chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

 
Chessgames.com User Profile

KnightLunatic
Member since Aug-30-06 · Last seen Oct-08-07
no bio

   KnightLunatic has kibitzed 154 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Aug-06-07 The World vs G Timmerman, 2007 (replies)
 
KnightLunatic: Hi all! I just now saw this new game and it is too late to read all the kibitzing here. Too bad 2.g3 or 2.c4 will be played anyway. 2.e4 is more aggressive, would probably lead to opposite side castles and we would probably get in one point of the game, an attack. Too bad we
 
   Dec-23-06 The World vs A Nickel, 2006 (replies)
 
KnightLunatic: Damn! This is an important decision and i'm too busy to analyse or to post any previous analysis....:-( Yet, i remember i have found a better game for white after Qc7+ than Qb6. With Qb6 there were some difficult lines that didn't end to a win. Of course that doesn't say much
 
   Dec-20-06 Eyal chessforum (replies)
 
KnightLunatic: <RookFile: He can't play his king to g5 if it is already there.> Yes, so let's correct my previous typo and make it: And now not 48.Qd8+ Kh6 49.b5?? Rxg2! draw but of course 48.Qe7! Kh6 49.Rf1!! that wins....
 
   Dec-18-06 jepflast chessforum (replies)
 
KnightLunatic: <RandomVisitor: <KnightLunatic>Rybka did not like the 45.Qb6 line because it is not so optimistic about 45...Qc7, scoring it 1.66/23-ply. What endgame tablebases are you using? After <45.Qb6 Qc7 46.Qxc7 Rxc7 47.Ra1 Ra7> ....my Shredder with its 3,4,5 ...
 
   Dec-16-06 RandomVisitor chessforum (replies)
 
KnightLunatic: <RandomVisitor: <Timothy Glenn Forney>All my computers are now running Rybka2.2n2.> Rybka 2.2n2 <seems> to be a bit weaker than rybka 2.2. You should consider that..... <seems>: Enough people have reported this....
 
   Dec-07-06 Kramnik - Deep Fritz (2006) (replies)
 
KnightLunatic: <ahmadov: To speak frankly, I was not impressed by the computer in this match. I expected much from it.> Did you expect a 6-0 for example? Or a 5-1? LOL! OK i know, you expected from the machine superior knowledge and ability to understand Chess, from that of the ...
 
   Oct-16-06 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
KnightLunatic: <Joshka: kinghtlunatic 33 moves allright, thanks, but what is the "W" rule?> Go here: http://www.exeterchessclub.org.uk/E... BTW computers with tablebases have another faster method for mating than the "W-rule" but unfortunately we, humans, can't see any pattern in ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC