Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing User Profile Chessforum

Big Pawn
Member since Dec-10-05 · Last seen Mar-23-18
Philosophical Thought of the Week: “We are all God’s children” - False!
>> Click here to see Big Pawn's game collections. Full Member

   Big Pawn has kibitzed 19423 times to chessgames   [less...]
   Mar-23-18 Kenneth S Rogoff (replies)
Big Pawn: Justin Trudeau Approval Rating Now Below President Trump as Right Wing Parties Surge in Canada The cucks in Canuckistan are about to be run over by all the Canadian Trump wannabees.
   Mar-22-18 technical draw chessforum (replies)
Big Pawn: < Right now I'm going to binge watch all 86 episodes of The Sopranos.> I did that a few years ago. Excellent series!
   Mar-22-18 Big Pawn chessforum
Big Pawn: <tga>, I read the article linked to in your forum. Very good. <It should come as no surprise to anyone familiar with Sex and Culture, the classic work of Oxford-educated anthropologist J.D. Unwin, that feminism and loose sexual mores are leading to cultural and ...
   Mar-22-18 thegoodanarchist chessforum (replies)
Big Pawn: <tga>, I took a glance at that article and it seems interesting right off the bat. When I have time tomorrow I will read the whole thing.
   Mar-21-18 World Championship Candidates (2018) (replies)
Big Pawn: <morph: Ideally this debate will follow a Hegelian Dialectic format: (1) thesis provokes (2) anti-thesis resulting in (3) synthesis.> When it comes to the libs on the rogoff page, they never actually participate in the Hegelian Dialectic because they refuse to engage in #2 ...
   Mar-21-18 Steinitz - Zukertort World Championship Match (1886)
Big Pawn: < FredGambit: I think the logic is that Korchnoi was in his mid to late 40s back when he was the world #2, ergo, pro chess was weak at that time if a guy that old performed that so strongly.> In essence that is correct, although I think the word "weak" is inaccurate. There's ...
   Mar-19-18 W So vs Caruana, 2018 (replies)
Big Pawn: <I've never seen Big Pawn but he really gets me excited, just hearing his name, I don't know what it is.> The masculinity I exude is positively intoxicating.
   Mar-18-18 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
Big Pawn: <Harry: How many times you posted that pic on here ?> How many times a week do you find yourself drunk, pooped and passed out?
   Mar-18-18 chessforum (replies)
Big Pawn: Using the Olga Viewer at this game Zytogorski vs Staunton, 1841 the pgn disappears and I'm unable to play through the game. I switched it to pgn viewer and it worked fine. Olga is not working.
   Mar-16-18 W So vs Aronian, 2018 (replies)
Big Pawn: What an amazing turnaround in this game. I looked at it a few moves ago and it looked really bad for White with his pieces on the first rank and behind by one pawn. I thought to myself, "Poor Wesley, it's just not his tournament" and now look! He's becoming one of my favorite ...
   Mar-14-18 Kramnik vs Caruana, 2018 (replies)
   Mar-14-18 Aronian vs Kramnik, 2018 (replies)
   Mar-13-18 Steinitz vs G B Fraser, 1867
   Mar-12-18 optimal play chessforum (replies)
   Mar-10-18 zborris8 chessforum (replies)
   Mar-10-18 Karjakin vs Mamedyarov, 2018 (replies)
   Mar-07-18 La Bourdonnais vs Cochrane, 1821
   Feb-28-18 Steinitz vs H Czarnowski, 1867
   Feb-26-18 Saemisch vs Nimzowitsch, 1923
   Feb-24-18 Anderssen vs Steinitz, 1866 (replies)
   Feb-22-18 D Wagner vs P Nikolic, 2017 (replies)
   Feb-22-18 Telemus chessforum (replies)
   Feb-21-18 Garry Kasparov (replies)
   Feb-21-18 Kasparov vs Petrosian, 1982
   Feb-18-18 Yu Yangyi vs G Oparin, 2012 (replies)
   Feb-10-18 Bogoljubov vs Nimzowitsch, 1929
   Feb-10-18 Bird vs G W Medley, 1849
   Feb-10-18 G W Medley vs Morphy, 1858
   Feb-08-18 Team White vs Team Black, 2017 (replies)
   Feb-04-18 Kaidanov vs D B Gurevich, 1997 (replies)
   Feb-03-18 Peter Morten (replies)
   Feb-02-18 twinlark chessforum (replies)
   Feb-01-18 Robert James Fischer (replies)
   Jan-29-18 AlphaZero (Computer) (replies)
   Jan-28-18 Tata Steel (2018) (replies)
   Jan-28-18 Geller vs J Vatnikov, 1950
   Jan-25-18 Blackburne vs Rubinstein, 1914
   Jan-22-18 cormier chessforum (replies)
   Jan-20-18 G Szabo vs V Nevednichy, 2017
   Jan-16-18 G W Medley vs Morphy, 1858 (replies)
   Jan-15-18 Anand vs Caruana, 2018 (replies)
   Jan-13-18 TheFocus chessforum (replies)
   Jan-08-18 WannaBe chessforum (replies)
   Jan-08-18 Gregor Samsa Mendel chessforum (replies)
   Jan-06-18 R Loetscher vs M Bluebaum, 2016 (replies)
   Dec-30-17 Magnus Carlsen (replies)
   Sep-28-17 playground player chessforum (replies)
   Sep-27-17 Tarjan vs Kramnik, 2017 (replies)
   Sep-27-17 offramp chessforum (replies)
   Sep-25-17 Z Harari vs H Obsieger, 2013
   Sep-24-17 World Cup (2017) (replies)
   Sep-24-17 D Zagorskis vs C Gabriel, 1997
   Sep-23-17 Isle of Man Open (2017) (replies)
   Sep-21-17 M Vachier-Lagrave vs Svidler, 2017
   Sep-21-17 D Wagner vs V Papin, 2015
   Sep-20-17 Louis Stumpers (replies)
   Sep-16-17 W So vs V Fedoseev, 2017 (replies)
   Sep-14-17 Tal vs F Olafsson, 1975 (replies)
   Sep-13-17 Ponomariov vs Harikrishna, 2017
   Sep-11-17 Caruana vs E Najer, 2017 (replies)
   Sep-08-17 Alan Shaw (replies)
   Sep-03-17 St. Louis Rapid & Blitz (Rapid) (2017) (replies)
   Aug-31-17 Kenneth S Rogoff (replies)
   Aug-30-17 A Golding vs A P Smith, 2017
   Aug-28-17 Anderssen vs Dufresne, 1852 (replies)
   Aug-24-17 F J Perez Perez vs Ujtumen, 1964
   Aug-23-17 Freddy Hestholm (replies)
   Aug-22-17 Valeri Ilyich Beim (replies)
   Aug-21-17 tuttifrutty chessforum (replies)
   Aug-19-17 OhioChessFan chessforum (replies)
   Aug-17-17 St. Louis Rapid & Blitz (Blitz) (2017) (replies)
   Aug-16-17 Memorable Quotes chessforum (replies)
   Aug-08-17 Caruana vs M Vachier-Lagrave, 2017 (replies)
   Aug-06-17 M Vachier-Lagrave vs Aronian, 2017 (replies)
   Aug-05-17 Carlsen vs M Vachier-Lagrave, 2017 (replies)
   Aug-04-17 Anand vs Carlsen, 2017 (replies)
   Aug-02-17 Joselito Oliveros (replies)
   Jul-29-17 Radjabov vs O Bortnyk, 2016 (replies)
   Jul-29-17 Morozevich vs Vaganian, 2017 (replies)
   Jul-01-17 Margate (1939) (replies)
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Elite Posters Cafe

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 109 OF 109 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <thegoodanarchist:

How can someone be so ignorant of history?

Automobile mass production. Airplane. Jazz music. Atom Bomb. Hydrogen Bomb. TV. Supersonic flight. Blues music. Rock and Roll. Transistors. Microchips. Internet. etc.

Too soon?

Cotton gin. Steam Locomotive. Rifle. Is that back far enough??>

At least they have crumpets!

Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Think Franklin Stove is an US invention, going back even further...
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Gibbs Free Energy. Another invention by an American, but too esoteric for Harry to appreciate :)
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <At least they have crumpets!>


Yes they do!

Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: I did something for the first time ever. Never before in my life.

I put green olive slices in my chili.

I am such a chili purist that I won't even put beans in it.

I have had a can of beans sitting in the pantry for at least 10 months. In that time, I must have cooked at least 8~9 chilis.

Every time, I look at the beans and I cannot do it. I cannot open the beans and put them in my chili.

But the green olive slices? They looked good! So I did it - I put half a cup of 'em in there tonight.

OMG, delicious!

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: Man, I love green olive but I'm not sure how I would like them in chili lol.

I do love chili though, been a big fan of chili all my life. I used to eat it very hot and spicy but my stomach can't handle that stuff anymore. I prefer my chili with beans.

Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <I used to eat it very hot and spicy but my stomach can't handle that stuff anymore.>

Have you ever tried digestive enzymes? Maybe one with a broad spectrum of enzymes?

Our body's systems (not just musculature) all seem to work on the principle of use it or lose it. So if you don't exercise, muscles get weak. If you don't incorporate spicy food all the time, then the digestive system stops making the enzymes needed to digest it thoroughly.

And of course, as we age the capacity of all of our systems declines, and can use help.

Back to diet, though. A friend of mine has a sister who cannot eat meat without getting acid reflux. As a poor University student she lived on a meat-free diet and her body got out of the habit of making enzymes to digest animal protein.

Also, the probiotic fauna in our systems change based on diet. When my mother traveled to China the tour guide told her group that their probiotic profile would change over completely in a couple of months, and change significantly in the 1 month they stayed over there. So they should expect a period of readjustment to American food upon returning.

When I was younger, I only took Prilosec or Pepcid AC for indigestion. Then, I learned about probiotics and digestive enzymes. Now I almost never take Pepcid and never ever take Prilosec. I just supplement with digestive enzymes and probiotics.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: The Alt-Right, and interesting group with an interesting take that I sometimes agree with and sometimes disagree, have their own interesting take on Jordan Peterson and the Cucks of Canuckistan.

<Jordy Potterson And The Cucks Of Canuckistan>

<Jordan Peterson is a cultured, sophisticated man, but much of human affairs occurs on a much more primitive, visceral level.

Trying to teach certain non-white populations to not think tribally is like trying to teach a hippopotamus ballet. OK, perhaps this analogy takes it a bit far, but the spirit of the claim is nonetheless substantially true. Many non-white populations have only ever thought and behaved tribally.

Many non-white groups don’t seem to possess the intellect or the introspective capacity to appreciate their own hypocrisy when it comes to issues of race (or any issue near and dear to them). And while I don’t wish to claim that it is impossible to make desert people, Melanesians, and Sub-Saharans into modestly objective thinkers on average or in sizable numbers, the evidence that it is possible is really just not there. There is every reason to believe that, in general, as populations, they haven’t the cognitive means to think like we do.

Jordan Peterson, famed Canadian professor, and self-proclaimed classical liberal, claims to be trying to save the West from identity politics. Not to put too fine a point on it, his attempts are laughably futile. In a recent interview, Peterson even claimed that he has “irrefutable evidence that [he has] pulled thousands of young men away from the attractions of the Alt-Right”. Being the consummate empiricist that he is, he has released none of this supposed evidence and almost certainly never will. I think he believes that if he proves to the regressive leftists and Cultural Marxists running the Western World that he is combating hate, and is in some sense their ally, they will leave him be and not persecute him for his ideas. He’s probably wrong on that account anyhow, but even if he is right, his messianic mission is still both misguided and pointless.

There is no way to make right-thinking white people not see what is being done to them by their pathologically anti-white overlords, the way they are being dispossessed, their lands invaded, their heroes denigrated, their way of life eradicated via mass-migration from the 3rd World. It is as incontrovertible as the sky is blue. The media can’t even hide the truth from common numbskulls any longer, despite its abyssal desire to do so. Our elites, even our own governments, which are supposed to represent us, are waging a war against our people. As whites continue to lose numbers and power, as we are vilified and marginalized and discriminated against ever more, whites young and old, but especially young, will flock to the Alt-Right to defend themselves, their families and their civilization from their racial and ideological (also usually racial) enemies, who despise them and long to do them harm by whatever means necessary. There is no way to put the Alt-Right back in the bag. We are a cultural and ideological force to be reckoned with, because identity politics are here, and here to stay. Diversity guarantees it.>

Read the rest.

Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Big Pawn:

The Alt-Right, and interesting group with an interesting take that I sometimes agree with and sometimes disagree, have their own interesting take on Jordan Peterson and the Cucks of Canuckistan.>

This video was on the side of your link:

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: Philosophical Thought of the Week: “We are all God’s children” - False!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Charlie Durman: <thegoodanarchist: <harrylime: ... EVERYTHING in YOUR land has been COPIED or STOLEN from ENGLAND and EUROPE .

lol lol


How can someone be so ignorant of history?

Automobile mass production. Airplane. Jazz music. Atom Bomb. Hydrogen Bomb. TV. Supersonic flight. Blues music. Rock and Roll. Transistors. Microchips. Internet. etc.

Too soon?

Cotton gin. Steam Locomotive. Rifle. Is that back far enough??>

Aeroplane = Europe

Atom Bomb = Europe

Jazz = Africa

TV = Blighty

Supersonic Flight = Blighty

Internet - Blighty

Microchips - Europe

Rock and Roll = I'll give you this.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Charlie Durman: Forgot..


lol lol lol

Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <Aeroplane = Europe>

The Wright Brothers. Ohio, USA

<Atom Bomb = Europe>

The Manhattan Project Team, first detonation Los Alamos New Mexico, USA

<Jazz = Africa>

Buddy Bolden, New Orleans, USA

<TV = Blighty>

Now you show your true colors. Blighty? It makes you angry to give America credit for anything, since you obviously hate America.

Philo Farnsworth, from Idaho, USA

<Supersonic Flight = Blighty>

Yeager, from Hamlin, West Virginia USA

<Internet - Blighty>

<Microchips - Europe>

Jack Kilby of Missouri, at TI, 1957

<Rock and Roll = I'll give you this.>

*You* don't give anything, because you don't have any say in it.

You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.

Now go learn some history.

< Charlie Durman: Forgot..


lol lol lol>

Did you forget how to read, too?

I said <Automobile mass production.> you nitwit.

Henry Ford.

You sound like Harry Lime.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: <tga: You sound like Harry Lime.> That's because it is <Harry the Limey>.

The only things the Brits invented are bad teeth and bad breath. I love old Britain though, the mean, nasty, colonial Britain that conquered the world. A tiny little island country with an empire that the sun never set on, to paraphrase Kipling.

But now they've been reduced to Cuck Island.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: <Top 5 Ways To Embrace And Express Your White Privilege>

An interesting take! Here at the Elite Poster's Cafe, we exercise free speech by speaking freely about what PC liberals label as taboo. We are going to explore this article on how to embrace your white privilege and we don't care if the libs try to shut us down by calling us racists, Nazis or anything else. To the article!

<Become who you are, fam.

White privilege is real. We’re special because we’re White. Our parents worked hard to give us privilege — not to transfer privilege equally among the races. Civilization, culture, and healthy societies is all about privilege. >

I reckon it's true! When they say, "White Privilege!" they are declaring that white people are special and have created special societies.

<1. Talk Down To People Of Color

Walking on eggshells and constantly showing deference to African-Americans has to end. This doesn’t make Blacks like us; it makes them have a contempt for us—a suspicious contempt at that, for none of them believe that we are sincere. (Blacks don’t want the coddling to end, though.) Even when conservatives say reasonable (if incomplete) things about Black crime and social dysfunction, they get accused of “White supremacy.” Such is the level of deference expected in our society.

Part of you pities Blacks, for their history is truly unfortunate. But you must engage in the real talk. Remember Blacks were better off when strong, uncucked White men set the tone for society.>

You might not like the idea of talking down to anyone, but remember, this is about <embracing> your white privilege! These polemic subtitles are fun, but a more serious point in that paragraph is that blacks do not look at coddling whites as sincere. It causes them to have contempt for us. That much is true.

<2. Talk About Race—The White Race In Particular

Race is a fascinating topic and it’s tragic that it has become taboo. We must take a page out of the playbook of non-Whites and constantly refer to race in our analysis of the issues of the day.

Ever notice how a Black or a Jewish person always starts out by saying, “as a person of color”ť or “as a third-generation Holocaust survivor”ť when they speak on important topics?

Well, we’re doing that going forward. When asked your feelings on just about anything, start by saying, “Well, as a European-American” or “as a White” and see what happens. Chances are the other person won’t know how to react.>

What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Imagine saying, "As a white man, I think..."

<Sam Francis quipped that while the Victorians were totally unencumbered discussing the intricacies of race, they were overly prudish when talking about sex. Whites today are encouraged to talk about sex to a degree that our ancestors would find repulsive. But we are not allowed to talk about race (at least not in a leftist-approved, “I feel so guilty”-like way).

Our history is amazing, and race is a genuinely fascinating topic. Whenever you can, make sure to insert race into the conversation. You may feel uncomfortable doing this around non-Whites, but rest assured, they will feel even more uncomfortable. Probably because they always assumed that White people just weren’t allowed to feel pride, or even talk about our racial history in an objective fashion.>

An interesting point. The liberals have made it okay to talk openly about sex by a no no to talk about what most people call race.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: <3. Gentrify Urban Places

It’s time we take back America’s cities. POCs have controlled them for too long and they’ve turned them into @#$%holes. This trend needs to be reversed.>


<We need to embrace gentrification and recognize it for the urban White colonialism that it is. The next time you see a metrosexual hipster biking back home from Whole Foods, clap him on the back and greet him with a cheery, “Hello, fellow Alt-Righter!” He might act like he doesn’t understand what you mean, but that’s all it is —an act. Functionally, he’s clearly a White colonist, taking back the inner-city from the non-Whites by paying his taxes, not committing crime, establishing hoity-toity pet stores and coffee shops, and raising prices on property as a result.>

LOL! So true.

<Alt-Righters should learn from the hipsters and other gentrifiers—because no one does more for the cause of White Urban Colonialism than them.>

I'm not really sure I want to call myself and alt-righter, but we all can learn about gentrification by studying the hipsters. They're as white as white can be.

<4. Dress Like A White Person

Anyone who dresses like a non-White will be treated like a non-White in the ethnostate. (It is worth pointing out that the reverse principle should not apply. Sorry, them’s the rules.).

Think of this maxim as more of a “don’t” than a “doť.” There are plenty of forms of acceptable White attire. For example, you can go for the sturdy, blue-collar blue-jeans-and-Timberlands look. Or you can go in the opposite direction, with the preppy-khakis-and-Sperry-boat-shoes look.

Both are White looks, with plenty of options in between.

But sagging pants, tribal tattoos or piercings, and snapback hats are no bueno. Ask yourself: “Would a non-White feel comfortable dressed like this?” If the answer is yes, it’s time to switch your wardrobe up.>

No one likes the wigger kids that dress and talk and act black, not even black people like them.

<5. Strategically Appropriate Black Lingo

Get woke, fam! And while you’re at it, call out THOTs and support “Based”ť friends and colleagues who speak out against White dispossession.

Though no self-respecting White person should wear Rastafarian dreadlocks…

…it is fascinating to see just how triggered people get about White people doing that.

Cultural appropriation is a tough topic for us on the Alt-Right. On the one hand, we love our own culture and wish to promote it; on the other, appropriatingť non-White culture is also one of our traditions. We make things better. So don’t be afraid to take raw material from other cultures and make it great. Optional: Have A Based Asian Friend

Most Blacks have a seething resentment of Asians because of their “model minority”ť reputation. Nothing triggers them more than Whites playing this cop-out card: “Me, racist? Tell that to my Japanese friend!” But this is an old strategy. It is far better to say, “Yes, I am racist, but my Asian friend is far more racist than me!”>

Asians do have a model minority reputation because they've earned it. Even though they were harshly discriminated against in this country, they don't hate America, they aren't failures, they enjoy visible success and they don't wave their Asian flags in our country. Asians are a good minority.

<See, most Asian first- and second-gen immigrants are, indeed, far more racist than the average White person, and you will find that you can actually learn a lot from them! Make sure to befriend their parents—for bonus points, their grandparents. Their power level might even put yours to shame.

Few know this, but multiculturalism can actually help you hone your @#$%lord skills. As an example, I’ve recently added the word, “Baizuo” to my handy list of insults to lob liberals’ way. Conclusion

For decades, conservatives have sought to deny the existence of White privilege: “In America, we don’t see race” or “In America, there’s a level playing field.” But let’s be honest: we do see race, and there’s no such thing as a level playing field in wider society. White privilege is real. We’re special because we’re White. Our parents worked hard to give us privilege (not to transfer privilege equally among the races). Civilization, culture, and healthy societies is all about privilege. We have a duty to cultivate privilege. And the White race won’t survive if we don’t.>

Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Big Pawn:

No one likes the wigger kids that dress and talk and act black, not even black people like them.>

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: That is an excellent scene from an excellent movie! Thanks for sharing, <dice>. Good quotes in that scene too.
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <Ever notice how a Black or a Jewish person always starts out by saying, “as a person of color” or “as a third-generation Holocaust survivor” when they speak on important topics?>

Uh, no. I can't remember the last time that happened around me.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: [Event "Match 2018"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2018.03.19"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Big Pawn"]
[Black "Novag, Sapphire 2"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B21"]
[PlyCount "93"]
[SourceDate "2018.03.19"]
[SourceVersionDate "2018.03.19"]

1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Nxc3 Nc6 5. Nf3 e6 6. Bc4 d6 7. O-O Nf6 8. Qe2 a6 9. Rd1 Qc7 10. Bf4 Nd7 11. Rac1 Qb8 12. Bb3 Nc5

click for larger view

13. Nd5 Nxb3 14. axb3
exd5 15. exd5+ Ne7

click for larger view

16. Nd2 Kd8 17. Ne4 Nf5 18. Ng5 Nh6 19. Re1 Bd7

click for larger view

20. Ne6+
fxe6 21. dxe6 Bb5 22. e7+ Ke8 23. exf8=Q+ Kxf8 24. Qe7+ Kg8 25. Bxh6 gxh6 26. Rc7 Qxc7 27. Qxc7 Re8 28. Rxe8+ Bxe8 29. Qe7 Bc6

click for larger view

30. f4 h5 31. f5 h6 32. Qe6+
Kf8 33. Qxd6+ Kf7 34. Qg6+ Kf8 35. Qf6+ Kg8 36. Qg6+ Kf8 37. Qxh5 Be8 38. Qh4 Rh7 39. Qf4 Bc6 40. g4 Ke8 41. h4 Re7 42. Qxh6 Re2 43. Qg7 Bd5 44. h5 Re7 45. Qh8+ Kd7 46. h6 Re4 47. Qg7+ 1-0

Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: FYI

thegoodanarchist chessforum (kibitz #751)

Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Thank you for the reply <Big Pawn> on the Candidates page. This is why I do not post over at Rogoff. Winning a debate or argument vs brain-dead Libs means nothing since those miscreants will never admit it

I've been in numerous debates where my position has been changed (ie: I have conceded a point), and have been happy to do so, usually because I have been "enlightened" to a degree, and have no problem admitting so

but try dealing with these nut-job liberals

they never admit when they are wrong and never concede anything. How can one negotiate or even enter into basic compromise with such uncompromising idiots?

and I'm a moderate fiscal-conservative (probably one of the best friends of these off-the-wall left-leaning goof balls)


Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Philosophical Thought of the Week: “We are all God’s children” - False! >

I think a case can be made both ways. In a generic sense, all people are God's children, one example being Acts 17:28 "we are also his offspring", which Paul is using in a universal sense.

In the sense of salvation, not all people are God's children, "for you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus." Galatians 3:27

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: <ocf>, John 3:10 tells us that we are either children of God or children of the Devil.

<By this it is evident who are the children of God, and who are the children of the devil: whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is the one who does not love his brother.>

He was referring to the previous verse, <He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil. 9Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. >

Liberals are the children of the Devil, the children of the lie.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: <tga>, I read the article linked to in your forum. Very good.

<It should come as no surprise to anyone familiar with Sex and Culture, the classic work of Oxford-educated anthropologist J.D. Unwin, that feminism and loose sexual mores are leading to cultural and civilizational decline in the West.>

Feminism is an outgrowth of liberalism. No liberalism, no feminism. Feminism is but one marching soldier in the army of liberalism, marching through American and causing disease, death and destruction across the land.

<The decline we are experiencing should have been expected by anyone familiar with the works of these great scientists and researchers.>

It was.

Must watch -

<This article will explain Unwin’s findings, which were published 30 years before the Women’s Liberation Movement.>

In the 1920s and 1930s there was the Frankfurt School in Germany. In many ways, the Frankfurt School influenced German society to be something of a precursor to 1960s decadence (including liberalism, feminism and a shift in sexual morality).

<Even as some biological consequences of a free-for-all sexual market have been staved off by advances in contraception and the legalization of killing unborn children, we have not been set free from the psychological, sociological and societal consequences of a feminized sexual marketplace>

As I often say, abortion is a "necessary evil" of a sexual free-for-all society. Liberalism is the religion of Satan himself. He is pride as sin is pride. The pride seeks first and foremost to please itself and sex is the ultimate gratifying experience. It's how one worships the Self. As Satan told Eve in the garden, eat the fruit from the forbidden tree - because you <want> to. Satisfy yourself and be like God. Liberalism was born that day.

<As much fun as going from girl to girl can be, ultimately that type of behavior leads to the destruction of a culture. >

All sinful behavior leads to destruction.

<The West achieved undeniable and astonishing progress until the time of the sexual revolution. After feminism, the wheels have started falling off the wagon.>

This is a bit misguided, since feminism is but the calling card of liberalism, which is actually a rejection of God. Secularism. Humanism.

Very interesting article and well written too. Thanks for sharing.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 109)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 109 OF 109 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific user and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.

You are not logged in to
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC