chessgames.com

  
Louis F Stumpers
Number of games in database: 33
Years covered: 1939 to 1969
Overall record: +9 -20 =4 (33.3%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.

Repertoire Explorer
Most played openings
D94 Grunfeld (2 games)
E60 King's Indian Defense (2 games)

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Louis F Stumpers
Search Google for Louis F Stumpers


LOUIS F STUMPERS
(born Aug-30-1911, died Sep-27-2003) Netherlands

[what is this?]

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 33  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. L Stumpers vs S Landau  0-141 1939 NED-ch11D33 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
2. H Van Steenis vs L Stumpers  1-025 1939 NED-ch11B02 Alekhine's Defense
3. T Van Scheltinga vs L Stumpers 1-035 1942 NED-ch12D94 Grunfeld
4. C B Van den Berg vs L Stumpers  1-058 1946 NED-ch prelim ID19 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
5. L Stumpers vs H Van Steenis 0-124 1946 NED-ch prelim ID28 Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical
6. G Fontein vs L Stumpers  ½-½26 1946 NED-ch prelim ID94 Grunfeld
7. L Stumpers vs Cortlever  ½-½50 1946 NED-ch prelim IE60 King's Indian Defense
8. L Stumpers vs J H Marwitz  1-040 1946 NED-ch prelim ID31 Queen's Gambit Declined
9. L Stumpers vs Euwe 0-130 1946 NED-ch prelim IE60 King's Indian Defense
10. W Wolthuis vs L Stumpers  ½-½52 1946 NED-ch prelim IC58 Two Knights
11. Tartakower vs L Stumpers 1-024 1947 Int BD74 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.cd Nxd5, 7.O-O
12. L Stumpers vs H Van Steenis  0-133 1947 Int BD23 Queen's Gambit Accepted
13. L Stumpers vs Grob 1-060 1947 Int BA55 Old Indian, Main line
14. V Soultanbeieff vs L Stumpers  ½-½46 1947 Int BD96 Grunfeld, Russian Variation
15. J T Barendregt vs L Stumpers  0-126 1948 NED-ch14C86 Ruy Lopez, Worrall Attack
16. L Stumpers vs A Vinken  0-133 1948 NED-ch14E21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
17. L Stumpers vs C Vlagsma  0-145 1948 NED-ch14C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
18. L Stumpers vs T Van Scheltinga  1-047 1948 NED-ch14C97 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Chigorin
19. L Stumpers vs H Kramer  0-140 1948 NED-ch14B92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation
20. J Baay vs L Stumpers  1-040 1948 NED-ch14E37 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
21. L Stumpers vs F Henneberke  1-043 1948 NED-ch14C92 Ruy Lopez, Closed
22. L Stumpers vs F Jenei  0-131 1949 HUN-NEDC99 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Chigorin, 12...cd
23. I V Rohacek vs L Stumpers  1-052 1949 CSR-NEDC47 Four Knights
24. H Kramer vs L Stumpers  1-067 1950 NED-chD79 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.O-O, Main line
25. L Stumpers vs E Spanjaard  1-044 1950 NED-chB59 Sicilian, Boleslavsky Variation, 7.Nb3
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 33  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Stumpers wins | Stumpers loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 111 OF 172 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-13-12  Jim Bartle: The Dick Allen photo: The cap has the P correct, so I think he's just fooling around. And that bat looks awfully tiny for a major league slugger.
Apr-13-12  King Death: Here's some quotes from Rickey Henderson, some are funny even though he had a huge ego.

http://www.nysportspace.com/forum/t...

Apr-13-12  tbentley: oooe, ooeo, oeoo, eooo, eooe, eoeo, oeoe
3*6*3+6*2+2*4*6+6*6=54+12+48+36=150
Apr-14-12  King Death: Ryan Leaf's in a heap of trouble:

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/...

If he survives this then there's the probation violation down in Texas. Hopefully he cleans up his act some.

Apr-14-12  Jim Bartle: The Henderson-Olerud story continues to be funny, no matter how many times I hear it. If it isn't true it should be.
Apr-14-12  King Death: <Jim Bartle> That story's one I never heard before among others on that page.

Olerud has no shot to make the Hall Of Fame but he was quite a player for a little bit. He could hit and was a pretty good 1st baseman.

Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Yogi Bera played in the outfield? Is this in his later years, after a Catcher's knees start to give out?
Apr-14-12  Jim Bartle: Yes, and when they had Elston Howard to do the catching. My guess is he would have done a lot of DHing if that had been an option.
Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <ughaibu: Sneaky: what's your answer to this: Find the number of 4-digit numbers with distinct digits chosen from the set 0,1,2,3,4,5 in which no two adjacent digits are even.>

Oh boy, this is a problem right out of my college combinatorics books! The professors made us memorize all of these arcane equations littered with factorials, but I'd just roll up my sleeves and think my way through his questions. When I got them wrong he'd say "I told you so!" and when I got them right it really got his goat.

Let's see if the rolled-sleeve method works here. It would be an easy question were it not for that "no two adjacent digits are even" clause, so I'll solve it *without* that clause first.

The first digit can be any of 6 numbers, clearly. The next digit can be any of 5 numbers. The third digit is one of 4. And the final digit is one of 3. So that's 6*5*4*3 = 360 numbers. The only problem is that some of these numbers have adjacent even digits.

I note that it's OK by you if they are all odd, you just don't want to see two adjacent evens. So EOEO is fine, EOOE is fine, etc. Let me enumerate all possibilities: OOOO OOOE OOEO OEOO OEOE EOOO EOOE EOEO. The configurations we must not allow are: OOEE OEEO OEEE EOEE EEOO EEOE EEEO EEEE

Hmmmm.... 8 configurations are OK, 8 are not OK. Since the original set of digits has an equal number of evens and odds, I'll just divide that 360 in half to get my final answer.

That's my answer, 180 numbers.

Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: <tbentley: oooe, ooeo, oeoo, eooo, eooe, eoeo, oeoe> At first I was going to say "Hey, you forgot OOOO!" but I see now that you didn't. Unlike myself, you cleverly noticed that there aren't enough distinct odd digits in the set to make OOOO possible.

Fortunately my reasoning still holds up, because EEEE is not possible either. In short there are 7 good configurations, 7 bad configurations, (not 8 and 8 as I said earlier). And because these configurations come in equal numbers my conclusion was still correct: the answer is 180.

Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sneaky: Getting back to the 10 self-referential statements: <ughaibu: Sneaky: you're still talking about simultaneous truth. Taken independently, sentence ten is the only one that must be false regardless of what the other nine assert.>

This is more of a question of how to express the concept of concurrent statements, than an analysis of the puzzle itself. It's a meta-analysis of the puzzle, if you will.

I will agree with this much: If the first 9 were obscured, and you could only see statement 10, you would conclude that 10 is false. However if the last 9 were obscured, and you could only see statement 1, you would have no way of knowing.

At first I thought you were picking hairs, but then I thought of a simple example that might illustrate the point you are trying to make. I'm not trying to make a "straw man" here, so if this is a bad example of your idea then feel free to correct me:

<
Which statement(s) is(are) true?

1. X = 3
2. X = X / X
3. X = X * X
4. X = X - X
5. X = X + 1
>

Mathematically, statement #5 is absolute garbage, for it says that 0=1. All of the other formulas are solvable, but not *simultaneously* solvable. We have to assume that the X in the first statement is not the same X in the second statement, etc.

I will argue however that the 10 self-referential statements cannot be interpreted like the 5 formulas above because they *specifically* reference other statements. Maybe I'm wrong; this is a fine point of interpretation.

Apr-14-12  King Death: < Jim Bartle: Yes, and when they had Elston Howard to do the catching. My guess is he would have done a lot of DHing if that had been an option...>

Those Yankees teams in the 50s were loaded, they had 4th outfielders that would've been regulars anywhere else. Also on most teams Ellie Howard would've had a chance at a Hall Of Fame career instead of backing up Berra until he was 100. He was a class act too.

Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Is anyone familiar with a funny song about the woeful Chicago Cubs? I think its by Arlo Guthrie, sounds like him. The song recounts low points in the life of a cubbies fan (no pennant since the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor). I always hear it on the radio around opening day.
Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  hms123: <HeMateMe>
A Dying Cub Fan's Last Request
by Steve Goodman (1983)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xBx...

A Dying Cub Fan's Last Request
By the shore's of old Lake Michigan
Where the "hawk wind" blows so cold
An old Cub fan lay dying
In his midnight hour that tolled
Round his bed, his friends had all gathered
They knew his time was short
And on his head they put this bright blue cap
From his all-time favorite sport
He told them, "Its late and its getting dark in here" And I know its time to go But before I leave the line-up
Boys, there's just one thing I'd like to know

Do they still play the blues in Chicago
When baseball season rolls around
When the snow melts away,
Do the Cubbies still play
In their ivy-covered burial ground
When I was a boy they were my pride and joy
But now they only bring fatigue
To the home of the brave
The land of the free
And the doormat of the National League

Told his friends "You know the law of averages says: Anything will happen that can"
That's what it says
"But the last time the Cubs won a National League pennant Was the year we dropped the bomb on Japan" The Cubs made me a criminal
Sent me down a wayward path
They stole my youth from me
(that's the truth)
I'd forsake my teachers
To go sit in the bleachers
In flagrant truancy

and then one thing led to another
and soon I'd discovered alcohol, gambling, dope
football, hockey, lacrosse, tennis
But what do you expect,
When you raise up a young boy's hopes
And then just crush 'em like so many paper beer cups.

Year after year after year
after year, after year, after year, after year, after year 'Til those hopes are just so much popcorn for the pigeons beneath the 'L' tracks to eat
He said, "You know I'll never see Wrigley Field, anymore before my eternal rest So if you have your pencils and your score cards ready, and I'll read you my last request He said, "Give me a double header funeral in Wrigley Field On some sunny weekend day (no lights) Have the organ play the "National Anthem"
and then a little 'na, na, na, na, hey hey, hey, Goodbye' Make six bullpen pitchers, carry my coffin and six ground keepers clear my path
Have the umpires bark me out at every base
In all their holy wrath
Its a beautiful day for a funeral, Hey Ernie lets play two! Somebody go get Jack Brickhouse to come back, and conduct just one more interview
Have the Cubbies run right out into the middle of the field, Have Keith Moreland drop a routine fly Give everybody two bags of peanuts and a frosty malt And I'll be ready to die

Build a big fire on home plate out of your Louisville Sluggers baseball bats, And toss my coffin in Let my ashes blow in a beautiful snow
From the prevailing 30 mile an hour southwest wind
When my last remains go flying over the left-field wall Will bid the bleacher bums ad?eu And I will come to my final resting place, out on Waveland Avenue

The dying man's friends told him to cut it out
They said stop it that's an awful shame
He whispered, "Don't Cry, we'll meet by and by near the Heavenly Hall of Fame He said, "I've got season's tickets to watch the Angels now, So its just what I'm going to do He said, "but you the living, you're stuck here with the Cubs, So its me that feels sorry for you!"

And he said, "Ahh Play, play that lonesome losers tune, That's the one I like the best" And he closed his eyes, and slipped away
What we got is the Dying Cub Fan's Last Request
And here it is

Do they still play the blues in Chicago
When baseball season rolls around
When the snow melts away,
Do the Cubbies still play
In their ivy-covered burial ground
When I was a boy they were my pride and joy
But now they only bring fatigue
To the home of the brave
The land of the free
And the doormat of the National League

A Dying Cub Fan's Last Request
http://www.baseball-almanac.com/poe...

Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Thats it! Its a great song, not just the lyrics, but the melody. Sounds a lot like Arlo Guthrie.
Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  talisman: Steve Goodman took Kris Kristoferson to a bar at closing time in Chicago. Steve according to Kris had been blowing them away with his opening songs, so he couldn't refuse. at 2:00pm putting up the tables and etc...John Prine pulled out his Martin...and that's how he got a contract...and those guys were best friends until the end for Steve... John Prine still has Steve's guitar.
Apr-14-12  Jim Bartle: I've posted this somewhere before, so apologies to those who have already seen it.

This song by Dodger fan Danny Kaye was a huge hit in LA during the 62 season, as the team seemed to be on its way to the pennant. It was popular is SF as well, but of course much, much more so, when the Giants caught the Dodgers on the last day and won the pennant.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvqO...

Tbe Legos are fun, but there's one big blunder. Guesses?

Apr-14-12  King Death: Have Keith Moreland drop a routine fly sounds right, if he could only have fielded or DHed in the other league some more.
Apr-14-12  ughaibu: Sneaky: my ambiguity included interpreting "if any" in terms of possibility, 'which of these statements could be true'. But as the puzzle asks 'which is/are true', the ambiguity maybe imaginary.

I agree with your answer to the combinatorics problem, however, all those who submitted solutions at Art Of Problem Solving, a maths site, agreed with Tbentley, except me of course. Though on this occasion I think the ambiguity is clearly imaginary.

Apr-14-12  tbentley: I assume the number can't start with 0.
Apr-14-12  tbentley: Before eliminating numbers beginning with 0 my answer was 4*6*3+3*6*6=72+108=180
Apr-14-12  ughaibu: Yes. As the question asks for "the number of 4-digit numbers" and the first "number" refers to a quantity, which on this occasion is a natural number, it's psychologically easy to assume that the second use of "number" also refers to a natural number, but for this to be so, it needs to be specified.
Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Before baseball was a billion doller sport, the Milwaukee "Brew Crew" was relevant.
Apr-17-12  Jim Bartle: What was nice about the "Brew Crew" of the Brewers was that the team really did have a bunch of blue collar types like Young, Gorman Thomas, Vuckovich and Gantner. Molitor and Simmons didn't fit the mold, really, but somehow fit in.
Apr-17-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Wassup with Magic Jonson and his DEEP pocketed friends? $2.3 billion for a baseball team? Sports Illustrated said last season the Dodgers had to put real cops in the stadium, to chase off the gangbangers.

I guess they'll raise the price of Beer and hot dogs, to help recoup their investment.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 172)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 111 OF 172 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies