Apr-07-13 A Manea vs T Nabaty, 2012 
| |
|
Cyphelium: <Conrad93> Of course it is limited, the question is whether it matters or not. I don't really believe in white's opening, but the position might still be playable. Variations have been suggested to support such a statement, be they right or wrong. You think that showing such
|
|
| | Mar-28-13 A Flaata vs Carlsen, 2000
| |
Cyphelium: <Dionysius1> 13.  xg7  xg7 14.  h6+
|
|
| | Mar-28-13 Carlsen vs Kramnik, 2013
| |
Cyphelium: <Guitar1352> 12.-  xc3 13. bxc3 xc3 might be playable, but white has compensation for the pawn and black is very passive. There are no forced lines,
|
|
| | Feb-04-13 P Ravn vs Portisch, 1957
| |
Cyphelium: <chessworm> After 34. - h2+ 35. xh2 xh2+ 36.
|
|
| | Feb-04-13 Karpov vs S Milliet, 2012
| |
|
Cyphelium: <Ulhumbrus> After 13.- e6 14. dxe6 fxe6 15. d1 c4 16. g1 d5, white could play 17. exd5 exd5 18.
|
|
| | Dec-12-12 Lasker vs E Delmar, 1892
| |
|
Cyphelium: <ughaibu> Yes, I did. Anyway, I guess 48. -xa3 49. f8 is enough?
|
|
| | Dec-12-12 Janowski vs Albin, 1898
| |
|
Cyphelium: <Nilsson> That would go a long way of explaining why he didn't play that. :-)
|
|
| | Dec-12-12 Tiger Hillarp Persson
| |
|
Cyphelium: <waustad> The reason you cannot find it is because it's a hidden dragon.
|
|
| | Dec-12-12 Kasparov vs Karpov, 2009
| |
|
Cyphelium: <kontoleon> 22.- h8 23. h5 and there's no defense to the threat of xh6+.
|
|
| | Nov-08-12 V Laznicka vs A R Saleh Salem, 2010
| |
|
Cyphelium: <Abdel Irada> Looking at it again, I actually think you are right. After 22. b4 xc4 23.
|
|
| | | indicates a reply to the comment. | |
