Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing User Profile Chessforum

Member since Aug-09-04
Mariano Sana, born in Buenos Aires, Argentina (I am exactly five years GM Alexey Shirov 's senior), living in the US since 1995. Since summer 2009, I am an associate professor of Sociology at Vanderbilt University: Previously, I was at Louisiana State University (2003-2009).

My published academic work can be seen here:

My avatar comes from a cartoon of mine drawn by a friend. My username, besides the pasta, is my cat's name, inspired by this cartoon:

My first tournament was at age 12 in 1979 in Argentina, and in that first stage of my chess life I played until the early 1990s. I finished 8th in the Argentine junior championship in 1985. So, I was good enough, but not great. (That same evaluation is apt today.) Unfortunately, no game scores survived from those years.

I started to play again when I finished grad school in Philadelphia in 2003. I play between zero and five tournaments a year.

I won the Louisiana State Championship in 2007. My playing wasn't that great, but I was mentally well prepared, slept well, and had a touch of luck. I played the Swiss gambit... Lost the first game and then won six in a row. This was my last round win, where I got lucky after playing the opening pretty terribly: J Rousselle vs M Sana, 2007.

More recently, I won the under 2200 section of the US Open in 2014. Again, Swiss gambit. Lost the first one, then won five in a row. Then I lost game 7, but won games 8 and 9. My last round win was featured as a Tuesday puzzle: K Gulamali vs M Sana, 2014. (I think this is my best game since I started to play again in 2003.)

I'd say that I am essentially a good but inconsistent player. For years I've been hovering around 2200. On a good day, well rested and inspired, I can collect an FM or IM scalp (T Bartell vs M Sana, 2009, R Burnett vs M Sana, 2012, M Sana vs C Blocker, 2014, M Sana vs R Burnett, 2015). But on a bad day, I can play horribly and lose against whoever is sitting in front of me, losing tons of rating points at once.

I hold the title of National Master. My FIDE rating is 2132. Whenever I have a really good tournament, it is not FIDE rated!

When I was a teenager I studied briefly with IM Jaime Emma, who was Argentine champion in 1978. Mostly, I studied alone, but I didn't study much. I also attended group classes at my club, taught by FM Mariano Varga (there's no game of his in this database). He was a great coach, actually.

In the summer I am likely to hit the road and play an open tournament or two. In particular, I like the World Open and the US Open. I also like to play the city championship here in Nashville. If you see me at a tournament, feel free to say hi. I am a friendly fellow!

When I post comments on this website, I always disclose if I am checking with my engine. Since I often do not, I may post flawed suggestions.

My participation on this website goes through ebbs and flows. It can be addictive and distract me from work, so I need to regulate that!

On August 9, 2014, I had my 10th year anniversary on Cheers!

IMPORTANT: Please do not post politically partisan or angry comments on my forum. Social commentary is welcomed if presented in an analytical and respectful way. (Although, as a general principle, I think those topics have a better home in other pages of this website.) Thank you.

>> Click here to see Fusilli's game collections. Full Member

   Fusilli has kibitzed 4084 times to chessgames   [more...]
   May-24-18 Huebner vs Portisch, 1980 (replies)
Fusilli: <Sally> P.S. I must say, though, that I am more risk-averse than you. And so is everyone else, from what I hear!
   May-19-18 Fusilli chessforum
Fusilli: <K13> I don't know how to answer! We didn't have a fallout or anything like that, but my last attempts at reaching him were not returned. I know he was very much into bridge now.
   Apr-28-18 Vladimir Petrov vs R Grau, 1939
Fusilli: 32.g5 burns the bridges. If it doesn't work, white will have to settle for the draw. But Petrov calculated well. If 34...Kd8: [DIAGRAM] 35.Nxb7+ Rxb7 36.Ra8 Rb8 37.Rxb8 Qxb8 38.Qa7 Kc8 39.Qf7 winning. [DIAGRAM]
   Apr-21-18 Biographer Bistro (replies)
Fusilli: P.S. to my previous post: if I don't hear any justification for it, I'll edit out the "national champions" bit.
   Apr-19-18 S Shankland vs J Xiong, 2018 (replies)
Fusilli: I'm not sure they repeated position enough times at the end for any of them to claim the draw. I think they should have repeated it a few more times.
   Apr-08-18 Kasparov vs Ulf Andersson, 1981 (replies)
Fusilli: <Retireborn: <HMM> According to Bob Wade's (I think) book, "I will not play with Kasparov anymore!" & stopped the clocks.> If memory serves, Anthony Saidy says the same in The March of Chess Ideas.
   Apr-08-18 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
Fusilli: <I don't know what went wrong for brazil.> Maybe this?
   Apr-08-18 Francisco Vallejo Pons (replies)
Fusilli: <Caissanist> Yeah, it's also on the news on CG's home page today: . That's so unfair, poor Paco.
   Apr-07-18 Nunn vs Timman, 1995
Fusilli: Ironic King's Gambit. By move 13, it is black who gave away a pawn and obtains persistent attack for it. Beautiful game by Timman. It has a cat-and-mouse feel to it.
   Mar-28-18 Grischuk vs Caruana, 2018 (replies)
Fusilli: <cadavieco> I second that!
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

My Facerook Wall

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 60 OF 60 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <OCF> Looking forward to it.

<Boomie> Ouch!

Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Actually, with Todd I blundered twice. First I blundered the win, then I blundered the draw. Here's how I blundered the win:

click for larger view


I played 44...Ra2+ which leads to a draw. Winning was 44...Ra1! It can be seen conceptually that boxing the white king must be the way to go, but white will promote in two moves, and it requires calculation to see that it works. For example: 45.Kc2 Re1 46.g7 Ra2+ 47.Bb2 Re2+ 48.Kc1 Rxb2 (either rook) 49.g8=Q doesn't work.

What works is not to take the bishop but threaten mate with 48...Kd3:

click for larger view

...which wins a tempo. Now mate is coming.

So, white can't play 46.g7. He needs to play 46.Rg2 or even 46.Kb2, and in both cases black at least captures the e3 and the computer says black is winning.

Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I think when you watch live games, or review games with an engine, it's very easy to forget that your flesh and blood opponents don't see everything like the engine does. I suspect engines have caused people to be reluctant to make speculative sacrifices or enter complex games, for fear that their opponent will just as easily find a refutation as the engines do. Likewise, I think people tend to use more time than is practically expedient, for fear they are missing something that ubiquitous engine/opponent will spot immediately.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <OCF> That makes a lot of sense to me. If there is something computers have taught us is that there is just so much, but so much, that we don't even consider during a chess game. It surely increases the pressure on analysis, leading to time trouble especially in complex games.
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Surely I cannot be the first person to bring to your attention an episode of the great TV comedy "Seinfeld", which features "Fusilli Jerry". However, in case I am, enjoy!

Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <thegoodanarchist> lol, no, you are not, but thanks for the laugh anyway!

My next user name will be Festivus! ;)

Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <Fusilli > Hadn't noticed that word before...

Did a quick looksee and it's supposed to be gender neutral?

Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <chancho> Big debate going on around it, but so far mostly constrained to academia. It worries me when academics decide that something new should apply to an entire population of millions of people without any consultation with them.

I have my reservations and want to write a short essay for the Heterodox Academy website. Yes, it's supposed to be gender-neutral, but I see problems with it. And I think there is a contradiction in taking a word from Spanish and making it an English noun and at the same time say that it is gendered. Nouns in English are not gendered. So, to me, the plural "Latinos", once it is a new English word, was no longer gendered. (And it certainly does not imply all men in Spanish!) The problem is that once they adopted "Latino", then "Latina" naturally followed. And as Latinos are largely bilingual, it became impossible to think of it as non-gendered.

Another argument I want to make is that language to classify people can be about sex or can be about gender, but we have to choose. Sex is easier because it's so much easier to see (and there are not so many choices!), and many people prefer to keep their gender identity private.

I'm still clarifying ideas in my head...

Premium Chessgames Member
  Boomie: Another problem with losing all those words that end in 'o' or 'a' is they are perfect for song lyrics or poetry. I mean, what rhymes with 'LatinX'? Frankly, it sounds like the name of a medical supply company.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <Boomie> Yeah... to me it sounds like a cleaning product (there is Clorox, Folex, Latinx...) or cold medicine (there is Mucinex, Latinx...)
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: <Fusilli> You are one of my favorite posters!

I noticed some comments you've made regarding people here at <CG> who actually play chess and/or have studied chess seriously. I've said in the past that its odd that hardly anyone plays chess here at <CG> and that its mainly a social-center for chess gossip. Well, I've found out thats not entirely accurate. Many members here at <CG> were at one time active players. However, many of those are basically inactive or retired from competitive play.

Interesting comments you've made about people over at the POTD not seriously committed to solving or training to improve their analytical abilities. I can say the operative word here is 'commitment'. As for my case I can tell you I got started late with chess at age 20+ but was 'hooked' and devoured book after book with a ravenous appetite, feeding my desire to improve. I guess I got to around 1800+ when interest waned. Recently at age ~50 I began a daily regime of puzzle solving & time mgmt exercises that lasted 2+ years. My goal was to reach 2000, but interest again waned, this time after I finally reached 1900

The painful thing about chess is once one stops training, even for a month or two, at least in my case, the rating drops like a stone! Very cruel :(

So I, like many others probably, just don't have the time to commit fully to playing chess, so I just try to find other ways to enjoy the game. For example, these days, I play exclusively Chess960. My rating fluctuates wildly, but who cares! At this stage in my chess journey, its just for fun!

Happy chess, morf


Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Thank you <morf> :)

My own commitment has been sharply reduced over the years. There was an entire decade of my life when I totally quit. These days I play a lot of frivolous blitz on ICC. When I decide to study, I either pick up Yusupov or watch ICC videos (Larry Christiansen's attack videos are my favorites), or I work on John Nunn's favorite chess puzzles. But I have very little time anyway. And my time is shrinking, as I am about to marry a mother of 4 and I am getting more and more involved as a dad.

I wish I had more time for serious tournament competition. Can't manage more than one or two local tournaments a year now...

Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Wow <Fusilli> congratulations on your imminent marriage! I imagine all your time will now taken up teaching your new 4 kids how to play chess with a goal to fill the house with Grandmasters!

BTW: Yusupov's books are excellent training vehicles. I enjoy playing over at my user is 'morf' and try to sneak in a couple of games per day


Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <morf> Thanks! The big day is June 3.

The kids are not very interested in chess, except for (luckily!) the youngest one (7 years old). She is at the President Day's chess camp right now at the Nashville Chess Center, run by FM Todd D Andrews and his sister, Tiffany Elliot. They are very good with kids! (And there are about 40 of them at the camp.)

Of course, I dream of getting my little girl all the way to GM, but she just started! :)

Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: Hi <Fusilli>. Best wishes for June 3.

Hi <OCF>. My favourite sob story about overestimating my opponent: In 1973-4 I had a miracle year of chess. It seemed that I couldn't lose a game if I tried. My teachers suggested I enter the Irish Schoolboys championship in Dublin so off I went.

7 round swiss. I lost my first 2 games. On the third I played the Richter Rauzer against my 12 year old opponent. Came a time when I saw a queen sac which would nett me more than its worth in minor pieces and a rook as he staved off mate. I assumed because he was playing "with the big boys" he must be good enough to have seen it, so I doubted my own analysis and played something else and lost.

After the game he volunteered (the swine!) that he had seen the sac and would have resigned if I'd played it. Hard on the ego. And I was staying away from home, with an ex schoolmate at Trinity College and I hated going back to tell him and his mates I'd lost again.

Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <Of course, I dream of getting my little girl all the way to GM, but she just started>

The journey begins!! Good luck, and congratulations on your future GM.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <Dionysius1> <TheFocus> Thank you!

She is so awesome. She ended up in 21st place in the category unrated (out of 25 kids or so) and was so excited about the 21st place medal she got!

Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: The good news is I won my last 4 games and someone showed me the queen sacrifice smothered mate with the Night, which I'd never seen before. That's so charming <fusilli> - children are great fun with how they see life.
Premium Chessgames Member
User: pool

User: Slide

User: Swimmer

User: WADE

User: butterfly

User: MarcoPolo

User: splash

User: filter

Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <OCF> I don't get it...
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Sometimes in blue link magic, the first line is a subject, topic, etc, and all the subsequent lines are related to that topic. So, main topic = "Pool". What do you find at a swimming pool? The other links I posted.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <OCF> Ah! Got it now!

Happy Sunday!

May-14-18  Knight13: <Fusilli> Are you still friends with <hms123>?
May-18-18  Knight13: <Fusilli> Got it.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <K13> I don't know how to answer! We didn't have a fallout or anything like that, but my last attempts at reaching him were not returned. I know he was very much into bridge now.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 60)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 60 OF 60 ·  Later Kibitzing>

A free online guide presented by
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific user and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.

You are not logged in to
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC