chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum
Phony Benoni
Member since Feb-10-06 · Last seen Oct-24-14
Greetings, O Seeker After Knowledge! You have arrived in Detroit, Michigan (whether you like it or not), and are reading words of wisdom from a player rated 2950--plus or minus 1000 points.

However, I've more or less retired from serious play--not that I ever took chess really seriously. You only have to look at my games to see that. These days I pursue the simple pleasures of finding games that are bizarre or just plain funny. I'd rather enjoy a game than analyze it.

For the record, my name is David Moody. This probably means nothing to you unless you're a longtime player from Michigan, though it's possible that if you attended any U.S. Opens from 1975-1999 we might have crossed paths. Lucky you.

If you know me at all, you'll realize that most of my remarks are meant to be humorous. I do this deliberately, so that if my analysis stinks to high heaven I can always say that I was just joking.

As you can undoubtedly tell from my sparkling wit, I'm a librarian in my spare time. Even worse, I'm a cataloger, which means I keep log books for cattle. Also, I'm not one of those extroverts who sit at the Reference Desk and help you with research. Instead, I spend all day staring at a computer screen updating and maintaining information in the library's catalog. The general public thinks Reference Librarians are dull. Reference Librarians think Catalogers are dull.

My greatest achievement in chess, other than tricking you into reading this, was probably mating with king, bishop and knight against king in a tournament game. I have to admit that this happened after an adjournment, and that I booked up like crazy before resuming. By the way, the fact I have had adjourned games shows you I've been around too long.

My funniest moment occurred when I finally got a chance to pull off a smothered mate in actual play. You know, 1.Nf7+ Kg8 2.Nh6+ Kh8 3.Qg8+ Rxg8 4.Nf7#. When I played the climactic queen check my opponent looked at the board in shocked disbelief and said, "But that's not mate! I can take the queen!"

Finally, I must confess that I once played a positional move, back around 1982. I'll try not to let that happen again.

>> Click here to see Phony Benoni's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Phony Benoni has kibitzed 14461 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Oct-24-14 Phony Benoni chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <JB> Sounds very significant.
 
   Oct-20-14 K Gratka vs M Azadmanesh, 1994 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Suggest, and ye shall receive.
 
   Oct-19-14 Kasparov vs Timman, 1991 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <morfishine? Well, there's NN vs Greco, 1620 , which still qualifies as one of NN's immortal games against Greco. Seriously, it's not hard to find counter-examples if you look hard enough. In fact, when I did a quick survey of the database, the a6/b5 vs. a7/b6 formation had ...
 
   Oct-18-14 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <WCC Editing Project> Since I am now working exclusively on the US Open, somebody else should probably tackle the Hastings updates. I'll be glad to take mine down when that happens.
 
   Oct-17-14 D Moody vs J Aldrich, 1998
 
Phony Benoni: Mdomradave> Thanks. The opening is another of those Blackmar-Diemer clones that despeeate attacking players try against the Caro-Kann at some point in their career.. There are a few traps involved and Black has to be accurate, but its scarcity speaks to its soundness. ...
 
   Oct-17-14 A Suvorin vs A Chekhov, 1893 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <kevin86> No. He always checked off.
 
   Oct-15-14 D Moody vs A Littke, 1992 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Looks like I was following my usual strategy in bad positions--put everything <en prise> and hope he takes the wrong piece. After 16...Bxf3 17.Ne3 is probably best, with many of the same ideas as 17.Nc7. Black can just take the knight safely after that move. His 16...Bf7 ...
 
   Oct-15-14 Carlsen vs Anand, 2013 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Isn't it good?
 
   Oct-14-14 Daunke vs P Kalmar-Wolf, 1925 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Well, White seemed to play reasonably enough for a while, but after 21.Ra2? nothing seemed to go right. The knight promotion isn't just cute, but the fastest way to force mate.
 
   Oct-13-14 Taubenhaus vs J C Halpern, 1887 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <sachistu> I do remember those "Chess Digest" pamphlets well, and though I can not personally evaluate the translation I can well believe Neat's review.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Let's play two!

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 368 OF 626 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-11-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Leyland is obviously too old, Tigers need new/younger blood. Bring in Jack McKeane or Tommy Lasorda!!

Maybe Connie Mack is still available.

Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: From ESPN: http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/p...

<In a fascinating turn of events, the Rays turned a 2-0 deficit into a 4-2 victory. Since 2009, the Tigers had been 229-1 when leading after eight innings. >

I wonder if the Yankees and M. Rivera can even claim that! WOW!!

Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: And she is engaged to be married, when?!?! http://espn.go.com/college-football...
Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <In a fascinating turn of events, the Rays turned a 2-0 deficit into a 4-2 victory. Since 2009, the Tigers had been 229-1 when leading after eight innings. >

That <is> good. But as you might expect, pretty much everyone wins when leading after 8 innings.

<Regardless of the pitching strategy, teams entering the ninth inning with a lead win roughly 95 percent of the time. That was the exact rate in 1901 and that was the rate 100 seasons later. In fact, the rate has varied merely from a high of 96.7 percent in 1909 to a low of 92.5 percent in 1941.>

http://www.webcitation.org/5wkrXZOsp

Presumably a good team like the Tigers would do better. 229-2 is about a 99% success rate -- which is terrific, but a team at the 95% average would win about 220 of 231 games.

Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: I'm surprised by the stats showing how often a team leading by one after eight innings wins, something like 85% of the time.

Still, as great as that 229-1 record is, I doubt that many were one-run leads.

Now I don't disagree with the decision, as I wasn't watching and it's early in the season and not September, but it is quite strange that a starting pitcher with a lead after eight is left in to take a loss.

Bill James ("I'm not worthy, I'm not worthy") once wrote that Nolan Ryan's record of never losing a game when he had a lead after eight meant nothing. He said no manager would let a starter with a lead lose in the ninth. That has to be an exaggeration, but he has a point.

Standard strategy certainly would have been to take Verlander out after he loaded the bases, and certainly after he threw a wild pitch. But other factors beside winning that one game can come into play.

Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: On a similiar note, Jonathan Broxton (ex-Dodgers closer) plunked 2 batters to lose a game. http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-b...

Another news, KC Royal player buys pizza! http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-b...

Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: I watched a lot of that KC-Oakland and game, and there was definitely a pro-Francouer group in the rightfield stands, and he was talking to them. Now I know why.

Official attendance was 12,000. Watching the game I would have guessed 5,000 or less.

There was one pretty funny play. A popup behind first base, not too high. The first baseman got it in his glove but flipped it in the air. The second baseman came over to grab it, but the first baseman chased it, too, and bumped into the second baseman, sending the ball into foul territory and putting the batter on second base.

Apr-12-12  King Death: <Phony Benoni: Verlander wasn't just tossing a shutout, it was a one-hit shutout--and he had only thrown 81 pitches in eight innings. No-brainer to leave him in....>

If that game is 9-1 I take him out and let the long man mop up, in that game I'd have let him finish too.

Apr-12-12  King Death: <keypusher> Maybe 30 years ago somebody came up with that statistic and was trying to use it as proof that the Yankees were a "lockdown" team. Then a little research was done and folks realized that the Yankees were no better than anybody else when it came to protecting those late leads. Now it's just another number.
Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Interesting history behind the term "rubber game/match", I am on my cell, and can't copy/paste well. Will post links later.
Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: I think Leyland's message to Verlander, in the first week of the season, was "I have confidence in you, I'm not taking you out at the first sign of trouble." Probably valuable over a long season, worth risking one loss.

The role of the ace reliever has changed so much over the years. Now it's sort of, ninth-inning only, and only with the lead in order not to overuse the closer.

What will the next big change be? I predict the closer will start to be used in the seventh or eighth as well as the ninth, still just for an inning or so, but when the situation seems most critical.

Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: Another strategy I question is this idea that with a man on second and no outs, the next batter should give himself up (hit to the right side) to get the runner to third. I can see trying not to pull the ball (righties) or definitely trying to pull (lefties), but the next batter should definitely be trying to get on base.

This is assuming it's not really late in the game and that one run is obviously a key to winning or losing.

Apr-12-12  King Death: <Jim Bartle> You're right and it's so that the closer can be in those save situations and post big numbers for his next contract. In the same way a lot of hitters won't sign deals to play in places like Seattle because of its rep as a pitcher's park, they don't want to hit .240 and go out looking for a job after.
Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: San Diego is another stadium where hitting is really tough.

I'm sure lots of other managers and GMs took this into account years earlier, but Whitey Herzog had to be one of the first to take ballparks into account. He traded for John Tudor despite his rather average stats, because he knew he was a lefthander who'd done OK,not terrible, pitching for Boston at Fenway for several years. And he pitched great for St. Louis.

Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: Speaking of hitting conditions, I sat in the rightfield bleachers at Candlestick before it was enclose with the double deck, and saw quite a few rockets to leftfield seem to just hit a wall and start going up instead of out.

And to rightfield as well. I clearly remember McCovey coming up with a man on and the Giants a run behind in the ninth. Hit a tremendous blast to right, really high, which we figured would land in the parking lot. Frank Robinson just stood waiting and waiting and trimming his fingernails, his back against the fence, and finally calmly caught the ball.

I also saw McCovey hit a grand slam on a high pop that the first baseman started out running after it was so shallow, so the wind could cut both ways.

Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Three Words, <Plastic Squeeze Bottle>, ketchup, mustard, relish, soy-sauce, MSG, mayo, you name it!!

http://blogs.palmbeachpost.com/marl...

But they'd probably suffer paper cuts just filling out the daily line-up card too.

Apr-13-12  King Death: <Jim Bartle> Putting Tudor in a bigger ball park with a team that could play defense behind him and letting him just throw strikes had to be better than Boston which was an average team then and not too hot defensively.
Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: Didn't <Phony Benoni> do some research last year that proved that late-inning leads generally protect themselves?
Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Redefines 'Flame Thrower'.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-b...

Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: Tampa Bay has a pitcher named Burke Badenhop. He really should be an infielder, and for a team which plays on real grass.
Apr-16-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Saw this tonight on ESPN SportsCenter:

Dodgers are 9-1, best start since 1988, the magical World Series Season.

Dodgers are also 8-1 on Jackie Robinson Day.

Which only means, we will reach the All-Star break with a 72-2 record. Do the math, the proof is in the putty-cat!

Apr-16-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Welcome to NY, kiddo, and that is before you even taken a practice snap!

http://espn.go.com/new-york/mlb/sto...

Apr-16-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: http://espn.go.com/chicago/nba/stor...

You lucky, you didn't have to play against Bill Laimbeer, you'd need dental oral surgery.

Apr-16-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: <WannaBe> As someone who actually did need oral surgery as a result of playing basketball against a man who was doing a rather good imitation of Laimbeer, your kibitz evokes unhappy memories! My man was a pastor, by the way.
Apr-16-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: Funny that the person commenting on hard fouls in the video above the article ws Kurt Rambis. He was probably the foulee in perhaps the most famous hard foul in history, taken down hard by Kevin McHale in the 84 Finals. That play has come to symbolize how the gritty Celts managed to beat the flashy Lakers that year.

The other really famous takedown, that I remember was of Bird by Laimbeer in the East finals sometime in the late 80s.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 626)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 368 OF 626 ·  Later Kibitzing>

from the Chessgames Store
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific user and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
  


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies