chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

 
Chessgames.com User Profile

Patriot
Member since Sep-26-08 · Last seen Jul-17-18
I'm a class A player with the USCF (~1840). But in 2006 I was class D (~1300) before I started taking lessons with NM Dan Heisman.

I've been coming to this site for quite a while and I believe it has helped me to better my analysis skills. It is very insightful to read posts by some of my favorite kibitzers: <johnlspouge> (was he kidnapped?), <dzechiel>, <TheaN>, <CHESSTTCAMPS>, <agb2002>, <gofer>, and of course <Once>, and other kibitzer "greats". My appreciation goes to them for helping me reach a higher level.

My thoughts on improvement have changed recently. I used to be dead set against helpmate problems which I thought teaches you the bad habit of expecting your opponent to make a bad move. Too much of anything is bad, but this has the positive of training piece coordination which is a very powerful skill to have. Here's another example: My coach showed me a few problems where you must force immediate checkmate by swapping any two pieces on the board, resulting in a legal checkmate position. For example, you can't swap a piece and a pawn if the pawn is on the 8th rank or checks your own king--that's not a legal position. There are many ways to improve key areas in chess.

If anyone wishes to critique my analysis or ideas, feel free to do so. I won't take it personally. I need feedback! Or if you want opinions on improvement, feel free to ask.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Patriot has kibitzed 3972 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jul-12-18 N Eliet vs Rozentalis, 2016 (replies)
 
Patriot: NM Dan Heisman has told me (when I was taking lessons) that it is more efficient to make a "pass move" to see what your opponent can do to you before looking to see what you can do to them. Here I think white is threatening Bxe6+ Kh8 Bxf5. I then calculated the right move sequence ...
 
   Jul-11-18 J Cox vs D Guthrie, 2016 (replies)
 
Patriot: I would say <40.Rexe6 Nxe6 41.Rb7+ Rxb7 42.axb7 +->
 
   Jul-10-18 Topalov vs Anand, 2016 (replies)
 
Patriot: 34...Rxf3+ removes the guard on a4 and the queen. 35.Qxf3 Qa4#.
 
   Jul-09-18 Hector vs A Gupta, 2016 (replies)
 
Patriot: 43.Rxf8+ Kxf8 44.Rd8#
 
   Jul-05-18 morfishine chessforum (replies)
 
Patriot: Thanks <morf>. It has been tough. I think Bobby Fischer came up with "Fischer random" which is the same as Chess960 - correct? And I think he did it to end all the standard opening stuff to revive the game and put people more at their wits as opposed to memorization.
 
   Jul-05-18 Guanchu Liu vs Li Chao, 2011 (replies)
 
Patriot: <<Cheapo by the Dozen> And the best defense to stop a quick mate, namely 40 g3, happens to hang a rook.> That hangs white's king.
 
   Jul-04-18 D Morozov vs I Makoveev, 2014 (replies)
 
Patriot: <ChessHigherCat> No, I try to figure out what's going on before doing any calculation unless there is a tactic glaringly obvious to me. When you look at how all the pieces are aimed and advanced pawns, that often suggests what candidates to look at. I think it's a mistake to ...
 
   Jun-27-18 P Delekta vs Geller, 1992 (replies)
 
Patriot: Seeing the immobile white king, it was then just a matter of opening the h-file and seeing if a rook was in position. So, <18...Qxg3 19.hxg3 g5> and mate is unstoppable. I like problems like this much more than the "insane" problems because these are much more logical to me. ...
 
   Jun-26-18 Gleizerov vs Krasenkow, 2016 (replies)
 
Patriot: <patzer2> I think the best "human" move is not <37.Qe6+> but <37.Qe5+> to eyeball the hanging rooks that might give black a better chance of miscalculating. If not losing a rook with check, it almost seems to open the door to a draw possibility by perpetual.
 
   Jun-21-18 Topalov vs T Paehtz Sr, 2017
 
Patriot: <agb2002> Yes that's a good point also. The flip side is that leaves black with the most dangerous piece for counterplay and to complicate the game. Unless you have calculated a win you are wagering that you will not make any human errors. This is the difference with human ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
  


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC