chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

 
Chessgames.com User Profile
Petrosianic
Member since Nov-29-03 · Last seen May-27-16
NM Graeme Cree

   Petrosianic has kibitzed 13292 times to chessgames   [more...]
   May-27-16 Kenneth Rogoff (replies)
 
Petrosianic: Okay, then we probably agree. Ordinary people don't benefit from those double standards. They think they do because they look at politics like it was a team sport, and your teams' success is the same as your own success. But it doesn't do us any good to know that some people got
 
   May-26-16 Valery Salov (replies)
 
Petrosianic: Aren't all grandmasters great?
 
   May-23-16 Petrosian vs Estrin, 1968 (replies)
 
Petrosianic: Headlines are sometimes meant to be eye-catching, rather than strictly accurate. This game is not really Tal-like at all, in that the attack is sharp, but not speculative. White doesn't sacrifice pieces with no clear followup just because the position looks promising. (Also, ...
 
   May-20-16 Robert James Fischer (replies)
 
Petrosianic: <First of all, I am not interested in "objective opinion."> Good, because technically there's no such thing. Objective means "Independent of the Human Mind", while opinion is unique to the human mind. When people talk about objective opinion, what they REALLY mean is ...
 
   May-18-16 Alan Shaw (replies)
 
Petrosianic: And that passage means "Thou Shalt Get Into as Many Flame Wars as Possible"? It doesn't seem likely. Isn't it more likely that it's an <observation> that this is the way people react to controversial ideas rather than a directive to act that way?
 
   May-18-16 Fischer vs Spassky, 1972 (replies)
 
Petrosianic: Now, if the line did play out <exactly> as zzyw told it (not a sure thing), this resulting position is probably drawn, just because the single Rook can't hold the pawns alone, and White can't attack the Black Kingside without his King's participation. The main difference ...
 
   May-17-16 Fischer vs Spassky, 1972 (replies)
 
Petrosianic: <But with Fischer it was not always about the money. He believed that professional chess players should be better compensated for their efforts but apparently to him this meant <all> professional chess players, not just himself.> Fischer wasn't greedy in the usual ...
 
   May-13-16 Kotov vs Botvinnik, 1955
 
Petrosianic: The simple explanation is just "Cut the King off", after which point it becomes a simple Overloaded Piece scenario.
 
   May-10-16 Petrosian vs Botvinnik, 1951
 
Petrosianic: Yes, also because of the year it was played.
 
   May-10-16 Magnus Carlsen (replies)
 
Petrosianic: You say that but would you stake your reputation as an anonymous poster on it?
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
  


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2016, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies