chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

 
Chessgames.com User Profile

Billosky
Member since Jun-22-06 · Last seen Nov-21-07
no bio

   Billosky has kibitzed 484 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Oct-23-07 The World vs G Timmerman, 2007 (replies)
 
Billosky: C5 for me too. I can't see anything else that's nearly as good.
 
   Oct-09-07 Team White vs Team Black, 2007 (replies)
 
Billosky: team white Ah ha! 1.c4 is catching up! A very good omen IMHO!
 
   Sep-28-07 Grischuk vs Anand, 2007 (replies)
 
Billosky: Am I the only one who hads the feeling that Anand was certain this was drawn a good twelve to fourteen moves before the end? Either that or the man has nerves of steel!
 
   Sep-25-07 Anand vs Morozevich, 2007 (replies)
 
Billosky: Frank Sinatra would never have done it the 41...h4 way!
 
   Sep-24-07 Svidler vs Morozevich, 2007 (replies)
 
Billosky: Why is g4 for White "bizarre"?
 
   Sep-24-07 Kramnik vs Anand, 2007 (replies)
 
Billosky: <It seems that Gefald would be satisfied by a draw by perpetual check.> Thanks, that's probably what's up, tho' I'd love to see him press on for a win.
 
   Sep-23-07 Morozevich vs Kramnik, 2007 (replies)
 
Billosky: <Krammy has no respect for Morozevich. Thats why.> He'll have plenty of respect for him tomorrow morning.
 
   Sep-23-07 Anand vs Aronian, 2007 (replies)
 
Billosky: Well it looks like we have already found out what Anand is made of! It only took him three moves to free himself up considerably. Still it seems strange to see HIM play this way.
 
   Sep-16-07 Battle of the Brains, 2007 (replies)
 
Billosky: <kwgurge> White's discussion of move 15 is on pp.90-93. It's interesting as at first we seemed to be leaning to the more straight-forward 15.exf6, and only then to have talked ourselves into 15.Nc5. With hindsight, 15.exf6, which still garnered 10 votes against 15.Nc5's 24 ...
 
   Sep-14-07 P J Winston vs Browne, 1972 (replies)
 
Billosky: Two of you comment on White's 12.Nd2, one of you saying you don't understand it, and the other that it is a theoretical novelty. Well, I must say I'm in the not understanding camp. What exactly is it supposed to do? Isn't White better off just developing his DSB or Q? I don't get ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
  


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC