chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

There is a clue unsolved right now on the Holiday Contest Clues Page!   [Official Contest Rules]
 
Chessgames.com User Profile

Fezzik
Member since Nov-04-02 · Last seen Jun-06-14
Hi, Fezzik was a giant in that classic by S. Morgenstern. (I'm no giant.) I'm an experienced chess coach and player calling from Colorado. Favorite players include Vassily Smyslov, Tal, Jon Speelman, and Evgeny Bareev. Ask me tomorrow, and the list may be different. :)

   Fezzik has kibitzed 869 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Feb-16-13 J Gallagher vs Le Quang Liem, 2013
 
Fezzik: Wow, what a game!
 
   Jan-19-13 Borislav Ivanov (replies)
 
Fezzik: The computer match up rate is the equivalent of DNA evidence. Is it enough by itself to prove that someone is guilty in a criminal case? Probably not. Is it enough in a civil case where the burden of proof is simply "preponderance of the evidence" yes. Same here. Borislav Ivanov ...
 
   Feb-14-12 Anand vs Aronian, 2006
 
Fezzik: Both players missed 15.Nxc7!!, but 15.Ne3 was sufficient. Of course, since this was a blindfold game, Anand could be excused for not playing such a tactical line in case Aronian had some surprise up his sleeve.
 
   Dec-14-11 Van der Wiel vs H Olafsson, 1991 (replies)
 
Fezzik: What's really surprising is that in the final position there's only one move that clearly wins. Congrats to Van der Weil for finding the only move!
 
   Nov-25-11 Tal vs A Vooremaa, 1979 (replies)
 
Fezzik: I remembered the right move rather than discovered it. But looking at the position, I wonder if I would have had Tal's courage to sac the Q in this way. It may not be a completely sound sacrifice, but to play someone with that sort of tactical vision would be terrifying!
 
   Oct-29-11 Robson vs B Finegold, 2011 (replies)
 
Fezzik: Btw, if the puzzle had been after White's 27th move, it would have been a "Very difficult" puzzle worthy of today's rating!
 
   Oct-18-11 Naiditsch vs Kramnik, 2009 (replies)
 
Fezzik: 21.Nd4 Rh4 22.Be3 would have been far more resilient. Black may have had an advantage, but proving it would have been difficult even for Kramnik.
 
   Oct-16-11 Pillsbury vs Tarrasch, 1895 (replies)
 
Fezzik: This is a classic combination by Pillsbury! Thanks to chessgames.com for helping us to remember it. Even though I remembered that White played Qg3 at some point, I couldn't quite piece it all together. Tal once wrote that Russian schoolboys, by the time they are 11, know how to ...
 
   Oct-03-11 Bosboom-Lanchava vs M Kursova, 2007 (replies)
 
Fezzik: At first I was surprised that Black, a +2300 player, would continue after 40.Qe3. But then I noticed the move number. The two players were almost certainly in time trouble when this position arose.
 
   Oct-02-11 Benko Gambit (A58) (replies)
 
Fezzik: Computers generally don't "get" gambits, but here the ones I've tested suggest that White has a minimal edge for the pawn, usually less than .3. So, by computer standards, the Benko falls very comfortably into the main stream of openings. The idea of giving up a pawn to allow white ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
  


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC