Dec-29-06 H Helms vs O Tenner, 1942 
| |
|
Gritty: 10. ... Bxf2+
rather than taking the pawn with the Knight is the move Tenner should have played. However, I think it would have still left white with an equalising position after
11. Kf1 f5
12. d3 threatening Bishop and Knight
|
|
| | Dec-14-06 Kudrin vs D King, 1988
| |
|
Gritty: This is a little gem of a game from Kudrin. Was King's position doomed from the moment he accepted the Rook sacrifice on h1? I can't see he had any way out after that.
|
|
| | Oct-13-06 Kramnik vs Topalov, 2006
| |
|
Gritty: <ketchuplover> <Why not play it out???????????????????> It always seems to be the positions they resign in that leave me realising what a Patzer I really am compared to the top players. I'd have fancied my chances of a draw by insufficient material as black in that one. ...
|
|
| | Oct-12-06 Kramnik vs Topalov, 2006
| |
|
Gritty: I seriously dislike the actions of Topalov's team, but time and again his play threatens to win me round. Hats off to him for playing Qb1. *claps*
|
|
| | Oct-10-06 Topalov vs Kramnik, 2006
| |
|
Gritty: <Hesam7> Excellent, thanks for that. *claps*
|
|
| | Oct-05-06 Kramnik vs Topalov, 2006
| |
|
Gritty: <Never mind. if f4 then Nd6 and Ne4 holds the g pawn and blocks the center.> Nd6? Are you sure?
|
|
| | Oct-04-06 Topalov vs Kramnik, 2006
Oct-02-06 Topalov vs Kramnik, 2006
| |
|
Gritty: Oh hang on, Bd6 looks good for Black.
|
|
| | Sep-29-06 Kramnik vs Topalov, 2006
| |
|
Gritty: <Gypsy> <Even the arbiters of the match have to abide by the contract of the match. Period.> Obviously. I would suggest that was part of any future contracts. However, judging by the result on the official site whereby Topalov has apparently won on "time", I may not have ...
|
|
| | Sep-27-06 Topalov vs Kramnik, 2006
| |
|
Gritty: Is this the end of Topalov's assault, as Kramnik has surely forced him onto the retreat now with the concerted attack on the b3 pawn.
|
|
| | | indicates a reply to the comment. | |
