Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing User Profile Chessforum

Annie K.
Member since Apr-02-04 · Last seen Aug-20-18
Annie Kappel

My YouTube channel, featuring pronunciations of non-English chess player names:

I'm 44 y/o, of Transylvanian origin, living in Israel since childhood. I speak English (no, really), Hungarian (great language!), and Hebrew (if I must, which is often, for some reason).

Afflicted with an uncontrollable sense of humor and other highly controversial characteristics.

I learned chess as a child, but had no further opportunities to practice the game. Returned to it seriously around 2004, and have been hanging out here since.

Note: if I am not home (i.e., here), you can probably find me at the Domdaniel chessforum, the SwitchingQuylthulg chessforum, the visayanbraindoctor chessforum, or the chessforum! :)


<My City of Moscow skits:>

<<<<<<>>>>> Kramnik's Party -> City of Moscow (kibitz #752)

<<<<<<>>>>> Sochi 2008: An F-Files Production -> City of Moscow (kibitz #774)


<Game Collection: My GotD Puns>

<My favorites:>

All Your Baze Are Belong To Us - L Baze vs T Palmer, 2004 - GotD Mar-21-10

Y Yu No Claim Repetition? - Yu Yangyi vs M R Venkatesh, 2012 - GotD Jun-30-12

He Who Has E Tate is Lost - E Tate vs Y Shulman, 2001 - GotD Sep-22-16

How Many Roads Must Aman Walk Down? - S Shankland vs A Hambleton, 2014 - GotD Dec-23-16 (besides the obvious reason for the pun - a long King walk - note also the terms 'shank' and 'amble' embedded in the player names)

So me the Wei - W So vs Wei Yi, 2013 - GotD Jan-29-17

This Won't Borya Ider - B Ider vs Wei Yi, 2014 - GotD Apr-01-17 (follow-up to previous day's GotD, 'This Won't Borya')

Injun vs Engin' - Anand vs REBEL, 1997 - GotD Jan-06-2018


<My other (linkable) site contributions:>

* The Player Names Pronunciation Project: (or look for names with a loudspeaker icon in the Player Directory)

* Created on my suggestion: Biographer Bistro

* The first (now retired) Carlsen Dancing Rook:

* The Caruana Dancing Rook:

* The Hou Dancing Rook:


<<<<<<< MAJOR CHESS SITES <<>>>>>>>>>

<< Correspondence chess <<<<<<>>>>>>>>

< ChessWorld ->

ChessWorld is my new main chess playing base. It's a rather restrictive site for non-paying members, but one of the best sites for paying members. The full features include excellent interface options and first class study and analysis resources. Nice community, likeable admin. Paid membership recommended.

< Update: while I will leave the original entry for ChessWorld as-is, I have by now been a member of the site for 2 years, and am now an admin there. I still think the site is one of the best, and the <other> admins are nice. :p >

My ChessWorld profile:

< Queen Alice ->

Queen Alice is a charming site - well behaved players, decent admin, site design visually very pleasant. It is also completely free. Unfortunately, it lacks team play, the interface and resources are relatively simple, and it can be frustratingly slow (loading times). Nevertheless warmly recommended.

My QueenAlice profile:

< GameKnot ->

GameKnot is technically an excellent site, however I would not recommend it to the serious player who is looking for a site to settle in, due to an anti$ocial admin with ju$t one $ingle intere$t in hi$ $ite... oop$, $orry about the typo$.

My GameKnot profile:

<< Other chess sites <<<<<<>>>>>>>>

< FICS - the Free Internet Chess Server ->

FICS is a great site to play chess at various faster time controls. There are a few difficulties getting started with it - first, it can be hard to find an email they will accept for registration; and second, there's a lot of site code to learn. But it's worth the hassle. :)

< ChessCube ->

ChessCube is quite good for fast time control games - provided you have a strong computer with broadband, as the site is entirely Flash based, which means it takes considerable computer resources to load. The site is nominally free, but heavily commercialized with all sorts of frills that can be purchased on it.

< Emrald Chess Tactics Server ->

Emrald is not a playing site - it is an invaluable tactical training asset. The only problem with it is also the difficulty of finding an "acceptable" email address to register with; but once past that hurdle, the site deserves nothing but praise.

It's a completely free site. You can play (practice) there as a guest, but they recommend registering, so that their program can keep track of your progress, in order to assign you puzzles best suited to your current level. I strongly second that recommendation. Register and always play logged in! It will make a huge difference in the site's ability to help you improve. An issue that scares some people off Emrald is that your progress is tracked via a "rating system", and because of the high importance they assign to speed, if you are not used to finding tactics fast, your rating will be very low at first - and many people are simply embarrassed to play logged in for that reason. Don't let it bother you! If you let embarrassment hold you back from letting the site help you improve to the best of its ability, you are only shooting yourself in the foot, and nobody else really cares that much anyway. ;p

A few of the people I've recommended Emrald to, had dropped it after a brief trial with remarks along the lines of "Oh, it's a blitz training site. I don't play blitz, so I don't like their obsession with speed." That reaction is absolutely wrong - and it's also one that many people who try the site out for only a short time are likely to have, if only because players who are used to being rated, say, 2000 and above, at corr. chess sites, are going to be annoyed and put on the defensive about finding themselves rated as low as 1200-1300 at Emrald, and will wish to dismiss the "insulting" site.

Yes, the Emrald rating system is heavily influenced by speed. But thinking that the site's purpose is blitz training is a complete misunderstanding of the lesson taught. The real purpose of Emrald practice is not to improve your blitz skills, but to train you to recognize dozens of tactical themes and opportunities AT A GLANCE - which will not only save you time in games of any time control, but is often the only way you will catch them AT ALL. Those brilliant tactical shots that can be seen in anyone's collection of "most memorable games", are often moves that will either occur to you as soon as you glance at the position, or you will miss them altogether. That's what Emrald really teaches - tactical chess intuition.

<Intuition in chess can be defined as the first move that comes to mind when you see a position. --- <Viswanathan Anand>>

<Personally, I am of the view that if a strong master does not see such a threat at once he will not notice it, even if he analyses the position for twenty or thirty minutes. --- <Tigran Petrosian >>


^ TL;DR.

Any other questions, feel free to ask. I might even answer. ;p

>> Click here to see Annie K.'s game collections. Full Member

   Annie K. has kibitzed 7478 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Aug-20-18 chessforum
Annie K.: Yes, I also think people will come back. It would still be much better to concentrate first of all on avoiding the broken homepage scenario. Chess24 also always states exactly when the games will start, you just have to know where to look. I use mostly their information for the ...
   Aug-18-18 Phony Benoni chessforum (replies)
Annie K.: <Phony> The daily features lately have been coming out of an emergency queue; they are really rejects, never intended to be published. Daniel would top up the queue with his actual selections, but he usually didn't put in more than a week or two's worth in advance. We have ...
   Aug-18-18 Annie K. chessforum (replies)
Annie K.: Yes, Daniel used to import the tournament pgns from TWIC whenever they were available there. It's still going, although I think they changed address a while ago. It's at now.
   Aug-16-18 Jimfromprovidence chessforum
Annie K.: That's great, I will. Thanks. Try not to draw public attention to games you would like to be featured - they should be surprises. :)
   Aug-14-18 Memorable Quotes chessforum
Annie K.: chessforum (kibitz #30196) <nok: <<(...) by Raymond Keene is a good book> Who wrote it?>>
   Aug-14-18 Chessgames Bookie chessforum (replies)
Annie K.: Sure, the actual (classical) Sinquefield starts on the 18th. The "St Louis" events were only the first part of it.
   Aug-13-18 SwitchingQuylthulg chessforum (replies)
Annie K.: *However*
   Aug-10-18 takchess chessforum (replies)
Annie K.: Exactly. Thanks very much. :)
   Aug-08-18 Daniel Freeman (replies)
Annie K.: <takchess> thanks. I'll forward your name to Kevin. Hopefully it won't be necessary post your email.
   Aug-02-18 twinlark chessforum (replies)
Annie K.: <twinlark> Good to have you back on the force. We have very thorough tracking of all edits now, so those dates are completely unnecessary. Visit the Biographer Bistro and familiarize yourself with the new links in the header, look at the [edit history] links on any player / ...
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Procrastinators' Club (planned)

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 267 OF 267 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  jith1207: Yes <Zanzibar>, I get your point, but I agree with <Caissanist>. For all we know, he must have been in another job, that he would have to transition someone else. Who knows, what he is going through. It definitely looks like a lot. And, he has known Daniel since teenage, and he needs more time than anyone else here to come out of the loss.

All we can do is wait patiently, and do not peruse what he writes here at this time. You have written in cg forum how difficult it is to take up someone else' legacy code initially. He may settle down and treat the community better, which would be the right thing to do, but this still might not be right time for him.

Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <Caissanist> thanks for the reply. You seem very reasonable generally, so I wanted to clarify. We'd all be happy with a once a week check-in, I think, just some reasonable regular update schedule.

<jith> - well, of course <sqeeky> should be mentioned along with <Sargon>. In fact, the two of them met yesterday, see: chessforum (kibitz #30193)

Aug-14-18  frogbert: <Just want to say I appreciate your work and dedication>

Wanted to chime in and say I share rogge's praise for <Annie K.>. Also, I'm fluent with the technologies used by, with a lot of experience in maintaining bigger systems than this site.

Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: I will also chip in to say that your effort is highly appreciated <Annie K>!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: Thanks everybody.

<Caissanist> and <jith> describe the situation very well.

Just to set things straight, I am still not in contact with <Sargon> - he is indeed very busy, and I don't want to distract him. What I know on that front comes from Daniel's mother. I have been in touch with <Kevin> separately.

Also for the record, I have no intention of getting involved with moderating CG. I did very little of that with Daniel, and I don't want that job now either.

Premium Chessgames Member
  rogge: Didn't think you would, a time-consuming and difficult task. Probably better done by an outsider, me thinks.
Premium Chessgames Member
  parmetd: Thanks Annie for your work. Is there an email to communicate with you privately?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: <parmetd> Do you have an account at one of the chess sites in my profile - QueenAlice for example? You can send me a private message there, and we can go from there.
Premium Chessgames Member
  parmetd: I have FICS and chessemrald
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: OK, send me a message at FICS. I'm AnnieK there. Hmm, emrald has been down for quite a while...
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: <<Annie K> Hmm, emrald has been down for quite a while...>

Yes, I was going to comment here once upon a time, seeing you were a fan of the site.

Do you know any of the story? Even when it went offline?

Too bad. At least ChessTempo is still kicking.

Premium Chessgames Member
  takchess: Annie, i have the first 3 weeks of puzzles lined up by days of the week. Regards. Jim
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <takchess: Annie, i have the first 3 weeks of puzzles lined up by days of the week. Regards. Jim>

Have you noticed that <Jimfromprovidence> has been each day supplying on the POTD forum a puzzle more suitable for that day of the week than the one provided by <chessgames>?

He rarely posts elsewhere, and his puzzles and solutions are always excellent.

Premium Chessgames Member
  jith1207: <takchess> : you might wanna give your suggestion on puzzles to chessgames help email with proper subject to highlight the importance to <Sargon>, he mentioned he got access to that recently.

If he's figured out how to link games in POTD and the problem is only about finding suitable games, that could be done in front page itself.

Premium Chessgames Member
  jith1207: Oh sorry, I didn't notice you and Annie discussing about this earlier in your forum. My apologies.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: <zanz> I noticed it went offline a long time ago, didn't look into the story. Guess I'll have to update my profile sometime. :(

<Jim> thanks very much. <Sargon> finally got in touch with me, so I'll be able to ask him to send your email to Kevin soon.

<jith> Yes, this should go via <Kevin>, not <Sargon>, but interest and well-meant advice are always appreciated. :)

<Tiggler> I didn't notice, thanks for the alert. I haven't been following the PotD for many years now. Daniel would sometimes show me a game he intended to put up, to get a second opinion on what moves come to mind first, but I didn't look at the kibitzing. I'll ask <Jimfromprovidence> if he'd like to join the effort to help <Kevin> too.

Premium Chessgames Member
  takchess: Absolutely the more the merrier. JimfromProvidence has been one of my favorite posters for years. Cheers, Jim
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <Annie>:<I'll ask <Jimfromprovidence> if he'd like to join the effort to help <Kevin> too.>

That's good, and I am very interested to learn that you have sufficient access to know how to contact <Jimfromprovidence>, presumably by means of the email address he provided on registering.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: <Tiggler> I don't - I simply posted to his forum. :) What happens next is that I write Sargon, who <should> have access to the emails related to the accounts, being the new administrator, and <he> sends these emails to Kevin.
Aug-18-18  JimNorCal: Was Daniel the sole updater for new events? Or did he have volunteers who are locked out or mourning or ...

Significant catch-up ahead ...

Tournament Index

Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: <JimNorCal> Daniel was the only one to set up tournament pages. I know there's a lot to catch up with.
Aug-18-18  JimNorCal: It's an enormous amount of material. Probably DF had it mostly automated.

In the old days you could get zipped files for all games in a given week from The Week In Chess. I wonder if TWIC is still a going concern.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: Yes, Daniel used to import the tournament pgns from TWIC whenever they were available there. It's still going, although I think they changed address a while ago. It's at now.
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <zanzi> you've had a bad run. I've waited a while to repsond to this one, but here goes.

<Diademas: I'm starting to think Daniel is alive and laughing his head off over all this.>

<zanzibar: <crickets>>

I respond to <Diademas> and we get this exchange:

<OhioChessFan: <Diademas> I have been thinking the same thing, but more like, is it even possible that......... Anyway, life and death are rarely tidy and never seem to be as neatly manicured as a typical sitcom where you have a problem presented and fixed in 30 minutes.>

So <Diademas> says he's thinking it's true and I comment that I've been wondering about it. Is there crickets on my post? No.

<zanzibar: <OCF> you're suggesting <Daniel> isn't dead.

<Have you no sense of decency?>>

Find a mirror, you double standard hypocrite. Simply unbelievable.

And for good measure, over on the Daniel Freeman page:

<Dionyseus: Heh <Daniel>! IF this is an orchestrated incident to purge of its less savoury bits (who will wander away in a week or two), then more power to you, and it'd be great to hear from you. If not, then my apologies to relatives and interims - just wishful thinking. Dion>

<zanzibar: <Dion> we wish, we wish...>

Your tribalism is simply disgusting. Have you no sense of decency?

Aug-20-18  Caissanist: Well, if <Sargon> or <sneakysqeeky> or other admins are looking for volunteers to do some moderation, I am willing to pitch in, at least for deleting off-topic and guideline violating posts from the chessgames support and Daniel Freeman pages, which of course really need it. My "qualifications" are I'm willing to do it and have been a member for 13 years and a volunteer editor for most of that time, without ever stirring up any significant controversy that I know of. If, it turns out my assistance is not needed for any reason, however, I will not take it personally. You can email me on Yahoo (username oneeyedman99) or message me on (
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 267)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 267 OF 267 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific user and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.

You are not logged in to
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC