Jun-19-13 Tal Memorial (2013) 
| |
|
Beholder: <parmetd: Nakamura still has Gelfand, Carlson and Morozevich left... so 1.5/3 isn't a stretch.> Beating Pontus Carlsson shouldn't be too hard for Naka, considering the rating difference.
|
|
| | Jun-19-13 YouRang chessforum 
| |
|
Beholder: It's getting ridiculous how few results I'm able to predict correctly in this event. == Round 7 Fri June 21
Carlsen - Morozevich 1-0
Nakamura - Gelfand 0-1
Mamedyarov - Anand 1/2
Kramnik - Andreikin 1/2
Karjakin - Caruana 1/2
|
|
| | Jun-15-13 Carlsen vs Caruana, 2013 
| |
|
Beholder: <chessdgc2: I've been playing chess for 30 years and I've NEVER seen a win in a position like this among players of this caliber, NEVER...I suppose it is possible, but only if one errors...> You are probably unfamiliar with a concept of a tablebase. Try reading this for a ...
|
|
| | Jun-13-13 Carlsen vs Kramnik, 2013 
| |
|
Beholder: <Ezzy: <Eugene Glazer, the commentator on chesspro>
Who in Caissa's name is Eugene Glazer.>
That would be GM Evgeny Gleizerov
|
|
| | Jun-12-13 Tal Memorial (Blitz) (2013) 
| |
|
Beholder: <nok: Unsurprising result, for once.> I wouldn't call it that. I expected either Karjakin or Carlsen to win this, and even in case Naka wins it (which he did), I fully expected these two to be right behind him, which did not happen. It's Anand and Kramnik behind him, with the
|
|
| | May-30-13 Bacrot vs Kamsky, 2013  May-24-13 Nakamura vs Bacrot, 2013 
| |
|
Beholder: <chessdgc2: Uh, looks like Grischuk is going down :)> You think it's a magic phrase that compels everyone to agree to a draw, right?
|
|
| | May-24-13 Kamsky vs Grischuk, 2013 
| |
|
Beholder: <chancho: Looks like Grischuk's going down.> That's what Kamsky thought when he started blitzing his moves. But this never works against Grischuk, even when he has only seconds left on his clock.
|
|
| | May-23-13 Kasimdzhanov vs Morozevich, 2013 
| |
|
Beholder: Finally! First!
|
|
| | May-23-13 Morozevich vs Svidler, 2013 
| |
|
Beholder: <Eyal: Svidler was actually the first who took the game out of very well-known territory with 9...c6 and then 10...d5> You've been reading the chesspro commentary I take it. Just switch the word 'position' for 'opening' and my point still stands.
|
|
| | indicates a reply to the comment. | |