V Soultanbeieff vs L Stumpers  ½-½46 1947 Int BD96 Grunfeld, Russian Variation
23. J T Barendregt vs L Stumpers  0-126 1948 NED-ch14C86 Ruy Lopez, Worrall Attack
24. L Stumpers vs A Vinken  0-133 1948 NED-ch14E21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
25. L Stumpers vs C Vlagsma  0-145 1948 NED-ch14C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 55  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Stumpers wins | Stumpers loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 286 OF 286 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Most interesting...

In theory, every flip can be tails, you keep collecting a dollar, on the otherside of the coin, it, too can be heads infinitely, too.

Of course, we know that's not likely to happen. Hummmmmm

Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: No X will so because the expected payout is 1/2*1+1/4*2+1/8*4+... =1/2+1/2+1/2+... - that is, infinite.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: Not the correct series <alexmagnus>.
Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: < Tiggler: ...
"Our second puzzle involves gambling. Let me describe a new game at the casino. The rules are as follows:

The house puts one dollar in a pot. The dealer flips a coin. If the coin comes up heads, the house doubles the amount of money in the pot and the dealer flips the coin again. If the coin comes up tails, then the game is over and you win the contents of the pot. The game costs X dollars to play.

If the casino is to break even playing this game, how much should they charge — what should be the value of X? And how much would you be willing to pay to play this game?"...>

Can the player ever lose his wager? Not from the description of the game execution. Looks like a variant of "comes tails you win comes head you do not lose"

Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <Tiggler> Why not? It is correct, at least if we assume that the casino can pay out any amount of money (a real casino would of course go bankrupt at some point).

But if the casino says the the game stops at the point the jackpot exceeds their (finite) money reserves - then, of course, X is a finite value, and quite a small one at that. If we assume the casino has one billion dollars, then the expected payout is only $15.50 (the power of two exceeding one billion is 2^30, so the coin can be flipped up to 31 times, resulting in a 31/2 expected payout).

Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <alexmagnus> Third term is wrong.
Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: < Tiggler: <alexmagnus> Third term is wrong.>

I read the 3rd term as (1/8)*4 and that is pretty much the mathematical expections for winning 4$.

Again, I like to ask: "when does the player lose his wager?". According to the game description it is not clear to me. Then of course we have the "golden rule" that you only gamble the money you can afford to lose. Of course, there is always the "utility function" which makes 2$ an initial good bet for the player.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <john barleycorn>
Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: < Tiggler: <john barleycorn> (1/8)*?>

The only way for the player to win 4$ with 3 coinflips is (head, head, tails)which is one of 8 possibilities so its probability is 1/8. So the mathematical expectation is (1/8)*4. At least that is the way I learned it.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <The only way for the player to win 4$ with 3 coinflips is (head, head, tails)>

This does not win $4.

Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: <Tiggler: ...

This does not win $4.>

1. the bank puts one dollar down and flips the coin. head comes. 2. the bank adds one dollar to the pot (now 2 dollar in total) and flips the coin. head comes. 3. the bank adds 2 dollars to the pot (now 4 $ in total) and flips the coin. tails come and the player wins the 4$.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <3. the bank adds 2 dollars to the pot (now 4 $ in total) and flips the coin.>

You are correct, and so was <alexmagnus>.

I solved the wrong problem: I had the bank adding $1 each time head comes. That is a much nicer puzzle imo, but not the correct one.

In that case the series is:
1/2 + (1/4)*2 + (1/8)*3 + (1/16)*4 + ...

= Sum(n/2^n)

To sum it we decompose as follows:

1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 ...
. + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 ...
. + 1/8 + 1/16 ...
. + 1/16 ...

= 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8...

= 2

I thought that was the correct answer. Sorry for mixing it up

Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: Actually, 2$ would be the amount I would bet for the player when he loses on head coming. But this is not said the game description. So, any amount is ok for the player as he can never lose.
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <Tiggler> Funnily, that variant of the game came to my mind too, with the same solution as you posted.
Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: Still, my question: "When does the player lose?" There is no misreading possible as it is not mentioned in the game description.

the question:

<If the casino is to break even playing this game, how much should they charge — what should be the value of X?>

is absolutely meaningless in that case.

Jul-03-16  beatgiant: <john barleycorn>
The player loses money if the charge X he paid is higher than the amount he won.
Jul-03-16  beatgiant: The gambling game in question is the well-known "St. Petersburg Paradox." Wikipedia has a good article on it.
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Here's the link, I'll save y'all from typing it in google. =)

Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: <beatgiant: <john barleycorn> The player loses money if the charge X he paid is higher than the amount he won.>

Ah, thank you. so the player pays an amount X at the beginning and it is automatically collected by the casino irrelevant of the outcome of the coin flips.

Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: It's convention time!

As is traditional, a banquet is held at the conclusion of the Republicratic convention. Two hundred senior partisans, selected by invitation from the party's most principled princes and dignified dignitaries, stream into the ballroom where tables have been set up.

When they arrive they find that seats has been preassigned. Every setting has a name tag, and the invitees are required to sit at the place with their own tag.


Two hundred mostly elderly, increasingly hungry, slightly tipsy (from pre-banquet cocktails) guests mill around, bumping into chairs and tables, stepping on each other's toes, as they try to locate their places. Some give up the search and sit at random, only to be displaced when the rightful occupant finds his name and claims the place. A few headstrong mavericks -- most of them long-serving legislators accustomed to their own safe electoral seats -- redistribute the name tags. As a result, some tables have more tags than chairs.

Is there a better way to do it? (Cf.

Jul-14-16  Schwartz: Just a small amount should search at the same time, unless there's a lot of room.
Premium Chessgames Member
  john barleycorn: get them seated by trained stuff.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: More cocktails! Then bring them in on wheelbarrows.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: Open seating is the reason Southwest Airlines boards twice as fast and saves billions.
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <Tiggler: Open seating is the reason Southwest Airlines boards twice as fast and saves billions.> Good point. But in this scenario the seating isn't open.

Since you mention airline seating, I should point out that some airlines *platoon* boarding passengers. Their tickets are labeled "Group 1," "Group 2," and so on, and the groups are assigned seats in such a way that Group 1 goes to the back of the plane where it won't interfere with Group 2. Then Group 2 takes the seats forward of them, and so on.

So one solution to the problem would be to give the banqueters tickets with table numbers. Alternatively, they could simply be told ahead of time what table they are assigned to, and at appropriate intervals the Maître d' could announce over the PA system "Table 1 now seating ... Table 2 now seating ...," etc. But I'm not convinced that there isn't a better way.

I recently attended an outdoor luncheon where they must have been around 200 guests, if not more. Owing to a conflict (it was a chess conflict, as a matter of fact), I arrived an hour after everyone else had been seated, and even knowing the table I was supposed to sit at I had a hell of a time finding my seat. So if everyone arrived at the same time it must have been a mess.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 286)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 286 OF 286 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2016, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies